header pic

Perhaps the BEST B1G Forum anywhere, here at College Football Fan Site, CFB51!!!

The 'Old' CFN/Scout Crowd- Enjoy Civil discussion, game analytics, in depth player and coaching 'takes' and discussing topics surrounding the game. You can even have your own free board, all you have to do is ask!!!

Anyone is welcomed and encouraged to join our FREE site and to take part in our community- a community with you- the user, the fan, -and the person- will be protected from intrusive actions and with a clean place to interact.


Author

Topic: Appalachian State thread

 (Read 8626 times)

OrangeAfroMan

  • Stats Porn
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 18784
  • Liked:
Re: Appalachian State thread
« Reply #28 on: September 12, 2018, 10:27:37 PM »
The quality of high school football in Alabama is better than any other state IMHO (quantity is a whole other animal though).  If AL were twice as big, it would be viewed as every bit the giant GA, TX, and FL are.
Never heard that.  I've always thought of Louisiana being the best pound-for-pound talent pool.  With FL being the best of the big 3.  
“The Swamp is where Gators live.  We feel comfortable there, but we hope our opponents feel tentative. A swamp is hot and sticky and can be dangerous." - Steve Spurrier

rolltidefan

  • Global Moderator
  • Starter
  • *****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 2219
  • Liked:
Re: Appalachian State thread
« Reply #29 on: September 13, 2018, 10:37:33 AM »
Quote
The quality of high school football in Alabama is better than any other state IMHO (quantity is a whole other animal though).  If AL were twice as big, it would be viewed as every bit the giant GA, TX, and FL are.
not sure it's the best, but it's good. la and miss are good as well for smaller states, and of course everyone knows ga and fl.
Quote
Never heard that.  I've always thought of Louisiana being the best pound-for-pound talent pool.  With FL being the best of the big 3.  
as of 2016 nfl season, la had the most per capita, with bama right on heals. i tabulated this based on numbers from quick googles searches of nfl players by state (which popped up a 2016 season link) and then searched a 2016 pop by state link. i rounded pop to nearest 1000.


2016
nfl playerspop (1000)per cap
1Louisiana6346821.346%
2Alabama6048631.234%
3South Carolina4849610.968%
4Georgia97103100.941%
5Florida193206120.936%
6Mississippi2729890.903%
7Ohio80116140.689%
8California187292500.639%
9Texas160278630.574%
10New Jersey5089440.559%
11Pennsylvania66127840.516%
12Tennessee3466510.511%
13Virginia4384120.511%
14Wisconsin2757790.467%
15Maryland2860160.465%
16Michigan4699280.463%
17Missouri2760930.443%
18North Carolina42101470.414%
19Illinois38128020.297%
20New York36197450.182%

Hawkinole

  • Starter
  • *****
  • Posts: 2218
  • Liked:
Re: Appalachian State thread
« Reply #30 on: September 13, 2018, 07:19:48 PM »

This year App State will likely go undefeated from here on out, will likely win the Sunbelt, and be in the running for a NY6 bowl game.

App State is the 2nd youngest team in CFB.  They will continue to get better, and will be a very scary team next year.

Oh -- and they play Wisconsin in 2020.
They should demand a rematch for their bowl game. I would guess a rematch would draw a lot of national interest. I would guess Penn State would not be interested.

OrangeAfroMan

  • Stats Porn
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 18784
  • Liked:
Re: Appalachian State thread
« Reply #31 on: September 13, 2018, 09:42:24 PM »
not sure it's the best, but it's good. la and miss are good as well for smaller states, and of course everyone knows ga and fl. as of 2016 nfl season, la had the most per capita, with bama right on heals. i tabulated this based on numbers from quick googles searches of nfl players by state (which popped up a 2016 season link) and then searched a 2016 pop by state link. i rounded pop to nearest 1000.


      
2016
nfl playerspop (1000)per cap
1Louisiana6346821.346%
2Alabama6048631.234%
3South Carolina4849610.968%
4Georgia97103100.941%
5Florida193206120.936%
6Mississippi2729890.903%
7Ohio80116140.689%
8California187292500.639%
9Texas160278630.574%
10New Jersey5089440.559%
11Pennsylvania66127840.516%
12Tennessee3466510.511%
13Virginia4384120.511%
14Wisconsin2757790.467%
15Maryland2860160.465%
16Michigan4699280.463%
17Missouri2760930.443%
18North Carolina42101470.414%
19Illinois38128020.297%
20New York36197450.182%

Cool, I was right on both counts.  
I love when FL shows up TX and CA.
“The Swamp is where Gators live.  We feel comfortable there, but we hope our opponents feel tentative. A swamp is hot and sticky and can be dangerous." - Steve Spurrier

FearlessF

  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 37314
  • Liked:
Re: Appalachian State thread
« Reply #32 on: September 13, 2018, 09:50:11 PM »
yup, in the late 80's early 90's Florida, Miami and FSU were gonna rule College football forever because of the number of elite recruits in the state
"Courage; Generosity; Fairness; Honor; In these are the true awards of manly sport."

FearlessF

  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 37314
  • Liked:
Re: Appalachian State thread
« Reply #33 on: September 13, 2018, 09:51:00 PM »
today there's not a single team from Florida, Texas, or Cali in the 4 team playoff
"Courage; Generosity; Fairness; Honor; In these are the true awards of manly sport."

OrangeAfroMan

  • Stats Porn
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 18784
  • Liked:
Re: Appalachian State thread
« Reply #34 on: September 13, 2018, 09:52:21 PM »
Boise's SOS since moving from the Big West to the WAC in 2000/2001:
96th
113
112
72
103
86
105
95
97
71
74
114
76
67
105
70
69

Are these not high school schedules?  What's preventing Appy St. from winning lots of games against crap slates like these?  I honestly don't know.

Compare to a random-ass team pulled out of a hat.....Iowa.  Let's look at their SOS in the same time-frame:
38
41
30
16
20
52
77....jesus, Hawkeyes, wtf?
58
50
45
40
48
47
68
55
49
3rd
So I'm gonna go ahead and call those SOS numbers embarrassing for Iowa.  Maybe it's having ISU as a rival, I don't know, but those are pretty gross numbers.  
You don't think Iowa has some hardware if they traded schedules with Boise?  I know they're apples and oranges, but still.  Any defense of the Broncos or support for the Broncos has a big, brick wall in the way - and it's SOS.
“The Swamp is where Gators live.  We feel comfortable there, but we hope our opponents feel tentative. A swamp is hot and sticky and can be dangerous." - Steve Spurrier

OrangeAfroMan

  • Stats Porn
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 18784
  • Liked:
Re: Appalachian State thread
« Reply #35 on: September 13, 2018, 09:53:16 PM »
yup, in the late 80's early 90's Florida, Miami and FSU were gonna rule College football forever because of the number of elite recruits in the state
A - the state of FL supplies the entire country with their skill position talent, and
B - I guess the current state of affairs is why they pay coaches all that money
“The Swamp is where Gators live.  We feel comfortable there, but we hope our opponents feel tentative. A swamp is hot and sticky and can be dangerous." - Steve Spurrier

FearlessF

  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 37314
  • Liked:
Re: Appalachian State thread
« Reply #36 on: September 13, 2018, 10:02:32 PM »
A - ed Zachery, why not keep the best recruits at home?

B - money doesn't buy recruits.  Well,............. it shouldn't.  Should have paid more to get Frost.
"Courage; Generosity; Fairness; Honor; In these are the true awards of manly sport."

Brutus Buckeye

  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 11228
  • Liked:
Re: Appalachian State thread
« Reply #37 on: September 13, 2018, 10:30:10 PM »
today there's not a single team from Florida, Texas, or Cali in the 4 team playoff
All of the major programs in those top three recruiting states already have a loss, two weeks in.
Texas and aTm, USC and UCLA, Florida, FSU and Miami. 
I bet it's been a while since THAT has happened. 
1919, 20, 21, 28, 29, 31, 34, 35, 36, 37, 42, 44
WWH: 1952, 54, 55, 57, 58, 60, 61, 62, 63, 65, 67, 68, 70, 72, 74, 75
1979, 81, 82, 84, 87, 94, 98
2001, 02, 04, 05, 06, 07, 08, 09, 10, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19

bayareabadger

  • Legend
  • ****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 7844
  • Liked:
Re: Appalachian State thread
« Reply #38 on: September 14, 2018, 08:55:27 AM »
Boise's SOS since moving from the Big West to the WAC in 2000/2001:
96th
113
112
72
103
86
105
95
97
71
74
114
76
67
105
70
69

Are these not high school schedules?  What's preventing Appy St. from winning lots of games against crap slates like these?  I honestly don't know.

Compare to a random-ass team pulled out of a hat.....Iowa.  Let's look at their SOS in the same time-frame:
38
41
30
16
20
52
77....jesus, Hawkeyes, wtf?
58
50
45
40
48
47
68
55
49
3rd
So I'm gonna go ahead and call those SOS numbers embarrassing for Iowa.  Maybe it's having ISU as a rival, I don't know, but those are pretty gross numbers.  
You don't think Iowa has some hardware if they traded schedules with Boise?  I know they're apples and oranges, but still.  Any defense of the Broncos or support for the Broncos has a big, brick wall in the way - and it's SOS.
Let's run through this 
A. Those are college schedules. Until one of them says something like 500th, they're college schedules. Florida did not host a high school a few weeks back. It hosted a damn college.
B. This does not mean those are robust schedules by any measure. It reflects the basic unbalances of the sport. It reflects that FBS is really a two-class system, with a lot of variance within. 
C. Calling those schedules embarrassing for Iowa is a good piece of context-less hot takery. If you give me some sort of nuance beyond, loogit them numbers, I'll read something into it. If not, I'll assume it's shooting from the hip.
D. App State will win lots of game against non-P5 teams. That's who it's allowed to play.
E. The schedule flip game is always just an avenue to say what we want. Most counter factuals are bad. I dunno if Iowa would have hardware. I've seen it lose to NIU and a great FCS team. It's the same silly game of "if team X were in Conference Y" and then we say whatever our worldview supports.
F. You're playing this game that schools have some kind of control over their schedules. They don't. Historically, they've controlled, what? One third or one fourth of the schedule depending on a historical rivalry. And even that you have limited control of because of the sports ups and downs. Lets say a team controls three games because of a historical rivalry, and it picks Western Carolina, Southern Miss and a 4-win UCF team. Then let's say they schedule Western Kentucky, Troy and FAU the next year. That's how you get back-to-back Top-5 schedules. 
G. The final question is this defense or support of Boise. What it, and this is just an idea, we assume Boise is a perfectly good football programs maximizing a situation that puts a cap on what it is? Not that it's some fraud. But that it's simply a program that because of the structures of the sport has little way to escape the kids table. Boise doesn't WANT to have a MWC schedule. But no one's offering anything else. SOS is a nice crutch, a sort of washing of the hands of a simple truth: The sport is built to ensure more than half the teams in FBS have no path to compete at the highest level. Boise could have a dang NFL team, and it couldn't change its situation. (Interestingly, the team with the worst SOS in the NFC last year won the Super Bowl, so perhaps, maybe just maybe, a team with poor SOS can actually be worth something)

847badgerfan

  • Administrator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 24999
  • Liked:
Re: Appalachian State thread
« Reply #39 on: September 14, 2018, 09:09:21 AM »
Boise would join the PAC in a heartbeat but it would never be offered.


If they were to join today though, my gut tells me they would immediately be in the upper division out there. It's a good program, much like Utah was before the PAC came calling.
U RAH RAH! WIS CON SIN!

Entropy

  • Starter
  • *****
  • Posts: 1432
  • Liked:
Re: Appalachian State thread
« Reply #40 on: September 14, 2018, 09:49:00 AM »
Never heard that.  I've always thought of Louisiana being the best pound-for-pound talent pool.  With FL being the best of the big 3.  
Mississippi and Louisiana would have been my guesses at 1 and 2 for pound for pound talent pool
« Last Edit: September 14, 2018, 09:51:15 AM by Entropy »

Brutus Buckeye

  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 11228
  • Liked:
Re: Appalachian State thread
« Reply #41 on: September 14, 2018, 10:15:12 AM »
The Utes actually had a pretty rough transition to the Pac 12, nonCon games vs Michigan not withstanding.
1919, 20, 21, 28, 29, 31, 34, 35, 36, 37, 42, 44
WWH: 1952, 54, 55, 57, 58, 60, 61, 62, 63, 65, 67, 68, 70, 72, 74, 75
1979, 81, 82, 84, 87, 94, 98
2001, 02, 04, 05, 06, 07, 08, 09, 10, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19

 

Support the Site!
Purchase of every item listed here DIRECTLY supports the site.