CFB51 College Football Fan Community

The Power Five => Big Ten => Topic started by: 847badgerfan on September 25, 2017, 10:35:03 AM

Title: The Hot Seats
Post by: 847badgerfan on September 25, 2017, 10:35:03 AM
We can update this one throughout the season, but I think we are now far enough in to start making some calls.

In the B1G, the only obvious hot seat is Mike Riley right now. Lovie might be feeling a little warm at Illinois but I think everyone else is pretty safe.

The SEC has quite a few hot seats though. Missouri, Texas A&M, Arkansas, Tennessee and Ole Miss could all be looking for coaches by the end of the year.

In the PAC-12, UCLA, Oregon State, Arizona State and Arizona could be looking around. 
Title: Re: The Hot Seats
Post by: Mdot21 on September 25, 2017, 11:58:07 AM
I think Riley is toast. That AD firing says a lot. President wants to hire a new AD to bring in a new coach. 

Mora, Sumlin, and Butch Jones are finito as well. I think. Mora has the best pure passer in the game right now and he's dropping games to Memphis and a bad Stanford team. Needed a miracle from Rosen to pull out that A&M game. Rosen made a mistake going there. Kid should've followed Harbaugh to Ann Arbor. 
Title: Re: The Hot Seats
Post by: Cincydawg on September 25, 2017, 02:52:23 PM
Before y'all fire Sumlin, you might note A&M is magically 3-1.  The bad news is I only see 3 more fairly assured wins.

The UNC fan base is pretty riled up right now also, at least those who post on line anyway.

Hopefully, Butch Jones doesn't get out of jail this weekend.

I thought ND might be looking also, but ND could be a 9-3 kind of team.
Title: Re: The Hot Seats
Post by: fezzador on September 25, 2017, 04:16:21 PM
Pat Narduzzi's buns might be getting a bit toasty. Just when you thought Pitt was respectable, they may end up being the ACC's doormat this year.

Title: Re: The Hot Seats
Post by: ELA on September 25, 2017, 04:21:37 PM
Pat Narduzzi's buns might be getting a bit toasty. Just when you thought Pitt was respectable, they may end up being the ACC's doormat this year.


I think he's probably safe this year, but he'll enter next year plenty hot.

He benefitted at first by his upperclassmen being some better than average classes that Chryst brought in due to PSU being a recruiting non factor for a couple years.  Now he's recruiting against the best the Penn State program has been in 20 years.  I think he's gone after 2018.  There isn't the local talent to support Pitt against a monster Penn State anymore.  I think they'd be better off bringing in and outsider who can tap into Florida and Texas talent, like WVU has been able to do.
Title: Re: The Hot Seats
Post by: utee94 on September 25, 2017, 04:29:02 PM
Before y'all fire Sumlin, you might note A&M is magically 3-1.  The bad news is I only see 3 more fairly assured wins.

The UNC fan base is pretty riled up right now also, at least those who post on line anyway.

Hopefully, Butch Jones doesn't get out of jail this weekend.

I thought ND might be looking also, but ND could be a 9-3 kind of team.
3-1 is actually a worse start than usual for the Aggies.  Last year they started 6-0 and finished 8-5.  In 2015 they started 5-0 and finished 8-5. In 2014 they started 5-0 and finished 8-5.  A bit of a pattern there.  And as you note, there's not a whole lot of promising looking victories remaining on their schedule this season.
Most Aggies I know are ready to send Sumlin packing, but of course the coaching carousel is always an uncertain place to find yourself.
Title: Re: The Hot Seats
Post by: 847badgerfan on September 25, 2017, 04:31:27 PM
Pat Narduzzi's buns might be getting a bit toasty. Just when you thought Pitt was respectable, they may end up being the ACC's doormat this year.


I'm thinking all of those Pitt fans who thought Chryst was the problem.. would like to have him back now.
Title: Re: The Hot Seats
Post by: ELA on September 25, 2017, 04:33:37 PM
I'm thinking all of those Pitt fans who thought Chryst was the problem.. would like to have him back now.
I never heard any Pitt fans say that.

I think what they'd like is for Penn State to go back to what they were in 2012 and 2013 on the recruiting trail, with limited scholarships, and unable to sell even a bowl trip to recruits.

The biggest loser when the PSU sanctions went away was Pitt.
Title: Re: The Hot Seats
Post by: 847badgerfan on September 25, 2017, 05:53:14 PM
I never heard any Pitt fans say that.

I think what they'd like is for Penn State to go back to what they were in 2012 and 2013 on the recruiting trail, with limited scholarships, and unable to sell even a bowl trip to recruits.

The biggest loser when the PSU sanctions went away was Pitt.
I never heard it, but they used to come on the Badger boards and write such things. I saw a little of it around here, but not terrible.

All of that turnover in coaches before PC made Pitt a big hot mess.

Pitt needs an on-campus stadium and facilities. Then they could recruit better.
Title: Re: The Hot Seats
Post by: rook119 on September 25, 2017, 06:51:18 PM
Pat Narduzzi's buns might be getting a bit toasty. Just when you thought Pitt was respectable, they may end up being the ACC's doormat this year.
Doubt it. Last year was fun and the schedule is rough as everyone left on it has gotten better. I predicted a 6-6 year but its probably going be 4-8. The defense is somewhat improved but they are giving up points because the offense is so bad. 
He's going to have to work OT to bring in a quality QB transfer or he's going to be in big trouble the next year.  
Title: Re: The Hot Seats
Post by: rook119 on September 25, 2017, 07:26:53 PM
I'm thinking all of those Pitt fans who thought Chryst was the problem.. would like to have him back now.
Granted there are always people who have unrealistic expectations but Chryst was pretty well liked because he was a really classy coach. He even went on recruiting visits after being interviewed by Wisconsin when the deal was all but sealed. He also stabilized the program. Everyone also knew that he wanted to go back to Wiscy someday and it wasn't like we were losing a 10-2 coach or anything. Did a hell of a job developing the OL which is something Pitt never had. 
Narduzzi also has done some good things. 2017 class is pretty much all redshirted but on paper was decent. He let Canada get weird with the offense when it still would have been very good going vanilla. Found and reclimated Peterman. Plus though the record isn't great he pulled out more than a fair share the of those close games that Pitt always loses (luck or just due, dunno, chryst's teams always seemed to lose them). QB is the biglargehuge problem right now. Plus he's either going to have to find/develop talent on the defensive end or start changing the way Pitt plays D to something more conserative. 
Title: Re: The Hot Seats
Post by: Abba on September 25, 2017, 10:20:33 PM
These days, a guy can be fired after 2 bad years.  With Schiano becoming available, I wouldn't be shocked if Rutgers dumps Ash and tries to bring back Greg.
Title: Re: The Hot Seats
Post by: Cincydawg on September 25, 2017, 10:40:23 PM
You fire the coach, and often whoever is available is no better, if not worse, IMHO.

You need to have your money in hand and your order in mind.
Title: Re: The Hot Seats
Post by: fezzador on September 26, 2017, 08:08:53 AM
These days, a guy can be fired after 2 bad years.  With Schiano becoming available, I wouldn't be shocked if Rutgers dumps Ash and tries to bring back Greg.
It's no longer unheard of for college coaches to get canned after just one season, at least strictly for performance issues.  See Ellis Johnson w/ Southern Miss back in '12.
Title: Re: The Hot Seats
Post by: bayareabadger on September 26, 2017, 08:35:11 AM
Pat Narduzzi's buns might be getting a bit toasty. Just when you thought Pitt was respectable, they may end up being the ACC's doormat this year.


He lost three games to teams that won 11, 10 and 9 games last year, plus got a battle from the FCS runner up. If that's unacceptable in year two after most of the offense leaves, dude would just be screwed. 
Title: Re: The Hot Seats
Post by: CatsbyAZ on September 26, 2017, 09:30:28 AM
To start with 5 of 10 or 15 hot seats, before leading into the main point:

Goskingslingbury (Texas Tech): The Raiders 3-0 start doesn't have the locals taking their finger off the trigger just yet, especially with a potential homerun hire in TT Alum Dave Aranda, formerly Wisconsin's DC and now at LSU, long overdue for a HC position.

Fedora (UNC): Even during the 2015 division winning season, NC lost their token two games they should'n't've; and the overall mediocrity isn't the fault of recruiting - Fedora can't keep assistants. I'd keep Fedora around for the sake of stability if this cheating scandal doesn't shake out in UNC's favor.

Mora Jr (UCLA): Just a shame how much is going to waste with Rosen at the helm. Their defense - 124th nationally & 525 yds allowed/game - is a batting order that gives its ace pitcher (Rosen) zero run support. The transaction of paying for Mora Jr's buyout AND hiring a new coach will run about $20,000,000 of public money.

Orgeron (LSU): No, I doubt Orgeron will be canned after this season, but LSU's AD is certainly up for the next Eichorst-ing after botching the Jimbo Fisher hire and letting down the fan base with the slapstick hire of a guy that averaged 3 wins/season at Ole Miss.

Jimbo (FSU): Jimbo's post-Jameis Winston editions are getting worse and worse. Specifics include inexcusably bad OL play especially given how well they recruit lineman, underachieving defenses that show no unity, and this year there is no running game.

All in all I can picture the days of long contract extensions and early firings slowly coming to an end, starting with California's always cash strapped higher tier education system already asking why so much money has to keep going into coaching football, even though the funding is segregated. UCLA's AD is praying for a sixth win just to half-ass justify keeping Mora Jr for another year of whittling down the enormous buyout. Where ADs go wrong isn't in initially hiring coaches for 2-3 million/season; it's in the wishful contract extensions that expose to risk too much public funding for the public to keep ignoring.
Title: Re: The Hot Seats
Post by: 847badgerfan on September 26, 2017, 09:50:12 AM
Not too familiar with the culture out there, but does UCLA have enough boosters who care about football that would pony up?
Title: Re: The Hot Seats
Post by: Cincydawg on September 26, 2017, 10:12:45 AM
Who are the coaches who might move, or move up, or come in from the press box to take all these open positions?

The Vandy coach might be an option for some, despite the 59-0.

I don't know about Mike Bobo at Colorado State now.

Title: Re: The Hot Seats
Post by: 847badgerfan on September 26, 2017, 10:22:18 AM
Jon Gruden and Chip Kelly are going to fill ALL of the openings by themselves.

Gruden's primary job will be Tennessee, however. I've heard that.
Title: Re: The Hot Seats
Post by: fezzador on September 26, 2017, 10:50:48 AM
Gruden to Tennessee = Harbaugh to Michigan.  Yes, it would be an upgrade, and yes they'd probably be one of the 3 best teams in the SEC year-in, year-out, but he ain't going to beat Saban.

They could hire Bill Belichick, or Vince Lombardi or Bear Bryant's ghosts, and they still can't beat Saban.  The guy has an absolute stranglehold on CFB.


Title: Re: The Hot Seats
Post by: CatsbyAZ on September 26, 2017, 02:39:56 PM
Not too familiar with the culture out there, but does UCLA have enough boosters who care about football that would pony up?
The Bruins boosters willing to fork over that much cash are more concerned with the basketball program and will use it on Steve Alford's buyout/replacement first.
Title: Re: The Hot Seats
Post by: 847badgerfan on September 26, 2017, 02:43:28 PM
Gruden to Tennessee = Harbaugh to Michigan.


Do ya think the Vol fans would be happy with 3rd place division finishes?

:88:
Title: Re: The Hot Seats
Post by: ELA on September 26, 2017, 04:39:23 PM
The Bruins boosters willing to fork over that much cash are more concerned with the basketball program and will use it on Steve Alford's buyout/replacement first.

They'll keep Alford in place until there are no more Balls left to come in and run his team for him.
Title: Re: The Hot Seats
Post by: Cincydawg on September 27, 2017, 08:42:51 AM
The Vols of course are cross division paired with Alabama, which is a tough draw of late.

Their goal should be to compete each year for the division championship and then take a shot at the SEC CG and make a NY6 bowl game every 3-4-5 years or so.  Whoever they get better be able to recruit out of state.
Title: Re: The Hot Seats
Post by: 847badgerfan on September 27, 2017, 08:52:23 AM
Saw Butch Jones attacking the media this week.

That right there tells you he's done.

Tennessee fans have higher expectations for their team than you do, CDawg.

They wanna be what Bama is today. I'm too far removed from the situation to tell whether that is reasonable, or if it's more likely that they will be what Bama was 10 years ago.
Title: Re: The Hot Seats
Post by: medinabuckeye1 on September 27, 2017, 10:21:36 AM
Do ya think the Vol fans would be happy with 3rd place division finishes?

:88:

Saw Butch Jones attacking the media this week.

That right there tells you he's done.

Tennessee fans have higher expectations for their team than you do, CDawg.

They wanna be what Bama is today. I'm too far removed from the situation to tell whether that is reasonable, or if it's more likely that they will be what Bama was 10 years ago.

The Vols of course are cross division paired with Alabama, which is a tough draw of late.

Their goal should be to compete each year for the division championship and then take a shot at the SEC CG and make a NY6 bowl game every 3-4-5 years or so.  Whoever they get better be able to recruit out of state.
I don't think the 3rd place division finishes thing would make them happy at all but that is partially because at present their Division is terrible.  The worldwide leader had the SEC-E as the #5 slot in the Bottom Ten (http://www.espn.com/college-football/story/_/page/bottom092617/bottom-10-sec-east-least) this week.  In this year's SEC-E simply being competent would get them to at least second place.  

Having Bama as their cross-division rival hurts but I agree with Cincydawg:  Their aim should be to be competitive in the SEC-E.  Even if they never win an SECCG that should still get them to NY6 with some regularity and if they get enough shots at Bama in Atlanta they are bound to win one eventually aren't they?  

I don't know that they can though.  I have a theory that essentially everybody being on national TV every week has made life for teams without a strong home recruiting base a lot more difficult.  I think this is a big part of the reason for the relative struggles of teams such as Nebraska, Tennessee, and Michigan.  

Additionally, I think that Tennessee faces another problem that is probably an even bigger issue.  They are now surrounded by reasonably competitive teams.  Tennessee had at least eight wins every year from 1985 through 2004 and won the first BCS Title game in 1998.  The top of the mountain (Rocky Top) for them was 1995-1998 when they went:
Looking around Tennessee in that era:
There isn't enough talent in Tennessee for the Volunteers to be consistently competitive on homegrown talent alone.  It the mid-to-late 90's they had a MUCH easier time stealing talent from surrounding states.  To get back to those heights today they probably need a coach who can recruit nationally.  
Title: Re: The Hot Seats
Post by: 847badgerfan on September 27, 2017, 10:28:35 AM
We all know Bama is the gold standard right now, but I'm curious what they will look like when Saban hangs 'em up. Is the program strong enough, top to bottom, to withstand losing him? Does he have an heir-apparent on the staff today?
Title: Re: The Hot Seats
Post by: 847badgerfan on October 01, 2017, 10:32:02 AM
So, Butch Jones. I wonder how much longer.
Title: Re: The Hot Seats
Post by: Cincydawg on October 01, 2017, 10:54:38 AM
I doubt they fire him midseason, but that doesn't mean anything really.  Then you get an interim coach like an Orgeron and you might whiff later and not find anyone better.  Having a new HC nearly always means the next year is a rebuilding 7-5 kind of year.  You hope year 2 is better.

For the Vols to be elite, everyone around them has to be down, as you noted.  That isn't going to happen now.  Alabama has enough of a system to keep on trucking even if Saban retires.  Their DC Pruitt could be a HC successor, don't know.  Their system, especially on defense, is depth and talent.  The freshmen and sophomores know they will play if they are good even if a junior or senior starts, and play a lot.  So, they get experience for when they are upper classmen.  And they are extremely talented.  The Vols recruit pretty well, but not nearly at that level.  Tennessee is not a recruiting hot bed, so they need to be able to go into GA and VA and NC and MS for guys, and right now that isn't happening.

And Jones gets in the news too much, I think, which is fine if you are Steve Spurrier, but he isn't.  He is the kind of coach who needs to be boring all the time.  They may be where Michigan was before Harbaugh, one more mediocre coaching hire and they are no longer relevant to recruits born after 2000.
Title: Re: The Hot Seats
Post by: Mdot21 on October 02, 2017, 01:37:00 PM
Losing 41-0 to UGA? Butch is finito. I still think that's a heck of a job. All it takes is the right coach. Probably going to be competing with LSU on the coach market though. Maybe A&M as well. 

It's crazy to me how far the SEC has fallen. It was hands down the best conference for many years, and then Saban just went in there and processed every good coach out lol. I bet LSU is wishing they still had Les Miles right about now....
Title: Re: The Hot Seats
Post by: Brutus Buckeye on October 02, 2017, 02:05:41 PM
Well at the very least, Butch did manage to outlast his replacement at Cincinnati. 
Title: Re: The Hot Seats
Post by: 847badgerfan on October 02, 2017, 02:47:21 PM
Well at the very least, Butch did manage to outlast his replacement at Cincinnati.
Bet Cincy wishes they still had him.
Title: Re: The Hot Seats
Post by: Brutus Buckeye on October 02, 2017, 03:11:29 PM
Eh, I wasn't sad to see him go. 

Yes Tubbs was worse, and Fickel's donkey ears appear to be showing early. But Butch was no Brian Kelly. Not even a Mark Dantonio. 

Heck, I'm not sure that he had Rick Minter beat.
Title: Re: The Hot Seats
Post by: 847badgerfan on October 02, 2017, 03:14:24 PM
I was talking about Tubs. He was a good coach.
Title: Re: The Hot Seats
Post by: Geolion91 on October 02, 2017, 03:30:40 PM
Gruden to Tennessee = Harbaugh to Michigan.  Yes, it would be an upgrade, and yes they'd probably be one of the 3 best teams in the SEC year-in, year-out, but he ain't going to beat Saban.

They could hire Bill Belichick, or Vince Lombardi or Bear Bryant's ghosts, and they still can't beat Saban.  The guy has an absolute stranglehold on CFB.



Saban won't be around a whole lot longer, probably.  He is getting older, you never know when he decides to retire.  hire Gruden, let him build up the roster, then he's in position when Saban retires and the SEC championship can finally go to another team.
Title: Re: The Hot Seats
Post by: Brutus Buckeye on October 02, 2017, 03:40:58 PM
I was talking about Tubs. He was a good coach.
Gotcha. 
Tubbs was awful. He was once good, but that star faded by the time he got to Texas Tech. Let alone Cincinnati. 
Title: Re: The Hot Seats
Post by: Cincydawg on October 03, 2017, 07:44:39 AM
I bet it's tough to coach when everyone thinks you are a DMW, about to be fired at any moment.

On the other hand, it isn't tough to be getting paid $4 million a year to do it with a buyout of whatever.

Sign me up.
Title: Re: The Hot Seats
Post by: Cincydawg on October 03, 2017, 10:01:10 AM
We often define bad coaching in terms of wins and losses, and of course vice versa.  I realize at times a coach makes such glaring errors that one can criticize him specifically, but often we just go with the W/L thing.

This strikes me as somewhat circular.  Urban is a great coach because he wins more often than he loses.  Of course were he at say Utah or BGSU he might not, well, strike that one.

But a coach is also subject to his environment, his ability to recruit, who is on his schedule, and whether things fall his way, things like injuries, Hail Marys, turnovers (which are largely random events IMHO).

I view Nick Saban as more of a program manager, a CEO type, and a very good one obviously, but he also has some inherent advantages.  As many note, he was so-so at Michigan State.  Perhaps he learned from that.  I'd guess we have some great coaches out there at lesser known programs who don't get recognition.  Maybe they have to pay their dues to move up from Eastern Montana State to Wyoming to Colorado State to UCLA.  And maybe at some point through no fault of their own, they hit a bad streak and don't  get that promotion.

Wisconsin has lost a few coaches and they are still doing quite well, despite not having all those Five Star guys lined up to play.  Are they just good at finding coaches?  Maybe their AD is really good, as opposed to say the one at LSU.

UGA MAY have tumbled to a smart hire, obviously way too early on that front.  The guy they fired was 10-3 and 9-3 in the preceding seasons, and is doing well now at Miami it would seem.

I guess my "point" if there is one is that the W:L percentage over a shorter period of time may not accurately reflect having a great coach.  It might reflect variables out of the control of the HC and staff.

Either way, I see an unusual number of SEC programs with a lot of money about to be throwing said money at an apparently smallish pool of talent.  
Title: Re: The Hot Seats
Post by: 847badgerfan on October 03, 2017, 10:06:26 AM
The UW AD is very good, but he made a bad hire with Andersen - OR Andersen sold him a bill of goods in the interview and he bought it. It was obvious to anyone paying attention that he was not a fit. Many of his recruits never made it to campus because they couldn't get in. I guess he thought he could beat admissions. Not happening in Madison, he realized it, and he left. Thank God.
Title: Re: The Hot Seats
Post by: Brutus Buckeye on October 03, 2017, 10:16:33 AM
Who's the worst coach at each Big Ten school since 1978? (modern era) 
Title: Re: The Hot Seats
Post by: 847badgerfan on October 03, 2017, 10:19:43 AM
Who's the worst coach at each Big Ten school since 1978? (modern era)
For UW it's Don Morton, hands down.
Title: Re: The Hot Seats
Post by: ELA on October 03, 2017, 10:49:16 AM
The obvious choice is Muddy Waters who went 10-23 from 80-82, but the program he inherited wasn't great, and I think still coming off sanctions, despite a random Big Ten title in 1978.

I'd say Bobby Williams.

He took over for Saban, was the player's choice, so there was no attrition, and took over on the heels of the best Michigan State team since 1987, and drove in into the ground in record time, both on and off the field.  What we'll never know is exactly how good the roster Saban left him was, it's not like Saban built up to the 10-2 1999 team, they were 6-6 for 4 straight years, and then suddenly a top 5 team.  So maybe 1999 was just a fluky good year, but I have a hard time believing that however fluky that team was, that they should have gone 16-19 over the next 3 years.  Granted a lot of the character issue guys Saban brought in undermined the whole thing too.
Title: Re: The Hot Seats
Post by: Temp430 on October 03, 2017, 11:01:53 AM
Brady Hoke for Michigan.  
Title: Re: The Hot Seats
Post by: 847badgerfan on October 03, 2017, 12:40:30 PM
Brady Hoke for Michigan.  
I would have thought RichRod, wo be honest. He tried to turn Michigan into a Big 12 team.
Title: Re: The Hot Seats
Post by: ELA on October 03, 2017, 12:48:52 PM
I would have thought RichRod, wo be honest. He tried to turn Michigan into a Big 12 team.
The team at least improved under RichRod.  Hoke got worse every year, while bringing in better talent
Title: Re: The Hot Seats
Post by: NickSmith4Three on October 03, 2017, 01:05:52 PM
Without at doubt, Tim Beckman

(https://cdn.vox-cdn.com/thumbor/jwmohn92ScsxzbJj1tt_AExJrPg=/562x210:2620x1582/1200x800/filters:focal(562x210:2620x1582)/cdn.vox-cdn.com/uploads/chorus_image/image/47050206/usa-today-7472593.0.jpg)
Title: Re: The Hot Seats
Post by: medinabuckeye1 on October 03, 2017, 01:24:10 PM
Who's the worst coach at each Big Ten school since 1978? (modern era)
For Ohio State this could be an interesting question.  Coaches:
If we include interim coaches then it is obviously Luke Fickell.  

If not, then my next question is whether Woody is to be judged based on his entire body of work (1951-1978) or only on the portion within this discussion.  Looking only at 1978 it is probably Woody.  

If Fickell is ineligible and Woody is to be judged based on his entire body of work then it obviously comes down to John Cooper or Earl Bruce.  Earl Bruce was clearly better with:
Title: Re: The Hot Seats
Post by: Brutus Buckeye on October 03, 2017, 01:52:40 PM
Agreed, for all those reasons plus the most important one...

Bruce: 5-4

Cooper: 2-10-1
Title: Re: The Hot Seats
Post by: Cincydawg on October 03, 2017, 02:24:39 PM
Most teams in the "pretty good" range play about 4-5 "real" contested games a year, right?  Many of us look at the schedule and see 7 or 8 near certain wins preseason (unless the wheels fall off of course).  So, let's say a team is at least pretty good, and manages to win those 7 games and then goes 2-3 in the 5 contested games.  So, you're 9-3, and perhaps no better than "pretty good".  On occasional years, the same teams is 3-2 or even 4-1 with a break, and they end up 11-1 looking like world beaters but may not have beaten anyone really (they tend to get bulldozed in a bowl game).

Putting aside recruiting, how many games a year will a good coach win that a mediocre coach would lose?  Two?

Title: Re: The Hot Seats
Post by: Mdot21 on October 03, 2017, 02:27:13 PM
The team at least improved under RichRod.  Hoke got worse every year, while bringing in better talent
have to agree here. Rodriguez blew the system up and tried to rebuild it and the real reason 3-9 happened is because he just didn't have a QB that first year. Every year his teams improved though. What did him in was his complete lack of a defense. 

Hoke had that great first year but after that it was complete regression. The team went backwards, players regressed instead of developed. Rodriguez actually brought in better offensive talent. And he developed that talent. Most of Hoke's offensive recruits just weren't that good. Damn near all Hoke's hot-shot offensive line recruits were busts. 5* Shane Morris was a disaster. 5* Derrick Green was just bad at football. 

And Hoke took what I think is the best QB talent they had since Henson in Devin Gardner and just destroyed him. He went from showing flashes and having real promise to just shattered in half. Hoke was a damn clown. Rodriguez can actually coach football. 
Title: Re: The Hot Seats
Post by: LittlePig on October 03, 2017, 04:04:56 PM
Iowa has had only 2 head coaches since 1979, Hayden Fry and Kirk Ferentz. 

So I guess the obvious answer for Iowa is the guy who was head coach in 1978, Bob Cummings, who was fired after the 1978 season.

If forced to choose between Fry and Ferentz, Ferentz will always be behind Fry in the hearts of Iowa fans, even though their overall records are similar.   Fry is treated pretty much like a god by Iowa fans.
Title: Re: The Hot Seats
Post by: Brutus Buckeye on October 03, 2017, 04:14:15 PM
We can count Bob Cummings. 

Losing record all five seasons? Yeah, that's not ideal. 
Title: Re: The Hot Seats
Post by: 847badgerfan on October 03, 2017, 04:16:03 PM
Iowa has had only 2 head coaches since 1979, Hayden Fry and Kirk Ferentz.

So I guess the obvious answer for Iowa is the guy who was head coach in 1978, Bob Cummings, who was fired after the 1978 season.

If forced to choose between Fry and Ferentz, Ferentz will always be behind Fry in the hearts of Iowa fans, even though their overall records are similar.   Fry is treated pretty much like a god by Iowa fans.
Fry was 15-2-1 against Wisconsin. 12-8 against Minnie. 16-4 against ISU.

For Kirk, it's 7-8, 11-6 and 9-9, respectively.
Title: Re: The Hot Seats
Post by: medinabuckeye1 on October 03, 2017, 04:28:25 PM
Fry was 15-2-1 against Wisconsin. 12-8 against Minnie. 16-4 against ISU.

For Kirk, it's 7-8, 11-6 and 9-9, respectively.
As I see that:
Iowa's last nine losses to ISU:
Title: Re: The Hot Seats
Post by: Brutus Buckeye on October 03, 2017, 05:59:03 PM
 Hoke was a damn clown.
This may qualify as legal libel against actual clowns. 
Title: Re: The Hot Seats
Post by: MarqHusker on October 03, 2017, 10:51:07 PM
For UW it's Don Morton, hands down.
His name always makes me think of a local Milwaukee radio talk show host, who always cautions every team and every school, that you should never assume that it can't get any worse, it can, and he always brings up Don Morton.  I know Jim Hiles was really a one year interim guy following the death of McClain, but they were heading in a generally downward direction following McClain's final season.  

Thus, I must impose upon this thread Nebraska's worst coach (pretending for a moment that I am eligible to submit a XII coach).   Billy Callahan.    Just when you thought you were fixing Nebraska football by canning Solich,  you bring us,   Billy C his WCO, and no clue attitude.  
Title: Re: The Hot Seats
Post by: LittlePig on October 03, 2017, 11:58:02 PM
Fry was 15-2-1 against Wisconsin. 12-8 against Minnie. 16-4 against ISU.

For Kirk, it's 7-8, 11-6 and 9-9, respectively.
But for what it is worth

Fry was 4-11-1 against Mich
Ferentz is 7-5 against Mich

Fry was 2-3 vs PSU
Ferentz is 8-6 against PSU

Fry is still the better coach, but Ferentz's sucess against teams like Michigan and Penn st is what keeps Ferentz close in the discussion.

Fry was more likely to beat teams that were worse than Iowa, and more likely to lose to teams considered better, except when Fry coachex against Minnesota, for some reason.

Ferentz has a style that keeps all games close, regardless of the opponent,  so he loses to worse teams more often and beats better teams more often then you would expect.
Title: Re: The Hot Seats
Post by: MarqHusker on October 04, 2017, 07:34:33 AM
Isn't this also an example of fun with end points?   (For Fry v Ferentz?)

That's peak Penn State vs Fry and less than peak PSU vs Ferentz.
Michigan may not be peak vs Fry, but they are a helluva lot better than Mich during Ferentz tenure.

Title: Re: The Hot Seats
Post by: 847badgerfan on October 04, 2017, 10:17:48 AM
Isn't this also an example of fun with end points?   (For Fry v Ferentz?)

That's peak Penn State vs Fry and less than peak PSU vs Ferentz.
Michigan may not be peak vs Fry, but they are a helluva lot better than Mich during Ferentz tenure.


This is what I was thinking.
Title: Re: The Hot Seats
Post by: medinabuckeye1 on October 04, 2017, 10:43:16 AM
Isn't this also an example of fun with end points?   (For Fry v Ferentz?)

That's peak Penn State vs Fry and less than peak PSU vs Ferentz.
Michigan may not be peak vs Fry, but they are a helluva lot better than Mich during Ferentz tenure.
I think it is a little of each.  Ferentz' seven wins over Michigan do include some wins over less-than-great Michigan teams but he didn't play Michigan's 3-9 squad and has a few wins over some pretty good Michigan teams as well.  Records of Michigan teams that Ferentz' Iowa squads defeated:
So yes, Fry got the benefit of playing ~.500 Michigan squads that his teams defeated in 2009, 2010, and 2013 but he also has four wins over double-digit winning Michigan teams.  

FWIW:
Fry's four wins over Michigan came against teams that went:
Title: Re: The Hot Seats
Post by: LetsGoPeay on October 04, 2017, 06:55:27 PM
For IU it’s either Bill Lynch or Gerry DiNardo. 
Title: Re: The Hot Seats
Post by: Mdot21 on October 04, 2017, 08:15:04 PM
I think it is a little of each.  Ferentz' seven wins over Michigan do include some wins over less-than-great Michigan teams but he didn't play Michigan's 3-9 squad and has a few wins over some pretty good Michigan teams as well.  Records of Michigan teams that Ferentz' Iowa squads defeated:
  • 11-2 (2011)
  • 10-3 (2003)

how the F did that 2003 Michigan team lose 3 games? Man he really earned that nickname- LLLoyd.

Chris Perry was a freaking animal that year, probably the last truly elite RB that Michigan has had. I loved Mike Hart- GREAT player- but he didn't have that kind of size/power breakaway speed combo. There was a reason that Perry was a 1st round pick and Hart a 6th round pick. One dude was 6'1, 230 running a 4.5 flat- the other was 5'9, 190 running probably a 4.8 lol.

Then they had Braylon who was 1st team All-B1G that year, Avant who was 2nd team All-B1G that year, and Breaston who won the Freshman of the Year award that year. Also had a senior John Navarre who started a bunch of games the previous 3 years and a veteran OL with LT Tony Pape who was 1st team All-B1G that year and a senior David Baas at center who was a 1st team All-American that year.

That was a let-down year. No way they should've lost to Iowa and Oregon. That Oregon loss was especially bad when you look at how Oregon finished and how they got blown out by a lot of teams that year.
Title: Re: The Hot Seats
Post by: LittlePig on October 04, 2017, 09:09:08 PM
I think it is a little of each.  Ferentz' seven wins over Michigan do include some wins over less-than-great Michigan teams but he didn't play Michigan's 3-9 squad and has a few wins over some pretty good Michigan teams as well.  Records of Michigan teams that Ferentz' Iowa squads defeated:
  • 11-2 (2011)
  • 10-3 (2016, 2003, 2002)
  • 7-6 (2013, 2010)
  • 5-7 (2009)
So yes, Fry got the benefit of playing ~.500 Michigan squads that his teams defeated in 2009, 2010, and 2013 but he also has four wins over double-digit winning Michigan teams.  

FWIW:
Fry's four wins over Michigan came against teams that went:
  • 10-1-1 (1985)
  • 9-3 (1990, 1981)
  • 6-6 (1984)

Interesting that 1981, 1985 and 1990 were the 3 years that Fry won the big ten and went to the Rose Bowl.   In those same years Iowa did not play OSU in 1981 and Iowa lost to OSU in 1985 and 1990.
 So I guess the key to Fry wining the Big Ten was beating Mich but not OSU.
Title: Re: The Hot Seats
Post by: 847badgerfan on October 05, 2017, 07:57:53 AM
Interesting that 1981, 1985 and 1990 were the 3 years that Fry won the big ten and went to the Rose Bowl.   In those same years Iowa did not play OSU in 1981 and Iowa lost to OSU in 1985 and 1990.
So I guess the key to Fry wining the Big Ten was beating Mich but not OSU.
And winning all of the games he should have won.
Title: Re: The Hot Seats
Post by: CatsbyAZ on October 06, 2017, 09:30:27 AM
Two days ago LSU's substandard AD hosted a sit-down with Ed Orgeron and his coordinators to talk things out. In the middle of the season, mind you.

From B.R: http://bleacherreport.com/articles/2736836-lsu-ad-joe-alleva-meets-with-ed-orgeron-coordinators-after-tigers-struggles (http://bleacherreport.com/articles/2736836-lsu-ad-joe-alleva-meets-with-ed-orgeron-coordinators-after-tigers-struggles)

"'''Whether or not the meetings produce any noticeable differences in the coming weeks, LSU has painted itself into a corner with Orgeron—at least for the next few years.
Yahoo Sports' reported the school would owe Orgeron about $9 million if it fired him this season "without cause." And that would be on top of the $3 million LSU already paid him for 2017. Firing Orgeron in 2018 would cost a total of $8.5 million—his buyout as well as his salary.
That's a lot of money for a school to pay somebody not to coach, especially for LSU given it's budgetary problems.
Things could get even more bleak, considering LSU's schedule. The Tigers play No. 21 Florida, No. 12 Auburn and No. 1 Alabama over the next month. It's possible LSU could miss a bowl game for the first time since 1999.
Hiring Orgeron, who went 10-25 in three years at Ole Miss, is looking like a mistake by LSU. The bigger misstep for the Tigers, though, may be giving him a contract with such a massive buyout."''

That last sentence makes the point I've screamed about all offseason whenever the topic of buyouts comes up. Why did this particular AD offer such a massive buyout to a coach nobody else wanted? LSU had the leverage in offering Orgeron a more responsible buyout and still conducted contract bidding as though Orgeron was the one to lose out on. And why do school presidents allow ADs to risk such high buyouts? And beyond university presidents, why do state level Board of Regents approve the financing of risky coaching hires and premature contract extensions?

There will come a day sooner rather than later when BoRs and school presidents will stop rubberstamping coaching paperwork sent from the AD's office. It will start soon enough with questioning contract extensions - why? Note the mentioning of LSU's "budgetary problems."
Title: Re: The Hot Seats
Post by: 847badgerfan on October 06, 2017, 09:35:34 AM
If anyone needs to be fired, it's Aleva. He seems like an arrogant ass, and he clearly doesn't know how to manage a football program. The Miles fiasco would have been the final straw if I was the school president. That was so damn poorly handled. I could see if Miles was an asshole. He wasn't. Far from it.
Title: Re: The Hot Seats
Post by: Brutus Buckeye on October 06, 2017, 09:40:42 AM
Interesting that 1981, 1985 and 1990 were the 3 years that Fry won the big ten and went to the Rose Bowl.   In those same years Iowa did not play OSU in 1981 and Iowa lost to OSU in 1985 and 1990.
 So I guess the key to Fry wining the Big Ten was beating Mich but not OSU.
All three of Northwestern's modern Big Ten Titles happened during years that they didn't play OSU, but beat Michigan. 1995, 96 and 2000
Title: Re: The Hot Seats
Post by: medinabuckeye1 on October 06, 2017, 10:32:02 AM
Interesting that 1981, 1985 and 1990 were the 3 years that Fry won the big ten and went to the Rose Bowl.   In those same years Iowa did not play OSU in 1981 and Iowa lost to OSU in 1985 and 1990.
 So I guess the key to Fry wining the Big Ten was beating Mich but not OSU.
Not playing Iowa in 1981/1982 probably cost Ohio State two RoseBowl appearances.  
1981:  
In 1981 the Conference adopted a nine-game full round-robin schedule for all teams except Iowa and Ohio State.  The Hawkeyes (lost to MN and ILL) and Buckeyes (lost to MN and UW) tied for first at 6-2 ahead of a three-way tie for 3/4/5 between M, ILL, and UW at 6-3.  Iowa won the tiebreaker on the "longest loser rule" because they hadn't been to the Rosebowl (or any other bowl) since the 1950's.  
1982:
In 1982 Ohio State and Iowa were, again, the only two conference teams not to play each other.  Michigan won the conference at 8-1 (lost to Ohio State).  Ohio State finished a half game back at 7-1 while Iowa was a game behind Ohio State at 6-2.  Had Ohio State played and beaten the Hawkeyes then the Buckeyes would have finished tied with Michigan and won the tie based on their H2H win.  
In 1983 and 1984 all 10 BigTen teams played nine games and Illinois became the answer to a trivia question.  Illinois went 9-0 in 1983 thus becoming the only team in the history of the conference to beat every other team in the conference.  I've always thought 1983 was interesting just because:
Title: Re: The Hot Seats
Post by: 847badgerfan on October 06, 2017, 10:39:27 AM
Those were the dark ages of the Big Ten. Illinois that year lost to a mediocre Mizzou team and got absolutely smoked by a mediocre UCLA team in the Rose Bowl.

Yuck.
Title: Re: The Hot Seats
Post by: NickSmith4Three on October 06, 2017, 10:58:44 AM
Those were the dark ages of the Big Ten. Illinois that year lost to a mediocre Mizzou team and got absolutely smoked by a mediocre UCLA team in the Rose Bowl.

Yuck.


It was because Illinois was partying too hard at the Playboy mansion before the Rose Bowl.  (Long rumor that has been pretty much debunked)
Title: Re: The Hot Seats
Post by: 847badgerfan on October 06, 2017, 11:13:15 AM
I think the conference treated all of its bowl games as vacations back then. And they should to a point, but there is still business to handle. From 1970 to 1987, the Big Ten won two Rose Bowl games. Yuck.
Title: Re: The Hot Seats
Post by: Geolion91 on October 06, 2017, 11:15:01 AM
Who's the worst coach at each Big Ten school since 1978? (modern era)
Hard call for Penn State
Bill O'Brien would have the worst overall record, but he also had the worst of the sanctions, and only 2 years of data.
Considering Paterno's long tenure, if we can break it up into short intervals, I would say 2000 to 2004.
Title: Re: The Hot Seats
Post by: grillrat on October 06, 2017, 11:30:48 AM
I think for Purdue this is pretty easy.  Hazell was not only Purdue's worst coach, he might actually be the second worst Big Ten coach in that time period.  Even Hazell though doesn't get the "top" honor that Rick Venturi will hold for a very very long time.
Title: Re: The Hot Seats
Post by: CatsbyAZ on October 12, 2017, 09:30:27 AM

The SEC has quite a few hot seats though. Missouri, Texas A&M, Arkansas, Tennessee and Ole Miss could all be looking for coaches by the end of the year.


Arkansas call-in shows as of late talking about Bret Bielema in the past tense. There's a given sense Bret is gone. With both #1 Alabama & #10 Auburn up next, Razorbacks are looking at 2-5. And it's a bad year to go looking for a coach with a handful of competitive openings expected across the conference.

Arkansas hasn't ever gained the expected traction under Bret. He stepped in talking about big offensive lines powering a strong running game and for a while it looked promising, with a convincing win over Texas in the Texas bowl to finish 2014 with a winning season. After a slow 2-4 start to 2015, in which a preseason #18 ranking was squandered by almost losing to UTEP, losing outright to Toledo and Texas Tech, they strung together a strong second half, finishing 8-5.

I'm wondering if hiring Enos hurt more than it helped, because Arkansas' offenses shelved the power running for a passing offense that hasn't entirely worked. It might've not mattered last year because the schedule was a truly brutal minefield that included a stretch of 7 ranked teams in 9 games. Still, Arkansas came out 7-4, with a good, program stabilizing shot to finish 9-4, until they blew the rivalry game Vs Missouri in embarrassing fashion, not to mention the blown lead Vs Virginia Tech in the Bowl.

The strengths of Bielema's Wisconsin teams haven't translated at Arkansas, though Bret became his own personal Badger OL.



<br />(https://thumb.ibb.co/i2KYab/bielma597.jpg) (https://ibb.co/i2KYab)<br />
Title: Re: The Hot Seats
Post by: fezzador on October 12, 2017, 11:13:09 AM
The reason why BB is struggling at Arky is simple... recruiting.  Arkansas will never consistently get Top 15 recruiting classes and the best way to neutralize the inherent talent deficits is to employ a different offensive attack (i.e. triple option, or even a variation of the spread as previously used by Petrino).  Arkansas has some of the biggest O-lines in creation, but having a bunch of 6'7, 340 pound guys doesn't mean squat if they're being overwhelmed by smaller, but quicker and stronger, defensive front 7's.

It's possible to be successful in Fayetteville, but it's obvious that they can't out-Bama, Bama.
Title: Re: The Hot Seats
Post by: CatsbyAZ on October 29, 2017, 03:05:09 PM
Officials at Florida have spent the past week reviewing whether they can dismiss coach Jim McElwain based on his unsubstantiated claims of receiving death threats. But let's face it, everyone at Florida realizes McElwain isn't the next Spurrier or Meyer and they want him out without having to pay for it. It's McElwain's $13 million buyout that's the point of delay, which goes to my incessant point that we're nearing the end of the Massive Buyout Era where Jimbo Fisher's is currently FORTY MILLION $!!! So, Florida officials are asking McElwain to take a lesser buyout.

Remember a coach like Steve Addazio received an extension to 2020 in 2014 based on paltry record of 13-12 before the Pinstripe Bowl. Coming into this season on the hot seat, BC is likely to post a 7 or 8 win season which in these changed times will likely only add an obligatory extension to 2021, as it should going forth for all coaches. Buyouts, as they have been traditionally handled, are just too much of an unjustifiable strain on university and especially public money.
Title: Re: The Hot Seats
Post by: MaximumSam on October 29, 2017, 04:18:19 PM
So Florida really trying to beat everyone else to the punch.  But for who?  Scott Frost?
Title: Re: The Hot Seats
Post by: Mdot21 on October 29, 2017, 05:53:33 PM
So Florida really trying to beat everyone else to the punch.  But for who?  Scott Frost?
Chip Kelly would be my guess. They get their hands on him- with all of that home grown speed in Florida and being so close to states that produce a lot of talent like Georgia and Louisiana- they'd be right back in the thick of it. 
Title: Re: The Hot Seats
Post by: Mdot21 on October 29, 2017, 05:58:17 PM
The reason why BB is struggling at Arky is simple... recruiting.  Arkansas will never consistently get Top 15 recruiting classes and the best way to neutralize the inherent talent deficits is to employ a different offensive attack (i.e. triple option, or even a variation of the spread as previously used by Petrino).  Arkansas has some of the biggest O-lines in creation, but having a bunch of 6'7, 340 pound guys doesn't mean squat if they're being overwhelmed by smaller, but quicker and stronger, defensive front 7's.

It's possible to be successful in Fayetteville, but it's obvious that they can't out-Bama, Bama.
Petrino was pretty successful at Arky with a pro-style offense. Granted- Petrino is one of the best play-callers around and develops QB's like none other- but it's not exactly like he was running the read option. Mallett was a drop back passer who was about as fast as wet paint drying. And it's not like Wisconsin was recruiting top 15 classes year in year out when BERT was there. They were still a very successful program despite the lack of STARZ POWERZ!!!! I think it was the support/system at Wisconsin that made him successful. They've had a formula since King Barry of Wisconsin, first of his name got there and they've stuck to it through BERT to Andersen to Chryst and it just works for them. Wisconsin has always had great staffs. Maybe BERT isn't that good a coach? Forget out Bama'ing Bama- the guy has struggled to beat even the bad teams in the SEC. And Toledo.
Title: Re: The Hot Seats
Post by: OrangeAfroMan on October 29, 2017, 08:57:23 PM
Kelly and Frost should be the first 2 calls.  Funny Addazio was brought up (unrelated)....Florida fans have a special dislike of him (the OC under Meyer the year after Tebow).  There were youtube vids posted making fun of his offense (WR screen on 1st down, dive play on 2nd, throw it on 3rd and long, punt).

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TamhUhpPO04

:72:
Title: Re: The Hot Seats
Post by: CatsbyAZ on October 30, 2017, 12:06:06 PM
OAM,
Florida should without a doubt go after the proven championship caliber coach like Chip K long before Scott Frost down in Orlando. IMO hiring Frost risks the same hiring malaise that approached McElwain who also had one good year (10-3) at a non-P5 before landing the monster stage in Gainesville. Frost is unproven, 13-7 overall, albeit with a good season going. I think the Huskers have the inside track on Frost as long as they are willing to be aggressive because I don't think Florida will (nor should) be aggressive with Frost.

Florida is one of the few programs that's always one good HC hire away from becoming a national title contender almost immediately; the fan & $$$ support is there and the recruiting takes care of itself.

As far as Addazio, I remember that insufferable dive play he dialed 30 and 40 times a game during Tebow's last year. Gator fans were convinced that a then less involved Meyer gave Addazio the reigns on offense as a way to do his buddy a favor and market him for a HC job somewhere. Given the inherent disadvantages of BC football's sparse recruiting grounds and crowded pro sports market, I think Addazio has done an about as well as any coach paid at his level can. This season will be his fourth winning season of his five in Boston. It's worth keeping Addazio but not worth ambitiously extending his contract.
Title: Re: The Hot Seats
Post by: Mdot21 on October 31, 2017, 05:29:30 PM
Florida was the first coaching domino to fall but it certainly won't be the last. Have to think Butch Jones is pretty much guaranteed to be gone at Tennessee at some point. Mora is on the hot-seat at UCLA. Sumlin is at A&M. Riley is at Nebraska. Great chance all 4 of those jobs open up by the end of the season. Going to really shake up recruiting as well. I know Michigan is already trying to poach some Florida and Tennessee commits/leans.
Title: Re: The Hot Seats
Post by: FearlessF on October 31, 2017, 06:57:47 PM
New Nebraska athletic director Bill Moos extensively praised UCF coach Scott Frost when asked about the former Husker star on Tuesday.

Speaking with KOZN radio in Omaha, Moos said Frost "has got the full package" as a coach and expects Frost to be leading a Power 5 program "probably sooner than later." Frost would be considered a primary candidate for Nebraska's coaching job if the school chooses to make a change.

Asked by host Nick Bahe if he is following Frost's progress this season, Moos replied, "Well, Scott, of course, has a great resume. ... He has learned from some of the great football minds in the business, throughout the years both at the college level and the professional ranks."

Moos praised Frost's work as an assistant at Oregon, where Moos served as athletic director from 1995 to 2007. He added that the only gap in Frost's profile was being a head coach and that he "has handled that superbly, from afar, as I look at it."

"Of course, he does have the roots here, raised in the state of Nebraska and playing for the icon that Tom Osborne is. A lot of things very positive," Moos said. "Scott is going to coach in a Power 5 [program], and probably sooner than later. He's paid his dues, and I've been quite impressed."
Title: Re: The Hot Seats
Post by: ELA on November 01, 2017, 08:52:06 AM
Florida was the first coaching domino to fall but it certainly won't be the last. Have to think Butch Jones is pretty much guaranteed to be gone at Tennessee at some point. Mora is on the hot-seat at UCLA. Sumlin is at A&M. Riley is at Nebraska. Great chance all 4 of those jobs open up by the end of the season. Going to really shake up recruiting as well. I know Michigan is already trying to poach some Florida and Tennessee commits/leans.
MSU has two Tennessee "commits" on campus this weekend
Title: Re: The Hot Seats
Post by: 847badgerfan on November 05, 2017, 09:07:23 AM
Boss Hawg almost lost to Coastal Something yesterday and needed a 4Q comeback to not lose. That surely would have been then end for him had he lost. It still may be.
Title: Re: The Hot Seats
Post by: Cincydawg on November 05, 2017, 09:45:07 AM
Almost losing to Coastal Southwest Eastern Carolina is cause for termination in my book.  The thing is, how many SEC teams are going to be looking at the same time?  Supply and demand.

You could end up late to the party and having to take your 4th or 5th choice, or just having to FIND anyone, like your interim coach just to have a coach.

I started a thread in SECland about what aspects make for a great coach and how many games in a season a great coach wins that a so-so coach would have lost.  Some of that of course depends on "how long was he there?".

Second year coaches seem to do well in many cases, which is interesting.  Maybe you should hire and fire a coach every two years.   :57:

SEC program that could be without a coach come January 5:  Arky, A&M, Florida, Tenn, Auburn (???), Ole Miss, Miss State, LSU, Mizzou ... that's one conference.  Imagine half of those programs are looking ......

Title: Re: The Hot Seats
Post by: CatsbyAZ on November 05, 2017, 10:19:04 AM
...

You could end up late to the party and having to take your 4th or 5th choice, or just having to FIND anyone, like your interim coach just to have a coach.

...

SEC program that could be without a coach come January 5:  Arky, A&M, Florida, Tenn, Auburn (???), Ole Miss, Miss State, LSU, Mizzou ... that's one conference.  Imagine half of those programs are looking ......


Which is why as a fan/follower of the Arizona schools I'm glad they've won their way out firing their coaches amidst a coaching search season that's destined to truly be cut throat. And the SEC vacancies will ripple nation wide and limit who UCLA can go out and try hiring, as if the Burins aren't already limited by a lazy AD. And once vacancies start filling up you'll see the trickle down effect of resultant openings at presumably Central Florida, Iowa State, Cal, Mississippi St, Florida Atlantic (yes, a Kiffin flyer) and (gulp) Utah. If Nebraska really wants Frost (which they should!) what is the new AD waiting for? Fire Riley and offer Frost by COB tomorrow!
Title: Re: The Hot Seats
Post by: Cincydawg on November 05, 2017, 12:40:36 PM
It would be interesting to see stats on how many coaches on average a top tier programs goes through after firing a reasonably successful coach who was not quite enough before they find a real replacement.

Tennessee is on the verge of going through another and at some point recruits don't even consider you a top tier program in any sense different from Kentucky.

It's risky either way.  Keep a disappointing coach and watch money dry up.  Fire him and perhaps get worse for three years or more.  This is why I worried about firing Richt.

Title: Re: The Hot Seats
Post by: GopherRock on November 05, 2017, 03:21:04 PM
Sounds like Sumlin is gone from A&M
Title: Re: The Hot Seats
Post by: Cincydawg on November 05, 2017, 03:55:59 PM
Most SEC teams are not very good right now, and most of their fan bases want better.

Part of this is the "Saban Effect".
Title: Re: The Hot Seats
Post by: 847badgerfan on November 05, 2017, 06:51:26 PM
I long for the days when a 9 win season (10 in this era) was good/great and finishing in the top 20/25 was good/great. Making a bowl game was special. Winning one was a bonus but not required.

Oh well.

It is what it is.
Title: Re: The Hot Seats
Post by: FearlessF on November 05, 2017, 06:59:07 PM
rumor in Lincoln from a guy with ties to boosters of substance says that Scott Frost is coming to UNL

we shall see
Title: Re: The Hot Seats
Post by: MrNubbz on November 05, 2017, 07:59:10 PM
GL hope it works out
Title: Re: The Hot Seats
Post by: 847badgerfan on November 05, 2017, 08:04:13 PM
rumor in Lincoln from a guy with ties to boosters of substance says that Scott Frost is coming to UNL

we shall see
I hope so.
Title: Re: The Hot Seats
Post by: Badger1969 on November 06, 2017, 09:26:00 AM
rumor in Lincoln from a guy with ties to boosters of substance says that Scott Frost is coming to UNL

we shall see
What about Les Miles?  I read he wants to get back into coaching.  He is now an annalist on BTN. 
Title: Re: The Hot Seats
Post by: 847badgerfan on November 06, 2017, 11:11:48 AM
I would hope the UNL AD is on the phone with Frost's agent every day.


Another guy who will probably get a good look for P5 jobs is Lane Kiffin. Don't laugh.

He's got FAU sitting at 6-3, 5-0 in conference and in first place. This is a team that won 3 total games last year.
Title: Re: The Hot Seats
Post by: fezzador on November 06, 2017, 11:35:20 AM
Imagine the irony if Kiffy goes to UCLA
Title: Re: The Hot Seats
Post by: fezzador on November 06, 2017, 11:37:00 AM
Imagine the irony if Kiffy goes to UCLA

The thing is, I think that would be a decent fit for him.  It's an area he's familiar with, and the expectations at UCLA are considerably lower than USC's.  If he can make them 9-3 consistently (which I think he can), and at least occasionally flirts with playoffs/NY6 bowls, he's golden.
Title: Re: The Hot Seats
Post by: FearlessF on November 06, 2017, 02:37:48 PM
What about Les Miles?  I read he wants to get back into coaching.  He is now an annalist on BTN.
don't know who is on Moos' short list
Les is goofy, but entertaining.  Would play big ten style offense and defense
would use the fullback since his son is a fullback at UNL
I could see it if Frost says NO
but, I've heard Frost has already said, Yes
Title: Re: The Hot Seats
Post by: betarhoalphadelta on November 06, 2017, 02:48:38 PM
I long for the days when a 9 win season (10 in this era) was good/great and finishing in the top 20/25 was good/great. Making a bowl game was special. Winning one was a bonus but not required.

Oh well.

It is what it is.
#firstworldproblems
Come to West Lafayette, the football equivalent of Ethiopia, and get results like that and we'll make you dictator for life.
Title: Re: The Hot Seats
Post by: Temp430 on November 06, 2017, 02:50:52 PM
Scott Frost at Nebraska would make things in the West division more fun.
Title: Re: The Hot Seats
Post by: MrNubbz on November 06, 2017, 02:56:23 PM
Another guy who will probably get a good look for P5 jobs is Lane Kiffin. Don't laugh.


Too Late
Title: Re: The Hot Seats
Post by: MrNubbz on November 06, 2017, 02:59:36 PM
Imagine the irony if Kiffy goes to UCLA
Aren't the shelves stocked with brainiacs in Westwood?They'd fall forever behind the Spoiled Children
Title: Re: The Hot Seats
Post by: FearlessF on November 06, 2017, 03:23:13 PM
it would be interesting to know the average number of coaches replaced in the 2010s compared to past decades, such as 2016 vs 2006 vs 1996 vs 1986 vs 1976 vs 1966 vs 1956
Title: Re: The Hot Seats
Post by: 847badgerfan on November 15, 2017, 10:59:37 AM
So, AD Jeff Long is out at Arkansas. If it wasn't already, Bret Bielema's ass is officially on fire now.
Title: Re: The Hot Seats
Post by: Brutus Buckeye on November 15, 2017, 11:35:02 AM
it would be interesting to know the average number of coaches replaced in the 2010s compared to past decades, such as 2016 vs 2006 vs 1996 vs 1986 vs 1976 vs 1966 vs 1956
Good thinkin'
Of course you'd have to confine the data to current P5 teams, in order to skirt the ever-fluctuating number of FB programs. 
Title: Re: The Hot Seats
Post by: ELA on November 15, 2017, 11:39:32 AM
So, AD Jeff Long is out at Arkansas. If it wasn't already, Bret Bielema's ass is officially on fire now.
Don't they have to pay him $15 million to go away?
The fact that that's the case is why Long is done.  But it might save Bret.
Title: Re: The Hot Seats
Post by: 847badgerfan on November 15, 2017, 11:46:10 AM
I recently read that the number is actually $4.5 Million.
Title: Re: The Hot Seats
Post by: ELA on November 15, 2017, 11:47:42 AM
I was going off of what they were saying on SiriusXM last night, but that would make more sense.
Title: Re: The Hot Seats
Post by: MaximumSam on November 15, 2017, 12:08:40 PM
I'm surprised they got rid of Jeff Long.  I thought he was rather well respected among the AD community, and while Bielema hasn't worked out, he wasn't a poor hire.  Petrino's motorcycle jaunt put them in a bad spot and they recovered nicely.  Now they have no AD and seem primed to can the coach at a time when Florida and Tennessee are also hiring.
Title: Re: The Hot Seats
Post by: Brutus Buckeye on November 15, 2017, 12:13:51 PM
(https://www.cfb51.com/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2F6Tcbf.jpg&hash=6ec6fcd36d0ba60ca1c7a6adcf40b50d)
Title: Re: The Hot Seats
Post by: Mdot21 on November 15, 2017, 02:03:01 PM
So, AD Jeff Long is out at Arkansas. If it wasn't already, Bret Bielema's ass is officially on fire now.
he's a goner. I don't see anyway he survives. I just don't know who they'll get to replace him.

If they ever decide to make a live action Beavis and Butthead movie he'll have plenty of free time..

(https://www.cfb51.com/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimg.bleacherreport.net%2Fimg%2Fimages%2Fphotos%2F002%2F562%2F542%2FBW-vnIQCMAAP1o7_crop_north.jpg%3Fh%3D533%26amp%3Bw%3D800%26amp%3Bq%3D70%26amp%3Bcrop_x%3Dcenter%26amp%3Bcrop_y%3Dtop&hash=38a02db11460e24dc71224a5fc18cd1f)
Title: Re: The Hot Seats
Post by: 847badgerfan on November 15, 2017, 03:48:20 PM
BB looks pretty lean in that picture compared to now. He does not look good at all. 
Title: Re: The Hot Seats
Post by: FearlessF on November 15, 2017, 10:54:28 PM
BB to Lincoln?????

https://www.saturdaydownsouth.com/arkansas-football/long-reported-exit-intriguing-next-option-arkansas-2017/ (https://www.saturdaydownsouth.com/arkansas-football/long-reported-exit-intriguing-next-option-arkansas-2017/)
Title: Re: The Hot Seats
Post by: bayareabadger on November 15, 2017, 11:00:52 PM
I was going off of what they were saying on SiriusXM last night, but that would make more sense.
The bigger number was floated early in the season and corrected about a week later. 
Title: Re: The Hot Seats
Post by: 847badgerfan on November 16, 2017, 08:40:24 AM
As I understand it now..

TODAY it is $15 Million. After the last second clicks off the clock this season, it is $5.9 Million.

So, needless to say, he will finish the season, at a minimum.
Title: Re: The Hot Seats
Post by: 847badgerfan on November 19, 2017, 02:33:51 PM
UCLA just whacked Jim Mora. And so it continues...
Title: Re: The Hot Seats
Post by: CWSooner on November 19, 2017, 04:16:05 PM
I long for the days when a 9 win season (10 in this era) was good/great and finishing in the top 20/25 was good/great. Making a bowl game was special. Winning one was a bonus but not required.

Oh well.

It is what it is.
UCLA just whacked Jim Mora. And so it continues...
Jim Mora probably longs for those days too.  Alas, he started well, winning 9, 10, and 10, with wins over USC in those three years, but then he tailed off, winning 8, 4, and 5 (so far) with no wins over USC.

He probably could have stayed at UCLA as long as he wanted winning 9 games a year, with a win over USC every 3 years or so.