CFB51 College Football Fan Community

The Power Five => Big Ten => Topic started by: Hawkinole on October 16, 2018, 02:14:14 AM

Title: Maryland (2-2, 4-3) at #19 Iowa (3-1, 6-1) Post Game
Post by: Hawkinole on October 16, 2018, 02:14:14 AM
Mcwterps? Will want to comment here, as may others.

It's too late for me to comment. Iowa's offense has improved greatly the past 3-games and Iowa's defense which has declined, should have more starters on board, at home this weekend.

Maryland poses a big challenge for Iowa. Probably a bigger challenge than most Iowans will realize. I love Maryland's helmets, but little else.

My analysis is lacking, but yours need not.
Title: Re: Maryland @ #19 Iowa Pre-Game
Post by: fezzador on October 16, 2018, 08:29:41 AM
I don't necessarily think Iowa's defense has "declined" per se, but when your offense and special teams gifts the other teams with turnovers and/or favorable field position, it suddenly makes it a lot easier to score points.  Iowa has been caught with its pants down more than once this season, and it paid for it more often than not.  The Wisconsin game is one I'm sure the Hawks would love to have back.

Iowa's run game hasn't exactly taken off this season.  Normally it's the bread-and-butter of Iowa football, but part of it is the run blocking isn't quite up to snuff, and part of it is that Iowa doesn't have a top-notch tailback.  The passing game has certainly kicked it into another gear so that's something, but it's still a bit hot-and-cold.

I'll admit I don't know a ton about UMD, but they appear to have a strong running game, and a strong run defense.  I do think that's good news for Iowa, but Maryland probably is the most athletic team Iowa faces all year (with the exception of Penn State).  I think the double-digit line is a bit much, I think it should probably be closer to 6 or 7.  I'm just glad the game is at home.
Title: Re: Maryland @ #19 Iowa Pre-Game
Post by: Temp430 on October 16, 2018, 09:16:06 AM
#19 Iowa at -10 does seem a bit much with Maryland having beat #7 Texas and Minnesota by a larger margin than #2 Ohio State this last weekend. 
Title: Re: Maryland @ #19 Iowa Pre-Game
Post by: mcwterps1 on October 16, 2018, 10:14:32 AM
I have no faith in Canada. 
Title: Re: Maryland @ #19 Iowa Pre-Game
Post by: Anonymous Coward on October 16, 2018, 01:25:41 PM
I have no faith in Canada.
Many consider him the best OC in america. Why the hate? Or is it just that you think it's a Peter Principle thing and, now that he's temporary/interim HC, he's a fish out of water?
Title: Re: Maryland (2-1, 4-2) at #19 Iowa (2-1, 5-1) Game Week
Post by: MaximumSam on October 16, 2018, 03:45:45 PM
Maryland has been such a weird team.  At times they have looked great, but they were clobbered by Michigan.  No shame in that, but they also had fewer yards against Temple than they did Michigan.  So who knows what you are going to get with this team.
Title: Re: Maryland (2-1, 4-2) at #19 Iowa (2-1, 5-1) Game Week
Post by: Anonymous Coward on October 16, 2018, 04:40:24 PM
Did Temple keep its starters in all game? 173 of Maryland's 220 yards against Michigan came against 2nd/3rd/4th stringers. 
Until those three drives, Maryland's drives went for 30, 2, 0, 6, 10, -1, -11, and 3 yards.
Title: Re: Maryland (2-1, 4-2) at #19 Iowa (2-1, 5-1) Game Week
Post by: Hawkinole on October 16, 2018, 04:43:27 PM
Did Temple keep its starters in all game? 173 of Maryland's 220 yards against Michigan came against 2nd/3rd/4th stringers.
Until those three drives, Maryland's drives went for 30, 2, 0, 6, 10, -1, -11, and 3 yards.
That was against an absolutely superb defense.
Title: Re: Maryland (2-1, 4-2) at #19 Iowa (2-1, 5-1) Game Week
Post by: Anonymous Coward on October 16, 2018, 04:51:54 PM
Iowa's is too. If the season ended today, Iowa would have a great argument for second best in the conference (clustered with PSU and MSU). Right?
Title: Re: Maryland (2-1, 4-2) at #19 Iowa (2-1, 5-1) Game Week
Post by: fezzador on October 16, 2018, 05:12:30 PM
If they ever stop gifting the other offense with crazy-good field position, sure.
Title: Re: Maryland (2-1, 4-2) at #19 Iowa (2-1, 5-1) Game Week
Post by: MaximumSam on October 16, 2018, 06:31:13 PM
Did Temple keep its starters in all game? 173 of Maryland's 220 yards against Michigan came against 2nd/3rd/4th stringers.
Until those three drives, Maryland's drives went for 30, 2, 0, 6, 10, -1, -11, and 3 yards.
No clue, though most of their yards came in the fourth quarter while down multiple scores. 
Title: Re: Maryland @ #19 Iowa Pre-Game
Post by: mcwterps1 on October 16, 2018, 07:35:38 PM
Many consider him the best OC in america. Why the hate? Or is it just that you think it's a Peter Principle thing and, now that he's temporary/interim HC, he's a fish out of water?
Well, he had 2 weeks to prepare for Michigan, but couldn't follow the same plan as ND. 
RPO with a mobile QB. Many starters on the field when Piggy gashed that defense.
But, he's stubborn with Hill at QB, and his offense produces penalties that put you behind the sticks farther than we can overcome.
Not impressed. I called it before the season started.  Close minded? I don't think so. It's just unfolding the way I thought it would.
Title: Re: Maryland (2-1, 4-2) at #19 Iowa (2-1, 5-1) Game Week
Post by: Anonymous Coward on October 16, 2018, 07:59:17 PM
Well, he had 2 weeks to prepare for Michigan, but couldn't follow the same plan as ND.
RPO with a mobile QB. Many starters on the field when Piggy gashed that defense.
But, he's stubborn with Hill at QB, and his offense produces penalties that put you behind the sticks farther than we can overcome.
Not impressed. I called it before the season started.  Close minded? I don't think so. It's just unfolding the way I thought it would.
A. As for the penalties: Why is that on Canada? It would seem equally on Durkin who built the team or on the players who commit them as individuals. I think it's just general, hard to fix, discipline issues. And I wouldn't think to pin that on a coach who until however many weeks ago was a coordinator.

B. We'll have to disagree about how many starters Michigan sat on D at the end on that one. From recollection, they were all in the backfield (some of the guys needing more practice, like Metellus and Kinnel). But the front seven was GREEN. I don't get happy taking credit away, but that correlated with the yards as much if not more than Pigrome's entrance.
C. As for Brown: He really evolved into a spread-killing DC at BC, and that included mobile QBs. It's too soon to say for sure (PSU with McSorely and maybe the bowl game will give opportunities to play that style again), but I think the ND game was a bit of a mirage in terms of Wimbush earning an edge on the edge. And even then ... it was just for half of the first half and one extra run in the 3rd Q. 
Beyond that, I really liked Brown's approach to defending JT Barrett, too. I know you've mentioned this as a past bugaboo of DB's, but I don't think it's an actual kyrptonite these days. He's pretty well rounded.
Title: Re: Maryland (2-1, 4-2) at #19 Iowa (2-1, 5-1) Game Week
Post by: mcwterps1 on October 16, 2018, 08:08:43 PM
A. As for the penalties: Why is that on Canada? It would seem equally on Durkin who built the team or on the players who commit them as individuals. I think it's just general, hard to fix, discipline issues. And I wouldn't think to pin that on a coach who until however many weeks ago was a coordinator.

B. We'll have to disagree about how many starters Michigan sat on D at the end on that one. From recollection, they were all in the backfield (some of the guys needing more practice, like Metellus and Kinnel). But the front seven was GREEN. I don't get happy taking credit away, but that correlated with the yards as much if not more than Pigrome's entrance.
C. As for Brown: He really evolved into a spread-killing DC at BC, and that included mobile QBs. It's too soon to say for sure (PSU with McSorely and maybe the bowl game will give opportunities to play that style again), but I think the ND game was a bit of a mirage in terms of Wimbush earning an edge on the edge. And even then ... it was just for half of the first half and one extra run in the 3rd Q.
Beyond that, I really liked Brown's approach to defending JT Barrett, too. I know you've mentioned this as a past bugaboo of DB's, but I don't think it's an actual kyrptonite these days. He's pretty well rounded.
I played in HS, and I look at a lot during games. I try to guess defenses and offenses, I watch the OL, I watch the DB's and DL, pretty much everything on both sides.
Don did what Temple did.  The OLB's kept the edge and kept contain. Those sweeps weren't going to work, ever.
And, it's not Durkin's fault for the Offense that shifts OL men and skill players pre-snap, but it is his fault for hiring him.
Title: Re: Maryland (2-1, 4-2) at #19 Iowa (2-1, 5-1) Game Week
Post by: Anonymous Coward on October 16, 2018, 09:15:49 PM
Could be. However, if Canada doesn't stick around at UMd, I do expect him to blossom elsewhere. His track record is one of the best.
Title: Re: Maryland (2-1, 4-2) at #19 Iowa (2-1, 5-1) Game Week
Post by: ELA on October 16, 2018, 09:58:41 PM
Iowa's is too. If the season ended today, Iowa would have a great argument for second best in the conference (clustered with PSU and MSU). Right?
Per Connolly, include Minnesota in that group.  All four are between 16 and 23 nationally, then drop to #41 OSU
Title: Re: Maryland (2-1, 4-2) at #19 Iowa (2-1, 5-1) Game Week
Post by: ELA on October 17, 2018, 08:07:46 AM

Maryland Terrapins (2-1, 4-2) at #19 Iowa Hawkeyes (2-1, 5-1)
NOON - Iowa City, IA - espn2
These aren't your older brother's Hawkeyes.  Remember "Talk to Your Kids About Undefeated Iowa?"  Even the strongest Iowa deniers can't deny this team, in fact the pollsters are holding them down more than most of the metrics are.  They are #19 in the AP Poll, but the Massey composite computer ranking has them #12, Sagarin says they are top 10.  Wisconsin's loss in Ann Arbor last week re-opened the door for the Hawkeyes to get another crack at a Big Ten championship in Indianapolis, after that 2015 team fell seconds short.  Their defense has been in the running all year to be the conference's second best, but since that Wisconsin game, the offense has been close on it's heels.  Nate Stanley exploded last week in a rout of the Hoosiers, with 320 yards and 6 touchdowns, giving him 12 in Big Ten play, second only to Dwayne Haskins, and Stanley is doing it in an offense averaging just under 32 pass attempts per game.  However it's averaging 9.4 yards per attempt, best in the conference.  Like I said, not your older brother's Iowa.  Can he repeat that against a Maryland defense that has also been surprisingly stout against the pass?  First the stats, then the caveat.  The Terps are allowing a conference best 46.8% opponents completion percentage, with a conference high 8 interceptions, while ranking #2 in yards per attempt (6.1), yards per game (157.0) and opponents passer rating.  The caveat.  Did you see Rutgers' stat line last Saturday.  When you've played 2 of your 3 games against the worst two passing offenses in the conference, that helps things.  Or is it Maryland making them look that bad?  This week will go a long way towards sorting that out.  Maryland has had their own passing woes, and while they did tally 3 passing touchdowns last week it was (a) against Rutgers and and (b) on a day where overall they were still just 9-20 (45%) for 85 yards (4.3 ypa), but with 3 touchdowns.  Two of the touchdowns were from outside the red zone too, which really makes that yards per attempt look ugly.  Ty Johnson and Anthony McFarland did what they always do, put up silly numbers on limited carries.  They are going to find it much tougher sledding against an Iowa defense that is more susceptible through the air than on the ground.  Matt Canada isn't going to ask Kasim Hill to beat Iowa throwing the ball, he isn't going to throw for 250 yards, but it's that completion percentage that needs to climb for Maryland to pull the upset.  He needs to pick up some 3rd and 6s, and give those backs another shot at breaking their chunk plays.   The Terps are averaging a horribly low 14.0 first downs per game, worst in the Big Ten, third worst nationally.  Their offense is all boom or bust, a huge touchdown run, or a three and out.
IOWA 34, MARYLAND 24
Title: Re: Maryland (2-1, 4-2) at #19 Iowa (2-1, 5-1) Game Week
Post by: Hawkinole on October 17, 2018, 06:07:49 PM
We have been reading all week about what a great running game Maryland operates.

Iowa Tight Ends Noah Fant and T.J. Hockensen, shared the Mackey Tight End of the Week Award for their performance against Indiana. First time ever tight ends from same team shared the award. One had 107 yards receiving, the other 102 yards receiving. A bit difficult to distinguish which was the more outstanding performance, receiving wise. And, Stanley was Davey O'Brien QB of the week. 

Hope it doesn't go to their heads. This is a new week, and a new opponent.
Title: Re: Maryland (2-1, 4-2) at #19 Iowa (2-1, 5-1) Game Week
Post by: mcwterps1 on October 17, 2018, 08:31:01 PM
We have been reading all week about what a great running game Maryland operates.

Iowa Tight Ends Noah Fant and T.J. Hockensen, shared the Mackey Tight End of the Week Award for their performance against Indiana. First time ever tight ends from same team shared the award. One had 107 yards receiving, the other 102 yards receiving. A bit difficult to distinguish which was the more outstanding performance, receiving wise. And, Stanley was Davey O'Brien QB of the week.

Hope it doesn't go to their heads. This is a new week, and a new opponent.
The defense is playing great. They have all year. It's the offense that doesn't sustain drives and keep the ball out of the opponents hands.
The one glaring issue with the defense though, is the lack of covering the TE. The flats and TE's seem to get little attention, and it's cost us ever since Buh came on board. 
So, unless we change things up and actually cover the TE'S, it will be a long day again.