CFB51 College Football Fan Community

The Power Five => Big Ten => Topic started by: 847badgerfan on October 12, 2018, 10:52:30 AM

Title: Board discussion and feedback
Post by: 847badgerfan on October 12, 2018, 10:52:30 AM
Seems like it might be time to look at a few things here. First I will explain my position, from the perspective of an owner/investor in this place.


I really hope it hasn't gone un-noticed, but maybe so? @ELA (https://www.cfb51.com/index.php?action=profile;u=55)  worked pretty hard a while back to get us organized, and he still does. He initiated season threads, which morph from off-season threads, for miscellaneous information on each team. He initiated game week threads, and even went so far as to organize titles of them to include records and rankings. There are many more examples of the work he's done here. And then there's @medinabuckeye1 (https://www.cfb51.com/index.php?action=profile;u=1547)  . Holy crap that guy...



I choose to respect the work these guys do and try to help them maintain it. I and others truly believe it makes our board better than most, despite our small membership. We also have zero moderation - we don't need it. So... Is being organized/structured a problem? Do we not have enough off-topic threads, or team threads?



Of course, feedback is always welcome.
Title: Re: Board discussion and feedback
Post by: Brutus Buckeye on October 12, 2018, 10:59:43 AM
Very organized and nice. Thanks for keeping it alive. 

I second the kudos to medina for allowing us access to his statistical mind. 
Title: Re: Board discussion and feedback
Post by: Cincydawg on October 12, 2018, 10:59:47 AM
I'm surprised we have not gained more members, for better or worse.  We used to see new members come in fairly often.  Maybe folks are all over at 247 or wherever where they can scream and yell and pound their chest.

New members of course can come at a price.

I'm not sure the SEC, ACC, and Pac Boards have enough traffic to really be needed.  I don't have a good idea as to how to merge to get to more of a critical mass though.
Title: Re: Board discussion and feedback
Post by: medinabuckeye1 on October 12, 2018, 11:03:48 AM
Thanks!  

I really think ELA contributes a lot more than I do.  His all-team rundown and weekly projections take a lot more work than what I do.  

I focus where I am most suited, tiebreakers and other statistical stuff.  
Title: Re: Board discussion and feedback
Post by: 847badgerfan on October 12, 2018, 11:04:53 AM
I'm surprised we have not gained more members, for better or worse.  We used to see new members come in fairly often.  Maybe folks are all over at 247 or wherever where they can scream and yell and pound their chest.

New members of course can come at a price.

I'm not sure the SEC, ACC, and Pac Boards have enough traffic to really be needed.  I don't have a good idea as to how to merge to get to more of a critical mass though.
I've been thinking about this a lot, as has @Drew4UTk (https://www.cfb51.com/index.php?action=profile;u=1) . When he started this thing, we discussed having a layout similar to what we had at Scout. Even there, toward the later years, we didn't have a lot of members on those other sites. 
As for more members, I do spend some time searching for old ones - mostly on the 247 boards. I've found a few and some have joined, but they don't post much, if at all. I think you're right in that a lot of people like to pound the chest and get in shit show fights. I'm glad we don't have that.
You want me to go find Crunch? Something for you to play with? Heh.
Title: Re: Board discussion and feedback
Post by: ELA on October 12, 2018, 11:12:09 AM
I think it's a good idea to keep them there.  No harm in having them, and it might look more welcoming to increased membership to see for fans of those teams that they have a home here.
Title: Re: Board discussion and feedback
Post by: MarqHusker on October 12, 2018, 11:18:03 AM
Technical question.  On my android, I can't see or click to other pages within a multipage thread. I have to go back out and find page 7 if I was on page 8.
Title: Re: Board discussion and feedback
Post by: Cincydawg on October 12, 2018, 11:19:03 AM
I wish we had more decent SEC posters (if that isn't an oxymoron!).

Fortunately, the B1G Board is very good.
Title: Re: Board discussion and feedback
Post by: 847badgerfan on October 12, 2018, 11:25:53 AM
I think it's a good idea to keep them there.  No harm in having them, and it might look more welcoming to increased membership to see for fans of those teams that they have a home here.
That's exactly why I haven't given too much more thought to making a change. Are there really fans of the ACC and PAC? If so, where the hell do they hang out?
Title: Re: Board discussion and feedback
Post by: ELA on October 12, 2018, 11:29:14 AM
I think it's a good idea to keep them there.  No harm in having them, and it might look more welcoming to increased membership to see for fans of those teams that they have a home here.
This also might be the most poorly worded sentence to say so little I've ever written.
Title: Re: Board discussion and feedback
Post by: Drew4UTk on October 12, 2018, 11:47:42 AM
Technical question.  On my android, I can't see or click to other pages within a multipage thread. I have to go back out and find page 7 if I was on page 8.
I'm on this- i did some work last weekend on the mobile version and inadvertently hid these things... they'll be back soon.

That's exactly why I haven't given too much more thought to making a change. Are there really fans of the ACC and PAC? If so, where the hell do they hang out?
yup- have it and not need it rather than....... but it's also considered that a 'dead' board makes a visitor think the whole place is so... so there is that, too... 

I wish we had more decent SEC posters (if that isn't an oxymoron!).

Fortunately, the B1G Board is very good.
something i'm torn on.........
we could drive traffic and get a LOT of it, as you can see in the 'visitors online' section... there are a LOT of legit visitors here.  if we were to pull a stunt a lot of sites do and allow visitors to only read the first three or four posts and then require them to register, we'd have a lot more participation- but the question is: "what quality of participation?"... .

as it is, and in my opinion, we have a small group to be sure, but it is a QUALITY small group, and one worth preserving.  I fear voices will be lost in the noise that are highly valued here if we were to run 'high percentage plays' to get more members.  I've thought about this to the point (and not knowing what to expects in the very beginning) I've already planned out (yet to implement) a 'private' board- or one that only 'original members' can access... this is something that absolutely would have happened if we'd had been 'occupied' during the closure of Scout.  


~break~

I DO feel like the place could be cleaned up some.  and... I'll get around to it I swear.  Right now I need to focus on the mobile site and get it squared away, as we have about 40% usage either mobile or tablet.  Once that is done i can start consolidating boards and reorganizing topics- but to be honest, unless you guys feel otherwise, it may be something that should await the off-season.  this would allow there to be no major bugs to work out that may impact usage, and not break anyone's familiarity with how it works now.   I know of three major bugs that remain, and one is out of my control and awaiting release of new function (they decided NOT to 'fix' but to totally rewrite).  

a CROWD will certainly pay for this place better- but at what cost to quality? 

I'm flirting with doubling down with my investment here right now, and something i can get the entire board involved with if they (you) choose.  it would be fun and profitable.  

also............ this is pretty interesting, and i haven;t shared it before:

the publisher is 99.9% aggregate right now, with the only original offerings done by me (horrible attempts) and @ELA (https://www.cfb51.com/index.php?action=profile;u=55) (which drew some attention)...... this is the good part:  people (writers) research message boards for subjects of interest- it's just a modern way of doing things- they take news broke by others, gauge interest and opinions from message boards, and they write articles..... this place is a good source for that- and something i'd like to see if anyone here wants to put forth the effort... basically "promote a thread to an article" the thread author takes credit for.  this would allow us to attack the search engines/news reels with a two pointed attack- increasing both the message board index as well as the original articles index... 
Title: Re: Board discussion and feedback
Post by: Brutus Buckeye on October 12, 2018, 11:49:23 AM
On the technical side sometimes my phone has a really skinny column for the text. Like one word per line, and if it's a long word it drifts off the side of the margin. Only certain threads though. Like the power ranking thread. So maybe it has to do with the way some of the lists get posted. 
Title: Re: Board discussion and feedback
Post by: medinabuckeye1 on October 12, 2018, 11:52:58 AM
On the technical side sometimes my phone has a really skinny column for the text. Like one word per line, and if it's a long word it drifts off the side of the margin. Only certain threads though. Like the power ranking thread. So maybe it has to do with the way some of the lists get posted.
I think that is because of the tables that I post in that one.  Those screw up the formatting.  
Title: Re: Board discussion and feedback
Post by: Drew4UTk on October 12, 2018, 11:56:36 AM
On the technical side sometimes my phone has a really skinny column for the text. Like one word per line, and if it's a long word it drifts off the side of the margin. Only certain threads though. Like the power ranking thread. So maybe it has to do with the way some of the lists get posted.
that's ALL on me... i set to work on the mobile theme and, in my haste to get it launched, went willy-nilly w/o consistency while building the format... sizing, in cascading style sheets, can be accomplished using several units of measure... though many of them seem to do the same thing there are nuances between them, making one better to use than all the others... right now the mobile theme is a victim of my confusion, using %, using pixels, using em's, using pt's, and visible widths/heights (vw,vh) all in some sort of salad that makes sense in some instances but not others... it's all part of what i'm now seeking to fix.  
Title: Re: Board discussion and feedback
Post by: MrNubbz on October 12, 2018, 12:02:08 PM
Common decency would demand we should have a "Welcome Nebraska Thread"
Title: Re: Board discussion and feedback
Post by: betarhoalphadelta on October 12, 2018, 12:18:20 PM
You guys are doing great work... Nothing to add. I do agree that we've also got a great group of posters here, and it's really nice that we are able to avoid actually making you guys be moderators.

However, I do just want to make a call to my fellow posters for a return to general civility. I've been seeing a lot more personal sniping here than I remember either last season or at the old board. Arguments--even mundane ones about whether a play is a designed run or an RPO--are getting ugly.

We can do better... 
Title: Re: Board discussion and feedback
Post by: ELA on October 12, 2018, 12:20:15 PM
You guys are doing great work... Nothing to add. I do agree that we've also got a great group of posters here, and it's really nice that we are able to avoid actually making you guys be moderators.

However, I do just want to make a call to my fellow posters for a return to general civility. I've been seeing a lot more personal sniping here than I remember either last season or at the old board. Arguments--even mundane ones about whether a play is a designed run or an RPO--are getting ugly.

We can do better...
That's a stupid opinion
Title: Re: Board discussion and feedback
Post by: betarhoalphadelta on October 12, 2018, 12:24:06 PM
That's a stupid opinion
Takes one to know one. 
Title: Re: Board discussion and feedback
Post by: Anonymous Coward on October 12, 2018, 12:26:07 PM
I think the place is great. It was formerly great because of how rare and active the community is and that was it. All that about the community is still true. But now it's also great because "we" (except I haven't done a damn thing to help, so really I mean Drew, badge and any other behind-the-scenes guys I'm unaware of) built this. Which is very rare. It says a lot about the people who made it happen and the value of the community they did it for.

Thanks all around, fellas.
Title: Re: Board discussion and feedback
Post by: Honestbuckeye on October 12, 2018, 12:37:53 PM
You guys are doing great work... Nothing to add. I do agree that we've also got a great group of posters here, and it's really nice that we are able to avoid actually making you guys be moderators.

However, I do just want to make a call to my fellow posters for a return to general civility. I've been seeing a lot more personal sniping here than I remember either last season or at the old board. Arguments--even mundane ones about whether a play is a designed run or an RPO--are getting ugly.

We can do better...
I like the civility comment, even though it is aimed inappropriately at me. Let’s not confuse uncivil it’s with a good debate.  And what may be mundane for you.....
I don’t like coming here as much as I used to though, with the exception of reading ELA’s prediction threads, Medina’s incredible analysis threads, and the pick-em and upset threads.
It seems no matter what I opine, the Devils’s advocates, and they are the same people and always in that mode, immediately work hard to dispute anything I say, particularly about OSU.   If you ever wandered here by accident, you would think this was primarily a Michigan Board, and that OSU is the runt of the litter. Those are just a few examples and observations.
I don’t recall EVER trying to promote my team, in fact quite the opposite. But I dare not defend them.  
I do way more reading than posting these days.  
Title: Re: Board discussion and feedback
Post by: Anonymous Coward on October 12, 2018, 12:48:17 PM
As for adding new members. That's something I recall ELA and I discussing on the old board as kind of a hard challenge. Because an insulated board can't really be stumbled into without a popular front page. And without this, the community does risk losing members faster than it gains.

So how can we grow to ensure our future and insure all the work the cfb51 team has put in? Well there are ways, but which are most practical?

Badge mentioned finding old posters and folding them back. And that's real. It could work. But the ratio of work finding them to payoff when they become active here must be kind of disappointing.

Alternatively: We could bring our brains together and find a way to advertise for free to attract the right kind of people. What might that look like? I'm not entirely sure. I doubt any of the big boards will ever let us post a thread to recruit away from them. And even if they would, and even if we crafted that message the best way, the obstacle of clicking from there to here is SO EASY that we'd almost inevitably gain a disappointingly high fraction of dumbasses.

Maybe the best way is to advertise with specific language for the kind of people who'd be attracted to a place like this and put it on something that is NOT electronic. Like a paper flier. Which may sound stupidly old-fashioned but because it takes more effort to go from reading that to visiting, I think that we would still gain members (albeit probably not super fast) without the disappointment of a high dumbass-to-justaguy ratio.

What might such a flier look like? Here's a 10-second mock-up that we could distribute **in low numbers** (5-10 at a time total!) each time one of us visits a new P5 university.

CFB51.COM
Are you a Big Ten fan?
Do you post online?
Are you tired of the fanboy accountz at ESPN and 247 that inevitably flame good conversations?
Looking for a community of nice-enough, normal-enough people (representing every team in your conference) to productively talk football?
Then check us out.
It's always free.
Title: Re: Board discussion and feedback
Post by: Drew4UTk on October 12, 2018, 12:49:40 PM
one of the things that kept me at Scout after I first discovered it was the 'conference' boards as opposed to 'team' boards.  it makes a person present things and consider things more objectively than the confined 'group think' of team boards.  as a for instance, visiting UT boards just about anywhere you'll see people posting about positives (not so much lately) and ignoring problems.  people who would offer even mildly objective posts would be roundly ridiculed and even banned in some cases... it was incredibly off putting to me to see that.  meanwhile, approaching a message board loosely focused on 'events' such as games in a conference (which was my initial take on scout) allowed civil (so civil, in fact, i had a hard time adjusting) and reasonable (based in reality) expectations.  

the catch to this is/was a dose of humility.  @Cincydawg (https://www.cfb51.com/index.php?action=profile;u=870) , for instance, knows good and damn well his Dawgs are pretty dang good- but instead of laser focusing on 'why they're going to beat an opponent', he instead offers reasons they aren't on the top of their game.  the same takeaway is present via either tact, but the tact that offers civility is the one typed up and posted.  this is the way i see the majority of this place and something i don't see very often elsewhere. 
Title: Re: Board discussion and feedback
Post by: Cincydawg on October 12, 2018, 12:57:48 PM
I'm from the Larry Munson/Vince Dooley school of football evaluation.

Woe is us, we have no business being on the same field as Austin Peay.  Any win would be due to luck.
Title: Re: Board discussion and feedback
Post by: Cincydawg on October 12, 2018, 01:05:11 PM
I imagine we have all a time or two read the comments on ESPN or wherever, and realized quickly they were all pejorative chest beating non-analytical tirades of zero interest written by folks with an apparent mental age of about 7.  Or 6.  

Title: Re: Board discussion and feedback
Post by: betarhoalphadelta on October 12, 2018, 01:22:13 PM
I like the civility comment, even though it is aimed inappropriately at me. Let’s not confuse uncivil it’s with a good debate.  And what may be mundane for you.....
Not aimed at you. I didn't even recall who was in that thread. Just that it seemed to get nasty. 
The Urban Meyer thread was another, and while you were involved in that thread, there was a lot of nastiness on multiple sides there, so you're not in any way singled out. 
I see the treatment OAM gets from a lot of people, where he gets into a thread and people pile on.
I recall a thread completely unrelated to OSU, over Shea Patterson, and that was getting far more heated than was really necessary. I think you probably weren't even in there.
So it's not any one person. It just seems from my position that things have been worse lately than usual. 
I think we can all do better.
Title: Re: Board discussion and feedback
Post by: betarhoalphadelta on October 12, 2018, 01:26:29 PM
Alternatively: We could bring our brains together and find a way to advertise for free to attract the right kind of people. What might that look like? 
One potential thing is if any of you guys comment on SBNation blogs for your team... I think most allow you to have a "signature" line. I could just see putting something like "The most reasonable college football forum on the internet: https://www.cfb51.com/" in your signature and seeing if people click over. Or just the URL.
Title: Re: Board discussion and feedback
Post by: Anonymous Coward on October 12, 2018, 01:43:38 PM
I don't post there, but that's an excellent idea. And the full signature is probably better than just the URL.
Title: Re: Board discussion and feedback
Post by: FearlessF on October 12, 2018, 01:57:53 PM
This also might be the most poorly worded sentence to say so little I've ever written.
well, I clicked like on that post because I understood it and agreed
Title: Re: Board discussion and feedback
Post by: Anonymous Coward on October 12, 2018, 02:07:46 PM
A very practical question before we get ahead of ourselves adding people:

What's a healthy rate of additions? 

Even if they're all the right people, I still imagine that it can't be unlimited. This site has costs, and with more traffic, I imagine its costs (and the probability of crashes?) would rise. 

What's the Goldilocks number?
Title: Re: Board discussion and feedback
Post by: FearlessF on October 12, 2018, 02:13:15 PM
I obviously enjoy this board and the people here.

I'd like to see more numbers of folks like the group here to create more traffic to entertain me, but I'm also fine with a small group.

But, if growing the group is important, I'm all for that.  I can handle some goofballs.  I even got along just fine with Crunch.

I try to bring this place up to old friends from past boards in an attempt to get them to join us here.  Becasue they were all good people.

The Sharkwater party is next weekend, I'll try to remember to invite others.
Title: Re: Board discussion and feedback
Post by: Drew4UTk on October 12, 2018, 02:16:34 PM
according to the results of my testing and the manner the server has it's FPM configured, 100 people can post at the precise same microsecond and the site won't buckle.  this isn't 100 people present at the same time, this is 100 people hitting 'post' or some other action, maybe navigating to another page or thread, at the precise same moment.  there can be thousands on the page at the same time- hell there can be tens of thousands.... 

the server is set with 16 2.3mhz processors on 32GB of RAM, and 1TB of storage space on a SSD drive.  i also run a cache script that takes massive work off the DB, making it less likely to stumble.  then, sitting in wait are other servers that will come online when (if) the site 'flares' with traffic, and shrinks back when it doesn't need it.  

we're pretty damn stable.  

last year you guys may recall long pauses after hitting post... that was a result of bugs... those bugs are largely if not all gone now, and the error log usually only has contents when someone mistypes their password, or the security apps decide to challenge you a little more (a way to keep robots from figuring out your passwords).  

......................... all of this said........................

more traffic is and would be nice... more exposure to the limited adverts i've put on this place will certainly allow it to pay for itself in whole instead of in part...... but i would hate to see a shift from quality to quantity.  good folks? hell yeah.... chest beating mouth breathers?  not so much...... 
Title: Re: Board discussion and feedback
Post by: MrNubbz on October 12, 2018, 02:50:53 PM
one of the things that kept me at Scout after I first discovered it was the 'conference' boards as opposed to 'team' boards.  it makes a person present things and consider things more objectively than the confined 'group think' of team boards.
Team Boards degenerate into polluted,slanderous views of reality and open,honest discourse.I'll stop by for program information but don't usually stick around for unsolicited opinions
Title: Re: Board discussion and feedback
Post by: ELA on October 12, 2018, 03:26:51 PM
Team Boards degenerate into polluted,slanderous views of reality and open,honest discourse.I'll stop by for program information but don't usually stick around for unsolicited opinions
Agreed.  They turn into cesspools of anti-homer conspiracies and convincing each other that all of their rivals are cheating.  The pre-Twitter days were a good source of some insider info, but now, they aren't even really good for that, at least the publicly accessible ones.
We claim the rationality of our board, but I think a part of that is the other fan bases are here to keep collective mentalities from snowballing like they do on the team boards.
Title: Re: Board discussion and feedback
Post by: NorthernOhioBuckeye on October 12, 2018, 04:19:55 PM
I know I don't post here often but I do try to read it most days. I want to thank Drew, ELA, 847 and all others for this board. It is far and away, the best college football community that I've ever had the pleasure of being around. And I agree that quantity does not always equal quality. But I will shake to trees to see if some of my college football friends (reasonable ones of course) would be interested in taking a peek at this board. 
Title: Re: Board discussion and feedback
Post by: MrNubbz on October 12, 2018, 04:57:55 PM
Agreed.  They turn into cesspools of anti-homer conspiracies and convincing each other that all of their rivals are cheating.  
Right out MP's Holy Grail "she's a witch"
Title: Re: Board discussion and feedback
Post by: huskerdinie on October 12, 2018, 08:11:49 PM
I agree with pretty much everyone's take on this board.  It is definitely one of the most civil boards I have ever seen.  I like it being a conference board rather than the more homer-centric team boards I have been a part of. Most days I get so overloaded with the political bs, social media sniping, and just general nastiness that it is a relief to come here and read some very polite discourse.  I love my team (even this year when we suck) but have no problem with acknowledging the good in our opponents, and while I am by no means an expert on any of the X's and O's, it's still fun to see how knowledgeable everyone else is~!  At least here, if I make a stupid / uninformed comment, the corrections are politely given, lol.  

So, I say good job all!  
Title: Re: Board discussion and feedback
Post by: OrangeAfroMan on October 12, 2018, 08:37:16 PM
I probably ran a lot of people off from the SEC board, and may be the reason some don’t return.  But I found it to be a lazy-thinking good-ole-boys forum.  I challenged their assumptions and brought analysis to the board while insisting they do as well.  Maybe that wasn’t helpful.


I do enjoy the back-and-Forth some May view as untoward squabbling.  But I find those to be productive (if not painful) steps in the right direction.  I’m certainly guilty of having a thin skin here, but again, I consider the name-calling lazy - taking the place of real, valid opinion.


You’ve all been patient in accommodating me here as the SEC board has dissipated.  I hope I’m viewed as someone, while at times rascal-ish, to be knowledgeable and always able to support my convictions.
Title: Re: Board discussion and feedback
Post by: FearlessF on October 12, 2018, 08:38:15 PM
you're the reason Crunch is not here?
Title: Re: Board discussion and feedback
Post by: Anonymous Coward on October 12, 2018, 08:56:16 PM
I probably ran a lot of people off from the SEC board, and may be the reason some don’t return.  But I found it to be a lazy-thinking good-ole-boys forum.  I challenged their assumptions and brought analysis to the board while insisting they do as well.  Maybe that wasn’t helpful.


I do enjoy the back-and-Forth some May view as untoward squabbling.  But I find those to be productive (if not painful) steps in the right direction.  I’m certainly guilty of having a thin skin here, but again, I consider the name-calling lazy - taking the place of real, valid opinion.


You’ve all been patient in accommodating me here as the SEC board has dissipated.  I hope I’m viewed as someone, while at times rescalish, to be knowledgeable and always able to support my convictions.
I don't know the eleventh word from the end, but I do like this post. It's a hard balancing act, though. Practicing good citizenship and braining at the same time.
Title: Re: Board discussion and feedback
Post by: FearlessF on October 12, 2018, 08:58:18 PM
I kinda like having you brainiacs around
Title: Re: Board discussion and feedback
Post by: jhetfield99 on October 12, 2018, 09:30:02 PM
One potential thing is if any of you guys comment on SBNation blogs for your team... I think most allow you to have a "signature" line. I could just see putting something like "The most reasonable college football forum on the internet: https://www.cfb51.com/" in your signature and seeing if people click over. Or just the URL.
This is a good call, I'll do that on my GoldandBlack.com account, as I believe you can have custom sigs there.  I would mention the old place several years ago on there and we'd gained a few new occasional posters. 
Overall I'm at a place in life where I'm so damn busy with work and kids I simply don't post anywhere like I used to.  I fell guilty about it, but figure I'll pick it back up at another time in life.
I like the forum overall and thinks the handful of games we have is fun. 
Title: Re: Board discussion and feedback
Post by: OrangeAfroMan on October 13, 2018, 01:39:41 AM
you're the reason Crunch is not here?
I hope so.
One of my biggest quips with the rest of the SEC board was why they liked having him around.  I was very critical of that.  

If it wasn't me, it may have been UT's performance the last couple of seasons - an 0-8 conference record might have led him to do the unthinkable.  
Title: Re: Board discussion and feedback
Post by: OrangeAfroMan on October 13, 2018, 01:41:14 AM
I don't know the eleventh word from the end, but I do like this post. It's a hard balancing act, though. Practicing good citizenship and braining at the same time.
rascal-ish
fixed it
Title: Re: Board discussion and feedback
Post by: MrNubbz on October 13, 2018, 02:39:03 AM
I kinda like having you brainiacs around
Back at ya  :017:
                    
Title: Re: Board discussion and feedback
Post by: 847badgerfan on October 13, 2018, 09:12:57 AM
This thread is brainy and civil and rascal-ish.



We do need more members, but only good ones. If a shitty one shows up, the board will take care of itself. I know you guys. 
Title: Re: Board discussion and feedback
Post by: Cincydawg on October 13, 2018, 09:14:45 AM
I don't think we need more people here or in B12 land.  Some more good SEC reps would be nice.  The place is dead slow.

I mean SEC slow.

Title: Re: Board discussion and feedback
Post by: Cincydawg on October 13, 2018, 09:17:17 AM
As for Crunch, he was slightly entertaining for about a month, and then amazingly predictable.  Predictable and stupid is not interesting.

I think he really did have issues.  He once posted that Tennessee football was the most important thing in his life other than his family.

Then there was the thing about winning at roulette.  

I for one don't need another poster of that ilk.

One or two good posters for each team other than Vandy would be nice.
Title: Re: Board discussion and feedback
Post by: 847badgerfan on October 13, 2018, 09:18:58 AM
There's this Vandy fan called @grillrat (https://www.cfb51.com/index.php?action=profile;u=11) who comes around from time to time.
Title: Re: Board discussion and feedback
Post by: 847badgerfan on October 13, 2018, 09:19:46 AM
Anyone been to the CFN Book Face page lately? I don't know how active that place is anymore.
Title: Re: Board discussion and feedback
Post by: Anonymous Coward on October 13, 2018, 09:36:50 AM
Anyone been to the CFN Book Face page lately? I don't know how active that place is anymore.
Haven't. Actually I never did except the day I first joined and, after that, when Marcel used to post there and I'd get an alert. Even if he did make the mistake of picking a lanky Buckeye as his second spirit mascot, this board really misses that guy.
Title: Re: Board discussion and feedback
Post by: Anonymous Coward on October 13, 2018, 09:38:54 AM
Not to replace anyone but to fill a glaring need, I'd like us to at least have 2-4 posters representing each school. NU, Illinois and Rutger qualify. Though, to keep those new Rutger reps, we'd prob have to give them their s back.
Title: Re: Board discussion and feedback
Post by: 847badgerfan on October 13, 2018, 09:54:09 AM
There's a can of worm_ open now.
Title: Re: Board discussion and feedback
Post by: SuperMario on October 13, 2018, 10:42:47 AM
I’m so thankful for what you guys have done to build and maintain this. For a long I visited the old board just for Badge, Gator and ELA, but there’s been so many quality contributors over the years. When I was overseas from 2005-2007, my interactions with people here were my only normal conversations about college football and I’m forever thankful for this group because of it.

I was really nervous that this thing would fall apart when Scout boards went down. You guys have honestly blown me away by how you rebuilt it and I would argue this is even more user friendly.

The one thing that can improve is our interaction with each other, myself certainly included. I think it’s time we all start liking each other again. We’ve stuck around each other this long, there’s certainly a reason.

For those of you that keep this thing going, a very heartfelt thank you!
Title: Re: Board discussion and feedback
Post by: MaximumSam on October 13, 2018, 11:02:30 AM
It's kind of crazy how long we've been posting as a group
Title: Re: Board discussion and feedback
Post by: 847badgerfan on October 13, 2018, 11:25:42 AM
It's kind of crazy how long we've been posting as a group
I'm happy @Drew4UTk (https://www.cfb51.com/index.php?action=profile;u=1) saw this and had the foresight and wherewithal to hatch this idea of keeping us together.
Title: Re: Board discussion and feedback
Post by: MaximumSam on October 13, 2018, 11:33:20 AM
I'm happy @Drew4UTk (https://www.cfb51.com/index.php?action=profile;u=1) saw this and had the foresight and wherewithal to hatch this idea of keeping us together.
Me too. I was skeptical it would work out, but it sure has
Title: Re: Board discussion and feedback
Post by: SuperMario on October 13, 2018, 12:22:12 PM
Haven't. Actually I never did except the day I first joined and, after that, when Marcel used to post there and I'd get an alert. Even if he did make the mistake of picking a lanky Buckeye as his second spirit mascot, this board really misses that guy.
Losing Marcel and John has really stunk. Gator’s weekend travel write-ups are still the best internet content college football has ever seen. They’re both a reminder that wins and losses aren’t nearly the most important part of college football.
Title: Re: Board discussion and feedback
Post by: MrNubbz on October 13, 2018, 12:26:32 PM
Me too. I was skeptical it would work out, but it sure has
Yup a lot of work behind the scenes but from this side it appears to have come off w/o a glitch.Ya know except for the fact we couldn't seem to shake fearless.Thanks again
Title: Re: Board discussion and feedback
Post by: FearlessF on October 13, 2018, 06:56:03 PM
I don't shake easy
Title: Re: Board discussion and feedback
Post by: Anonymous Coward on October 14, 2018, 07:43:12 PM
I just noticed that the thumbs-up "Like" graphic isn't just a thumbs-up. There's something in the hand.
What is that? A joystick? Cigarillo? Blow gun? Candy bar? Opponent's severed thumb as sort of a double-thumbs-up?
Now that I've noticed it, I can't unnotice it. Need to know.
Title: Re: Board discussion and feedback
Post by: FearlessF on October 14, 2018, 07:45:34 PM
looks like a bottle of beer to me
Title: Re: Board discussion and feedback
Post by: Drew4UTk on October 14, 2018, 07:47:36 PM
Beer. 
Title: Re: Board discussion and feedback
Post by: Anonymous Coward on October 14, 2018, 08:26:02 PM
Ah! The top of a glass bottle!
Title: Re: Board discussion and feedback
Post by: GopherRock on October 15, 2018, 06:46:53 PM
It looks like a bottle opener.

The main issue I've seen is not being able to see the page numbers within the thread on mobile.
Title: Re: Board discussion and feedback
Post by: OrangeAfroMan on October 15, 2018, 06:51:10 PM
It's A dildo.  We can't say it's YOUR dildo.  
Title: Re: Board discussion and feedback
Post by: iahawk15 on October 15, 2018, 06:52:40 PM
It looks like a bottle opener.

The main issue I've seen is not being able to see the page numbers within the thread on mobile.
I was actually just coming to post this! Pagination is missing within thread view. Link to last post is missing in thread list view. For me anyway, Galaxy S5 Chrome browser.
Title: Re: Board discussion and feedback
Post by: betarhoalphadelta on October 15, 2018, 07:28:18 PM
It's A dildo.  We can't say it's YOUR dildo.  
That's definitely a little more than a thumbs up...
Title: Re: Board discussion and feedback
Post by: Hawkinole on October 16, 2018, 02:15:52 AM
How many visitors regularly view posts, who do not post, as compared to #s of posters?
Title: Re: Board discussion and feedback
Post by: Brutus Buckeye on October 18, 2018, 12:29:00 PM
Why do the Big Ten and Sec Conference boards have the "East" helmets on the left and the "West" helmets on the right? 

Shouldn't it be the other way around? Like on a map? 

Why aren't the helmets on the Pac 12 and ACC board divvied up by divisions like the Big Ten and Sec? Instead they are divided up asymmetrically in alphabetical order. 

On the Pac board Stanford, Utah, UDub and Wazzou are on the right with the other 8 teams on the left.

On the Acc board BC, Clemson, FSU, Louisville and NC State are on the left with the other 9 teams plus ND on the right. 

Not a big deal of course, just something I've noticed.
Title: Re: Board discussion and feedback
Post by: Anonymous Coward on October 18, 2018, 01:10:29 PM
Since Earth is a globe, there's no "right" way to represent it in two dimensions. The western convention is to put north at top and the Americas at left (these are Mercator maps). Other equally legitimate maps put (a) north at top and Eurasia/Oceania at left or (b) north at bottom.

Having said that, I do tend to fall in line with many conventions and applaud your anal retentiveness here.
Title: Re: Board discussion and feedback
Post by: Brutus Buckeye on October 18, 2018, 01:23:36 PM
That argument would be a lot more sound if these conferences were global instead of regional. 
Title: Re: Board discussion and feedback
Post by: 847badgerfan on October 18, 2018, 01:56:58 PM
We ARE global man!!
Title: Re: Board discussion and feedback
Post by: Anonymous Coward on October 18, 2018, 03:13:41 PM
That argument would be a lot more sound if these conferences were global instead of regional.
Ha. I like the energy of the post more than the idea.
If something exists on a globe that can be legitimately projected 2-dimensionally in several ways, then it doesn't matter if you're talking about the whole globe or just a part. Whether zoomed in or out, "left/right" is equally meaningless.
That's (not the same but related to) why I try so hard to get my wife to stop producing directions that are so left/right heavy. Handed directions are inferior to the Cardinal ones.
Title: Re: Board discussion and feedback
Post by: Brutus Buckeye on October 18, 2018, 03:17:40 PM
If you found a gal that gives left and rights instead of random land marks, hang onto that one like grim death my fried. 
Title: Re: Board discussion and feedback
Post by: MrNubbz on October 18, 2018, 03:33:53 PM
Stop exciting yourself you're not finishing your sentences
Title: Re: Board discussion and feedback
Post by: Anonymous Coward on October 18, 2018, 03:45:13 PM
If you found a gal that gives left and rights instead of random land marks, hang onto that one like grim death my fried.
Ha, I'll definitely keep her. 
But "travel east, turn north" is always better than "go down that road, turn right" because the second gets you lost and keeps you that way if you miss something.
Title: Re: Board discussion and feedback
Post by: 847badgerfan on October 18, 2018, 04:06:26 PM
Ha, I'll definitely keep her.
But "travel east, turn north" is always better than "go down that road, turn right" because the second gets you lost and keeps you that way if you miss something.
If you were traveling East and turned North, you'd be going down that road and turning LEFT.
Just sayin'.
Title: Re: Board discussion and feedback
Post by: Brutus Buckeye on October 18, 2018, 04:06:41 PM
That's much better than "drive down the street until you see the tanning salon, then turn that way at the next street. If the curb goes from old and dingy to new and shiny then you went to far and you need to turn around. Then you are going to see a Panera. And if you drive past that there's gonna be a nail spa. You don't want to turn there, but turn by the post office that's across the street from it. And then..." 
Title: Re: Board discussion and feedback
Post by: 847badgerfan on October 18, 2018, 04:10:33 PM
I'm one of those who studies maps before I go somewhere. No GPS. No directions. Just give me an address and I'll be there.
Title: Re: Board discussion and feedback
Post by: FearlessF on October 18, 2018, 04:24:19 PM
If you found a gal that gives left and rights instead of random land marks, hang onto that one like grim death my fried.
some women know their right hand from their left, but never met one that knew North, South, East, & West.
Title: Re: Board discussion and feedback
Post by: FearlessF on October 18, 2018, 04:25:46 PM
I'm one of those who studies maps before I go somewhere. No GPS. No directions. Just give me an address and I'll be there.
I used to be one of those, up until a couple years ago, when Google finally figured out maps
now I use the phone - rarely fails
Title: Re: Board discussion and feedback
Post by: Anonymous Coward on October 18, 2018, 04:32:30 PM
If you were traveling East and turned North, you'd be going down that road and turning LEFT.
Just sayin'.
Obviously, but if you get turned around, you don't know which general direction to go to get unstuck without finding outside help. If I know a destination is due north of right *here*, it doesn't matter how many times you spin me around, after the dizziness goes away, I can look at the sun/stars/compass and start going in the right direction within a second.
Title: Re: Board discussion and feedback
Post by: MrNubbz on October 18, 2018, 04:32:39 PM
If you were traveling East and turned North, you'd be going down that road and turning LEFT.
Just sayin'.
Just don't pull a U turn
I'm one of those who studies maps before I go somewhere. No GPS. No directions. Just give me an address and I'll be there.
Me too,comes from years of driving thru Ohio,Pa,NY, up to fishing camps in Ontario/Quebec.About 2000 we had two SUV's trailering boats.One friend had his new fangled cell w/GPS.In our truck we had compass/maps.Other buddies didn't plan on tornado's taking out towers 750 miles above the border.We were able to get our provincial fishing licenses,Good Canadian beer and boat in the water when they showed up 10 hrs later
                                                                                        :85:
Title: Re: Board discussion and feedback
Post by: 847badgerfan on October 18, 2018, 04:36:44 PM
I'm a freakin' Land Surveyor. Get lost, my ass.
Title: Re: Board discussion and feedback
Post by: MrNubbz on October 18, 2018, 04:42:23 PM
Well you prolly hear that when they get the bill
Title: Re: Board discussion and feedback
Post by: Anonymous Coward on October 18, 2018, 05:12:08 PM
I'm a freakin' Land Surveyor. Get lost, my ass.
Not everyone has that. And ALL of those people are best off if they master their cardinal directions. 
If using a GPS unit is like using a calculator in school and never practicing the math yourself, using "go left/right" is like learning a few convenient arithmetic rules ("carry the one"), but never actually understanding the underlying math for itself. 
Only the people who master their cardinal directions are going to be set in truly any situation. Left/right is just a proxy that often works equally well. And sometimes when it fails, whoa nelly.
Title: Re: Board discussion and feedback
Post by: Brutus Buckeye on October 18, 2018, 05:23:01 PM
All that aside, my monitor is a flat rectangle. Not a sphere. 
Title: Re: Board discussion and feedback
Post by: Anonymous Coward on October 18, 2018, 05:51:23 PM
So is your map. And both explain why, on first impressions, we come away thinking Greenland is as large as Africa when in reality it's only about the size of Algeria. Or that Antarctica is big like Eurasia. It's a main flaw of the Mercator Projection, whose lines of longitude do not converge to a pole but simply run parallel at every point, which over-represents land masses as you move north or south from the equator.

(https://languagesoftheworld.info/wp-content/uploads/2014/05/map-projections-galore.jpg)
Projecting a sphere onto a flat surface is an unsolved challenge. All of these have utility. But maybe I like the Waterman Butterfly Projection best (not seen here)
Title: Re: Board discussion and feedback
Post by: MrNubbz on October 18, 2018, 06:04:32 PM
What the hell would the purpose be for the map/globe in the bottom left hand corner.Did Picasso paint that,make it red and put it on the badgers helmet
Title: Re: Board discussion and feedback
Post by: Brutus Buckeye on October 18, 2018, 06:09:18 PM
Yeah I've taken a bunch of cartography courses. I know how maps work.
Title: Re: Board discussion and feedback
Post by: betarhoalphadelta on October 18, 2018, 06:58:44 PM
Since Earth is a globe, there's no "right" way to represent it in two dimensions. The western convention is to put north at top and the Americas at left (these are Mercator maps). Other equally legitimate maps put (a) north at top and Eurasia/Oceania at left or (b) north at bottom.

Having said that, I do tend to fall in line with many conventions and applaud your anal retentiveness here.
However, given that the distance traveled between the schools is SO much shorter in one direction than the other, which is nearly a full circumnavigation of the globe, it makes sense to view their locations relatively in the shorter direction. 
I.e. we could either group the helmets by the West division
, and the East division
. And then within each division, present them by how far longitudinally far they are from the middle. 
Of course, Leaders and Legends never had this problem. 
Title: Re: Board discussion and feedback
Post by: Anonymous Coward on October 18, 2018, 07:49:22 PM
What the hell would the purpose be for the map/globe in the bottom left hand corner.Did Picasso paint that,make it red and put it on the badgers helmet
It is far better than the standard Mercator projections (the rectangular map we all know and love or "love") at representing the size of things near the poles. Because its longitude lines converge.
I said this example earlier. But it's so crazy that I think it bears repeating. Greenland is actually close in size to Algeria. But if you google image search for "world map," all of the top hits show something for Greenland that resembles the entire continent of Africa in size. It's an absurd mistake but inevitable if lthe longitude lines run parallel.
Title: Re: Board discussion and feedback
Post by: Anonymous Coward on October 18, 2018, 07:51:59 PM
However, given that the distance traveled between the schools is SO much shorter in one direction than the other, which is nearly a full circumnavigation of the globe, it makes sense to view their locations relatively in the shorter direction.
I.e. we could either group the helmets by the West division
, and the East division
. And then within each division, present them by how far longitudinally far they are from the middle.
Of course, Leaders and Legends never had this problem.
I was moreso acknowledging that an entirely legitimate map with south marked at top and north at bottom would have the west at right and east at left. As one way of pointing out how arbitrary it is to say "west = left; east = right."
Title: Re: Board discussion and feedback
Post by: betarhoalphadelta on October 18, 2018, 09:27:00 PM
I was moreso acknowledging that an entirely legitimate map with south marked at top and north at bottom would have the west at right and east at left. As one way of pointing out how arbitrary it is to say "west = left; east = right."
How high are you, bro? 
Title: Re: Board discussion and feedback
Post by: Brutus Buckeye on October 18, 2018, 10:12:24 PM
Why do the Big Ten and Sec Conference boards have the "East" helmets on the left and the "West" helmets on the right?

Shouldn't it be the other way around? Like on a map?

Why aren't the helmets on the Pac 12 and ACC board divvied up by divisions like the Big Ten and Sec? Instead they are divided up asymmetrically in alphabetical order.

On the Pac board Stanford, Utah, UDub and Wazzou are on the right with the other 8 teams on the left.

On the Acc board BC, Clemson, FSU, Louisville and NC State are on the left with the other 9 teams plus ND on the right.

Not a big deal of course, just something I've noticed.
Upon closer inspection the Acc board helmets aren't even in alphabetical order like the Pac 12. 
It has Boston College, Clemson, Florida State, Louisville and then NC State to the left of the ACC logo. 
To the right is Notre Dame, Syracuse, Wake Forest, Duke, Georgia Tech, Miami, North Carolina, Pitt, Virginia and then Virginia Tech. 
What Dude
Oh I see. It would be divided into divisions if the Acc logo were between Wake Forest and Duke instead of NC State and Notre Dame. 
Weird. 
Title: Re: Board discussion and feedback
Post by: 847badgerfan on October 19, 2018, 06:46:30 AM
What the hell would the purpose be for the map/globe in the bottom left hand corner.Did Picasso paint that,make it red and put it on the badgers helmet
Seems to me it would be useful to look at if you were planning a sea route. It covers all the main ones in one shot.
Title: Re: Board discussion and feedback
Post by: 847badgerfan on October 19, 2018, 06:48:52 AM
Well you prolly hear that when they get the bill
That's why I don't do residential work. For what some dickweeds charge for those surveys.. I can't even send my guys out to start the truck.
Title: Re: Board discussion and feedback
Post by: Drew4UTk on October 19, 2018, 07:16:40 AM
Upon closer inspection the Acc board helmets aren't even in alphabetical order like the Pac 12.
It has Boston College, Clemson, Florida State, Louisville and then NC State to the left of the ACC logo.
To the right is Notre Dame, Syracuse, Wake Forest, Duke, Georgia Tech, Miami, North Carolina, Pitt, Virginia and then Virginia Tech.
What Dude?
Oh I see. It would be divided into divisions if the Acc logo were between Wake Forest and Duke instead of NC State and Notre Dame.
Weird.
I did all of those by hand using MS Paint, and while on an airplane... it was a PITA, but something that occupied my time and insomnia (i CANNOT sleep on an airplane- weird, huh? and it doesn't if I'm flying up South or Down North, Left East or Left West)... IIRC I stuck them where they fit best, with original intent to make the little conference banner look like a tab... I kinda fell flat on that it would appear.  
Title: Re: Board discussion and feedback
Post by: 847badgerfan on October 19, 2018, 08:11:58 AM
How many visitors regularly view posts, who do not post, as compared to #s of posters?
I'm thinking about half or so. It would be good to get them all active here. I recognize some of the names and they are good ones.
Title: Re: Board discussion and feedback
Post by: Brutus Buckeye on October 19, 2018, 08:23:40 AM
OldLardBelly is still poking around on the 247 sites. 
Title: Re: Board discussion and feedback
Post by: MrNubbz on October 19, 2018, 08:54:46 AM
Back in '03/'04 when I started posting,I viewed/lurked for prolly1-2 years.Back then social media wasn't the boom it is today.I'd View CFN for content as I was wagering a bit back then
Title: Re: Board discussion and feedback
Post by: MrNubbz on October 19, 2018, 09:03:42 AM
OldLardBelly is still poking around on the 247 sites.
Ya over on Bucknuts - so is Buckeye Rob,don't know if you were around when he was here - over on the CFN Board rather.I think Cincidawg posts over there occasionally.Amazing the different boards that either merged or disappeared and not for the better IMO.Hineygate is/was a weird one they booted me after one post.i think they threw me out because I responded to a troll/flamer.Moderator prolly fat thumbed me while going after him
Title: Re: Board discussion and feedback
Post by: 847badgerfan on October 19, 2018, 09:55:08 AM
OldLardBelly is still poking around on the 247 sites.
Go get him!
Title: Re: Board discussion and feedback
Post by: Brutus Buckeye on October 19, 2018, 10:02:03 AM
He is on Bucknuts.

My old account was obliterated along with scout.
Title: Re: Board discussion and feedback
Post by: Hawkinole on October 20, 2018, 02:27:43 AM
If we want new members, we should discuss the viability of each of us individually posting a link to our Facebook accounts to this website. I am thinking we each have like-minded college football social friends, who are not on here.

What do the others think?
Title: Re: Board discussion and feedback
Post by: 847badgerfan on October 20, 2018, 08:35:55 AM
Please do!!
Title: Re: Board discussion and feedback
Post by: mcwterps1 on October 21, 2018, 03:20:08 PM
Where are the numbers within a thread that show pages ?
Title: Re: Board discussion and feedback
Post by: FearlessF on October 21, 2018, 08:25:40 PM
a good guy from the old days stopped by the tailgate saturday

He caught up with Rabid Rattlesnake Boy

I'll hit them up
Title: Re: Board discussion and feedback
Post by: Hawkinole on October 21, 2018, 11:46:17 PM
Please do!!
I posted this to my Facebook Account, tonight:

If you enjoy college football, and would enjoy having civil discourse with fans throughout the country, check into doing so here. It is a small group of good people. www.cfb51.com

You are welcome to copy and paste to your Facebook pages.

I would suggest the "Dead nuts accurate" mantra be removed from the website, because now my FB preview has that mantra, and we don't want that all over the country.
Title: Re: Board discussion and feedback
Post by: SuperMario on October 22, 2018, 08:42:48 AM
Where are the numbers within a thread that show pages ?
I thought I was the only one. I unfortuantely dropped my phone face down on my driveway two weeks ago, so I had to get a fancy new one, which was unneeded. The new fancy one doesn’t show page numbers.
Title: Re: Board discussion and feedback
Post by: 847badgerfan on October 22, 2018, 09:07:34 AM
I see them on my Surface. Haven't check mobile though. Maybe @Drew4UTk (https://www.cfb51.com/index.php?action=profile;u=1) can chime in on this question.
Title: Re: Board discussion and feedback
Post by: Drew4UTk on October 22, 2018, 09:09:04 AM
it's on me... I 'hid' them on the mobile theme inadvertently... will fix it as soon as i get some white space. 
Title: Re: Board discussion and feedback
Post by: OrangeAfroMan on October 22, 2018, 03:37:04 PM
West and East on a map are arbitrary, but born of a Euro-centric tradition.  I much prefer the world map with the Americas on the right and Europe/Africa on the far left because it's the layout which enables you to see how our species expanded across the globe.  


Random, maybe, but better than "oh let's have Europe in the middle because of guns, germs, and steel".  No, let's have the cradle of life in SE Africa be the "starting point" on the left side, and your eyes glide right along the Arabian peninsula, across to India and down into SE Asia/Indonesia.  Then up along the Asian/Pacific coast, up to and across the Bering Strait and back down the American/Pacific coast.



And shouldn't maps be printed to look sort of like the 'Tapout' logo?  I can't think of anything else that curves out like that on both ends.  But I think it would provide an accurate portrayal of the landmasses' actual sizes.
Title: Re: Board discussion and feedback
Post by: FearlessF on October 30, 2018, 09:07:20 AM
sent a good Husker fan a link to the board a few minutes ago

hopefully he will check in
Title: Re: Board discussion and feedback
Post by: Hawkinole on October 30, 2018, 03:10:40 PM
sent a good Husker fan a link to the board a few minutes ago

hopefully he will check in
I posted the link on my Facebook page a while back. I had one buddy "like" it. Hopefully, actions like this will spur a few some new posters to come on-board. I am very satisfied with those we have. It would be nice to develop a few more members.
Title: Re: Board discussion and feedback
Post by: Entropy on October 30, 2018, 03:32:06 PM
as long as they are not iowa fans.... 
Title: Re: Board discussion and feedback
Post by: Drew4UTk on October 30, 2018, 10:28:42 PM
Y'alls page numbers that I lost are back on mobile view.., ya may have to dump saved pages/images in your phones browsers privacy settings to get 'em though. 
Title: Re: Board discussion and feedback
Post by: FearlessF on October 30, 2018, 10:35:48 PM
nice work
Title: Re: Board discussion and feedback
Post by: Drew4UTk on November 07, 2018, 06:30:54 PM
Well this is not so funny... I struggled with one aspect of mobile forever, and it was chrome mobile specifically.  

I gave up .

And, I just installed a chrome mobile update and the issue is gone.... It's good, I guess, but I wasted time on something I was never going to fix because it wasn't on me to begin with... A LOT of time . all good all the same though .
Title: Re: Board discussion and feedback
Post by: FearlessF on November 07, 2018, 07:06:23 PM
you installed the chrome update

you're responsible for "fixing it"

nice work!
Title: Re: Board discussion and feedback
Post by: Cincydawg on November 08, 2018, 08:22:01 AM
I think the mods should ban anyone who diverts a thread from its original topic.
Title: Re: Board discussion and feedback
Post by: Drew4UTk on November 08, 2018, 08:34:33 AM
I think the mods should ban anyone who diverts a thread from its original topic.
heheheheheheeeee- you're a mod bro!!! have at it!!!!! heheheheheeeeeee!!!!!
Title: Re: Board discussion and feedback
Post by: MrNubbz on November 08, 2018, 08:40:03 AM
I think the mods should ban anyone who diverts a thread from its original topic.
That would be Hari Kari
Title: Re: Board discussion and feedback
Post by: Cincydawg on November 08, 2018, 08:53:21 AM
I'm not talking about Cubs' announcers here.  Stay on topic!
Title: Re: Board discussion and feedback
Post by: MrNubbz on November 08, 2018, 08:57:59 AM
I'm a Bud Man and a Cub Fan!
Title: Re: Board discussion and feedback
Post by: utee94 on November 08, 2018, 09:30:22 AM
All that aside, my monitor is a flat rectangle. Not a sphere.
My monitor is a beautiful 34" curved high tech art piece. :)
https://www.dell.com/en-us/shop/dell-ultrasharp-34-curved-usb-c-monitor-u3419w/apd/210-arcl/monitors-monitor-accessories
Title: Re: Board discussion and feedback
Post by: MrNubbz on November 08, 2018, 09:44:47 AM
Did you pony up 850.00 for it?
Title: Re: Board discussion and feedback
Post by: utee94 on November 08, 2018, 10:44:04 AM
Did you pony up 850.00 for it?
Nah, it was free for me.  But that's because I know a guy. ;)
Title: Re: Board discussion and feedback
Post by: FearlessF on November 08, 2018, 11:22:54 AM
I'm a Bud Man!

(https://i.ebayimg.com/images/g/bt0AAOxyu4dRvK0x/s-l640.jpg)