Temp,LOL.
I never knew you were a Cleveland Browns fan but I see that you have the Cleveland Browns kicking team as your picture.
Temp,Ain't that the truth,what did he miss 2 xtra points and 2 FG's?Or was it just 1FG.He gets a pass last week because of the steady rain - but inside - not so much.Wasn't this guy highly touted also?Dayum,prolly just needs a good talk from an insightful soul
I never knew you were a Cleveland Browns fan but I see that you have the Cleveland Browns kicking team as your picture.
Ain't that the truth,what did he miss 2 xtra points and 2 FG's?Or was it just 1FG.He gets a pass last week because of the steady rain - but inside - not so much.Wasn't this guy highly touted also?Dayum,prolly just needs a good talk from an insightful soulyou should have watched the game in Lambeau
Mods where are you? Shut down this thread. NFL hijacking from the OP on out.Not sure the Browns are a Pro Team however
Not sure the Browns are a Pro Team howeverIt's just incredible how they find ways to lose games. I will say, they actually look like solid team this year. The defense is pretty nasty with a healthy Garrett and a young stud Buckeye (college reference to keep the thread active).
here it is, from the Sporting News (http://www.sportingnews.com/ca/ncaa-football/news/michigan-nebraska-split-championship-charles-woodson-scott-frost/vsbyxm18ybl31cz20pn5xhguj)pretty dumb what if imo. no way to really know. I'll be a homer an roll with Michigan just based off of that defense and what the starters on those two teams did at the next level in the NFL. That '97 Michigan defense was just filthy. Best in the country by far that year and they had maybe the best college defensive player of the last 25 years. Woodson was unreal. Future NFL Hall of Famer. That offensive line was ridiculous, maybe one of the best in recent CFB history. 4 of their 5 starters were drafted in the first 2 rounds. Tackle Jon Jansen and guard Maurice Williams were drafted in the 2nd round, and guard Steve Hutchinson and tackle Jeff Backus were drafted in the 1st round. All 4 of them had really solid pro careers as everyone of them played in the NFL for at least 10 seasons. Williams played 10 seasons and Backus played 12. Jansen made two All-Pro teams, and Hutchinson made All-Pro 7 times was on the All-Decade team for the 2000s and is a future Hall of Famer. That OL was beastly. Griese wasn't great but he was a solid QB, was drafted in the 3rd round and he played in the NFL for 12 seasons and started around 100 games. Scott Frost never sniffed an NFL field. Michigan also had a really good kicker that year. Jay Feely played in the NFL for 14 seasons, made a lot of big kicks in the NFL.
(https://images.performgroup.com/di/library/sporting_news/13/2b/charles-woodson-scott-frost-091718-sn-ftr_1eukvbm8zu4d41sqrnfhfl1q2e.jpg?t=-381149803)
I think for Michigan the game really depends on three things. Offensive line. Obvious. They need to be way better in pass protection and in a hurry. Secondly- Harbaugh needs to unleash Patterson and use the pass to set up the run. IF he keeps trying to force a running game that isn't there this game will be closer than it needs to be. And last but not least- the defense. The defense has just been sluggish the first 3 weeks. Was really expecting so much more. They've started all 3 games off looking uninterested and lousy. I want to see them start out with an edge and play an entire game like their hair is on fire. They've played lousy, sloppy football for 3 weeks. They have the talent and ability to play so much better on defense.Patterson's efficiency has been great so far. Boy do I wish we had him last year.
I think for Michigan the game really depends on three things. Offensive line. Obvious. They need to be way better in pass protection and in a hurry. Secondly- Harbaugh needs to unleash Patterson and use the pass to set up the run. IF he keeps trying to force a running game that isn't there this game will be closer than it needs to be. And last but not least- the defense. The defense has just been sluggish the first 3 weeks. Was really expecting so much more. They've started all 3 games off looking uninterested and lousy. I want to see them start out with an edge and play an entire game like their hair is on fire. They've played lousy, sloppy football for 3 weeks. They have the talent and ability to play so much better on defense.just show up and Michigan wins this one.. UNL is too mistake prone. And it should be expected. UNL's gone from an options offense, to WCO, to a spread running game, to pro style to an RPO dominated offense. Any wonder why this wouldn't lead to confusion and mistakes by players? It's going to take time... more time than folks in Nebraska wanted to admit.
Mods where are you? Shut down this thread. NFL hijacking from the OP on out. I suppose that may be a welcome distraction than actually talking about this matchup. I'd like to see a game w/o a turnover, and a reasonable number of penalties.LoL, sorry about that. I agree with @MrNubbz (https://www.cfb51.com/index.php?action=profile;u=17) though, Cleveland hasn't had a professional football team in years.
Who is this scrub from Nebraska? How dare this peasant open his mouth to speak the name of one of the all-time greats. Someone should slap this fool.Jay Foreman is a former American football linebacker in the National Football League with the Buffalo Bills, the Houston Texans, and the New York Giants. He played college football at the University of Nebraska-Lincoln and was drafted in the fifth round of the 1999 NFL Draft. He is the son of Chuck Foreman.
pretty dumb what if imo. no way to really know. I'll be a homer an roll with Michigan just based off of that defense and what the starters on those two teams did at the next level in the NFL.I agree it's pretty dumb, but someone had to do it this week.
This Nebraska OL will the cure for whatever ails the Michigan defense...it is legitimately terrible. Even in a pro style scheme they would be under-talented, but in this wide-split offense they are barely functional.Ed Zachery
I hope they will clean up the mistakes as we progress through the year, but these toads need to be replaced with quick-twitch athletes.
Running backs coach Ryan Held evoked Rocky IV when talking about the challenge ahead of the Huskers in Ann Arbor, where they opened as 18-point underdogs this week.Jesus
“At the end of the day, this is Rocky IV. Nobody thinks we can win this game. National people don’t think we can win this game. We have to be able to rally, come together as a group, go on the road, get on that airplane like Rocky Balboa did and frickin’ beat Ivan Drago. That’s what we have to do. That’s kind of where we’re at and we’re going to keep fighting to get this done.”
1) I think Michigan may be a tad overrated. Notre Dame is 3-0 but they have been barely scraping by with close wins over bad teams since their close win over Michigan. That makes Michigan's loss to them look worse, IMHO.I tentatively agree, though I am mostly waiting for their Stanford game before deciding.
Sort of like that iowa from that game wasn't the same one that viewers had seen.Although JT was a contributing factor*If* Michigan eventually comes together to prove itself as a great team, then yes it is like that. Even then, I suppose ND would have to be middle of the road for it to be a tight comparison. That weird OSU-Iowa game was weirder than weird.
1) I think Michigan may be a tad overrated. Notre Dame is 3-0 but they have been barely scraping by with close wins over bad teams since their close win over Michigan. That makes Michigan's loss to them look worse, IMHO.Not sure I agree with this line of thinking. Notre Dame may well be overrated and they may have well beaten Michigan, but perspective please. It was the opening game of the season on the road, at night no less. We saw that Ohio State 2014 team. They lost at night at home to a Virginia Tech team that finished 7-6 and that OSU team went on to win a title. Not a good idea to over-react to the first couple weeks of a season one way or the other. Better to let things play out.
Patterson looks like the thrower M's been looking for from the little I've seen of him,makes good decisions,puts it in tight spots with some zing,should be the right guyI think so, too. His trajectory is on top of expectations so far, which is saying something. And the depth behind him is by far the best of the Harbaugh era (we're finally legit 3-deep and at the drop off in composure/productivity from Patterson to McCaffery is minimal -- albeit in limited snaps and McCaffery's arm isn't as strong, but he is promising in everything else).
I think so, too. His trajectory is on top of expectations so far, which is saying something. And the depth behind him is by far the best of the Harbaugh era (we're finally legit 3-deep and at the drop off in composure/productivity from Patterson to McCaffery is minimal -- albeit in limited snaps and McCaffery's arm isn't as strong, but he is promising in everything else).Patterson looks way better than I thought he would. Add to the fact that he's missing the teams top WR in Tarik Black due to injury and the fact that the OL has been a complete mess- it's even more impressive. Give that kid a legit OL and a healthy Tarik Black and open the playbook up and he'd smash every passing record at Michigan with ease.
It's all about November, though.
It takes time for an OL unit to gel and it takes time for a QB to develop that chemistry with receivers. That's all not going to happen game one, on the road at night.Injury aside, Shea was one of the bright spots against ND.
Add to that mix ND being fired up and Wimbush making magic on a couple deep throws that he normally never makes- and that's how you have 24-17. Like that 45 yard TD bomb that the little 5'9 white receiver jumped over the 6'2 safety Brad Hawkins in which he snatched away an INT from Hawkins and scored a TD- that stuff just doesn't happen most games- did in that one in that environment.It was even worse than that. Brad Hawkins had the ball between his two hands, all to himself. But it bounced out when he hit the ground. However, despite *both* DBs' position to suffocate the WR and Hawkins's play on the ball, it bounced out of his hands in juuuuuuuuust the right way to be gently handed to the bread basket of the receiver who otherwise had no chance until then. That's chaos, karma, or ... something else. And if it's something else, then that something is not replicable, that's for sure.
I will say this. Shea Patterson is by far the best QB that I've seen at Michigan under Harbaugh and he's the best QB they've had in a looooong time. That's not even remotely close. They have receiver talent up the wazoo with DPJ, Gentry, Perry, and Nico Collins, and it'll only improve that much more once Tarik Black is back from injury. Shea looks like the real deal to me. This season will all hinge on Ed Warriner being the real deal. He needs to get that OL unit playing at a functional level by midseason and playing it's best ball by the end of the season. He does that- Michigan will be just fine.Shea is basically a 5-star Tate Forcier ... who actually goes to class.
Not sure I agree with this line of thinking. Notre Dame may well be overrated and they may have well beaten Michigan, but perspective please. It was the opening game of the season on the road, at night no less. We saw that Ohio State 2014 team. They lost at night at home to a Virginia Tech team that finished 7-6 and that OSU team went on to win a title. Not a good idea to over-react to the first couple weeks of a season one way or the other. Better to let things play out.Anything is possible. That ND/M game might have been a heavyweight bout between two serious playoff contenders. It also might have been a complete fluke in which mediocre ND pulled a miracle and knocked off serious playoff contender Michigan.
Ed Warriner is trying to remake an OL unit that was a disaster in 2017 and Shea Patterson was making his first start in a new offense with new receivers that he's never played in live action with. It takes time for an OL unit to gel and it takes time for a QB to develop that chemistry with receivers. That's all not going to happen game one, on the road at night. Add to that mix ND being fired up and Wimbush making magic on a couple deep throws that he normally never makes- and that's how you have 24-17. Like that 45 yard TD bomb that the little 5'9 white receiver jumped over the 6'2 safety Brad Hawkins in which he snatched away an INT from Hawkins and scored a TD- that stuff just doesn't happen most games- did in that one in that environment.
I will say this. Shea Patterson is by far the best QB that I've seen at Michigan under Harbaugh and he's the best QB they've had in a looooong time. That's not even remotely close. They have receiver talent up the wazoo with DPJ, Gentry, Perry, and Nico Collins, and it'll only improve that much more once Tarik Black is back from injury. Shea looks like the real deal to me. This season will all hinge on Ed Warriner being the real deal. He needs to get that OL unit playing at a functional level by midseason and playing it's best ball by the end of the season. He does that- Michigan will be just fine.
Patterson looks way better than I thought he would. Add to the fact that he's missing the teams top WR in Tarik Black due to injuryGoes to show you how wrong ratings/rankings can be.Both DPJ & Collins were 4/5 *s and T.Black was rated a 3 believe coming out.Though TB hasn't seen the field enough to conclusively suggest he's the most talented he has certainly passed the EYE test in the limited time he's gotten snaps
Not sure I agree with this line of thinking. Notre Dame may well be overrated and they may have well beaten Michigan, but perspective please. It was the opening game of the season on the road, at night no less. We saw that Ohio State 2014 team. They lost at night at home to a Virginia Tech team that finished 7-6 and that OSU team went on to win a title. Not a good idea to over-react to the first couple weeks of a season one way or the other. Better to let things play out.This!!
Ed Warriner is trying to remake an OL unit that was a disaster in 2017 and Shea Patterson was making his first start in a new offense with new receivers that he's never played in live action with. It takes time for an OL unit to gel and it takes time for a QB to develop that chemistry with receivers. That's all not going to happen game one, on the road at night. Add to that mix ND being fired up and Wimbush making magic on a couple deep throws that he normally never makes- and that's how you have 24-17. Like that 45 yard TD bomb that the little 5'9 white receiver jumped over the 6'2 safety Brad Hawkins in which he snatched away an INT from Hawkins and scored a TD- that stuff just doesn't happen most games- did in that one in that environment.
I will say this. Shea Patterson is by far the best QB that I've seen at Michigan under Harbaugh and he's the best QB they've had in a looooong time. That's not even remotely close. They have receiver talent up the wazoo with DPJ, Gentry, Perry, and Nico Collins, and it'll only improve that much more once Tarik Black is back from injury. Shea looks like the real deal to me. This season will all hinge on Ed Warriner being the real deal. He needs to get that OL unit playing at a functional level by midseason and playing it's best ball by the end of the season. He does that- Michigan will be just fine.
I see an opportunity for the Huskers if Martinez plays with Hudson out for Michigan in the first half.build a huge 14 point lead in the first half and hang on for dear life?
1) I think Michigan may be a tad overrated. Notre Dame is 3-0 but they have been barely scraping by with close wins over bad teams since their close win over Michigan. That makes Michigan's loss to them look worse, IMHO.Time will tell how good ND is. I though the Irish D was solid. And 14 of Notre Dame’s points were scored in the first 8 minutes of the season. After that Michigan’s D clamped down and the O with suspect OL outscored the Irish. So, I’m comfortable with Michigan at 19. Certainly a huge gap between them and the Buckeyes.
Goes to show you how wrong ratings/rankings can be.Both DPJ & Collins were 4/5 *s and T.Black was rated a 3 believe coming out.Though TB hasn't seen the field enough to conclusively suggest he's the most talented he has certainly passed the EYE test in the limited time he's gotten snapsNo doubt about Black. Though that's routinely the case in the northeastern states. There's a large, underrated and untapped quantity/quality of talent there. I love when Michigan pulls 3-stars from that area in particular. I haven't crunched any numbers but those kids are among the nation's best overachievers.
| Nebraska Cornhuskers (0-2) at #19 Michigan Wolverines (2-1) |
| NOON - Ann Arbor, MI - FS1 |
| How many years does Nebraska have to be in the conference before we stop hearing the 1997 what ifs every time they play Michigan? With Frost coaching his first game in the series, there was going to be a natural uptick this year. Hopefully absent Brian Griese taking the Michigan job at some point in the future this will be peak for that. Neither team is where they were in 1997, but obviously Michigan is much closer. They are in Year 4 of their coaching regime, so their "rebuild" whatever it was, is over. Nebraska's is just beginning, and is including a massive overhaul of offensive systems. I picked Troy to upset them last week without Martinez, and that panned out. Sounds almost certain Martinez will play this week, which as a neutral fan is a good thing. He's fun to watch, and it's clear that Frost's offense is fully dependent on having a quarterback with his skill set in there. They've faced a mediocre defense in Colorado (#50 in S&P+ defense) and a bad one in Troy (#96). Michigan's is #7, and probably after the first drive of the season, is much higher. The "weak spot" if there is one, is at linebacker, now particularly with Hudson suspended for the first half due to a targeting ejection in the second half against SMU. You still have a Butkus Award candidate there in Devin Bush Jr., so as I said, relatively. So while the Huskers don't have the personnel yet, this is the type of attack that could help negate Michigan's strengths at cornerback and pass rush, because their run defense has been merely fine. Not that anyone is trying to hand out Blackshirts to the group, but the Nebraska defense has been better than the blame they've taken. The turnover differential isn't helping, averaging 3 turnovers, and -2 per game, both 2nd worst in the Big Ten. The overall scoring and total defense numbers don't look great, but on a per play basis, they are only allowing 2.7 yards per carry, 3rd best in the Big Ten, and 6.5 yards per pass attempt, squarely in the middle. To help this offense in transition though they have to create more turnovers, particularly this week. For Michigan's offense, this is a good litmus test. They looked bad against Notre Dame. While the Wimbush we saw that night was probably not the real Wimbush, the Irish defense appears to be every bit of what we saw, still a top 5 unit nationally. After that they played a pair of defenses ranked outside the top 100. So judging anything, positive or negative, from those three games seems unfair. Nebraska's defense is more indicative of the type of defense Michigan is likely to play week in and week out. Karan Higdon is expected to play Saturday, and that is huge. The run game struggled without him against SMU. While Chris Evans is a home run threat, he's clearly not an every down back. Instead the offense leaned heavily on the passing game, and Donovan Peoples-Jones had his coming out party, with 3 touchdowns. Banking on 13.2 yards per attempt is generally not a good strategy. Win or lose, coming out of this game I think we can finally draw some conclusions about this offense. |
| MICHIGAN 37, NEBRASKA 14 |
...and throw at #21. Alot.yes... the highly regarded DB of Riley's first class who still likes to spin around when a WR changes direction.
this game scares me a lot for two reasons.I think we'll see that against the hardest games on the schedule. But the season is still young and Shea and the WRs clearly don't need to be broken in (you could argue that the OTs do, but it seems the passing game can work well enough with quick drops to mitigate that and unless we switch from Runyan/JBB to a younger guy or two, I'm not sure they can make the most of that opportunity to grow).
1) Harbaugh is a stubborn sob. He's going to try to force the run when he's got a QB who can really spin it. Which probably means the game will be closer than it has to be. Instead of coming out and letting Shea throw it all over the parking lot and try to score points fast- he'll probably come out and try to run run run, let Shea throw 20 times or less and run 45-50. Stupid. With a captial S.
2) The defense has been lethargic. They just aren't playing with the same kind of edge and the same kind of urgency that we've become used to seeing out of a Don Brown defense.Now that the DTs are getting straightened out (Mone and Kemp are playing far better now as resetters of the LOS [in opponent-invariant ways] ... and that's before the actual starter, Solomon, comes back), my biggest concern for the defense is melting away.
This game definitely worries me.
Husker fans are pinning their hopes on a Michigan OL that is nowhere near the mess they think it is, and an 18yo freshman QB with one game of collegiate experience. If the roles were reversed, they'd think talk of an upset was laughable. It is.Oh that Michigan OL is a mess. Total mess. The tackles are garbage with a capital G. Neither one of them can pass protect. Neither can the top 2 RB's. Higdon and Evans flat out suck in pass pro.
Oh that Michigan OL is a mess. Total mess. The tackles are garbage with a capital G. Neither one of them can pass protect. Neither can the top 2 RB's. Higdon and Evans flat out suck in pass pro.everything is relative and Michigan's O-line is MUCH better than Nebraska's
No reason to be concerned. We have no DBs that can cover your WRs, no WRs that can outrun your DBs, no OL that can block your defensive front, and one LB that can run with Patterson...he'll be suspended for the first half.I believe Mo Barry was ejected in the first half of last week's game
Much good reading thereNo matter how it goes, I'm somewhat more worried about the first half. Don Brown is a 2nd half kind of DC. And being down Khaleke Hudson for the first half (targeting last week) is looking like a bigger deal than I first expected. His replacement is smart and solid with fundamentals but far less talented/quick, and Michigan could really use that on blitzes and getting to the edge. Thank goodness for Devin Bush and the DEs, at least.
I don't know why you would be more nervous
but, I hope you are nervous at halftime tomorrow
When might Michigan fans become unhappy with the coaching situation? Is that in the offing at all?If Patterson graduates without even a trip to Indy, things will get louder. For it to happen this year would require another 4-5ish loss season. Not to put him on a hot seat, but for the rumblings to be more than just a segmented portion of the vocal online fan base
If Patterson graduates without even a trip to Indy, things will get louder. For it to happen this year would require another 4-5ish loss season. Not to put him on a hot seat, but for the rumblings to be more than just a segmented portion of the vocal online fan baseI can only speak for myself, but my impression of Harbaugh and staff has wavered a bit recently. The big recruiting events, summer camps and overseas trips seemed like a big splash at first, but as the losses against top tier competition pile up, those things seem like a distraction and lack of focus.
I just saw the half time score, a bit of a shock to me.I’m a little surprised. Not shocked though. This Michigan team had not been living up to its potential. Especially that defense. For whatever reason they were just on today. They have the talent to be this dominant week in week out.
The Domers looked pretty mundane against Vanderbilt, which is some evidence they are not that good.Notre Dame looked like a different team with Ian Book starting over Wimbush. It's one game and Wake Forrest, so caveats apply, but Book just looks so much better and more natural at the QB position than Wimbush that it ain't even funny.
Of course Vandy often plays one game a year over their heads and almost wins.
Here's a Harbaugh statline for ya:That has to be some kind of efficiency scale record.Wonder if anyone had him CFB Fantasy
Fullback Ben Mason, 6 carries, 6 yards, 3 touchdowns.
There are some emerging players I'm really excited about.Aidan Hutchinson looked more impressive to me than either Kemp or Paye. Paye looked pretty close. Still not all that impressed with Kemp. He's a much better fit inside though then at DE. At DE he basically sucked. At DT he's a solid player- nothing more. Don't want to overreact to him going from sucking at DE to being a solid player at DT.
- When Rashan Gary went out, Kwity Paye maintained nearly the same level on run D (and Kwity *may* have a better pass rush, though that isn't the core of Rashan's game). Would have seemed preposterous in the preseason.
- Carlo Kemp is quietly ascending as a DT the last few games; major luxury with Solomon out and all that Dwumfour hype clearly being *excusively* about him as a pass rusher (he cannot run stuff)
- Will Hart averaged 60 yards on 3 punts and is at 53/p on the season. This was supposed to be a huge weakness. It isn't
The eye test says he was prolly fired for recruitingHe was fired for not being Tom Osbourne*, as was Solich, Billy C (never should have been hired) and BoPeep.
I dunno. Riley recruited fairly OK (according to the rankings anyway). He biffed on OL and DL though, and that's what is killing UNL right now.Riley recruited skill positions impressively but you're right about the trenches. Since I've witnessed both DL and OL hit rock bottom for my team since 2007, I'll say that a DL can realistically get to a championship level in 2-3 years with all the right recruiting and development (thank you Greg Mattison!), but an OL starting from scratch ...
It's very strange to see how little we are missing Black so far. Encouraging. I guess that's all Shea and the 2017 WR hall, which I guess was kinda filthy.That 2017 haul was really filthy. DPJ, Nico Collins, Tarik Black, and Oliver Martin? That's an insane WR class.
I'm just happy Solomon is probably coming back, period. His ceiling is at a whole other level and could cement this defense as 2006/2016ish, though I do worry about the shape he's in after missing so much time.he was FIVE STARZ for a reason. Freakish talent. His HS tape was incredible and he backed it up at the Army Bowl practices/game. That DL looks a lot better with him in that rotation.
Black might be back in November but how effective or restored full go could he be?Last year with a similar injury he missed the rest of the season.Good luck if he can pull it off just not sure it's worth rolling the dice at that point.Because if he goes down again in the same season that's all she wrote for that kids confidence and prolly career.If the severity is the same, then absolutely true. It sounds like it's a similar but less severe injury. Still like the idea of caution unless something extreme happens to the depth chart.
Took a peek at some of the Nebraska boards. Some of the natives are getting a little restless already.which is why Nebraska is where it is... poor leadership at the school and AD has let fans run the program instead of sticking to a plan. Since Solich, UNL has had 4 coaches with 4 very different systems. There is no plan like Barry has at Wisc. And it's shown.
Michael Zordich is an excellent DBs coach. And, like Watson, he largely got a whodat? from fans when Harbaugh hired him.Really? Didn't he play like 15 years in the NFL? I certainly remember him
It's time Nebraska fans accept it and look for small steps rather than "if they run harder and puke more, they can beat OSU". The locals are blinded by the past.This is going to be difficult for the fanbase to accept...primarily because it does not have a realistic view of where the program really is. That's not a situation that is unique to Nebraska, but maybe its worse here than other places, IDK.
tough balance between calling something a transition year and keeping the guys motivated,... mostly upper classmen. I get it.yup, I get it as well. Especially for recruiting.
Your Vikings knocked me out of my survivor pool - big money tooLSU -20 cost me nearly $200
subtracting rushing yards from passing yards is weirdI don't think that's the explanation, is it? I just figured his other 6 completions were forward passes for a net -10 yards.
subtracting rushing yards from passing yards is weirdNo. You know what's weird? Subtracting sacks from rushing yards is weird. Sacks should go against the passing yardage total.
No. You know what's weird? Subtracting sacks from rushing yards is weird. Sacks should go against the passing yardage total.I've always felt that way. It's weird for something that's negative and pass-related to go against the run game instead.
No. You know what's weird? Subtracting sacks from rushing yards is weird. Sacks should go against the passing yardage total.I get it from a logical perspective. The ball wasn't thrown, therefore it wasn't a pass, therefore it was a rush.
ESPN’s Paul Finebaum calls Nebraska the nation’s most disappointing team so far in 2018.that little weasel is nothing but a troll.
no argument
So he's Nebraska's RichRod?
he's trying to radically change offensive and defensive systems. He's trying to play a style of football that most of the guys there weren't recruited to play and aren't very good fits for. It was always going to be a bumpy transition. Especially at the very beginning of the season.
So he's Nebraska's RichRod?**If** RR had been trying to switch Michigan back to Bo, yes.