Rk | LW | ||
1. | Alabama | 0-0 | - |
2. | Clemson | 0-0 | - |
3. | OHIO STATE | 0-0 | - |
4. | Georgia | 0-0 | - |
5. | Oklahoma | 0-0 | - |
6. | Washington | 0-0 | - |
7. | WISCONSIN | 0-0 | - |
8. | Miami | 0-0 | - |
9. | PENN STATE | 0-0 | - |
10. | Auburn | 0-0 | - |
11. | Notre Dame | 0-0 | - |
12. | MICHIGAN STATE | 0-0 | - |
13. | Stanford | 0-0 | - |
14. | MICHIGAN | 0-0 | - |
15. | USC | 0-0 | - |
16. | TCU | 0-0 | - |
17. | Virginia Tech | 0-0 | - |
18. | Mississippi State | 0-0 | - |
19. | Florida State | 0-0 | - |
20. | West Virginia | 0-0 | - |
21. | Texas | 0-0 | - |
22. | Boise State | 0-0 | - |
23. | Central Florida | 0-0 | - |
24. | LSU | 0-0 | - |
25. | Oklahoma State | 0-0 | - |
rough week for pac12.Washington's loss was to Utah, which now announced themselves as a player in the conference race. They have trips to Pullman and Palo Alto the next two weeks. Get through that, and the Utes become a real CFP contender. Oregon, Cal, Arizona and Washington State are all still undefeated too, against meh schedules.
wash, usc, asu and ucla all going down to non-conf foes. putting all hopes on stanford again.
Washington's loss was to Utah, which now announced themselves as a player in the conference race. They have trips to Pullman and Palo Alto the next two weeks. Get through that, and the Utes become a real CFP contender. Oregon, Cal, Arizona and Washington State are all still undefeated too, against meh schedules.doh, i'm an idiot.
Ask LSU how easy it is to play Troy. I could see an emotional win vs Colorado and a let down vs Troy, especially if UNL starts a freshman QBThis Troy isn't nearly as good as last year's version. They lost all of their starting skill positions players, and 6 starters from a defense that carried them, top 20 nationally in S&P+. Somehow nobody hired Neal Brown, but that's about the only thing they have going for them going into 2018. I think Nebraska is still trying to figure out enough stuff that maybe they make some mistakes. But I still think HUskers win.
I also think Michigan will beat UNL, but I think this is the game people begin to see UNL as on the rise (not 2018, but going forward). I expect they'll play wellHere I disagree, new, young offense, going on the road for the first time, against THAT defense? And while Harbaugh's struggles against good teams are well documented, his teams have consistently handled the teams they should. Not just not lose, but not even really be in danger of losing. Somehow Indiana is the exception there, giving him trouble three times, but aside from the Hoosiers.
Ask LSU how easy it is to play Troy. I could see an emotional win vs Colorado and a let down vs Troy, especially if UNL starts a freshman QBSince Transfer QB Noah Vedral won't pursue waiver for immediate eligibility, it could be worse if Frost doesn't start a freshman
This Troy isn't nearly as good as last year's version. They lost all of their starting skill positions players, and 6 starters from a defense that carried them, top 20 nationally in S&P+. Somehow nobody hired Neal Brown, but that's about the only thing they have going for them going into 2018. I think Nebraska is still trying to figure out enough stuff that maybe they make some mistakes. But I still think HUskers win.all good thoughts. Maybe its hope, but young teams like to play to their competition. Maybe it's hope on my part, but I could see a UNL have that up and down season. Young team, new system, new staff... They will look both better and worse than their true team performance level.
My off the cuff pick: Nebraska 31, Troy 23
Here I disagree, new, young offense, going on the road for the first time, against THAT defense? And while Harbaugh's struggles against good teams are well documented, his teams have consistently handled the teams they should. Not just not lose, but not even really be in danger of losing. Somehow Indiana is the exception there, giving him trouble three times, but aside from the Hoosiers.
Michigan 35, Nebraska 15
WEEK 5It is interesting how your projections make this even bigger than it appears presently. With Michigan (ND) and Michigan State (ASU) losing OOC and Wisconsin (IA) losing a conference game, Penn State and Ohio State would be the only two B1G teams to start ranked and still be undefeated heading into the final weekend of September.
Saturday, September 29
ESPN College Gameday, live from State College, PA
#8 PENN STATE 34, #3 OHIO STATE 31
BIG TENObviously Ohio State would lose a two-team tie with PSU based on H2H. Per the B1G website (http://www.bigten.org/sports/m-footbl/archive/081011aaa.html), here is the B1GCG tiebreaking procedure for a multiple team tie:
EAST
- Penn State (2-0) 5-0 (beat IL and tOSU) B1G-W opponents: IL, IA, UW
- Michigan State (2-0) 4-1 (beat IU and NU, lost OOC to ASU) B1G-W opponents: NU, PU, UNL
- Ohio State (2-1) 5-1 (beat RU and IU, lost to PSU) B1G-W opponents: MN, PU, UNL
- Michigan (2-1) 4-2 (beat UNL and UMD, lost to NU, lost OOC to ND) B1G-W opponents: UNL, NU, UW
- Maryland (1-1) 3-2 (beat MN, lost to M, lost OOC to TX) B1G-W opponents: MN, IA, IL
- Indiana (1-2) 4-2 (beat RU, lost to MSU and tOSU) B1G-W opponents: IA, MN, PU
- Rutgers (1-2) 4-2 (beat IL, lost to tOSU and IU) B1G-W opponents: IL, NU, UW
In this hypothetical that makes it nearly impossible for Ohio State to win any tie involving Penn State.Getting "eliminated" form B1G title in September is foreign to this generation of Buckeyes. Guess we have to beat those dern lions in Happy Valley.
Getting "eliminated" form B1G title in September is foreign to this generation of Buckeyes. Guess we have to beat those dern lions in Happy Valley.You inferred this with your use of quotation marks but obviously the Buckeyes would not be mathematically eliminated anywhere near that early in this scenario. The problem is that the Buckeyes would need a lot of things to break exactly their way because they could not win a two-way tie with Penn State and they more than likely couldn't win a three-way tie involving Penn State either.
You inferred this with your use of quotation marks but obviously the Buckeyes would not be mathematically eliminated anywhere near that early in this scenario. The problem is that the Buckeyes would need a lot of things to break exactly their way because they could not win a two-way tie with Penn State and they more than likely couldn't win a three-way tie involving Penn State either.Penn State still has MSU, UM and Wisconsin to play.
that would be one hell of a fun game to go to.
Saturday, October 13
ESPN College Gameday, live from State College, PA
#5 PENN STATE 24, #11 MICHIGAN STATE 23
If Iowa is 9-1, and Northwestern is 7-3 (assuming they beat Rutgers and split Wisconsin and ND) on November 10th, in your would would you have GameDay in Iowa City that day?I don't know, no idea what other games are going on that day
white-out, night gamei went to the bama game in '11, was a white out game. bought last minute single ticket from psu ad and sat in with the white croud. was a fun experience. wasn't long after that the sandusky stuff hit news. i remember the fans and having a great time and being a little in awe of the place, and then it just being overshadowed by all that. felt bad for the fans, who were/are good people.
BIG TENPenn State looks INCREDIBLY good in this scenario. They only have a one-game lead on the Buckeyes and Spartans but with tie-breaking H2H wins over both Ohio State and Michigan State they would have to lose twice to miss the B1GCG.
EAST
- Penn State (4-0) 7-0
- Ohio State (4-1) 7-1
- Michigan State (3-1) 5-2
- Michigan (3-2) 5-3
- Maryland (2-2) 4-3
- Indiana (1-4) 4-4
- Rutgers (1-4) 4-4
BIG TENIn this scenario Iowa would be very close to mathematically clinching.
WEST
- Iowa (5-1) 8-1
- Wisconsin (4-2) 7-2
- Northwestern (3-3) 6-3
- Purdue (3-3) 5-4
- Minnesota (2-4) 4-5
- Nebraska (1-5) 4-5
- Illinois (0-6) 2-7
BIG TENDespite the apparent three-way tie in this scenario, Penn State still holds the inside track. They hold a H2H tiebreaker over the other two 5-1 teams and additionally, the Buckeyes and Spartans have not played yet so at least one of them must necessarily lose again.
EAST
- Ohio State (5-1) 8-1
- Penn State (5-1) 8-1
- Michigan State (5-1) 7-2
- Michigan (4-2) 6-3
- Maryland (3-3) 5-4
- Indiana (1-5) 4-5
- Rutgers (1-5) 4-5
Despite the apparent three-way tie in this scenario, Penn State still holds the inside track. They hold a H2H tiebreaker over the other two 5-1 teams and additionally, the Buckeyes and Spartans have not played yet so at least one of them must necessarily lose again.So is he heading to the previous scenario where Penn State wins the division, but Ohio State goes to the CFP.
Path to B1GCG from this point:
- Ohio State: Win out and have PSU lose at least once.
- Penn State: Controls their own destiny, if they win out they can do no worse than a tie with the tOSU/MSU winner and they win that tie.
- Michigan State: Win out and have PSU lose at least once.
- Michigan: This one is trickier. They would win a tie with PSU but lose a tie with MSU and they haven't played the Buckeyes yet. They would need to win out and they would additionally need PSU and MSU to each lose once more. Furthermore, since they lose a two-way tie with the Spartans, they either need the Spartans to lose twice more or for the three way tiebreaker with MSU and PSU to go their way. FWIW: the three-way tiebreaker probably would break in Michigan's favor because they are the only team in the running to have a non-divisional loss and divisional record is the second tiebreaker (only after H2H...2H).
- Maryland: The Terps would still be in it mathematically but barely. The tOSU/MSU winner will have at least six wins and Maryland could do no better than 6-3 so they would need all kinds of unlikely help just to get into a multiple-team tie at 6-3 and then they would have to hope that the tiebreakers broke their way.
- Indiana and Rutgers would be mathematicaly eliminated.
So is he heading to the previous scenario where Penn State wins the division, but Ohio State goes to the CFP.I think that is extraordinarily unlikely unless Penn State also goes to the CFP. There are some substantial differences as compared to 2016:
WEEK 11This would all but lock up an Iowa/Penn State rematch in the B1GCG:
- #9 PENN STATE d. #15 WISCONSIN
- #18 IOWA d. NORTHWESTERN
just need an upset of Sparty or Herky to get to that 6 win bowl game
WEST
- Iowa (6-1) 9-1
- Wisconsin (4-3) 7-3
- Purdue (4-3) 6-4
- Northwestern (3-4) 6-4
- Nebraska (2-5) 5-5
- Minnesota (2-5) 4-6
- Illinois (0-7) 2-8
USCe undefeated is entertaining as a prediction.I have them in my preseason top 20, but I think their early schedule breaks well. I think the only game they play against another team I have in my top 40 is Georgia at home. Get past that, and it's a pretty cake schedule. They miss Alabama, Auburn, LSU, and Mississippi State as crossover opponents, and get Texas A&M at home. But would I be surprised if they lose at home to Georgia, then go to Lexington and lose on the road there to be out of the race before October 1? Not at all.
I am confused.
- SEC: This one is next because it wouldn't be impossible for Bama to lose and get into the CFP anyway if they finish 12-
This is fun to view. You have me drunk on possibility.While I don't expect Iowa to beat Wisconsin, nor handle that 4-out-of-5 road stretch as well as ELA predicted, the most entertaining part to me has been the polls. Each week, I imagine the outcry from the goober component of the Iowa fanbase:
In this age some of the things that should be an advantage, or no longer.
Some P-5 teams with highly rated senior dominated lineups have players protecting their health for the next level. Iowa does not have a senior dominated lineup. I am not drinking ELA's Kool-Aid. My prediction for the Hawkeyes remains 8-9 wins. And, actually, with four down lineman suspended for Game 1 (from both OL and DL), Game #1, NIU, will be a big challenge. I think Iowa intends to challenge Wisconsin this year; but it remains to be seen how successfully. At least Iowa should develop some depth out of the NIU game.
BIG TENIn the West the Hawkeyes have now clinched an outright B1G-W Championship.
EASTWEST
- Penn State (7-1) 10-1
- Michigan State (7-1) 9-2
- Ohio State (6-2) 9-2
- Michigan (6-2) 8-3
- Maryland (3-5) 5-6
- Indiana (2-6) 5-6
- Rutgers (1-7) 4-7
- Iowa (7-1) 10-1
- Wisconsin (5-3) 8-3
- Northwestern (4-4) 7-4
- Purdue (4-4) 6-5
- Nebraska (2-6) 5-6
- Minnesota (2-6) 4-7
- Illinois (0-8) 2-9
Game | #1 | #2 | #3 | #4 | #5 | #6 | #7 | #8 |
PSU v UMD | PSU | PSU | PSU | PSU | UMD | UMD | UMD | UMD |
MSU v RU | MSU | MSU | RU | RU | MSU | MSU | RU | RU |
M @ tOSU | tOSU | M | tOSU | M | tOSU | M | tOSU | M |
B1G-E Champ | PSU, MSU | PSU, MSU | PSU | PSU | MSU | MSU | PS,MS,OS | PS,MS,M |
B1GCG Rep | PSU | PSU | PSU | PSU | MSU | MSU | PSU | M |
You schedule programs, not teams. Whoever scheduled Texas in 2010 to play in 2015-6 caught a break. Same with Tennessee et al.That's why backing out is an option
Whoever scheduled Michigan State or Washington didn't.
If Michigan finishes 8-4, fans will be riotous. Not that Harbaugh would be on the hot seat, but for the first time most fans would feel he's underachieved. Last year, it made sense. They were bar none the youngest in the nation, predicted to finish 9-3, and then lost their top 2 quarterbacks to injury. In that setting, finishing with 8 wins was painful but made every kind of sense.If you notice, I think I wound up almost universally picking the home team to win where conference top 7 teams played. Considering I had the entire top 7 ranked between #3 and #19 in my countdown, that makes sense. I think Michigan will be quite good, I think I had them #11. But they also play 6 teams I have in my top 19, 4 of which are on the road. Michigan has lost 16 straight games to ranked teams on the road, dating back 12 years, and now they have 4 in the same year. There aren't a ton of teams I would pick to go better than about 9-3 at best against that schedule.
Not this season.
I know. My hidden emphasis was that NU game. No matter its location or the Cats' quality, Harbaugh can't be comfortable if he loses it. And he can be comfortable if he hits 9 wins, with a bowl chance at 10. I guess that is where I see the line being drawn, and I see it as big bold and obvious.I'm quite a bit higher than most on both Iowa and Northwestern. If Northwestern is what the consensus on them is, I agree that's a game Michigan *should* win. I also know MSU will never be OSU to UM, but I do know how much they hate to lose that one. So while MSU eternally has the intangible advantage in that game, I keep waiting for the one UM performance that tells me they are fed up and want to restore some order. That mentality probably lasts one year, but I keep expecting *this* to be that year, and I've yet to see it. Maybe it isn't there.
I still don't know how much we learn in Week 1 if Michigan wins. Obviously, 9-3 would then seem to become the floor. But what if Wimbush is just plain bad (in terms of well roundedness)?No matter how good or bad Notre Dame may be, winning an early season night game in South Bend is a generally a good sign (checks MSU 2016 schedule and slinks back)
I still don't know how much we learn in Week 1 if Michigan wins. Obviously, 9-3 would then seem to become the floor. But what if Wimbush is just plain bad (in terms of well roundedness)?IMHO, we NEVER know how much we learn from not just week 1, but all early season games for several reasons. For one thing, ELA's 2016 example is a great one. MSU was coming off of a 12-2 season with a CFP appearance while ND was coming off of a 10-3 season and that game looked to be HUGE. Looking back on it at the end of the season it was a pretty much meaningless contest between teams that finished 4-8 and 3-9.
ELA.. this is well thought out and nicely done. Had to take a bit of time, so thank you.there are 40 bowl games (41 with the cfp) with 80 teams participating.
All that said... =) ..... side bet on UNL making a bowl game this year? I think they will.
ELA.. this is well thought out and nicely done. Had to take a bit of time, so thank you.Ent,
All that said... =) ..... side bet on UNL making a bowl game this year? I think they will.
ELA.. this is well thought out and nicely done. Had to take a bit of time, so thank you.Eh, I actually agree. I have them at 5-7, which as pointed out below, may already be enough.
All that said... =) ..... side bet on UNL making a bowl game this year? I think they will.
Ent,I assumed we were betting my farm against his
Praying you are correct and ELA is wrong.
I'm siding with you. I'm guessing 6 wins. but, I won't be betting the farm.
I think Neb has the grad rate. They did a couple seasons ago.
i think there is some grad% rate they go by, so that would play a role. but if it weren't, my guess would be neb, lsu, ole miss and arky.
I assumed we were betting my farm against hiscorrect, I'm staying out of it.
so, in the 5th annual alabama invitational cfp, we have:IMO, it would be PSU without much debate. You have 4 P5 undefeated or one loss conference champs. It's where you have the 1 loss non-champ vs. the 2-loss champ that the debate starts.
bama
ou
clemson
and...
uga? psu? taking bets now.
i'll take psu, cause if you don't make your own ccg how can you expect to make the national playoffs? :sign0151:
I think Neb has the grad rate. They did a couple seasons ago.i'm sure they do. i was just saying, imo, based on fanbase/name that i think those teams would be first choice.
IMO, it would be PSU without much debate. You have 4 P5 undefeated or one loss conference champs. It's where you have the 1 loss non-champ vs. the 2-loss champ that the debate starts.i agree. but a 4 spot jump is no easy task. but 2 lost, and only one you'd really jump over is non-champ uga.
i agree. but a 4 spot jump is no easy task. but 2 lost, and only one you'd really jump over is non-champ uga.Yeah, and the committee has said that conference titles are a data point, and a data point they don't consider until actually earned. Meaning PSU being 1st in the Big Ten vs. Georgia being 3rd in the SEC was irrelevant until Penn State actually won the conference, which they now have.
and all jokes aside, that should be the way it is.
there are 40 bowl games (41 with the cfp) with 80 teams participating.I should have said 6 wins. I'm hoping they don't back their way into a bowl.
i counted 76 in ELA list that qualify (.500 or + record).
leaving 4 5-7 teams likely in. guaranteed all will be p5 teams. teams meeting that requirement are:
- cuse
- virginia
- maryland
- indiana
- nebraska
- kentucky
- lsu
- ole miss
- arkansas
i think there is some grad% rate they go by, so that would play a role. but if it weren't, my guess would be neb, lsu, ole miss and arky.
Eh, I actually agree. I have them at 5-7, which as pointed out below, may already be enough.I'd make it 6 wins... I'm not interested in a 5 win bowl back in...
Ent,I think 6 wins personally... ELA has 5. Most likely a ball bounce will decide who is correct. It's just for fun..
Praying you are correct and ELA is wrong.
I'm siding with you. I'm guessing 6 wins. but, I won't be betting the farm.
Yeah, and the committee has said that conference titles are a data point, and a data point they don't consider until actually earned. Meaning PSU being 1st in the Big Ten vs. Georgia being 3rd in the SEC was irrelevant until Penn State actually won the conference, which they now have.I agree with the consensus. I think it is pretty clear from past experience that the committee's choice, at least barring something extraordinary will be:
DECEMBER 15 | ||
NEW MEXICO | Fresno State (11-2) vs. Florida Atlantic (10-3) | |
CURE | Southern Miss (6-6) vs. NM State (6-6) | |
LAS VEGAS | Stanford (8-4) vs. Boise State (12-1) | |
CAMELLIA | Appalachian State (11-2) vs. Ohio (8-4) | |
NEW ORLEANS | Louisiana Tech (7-5) vs. South Alabama (6-6) | |
. | ||
DECEMBER 18 | ||
BOCA RATON | UAB (8-4) vs. Temple (6-6) | |
. | ||
DECEMBER 19 | ||
FRISCO | Houston (6-6) vs. UNLV (6-6) | |
. | ||
DECEMBER 20 | ||
GASPARILLA | Boston College (7-5) vs. SMU (6-6) | |
. | ||
DECEMBER 21 | ||
BAHAMAS | Marshall (8-4) vs. Miami(Ohio) (7-5) | |
POTATO | San Diego State (9-3) vs. Toledo (9-3) | |
. | ||
DECEMBER 22 | ||
BIRMINGHAM | Army (10-2) vs. Tulane (8-5) | |
ARMED FORCES | Iowa State (7-5) vs. Memphis (8-4) | |
DOLLAR GENERAL | Troy (8-4) vs. Buffalo (7-6) | |
HAWAII | North Texas (10-3) vs. Utah State (8-4) | |
. | ||
DECEMBER 26 | ||
FIRST RESPONDER | Middle Tennessee (7-5) vs. Western Michigan (6-6) | |
QUICK LANE | Wake Forest (6-6) vs. Northern Illinois (10-3) | |
CHEEZ-IT | Oregon (8-4) vs. Texas Tech (6-6) | |
. | ||
DECEMBER 27 | ||
INDEPENDENCE | Louisville (7-5) vs. South Florida (10-2) | |
PINSTRIPE | #18 Notre Dame (9-3) vs. California (6-6) | |
SAN FRANCISCO | #24 Washington State (9-3) vs. NORTHWESTERN (8-4) | |
TEXAS | Kansas State (8-4) vs. Arizona State (6-6) | |
. | ||
DECEMBER 28 | ||
MUSIC CITY | #19 WISCONSIN (9-3) vs. LSU (5-7) | |
CAMPING WORLD | #14 Miami (10-2) vs. Texas (8-4) | |
ALAMO | #21 USC (9-3) vs. #23 Oklahoma State (9-3) | |
HOLIDAY | #20 Utah (10-3) vs. MICHIGAN (8-4) | |
. | ||
DECEMBER 29 | ||
BELK | #16 Florida State (9-3) vs. Missouri (7-5) | |
PEACH | #7 Virginia Tech (11-2) vs. #9 OHIO STATE (10-2) | |
ORANGE | #2 Oklahoma (13-0) vs. #3 Clemson (12-1) | |
COTTON | #1 Alabama (13-0) vs. #4 PENN STATE (12-1) | |
ARIZONA | Arkansas State (10-3) vs. Wyoming (7-5) | |
. | ||
DECEMBER 31 | ||
MILITARY | Duke (7-5) vs. Navy (8-5) | |
SUN | #25 Arizona (9-3) vs. Georgia Tech (7-5) | |
LIBERTY | Texas A&M (7-5) vs. West Virginia (6-6) | |
GATOR | #13 NC State (10-2) vs. Florida (8-4) | |
. | ||
JANUARY 1 | ||
OUTBACK | #17 Auburn (9-3) vs. PURDUE (7-5) | |
CITRUS | #12 Mississippi State (10-2) vs. #13 IOWA (11-2) | |
FIESTA | #6 South Carolina (11-2) vs. #10 Central Florida (13-0) | |
ROSE | #8 MICHIGAN STATE (10-2) vs. #11 Washington (11-2) | |
SUGAR | #5 Georgia (11-1) vs. #22 TCU (9-4) | |
. | ||
JANUARY 7 | ||
NATIONAL CHAMPIONSHIP | TBA | |
I'm being 100% selfish here, but I'd rather Purdue end up in the Holiday than the Outback. I can drive there ;-)Yeah, the way it falls here Purdue is almost defaulted to the Outback. The teams they want to avoid are UW, UM, Iowa and Northwestern, the only teams Purdue is competing with for bowl spots. They may go ahead and just burn their 2nd Wisconsin though. I think they'd avoid Michigan in back to back years, particularly, as has been pointed out, a 2nd straight 8-4 season would be seen as a disappointment.
I suppose you're picking them to the Outback over UM because Michigan was already there, and they try to avoid <5 teams in 6 years.
But I think Purdue is still too talent-poor to really line up with most top SEC teams, and having to "play up" a slot because of being selected over UM makes it even worse...
That would be a lousy year for UGA, even if they beat 9-5 TCU in the bowl game. Really lousy, as 12-1 and probably a final ranking of 3. That is kinda funny.I didn't realize how bad until I did my post upthread comparing PSU's and UGA's theoretical SoS in this scenario.
One win over a ranked team assuming Auburn stays ranked.
OOC slate really is bad this year.
DECEMBER 15 | ||
NEW MEXICO | Fresno State d. Florida Atlantic | |
CURE | Southern Miss d. NM State | |
LAS VEGAS | Boise State d. Stanford | |
CAMELLIA | Ohio d. Appalachian State | |
NEW ORLEANS | Louisiana Tech d. South Alabama | |
. | ||
DECEMBER 18 | ||
BOCA RATON | Temple d. UAB | |
. | ||
DECEMBER 19 | ||
FRISCO | Houston d. UNLV | |
. | ||
DECEMBER 20 | ||
GASPARILLA | Boston College d. SMU | |
. | ||
DECEMBER 21 | ||
BAHAMAS | Miami(Ohio) d. Marshall | |
POTATO | San Diego State d. Toledo | |
. | ||
DECEMBER 22 | ||
BIRMINGHAM | Army d. Tulane | |
ARMED FORCES | Iowa State d. Memphis | |
DOLLAR GENERAL | Buffalo d. Troy | |
HAWAII | North Texas d. Utah State | |
. | ||
DECEMBER 26 | ||
FIRST RESPONDER | Middle Tennessee d. Western Michigan | |
QUICK LANE | Wake Forest d. Northern Illinois | |
CHEEZ-IT | Oregon d. Texas Tech | |
. | ||
DECEMBER 27 | ||
INDEPENDENCE | Louisville d. South Florida | |
PINSTRIPE | #18 Notre Dame d. California | |
SAN FRANCISCO | NORTHWESTERN d. #24 Washington State | |
TEXAS | Kansas State d. Arizona State | |
. | ||
DECEMBER 28 | ||
MUSIC CITY | #19 WISCONSIN d. LSU | |
CAMPING WORLD | #14 Miami d. Texas | |
ALAMO | #21 USC d. #23 Oklahoma State | |
HOLIDAY | MICHIGAN d. #20 Utah | |
. | ||
DECEMBER 29 | ||
BELK | #16 Florida State d. Missouri | |
PEACH | #9 OHIO STATE d. #7 Virginia Tech | |
ORANGE | #3 Clemson 38, #2 Oklahoma 23 | |
COTTON | #1 Alabama 31, #4 PENN STATE 24 | |
ARIZONA | Wyoming d. Arkansas State | |
. | ||
DECEMBER 31 | ||
MILITARY | Duke d. Navy | |
SUN | Georgia Tech d. #25 Arizona | |
LIBERTY | Texas A&M d. West Virginia | |
GATOR | #13 NC State d. Florida | |
. | ||
JANUARY 1 | ||
OUTBACK | #17 Auburn d. PURDUE | |
CITRUS | #12 Mississippi State d. #13 IOWA | |
FIESTA | #10 Central Florida d. #6 South Carolina | |
ROSE | #11 Washington d. #8 MICHIGAN STATE | |
SUGAR | #5 Georgia d. #22 TCU | |
. | ||
JANUARY 7 | ||
NATIONAL CHAMPIONSHIP | #1 Alabama (14-0) vs. #3 Clemson (13-1) | |
NATIONAL CHAMPIONSHIP GAMECan I dislike a post?
Monday, January 7
#3 Clemson 27, #1 Alabama 24
NATIONAL CHAMPIONSHIP GAMEPsh, this result was obvious all along...
Monday, January 7
#3 Clemson 27, #1 Alabama 24