CFB51 College Football Fan Community
The Power Five => Big Ten => Topic started by: ELA on July 10, 2018, 08:11:28 AM
-
| SYSTEMIC CHANGES |
| End of TV monopoly |
| Recruiting coverage |
| Early NFL Draft entry |
|
|
| SYSTEM RULE CHANGES |
| Academic ineligibility |
| CFP |
|
|
|
| GAME RULE CHANGES |
| OT |
| Narrower hashmarks |
|
|
|
| GAME PLAY CHANGES |
| Wishbone |
| SEC integration |
|
|
-
Call me crazy, but I actually liked the BCS. And while conference championship games are necessary, I wish they weren't. I wish we could do full (or at least close to) round robins.
-
This is a tough one, IMHO.
The BCS was a major national change to the way we determine NC's so it impacted the whole country. On the other hand, it turned out to be temporary and the CG's impact more teams in a given year because only a few nationally are really in the NC race but a lot more are in their own local conference race each year.
I voted CG's.
-
I despise CCGs, so I voted BCS, which at time I thought was a positive change.
Since then I've changed my mind, the move from regional to national exposure is actually what's driving most of what I'm growing to dislike about the sport, but still, it's better than CCGs, which are stupid and suck.
Smaller conferences with traditional regional rivalries and full roundrobin-- that's where it's at.
-
the BCS wasn't a bad thing
CCGs are
-
Woah, we've got a tie here too?