CFB51 College Football Fan Community

The Power Five => Big Ten => Topic started by: 847badgerfan on June 06, 2022, 04:02:07 PM

Title: D-Day thread
Post by: 847badgerfan on June 06, 2022, 04:02:07 PM
I accidentally nuked it. @medinabuckeye1 (https://www.cfb51.com/index.php?action=profile;u=1547) please revive. Sorry about that.
Title: Re: D-Day thread
Post by: medinabuckeye1 on June 06, 2022, 04:09:34 PM
78 years ago this morning 160,000 American, British, and Canadian soldiers assaulted Hitler's Atlantic Wall. They were ultimately successful but a terrible price was paid. Many of their number never got to be the frail old men that we know today. 

This picture reminds me that in their youth they accomplished amazing things. 
Title: Re: D-Day thread
Post by: FearlessF on June 06, 2022, 04:33:29 PM
A salute to Yogi Berra for his participation in the D-Day invasion at Normandy, France June 6, 1944. #DDay

(https://scontent.ffod1-1.fna.fbcdn.net/v/t39.30808-6/286343195_1807676272767675_575457844461964641_n.png?_nc_cat=1&ccb=1-7&_nc_sid=730e14&_nc_ohc=L7ua16lR7u4AX_2Mhkc&_nc_ht=scontent.ffod1-1.fna&oh=00_AT8ZO3GxRMBwXBtqr0jqTHouQV2Bpc9ni1gnc5o96aXkkg&oe=62A3791E)
Title: Re: D-Day thread
Post by: longhorn320 on June 06, 2022, 05:52:04 PM
A salute to Yogi Berra for his participation in the D-Day invasion at Normandy, France June 6, 1944. #DDay

(https://scontent.ffod1-1.fna.fbcdn.net/v/t39.30808-6/286343195_1807676272767675_575457844461964641_n.png?_nc_cat=1&ccb=1-7&_nc_sid=730e14&_nc_ohc=L7ua16lR7u4AX_2Mhkc&_nc_ht=scontent.ffod1-1.fna&oh=00_AT8ZO3GxRMBwXBtqr0jqTHouQV2Bpc9ni1gnc5o96aXkkg&oe=62A3791E)
as Yogi once said "When you come to a fork in the road take it"
Title: Re: D-Day thread
Post by: FearlessF on June 06, 2022, 06:41:25 PM
Operation Neptune

The U.S. Navy on D-Day, 6 June 1944


https://www.history.navy.mil/browse-by-topic/wars-conflicts-and-operations/world-war-ii/1944/overlord/operation-neptune.html?fbclid=IwAR28sS48MbFp7bBKlChGbNaOGAPRN1ymzVrGDfXn6HcXeETgj_zLb39aa3k (https://www.history.navy.mil/browse-by-topic/wars-conflicts-and-operations/world-war-ii/1944/overlord/operation-neptune.html?fbclid=IwAR28sS48MbFp7bBKlChGbNaOGAPRN1ymzVrGDfXn6HcXeETgj_zLb39aa3k)

I'll take a moment to tip my cap to the heroic sailors who helped insure victory. Most of the history of D-Day focuses on the soldiers--the infantrymen who jumped and waded their way into France--and rightly so. Nonetheless, when the 1st and 29th Infantry Divisions were catching hell on Omaha Beach, Navy Destroyers came within small arms range to put direct fire onto German positions, allowing those men to push forward off the beach. And it was Navy sailors who drove the landing craft that took the Army to the beach--and who were themselves targets and victims of enemy fire.
Title: Re: D-Day thread
Post by: MrNubbz on June 06, 2022, 07:20:50 PM
And it was Navy sailors who drove the landing craft that took the Army to the beach--and who were themselves targets and victims of enemy fire.

 Here's one
https://youtu.be/5Zx3X08saO8
Title: Re: D-Day thread
Post by: medinabuckeye1 on June 06, 2022, 09:20:56 PM
And it was Navy sailors who drove the landing craft that took the Army to the beach--and who were themselves targets and victims of enemy fire.
I used to do some volunteer work with a guy who drove an LST during WWII. LST stood for "Landing Ship Tank" to indicate that it could put tanks ashore. He said, however, that it actually stood for "Large Stationary Target".
Title: Re: D-Day thread
Post by: bayareabadger on June 06, 2022, 09:48:44 PM
On the subject, finally watched Band of Brothers a month ago. 

Really an amazing depiction of the experiences of those heroic folks. 
Title: Re: D-Day thread
Post by: ELA on June 07, 2022, 12:21:37 AM
The opening scene of Saving Private Ryan is still tough to watch.  Probably tougher, for me, than when it first came out, and I was 14, no fully able to grasp the reality ofnit
Title: Re: D-Day thread
Post by: MarqHusker on June 07, 2022, 01:17:20 AM
I know D Day is about as good as any event to point to to illustrate just how traumatic, heroic and horrible life can be (for countless reasons) but I simply cannot imagine the carnage of the Civil War no matter how many books I read, or shows I've seen.
Title: Re: D-Day thread
Post by: 847badgerfan on June 07, 2022, 07:43:06 AM
What those young men did was truly amazing, in so many ways. 

It's hard to even think about the courage, resilience and sacrifice.
Title: Re: D-Day thread
Post by: Brutus Buckeye on June 07, 2022, 08:15:18 AM
Biden couldn't be bothered to mumble a word about it for the second year in a row. 
Title: Re: D-Day thread
Post by: GopherRock on June 07, 2022, 09:10:46 AM
As noted in the other thread, Grandpa GR went ashore in Normandy later in the afternoon on D Day. Sent arty at the Nazis from Normandy to Germany, and came back deaf as a post because of it. Two Bronze Stars. Never told a soul about any of it. We had to look at his DD214 to find this out.

My dad recently gave me a picture of him and the rest of his squad, taken somewhere in the Ardennes in February 1945. It is in a prominent location in my house.
Title: Re: D-Day thread
Post by: 847badgerfan on June 07, 2022, 09:11:35 AM
As noted in the other thread, Grandpa GR went ashore in Normandy later in the afternoon on D Day. Sent arty at the Nazis from Normandy to Germany, and came back deaf as a post because of it. Two Bronze Stars. Never told a soul about any of it. We had to look at his DD214 to find this out.

My dad recently gave me a picture of him and the rest of his squad, taken somewhere in the Ardennes in February 1945. It is in a prominent location in my house.
Please share if you can.
Title: Re: D-Day thread
Post by: MrNubbz on June 07, 2022, 09:37:34 AM
I know D Day is about as good as any event to point to to illustrate just how traumatic, heroic and horrible life can be (for countless reasons) but I simply cannot imagine the carnage of the Civil War no matter how many books I read, or shows I've seen.
Yup,same when reading about Market-Garden and the Netherlands.Because Montgomery had it in his head give me all the supplies I'll go to Berlin.Absolutely picturesque storybrook towns of Arnhem & Nimegen were burnt then leveled.Squads of NAZIs drove all of the livestock and looted everything of worth or use back to the Reich.That winter 20-22,000 Dutch citizens starved .Some paid a horrific price for a terribly long time
Title: Re: D-Day thread
Post by: medinabuckeye1 on June 07, 2022, 12:26:35 PM
I know D Day is about as good as any event to point to to illustrate just how traumatic, heroic and horrible life can be (for countless reasons) but I simply cannot imagine the carnage of the Civil War no matter how many books I read, or shows I've seen.
Agreed.  Two things to point out about that:

First, I once came across a book or maybe website (I don't remember) where they listed the % chance for a wounded soldier to survive IF they reached a field hospital alive.  In modern times (basically Korea -> present) it is almost 100%.  Basically, if a soldier's wounds don't kill him before he reaches a field hospital he'll almost always survive because the medicine/technology/doctors are SO GOOD that they can do amazing things.  Prior to that, wow.  Especially when you get back to the Civil War.  I get the impression that field hospitals may have done more harm than good.  They didn't understand germs, they didn't have antibiotics, they didn't wash medical implements or even their hands in between surgeries, etc.  

Second, the US had more deaths in the Civil War than in WWII.  Actually, the Civil War was so deadly that the US had more deaths in it than in all other wars combined up until fairly recently.  This, however, actually understates how deadly the Civil War was because the population was different.   Compare the Civil War to WWII:

The Civil War "only" saw about 50% more US deaths than the US lost in WWII but in terms of percentage of population the Civil War was nearly seven times as deadly.  
Title: Re: D-Day thread
Post by: medinabuckeye1 on June 07, 2022, 12:43:25 PM
Second, the US had more deaths in the Civil War than in WWII.  Actually, the Civil War was so deadly that the US had more deaths in it than in all other wars combined up until fairly recently.  This, however, actually understates how deadly the Civil War was because the population was different.  Compare the Civil War to WWII:
  • Civil War:  ~655,000 killed, 1860 US Population ~31M.  2% killed. 
  • WWII:  ~405,000 killed, 1940 US Population ~132M.  0.3% killed. 

The Civil War "only" saw about 50% more US deaths than the US lost in WWII but in terms of percentage of population the Civil War was nearly seven times as deadly. 
Please allow me to add some perspective:
There were obviously some female casualties in both the Civil War (Jennie Wade at Gettysburg comes to mind) and in WWII as well but they were so few as to be statistically insignificant.  For example, Jennie Wade was the ONLY woman killed at Gettysburg where the combined Union and Confederate casualties were over 7K dead, 27K wounded (some would later succumb), and 11k missing or captured.  Thus, you can roughly double those percentages to say that in the Civil War and WWII approximately 4% and 0.6% of American Men were killed.  

Beyond that, while there were a few guys my age (over 45) killed in both wars, there weren't many.  Most guys that age are either high ranking enough not to be on the front line or else not in the military at all.  Most of the deaths come from an age-range that probably represents less than half of male population.  Thus, among "combat aged" men the numbers killed were probably about 8% and 1.2% in the Civil War and WWII respectively.  That is something like:

To put that into perspective, I invite you to consider your HS class.  My HS class had ~400 people so ~200 guys.  If that class had graduated in 1860 then, on average, roughly 17 of us would have been killed in the civil War.  If that class had graduated in 1940 then, on average, a little over two of us would have been killed in WWII.  

Title: Re: D-Day thread
Post by: Geolion91 on June 08, 2022, 03:39:44 PM

Second, the US had more deaths in the Civil War than in WWII.  Actually, the Civil War was so deadly that the US had more deaths in it than in all other wars combined up until fairly recently.  This, however, actually understates how deadly the Civil War was because the population was different.  Compare the Civil War to WWII:
  • Civil War:  ~655,000 killed, 1860 US Population ~31M.  2% killed. 
  • WWII:  ~405,000 killed, 1940 US Population ~132M.  0.3% killed. 

The Civil War "only" saw about 50% more US deaths than the US lost in WWII but in terms of percentage of population the Civil War was nearly seven times as deadly. 
Lining up and shooting as a volley will do that, not to mention that charges across an open field were still a fairly common tactic.  I guess it wasn't until WWI that the use of cover and concealment became a normal tactic.

Another factor is that it was Americans on both sides of the conflict, still, eye popping statistics.
Title: Re: D-Day thread
Post by: MrNubbz on June 08, 2022, 03:54:57 PM
  • Civil War:  ~655,000 killed, 1860 US Population ~31M.  2% killed. 
  • WWII:  ~405,000 killed, 1940 US Population ~132M.  0.3% killed. 

The Civil War "only" saw about 50% more US deaths than the US lost in WWII but in terms of percentage of population the Civil War was nearly seven times as deadly. 
Please allow me to add some perspective:
More like - "Please allow me to introduce myself,I'm a man of wealth and taste......"
Title: Re: D-Day thread
Post by: medinabuckeye1 on June 08, 2022, 04:56:32 PM
Lining up and shooting as a volley will do that, not to mention that charges across an open field were still a fairly common tactic.  I guess it wasn't until WWI that the use of cover and concealment became a normal tactic.

Another factor is that it was Americans on both sides of the conflict, still, eye popping statistics.
In your state, when you stand at "The Angle" on the Gettysburg Battlefield and look out across the vast open field between there and where the Confederate lines were located it is amazing that they even tried and absolutely astounding that a few of the Confederates actually got all the way across and penetrated the Union Lines.  Confederate General Lewis Armistead was mortally wounded behind the Union line while trying to turn a Union Cannon to use it against Union troops.  

For the inverse my 2great grandfather was wounded outside of Atlanta and I visited the battlefield where it happened.  I wasn't surprised that he was wounded, I was surprised that he or anybody from his unit actually managed to survive.  At that particular battle the Confederates were dug in atop a mountain with artillery support and the Union Troops charged up the mountain after them.  His unit started out in a tree-line, crossed a large (I'd guess 150-200 yards) open field while being shot at, then ran up the mountain while being shot at.  Then when the charge was unsuccessful the Union commanders' next bright idea was to get some Pennsylvanians who had experience as coal miners and have them dig a tunnel under the mountain top.  The plan was to pack the tunnel with explosives and blow the Confederates off the Mountain.  It didn't happen because the Confederates retreated while the tunnel was being dug because they were in danger of being surrounded.  The fact that the Confederates were in danger of being surrounded illustrates the futility of the entire operation.  If your enemy has a strong fortified position that is nearly impossible to assault and you have the option of simply surrounding them through easier terrain why would you order a frontal assault against such a position?   
Title: Re: D-Day thread
Post by: Cincydawg on June 10, 2022, 08:00:07 AM
I presume that was Kennesaw Mountain.  Sherman had been flanking the entire campaign and Johnston had obliged, but the position on KM was substantial enough to make flanking somewhat difficult and risky.  The attack did result in the Federals gaining a position on the Confederate left that was dangerous to them.

Most Civil War deaths were nonbattle caused.  It is amazing how many survived the crude surgeries performed back then.

I had a friend in college who was big into military history.  We'd stay up all night playing boatd games that simulated various battles, and it got me interested.  One was about D-Day, a pretty decent game really.  The presence of the German 352nd division was unknown to the Allies above Omaha Beach and a real problem for them.  The other troops were mostly static "old men" troops and one Russian battalion behind the lines that did nothing.

The failure to take Caen was regrettable, and predictable really.
Title: Re: D-Day thread
Post by: medinabuckeye1 on June 10, 2022, 03:58:47 PM
I presume that was Kennesaw Mountain.  Sherman had been flanking the entire campaign and Johnston had obliged, but the position on KM was substantial enough to make flanking somewhat difficult and risky.  The attack did result in the Federals gaining a position on the Confederate left that was dangerous to them.
It was Kennesaw Mountain.  I've only read a bit about it but it seems to me that flanking the mountain can't possibly have been more difficult than a frontal assault against dug-in defenders on top of a freaking MOUNTAIN with cannons no less.  As I described upthread, what my 2-great grandfather and his companions were ordered to do was flat-out insane.  It is amazing that any of them survived.  
Title: Re: D-Day thread
Post by: Cincydawg on June 10, 2022, 04:12:27 PM
The issue with Sherman's flanking was that Johnston COULD have attacked north while much of the Union army was to the west.  This was the fear, and in fact Johnston planned to do just that but was thwarted several times for various and sundry.  The KM position was more lengthy than the previous ones.

The attack succeeded strategically, but not tactically.  

Battle of Kennesaw Mountain - New Georgia Encyclopedia (https://www.georgiaencyclopedia.org/articles/history-archaeology/battle-of-kennesaw-mountain/)

It is an interesting place to visit on a clear day.  The mountain is easily visible from downtown Atlanta up a building, it's not far at all.  There are historical markers all around me now and more north around Peachtree Creek, which is a fairly significantly barrier even today.

But I digress.
Title: Re: D-Day thread
Post by: MrNubbz on June 10, 2022, 07:07:56 PM
Crap of all things - we missed the Anniversery of the Battle of Midway - absolutely incredible achievement by all involved . 80 yrs ago June 4-7 1942. SALUTE

https://youtu.be/4qQim09n6mY


https://youtu.be/uZGGn2ZfGZo
Title: Re: D-Day thread
Post by: medinabuckeye1 on June 10, 2022, 07:14:36 PM
Crap of all things - we missed the Anniversery of the Battle of Midway - absolutely incredible achievement by all involved . 80 yrs ago June 4-7 1942. SALUTE

https://youtu.be/4qQim09n6mY


https://youtu.be/uZGGn2ZfGZo
If you want to know a lot more about Midway, I highly recommend Shattered Sword.

https://www.amazon.com/Shattered-Sword-Untold-Battle-Midway/dp/1574889249/ref=asc_df_1574889249/?tag=hyprod-20&linkCode=df0&hvadid=312090128763&hvpos=&hvnetw=g&hvrand=5639377584232327235&hvpone=&hvptwo=&hvqmt=&hvdev=m&hvdvcmdl=&hvlocint=&hvlocphy=9015378&hvtargid=pla-451142347916&psc=1
Title: Re: D-Day thread
Post by: Cincydawg on June 11, 2022, 07:00:16 AM
The role of the Hornet air wing at Midway is often overlooked, for good reason.