CFB51 College Football Fan Community
The Power Five => Big Ten => Topic started by: ELA on September 19, 2020, 10:19:55 AM
-
QB | Nate Stanley | 16-19 |
RB | Akrum Wadley | 13-17 |
RB | LeShun Daniels Jr. | 13-16 |
WR | Marvin McNutt | 07-11 |
WR | | |
TE | | |
T | | |
G | | |
C | | |
G | | |
T | | |
| | . |
DE | | |
DT | Jaleel Johnson | 12-16 |
DT | Mike Daniels | 07-11 |
DE | | |
LB | Josey Jewell | 13-17 |
LB | Christian Kirksey | 10-13 |
LB | Anthony Hitchens | 10-13 |
CB | Desmond King | 13-16 |
CB | Josh Jackson | 14-17 |
S | Micah Hyde | 09-12 |
S | Amani Hooker | 16-18 |
| | . |
K | Mike Meyer | 10-13 |
P | Ron Coluzzi | 12-16 |
-
TS
-
Should probably at least consider Kevontae Martin-Manley. While he was not the most talented wide receiver, he is Iowa’s all-time leader in receptions and played solely in this decade. I would definitely consider him over McCarron. Tevaun Smith and ISM are both more gifted receivers than Martin-Manley, if people wanted to go on talent over career production.
Iowa Receivers in 2010s (except McNutt):
Martin-Manley 174-1799-12
Matt Vandeburg 134-1686-10
Tevaun Smith 102-1500-7
Keenan Davis 112-1470-7
Smith-Marsette 85-1270-10
Riley McCarron 50-584-5
-
TS ;D
-
I would not argue with someone for picking Tevaun Smith, and I am not saying it should be KMM. I am just saying that KMM should have been considered, especially if McCarron is on the list.
-
Iowa throws the ball to people that aren't TEs?
-
It is an absolute joke that KMM was not an.option on this list. There should be revote.
I can barely remember who Riley McCarren is or when he played.
-
It is an absolute joke that KMM was not an.option on this list. There should be revote.
I can barely remember who Riley McCarren is or when he played.
He was never All-Big Ten, not even HM. All of these guys were. That's the standard.
Also, it's tied
-
That just tells me that it was ridiculous that he never made honorable mention All-Big Ten. If that is the standard, then I can accept it as the reason he was left off. In this particular case, I think the standard misses the mark for an all-decade team, as it values individual seasons over careers. Not many cases where an individual who is a school’s career all-time leader in an offensive category cannot get into an all-decade vote.
-
That just tells me that it was ridiculous that he never made honorable mention All-Big Ten. If that is the standard, then I can accept it as the reason he was left off. In this particular case, I think the standard misses the mark for an all-decade team, as it values individual seasons over careers. Not many cases where an individual who is a school’s career all-time leader in an offensive category cannot get into an all-decade vote.
I was wondering why a lot of Purdue players just seemed to show up on ELA's list and I never saw threads to vote... I'm guessing that not enough players from Purdue ever even got onto All-B1G lists at certain positions, even HM, to generate a vote.
It's difficult because you can have a player from a "weaker" school who may be one of the better players for his team that decade, but never reach HM, because there are at least 4 better players at the position that year. Even a position like Safety, where you have 2 on the field for each team, the top 8 players at the position can only [at max] comprise 8 teams. So even if a player should be one of the better players for his team that decade, if he's great at Indiana but not top 8 at his position in any year, he doesn't qualify.
At the same time you're trying to create an all-decade team for Ohio State who has 10+ players per every position on its list because their recruits were better than anyone else's all decade.
-
I'm including HM guys
-
I'm including HM guys
I know. For non-helmet teams, though, that still thins the field.
But I'm not complaining. Nobody cares about the all-decade team for non-helmets anyway.
-
KMMs best year was his sophomore year, when he was 14th in the Big Ten in receiving yards, and had 2 touchdowns.
He was 25th, 25th and 20th in his other three years.
I had to set some sort of criteria, and there are obvious holes. But eh, this isn't the hill I'd die on.