CFB51 College Football Fan Community

The Power Five => Big Ten => Topic started by: ELA on December 28, 2019, 02:43:46 PM

Title: Outback Bowl: #18 Minnesota 31, #12 Auburn 24 Post Game
Post by: ELA on December 28, 2019, 02:43:46 PM
OUTBACK BOWL
#18 Minnesota Golden Gophers (10-2) vs. #12 Auburn Tigers (9-3)
New Years Day @ 1:00 - Tampa, FL - ESPN
While the Citrus Bowl has the helmets, this is the New Years Day afternoon game I'm more excited for, between two teams that I think both want to be there.  Auburn showed last year that they are going to be ready to show up for a second tier bowl, and unlike last year, this Minnesota team can probably give them a fight.  While it technically occurred in 2018, Minnesota launched their 2019 season with a dominating win over Georgia Tech in the Quick Lane Bowl a year ago.  While their early season momentum fell short of a first ever division title, and trip to Indianapolis, they still have a chance to have their winningest season in over a century, and the program's first New Years Day Bowl victory since the 1962 Rose Bowl.  For their part, Gus Malzahn was able to use the Tigers' flat effort against UCF the year before to get their A+ game in the Music City Bowl last year.  And this isn't a team that limped its way into the postseason.  They played 5 top 10 teams, and beat two of them, including a season ending win in the Iron Bowl.  Auburn ranks #10 in SP+, with a rating of 21.8, and can look to this game to launch them into their 2020 campaign, as the Gophers did this year.  With Bo Nix returning as a true sophomore, and division rivals LSU and Alabama both looking to replace their starting quarterbacks, the Tigers look to perhaps be the SEC West favorite next year.  For Minnesota's offense, who can dictate how the passing game plays out?  The Gophers aren't going to pass often, but look to hit big downfield plays when they do.  Auburn's secondary will give you the underneath stuff, but there is probably no secondary in the nation, outside of maybe Clemson, who has more sound tacklers.  Can Tanner Morgan consistently complete the short passes and 3rd down conversions that will be there?  Because as good as Bateman and Johnson are, the downfield targets typically aren't there against the Tigers.  Auburn was 8th nationally in yards per completion allowed.
AUBURN 31, MINNESOTA 23

Title: Re: Outback Bowl: #18 Minnesota (10-2) vs. #12 Auburn (9-3)
Post by: Benthere2 on December 29, 2019, 07:50:47 AM
Nice write up. If you give the gophers the short passes/slants this could be a very interesting game. 
Title: Re: Outback Bowl: #18 Minnesota (10-2) vs. #12 Auburn (9-3)
Post by: Cincydawg on December 29, 2019, 08:46:56 AM
This, to me, is another of the very interesting games afoot.  USC-Iowa was (for me) as well.  I like all these bowl games and ignore all the hype over the playoff.  Yes, it's very important and I watch, but it doesn't need the constant hype when the "lesser" bowl games often are very compelling, like Bama-Michigan as well.

Why don't they hype these games?  Any marginal fan is aware of the playoff situation.
Title: Re: Outback Bowl: #18 Minnesota (10-2) vs. #12 Auburn (9-3)
Post by: Benthere2 on January 01, 2020, 05:35:15 PM
The better team won this game
Title: Re: Outback Bowl: #18 Minnesota (10-2) vs. #12 Auburn (9-3)
Post by: bayareabadger on January 01, 2020, 05:57:08 PM
Good for Minnesota. Lord do I hate them so. 
Title: Re: Outback Bowl: #18 Minnesota (10-2) vs. #12 Auburn (9-3)
Post by: FearlessF on January 01, 2020, 06:46:42 PM
nice win, Gophers!!!


Corngrats
Title: Re: Outback Bowl: #18 Minnesota (10-2) vs. #12 Auburn (9-3)
Post by: CWSooner on January 01, 2020, 07:07:48 PM
Congrats to the Gophers!
Title: Re: Outback Bowl: #18 Minnesota (11-2) vs. #12 Auburn (9-4) Post Game
Post by: 847badgerfan on January 01, 2020, 07:10:11 PM
The better team won this game
You got that right. Dare I say.. Minnie looked like Wisconsin today. Very physical. I loved watching it.


Should have been a 3 score win. Dominant. 
Title: Re: Outback Bowl: #18 Minnesota 31, #12 Auburn 24 Post Game
Post by: Cincydawg on January 01, 2020, 10:47:47 PM
Minnesota looked more like Auburn than Auburn did.  It resembled the OSU win over Alabama.
Title: Re: Outback Bowl: #18 Minnesota 31, #12 Auburn 24 Post Game
Post by: Benthere2 on January 02, 2020, 04:32:54 AM
Against one of the best defenses in the country, Johnson's final stat line reads. 
- 12 catches
- 204 receiving yards
- Two touchdowns
- One Outback Bowl MVP


Title: Re: Outback Bowl: #18 Minnesota 31, #12 Auburn 24 Post Game
Post by: Temp430 on January 02, 2020, 07:13:57 AM
Congrats to the Gophers!  Its a Quality Win with Distinction.
Title: Re: Outback Bowl: #18 Minnesota 31, #12 Auburn 24 Post Game
Post by: Cincydawg on January 02, 2020, 09:35:06 AM
Yeah, I'm still impressed.  They played like they were Wisconsin or something.
Title: Re: Outback Bowl: #18 Minnesota 31, #12 Auburn 24 Post Game
Post by: Entropy on January 02, 2020, 10:24:05 AM
This, to me, is another of the very interesting games afoot.  USC-Iowa was (for me) as well.  I like all these bowl games and ignore all the hype over the playoff.  Yes, it's very important and I watch, but it doesn't need the constant hype when the "lesser" bowl games often are very compelling, like Bama-Michigan as well.

Why don't they hype these games?  Any marginal fan is aware of the playoff situation.

I had a convesation with a CF fan yesterday on ESPN's hype of the playoff at the expense of other bowl games.   We both felt it was odd they were advertising the playoff and giving little ad time to other bowl games.  Makes you wonder if the diminishing the bowl games in hopes of a playoff expansion is a long term play for ESPN.  
Title: Re: Outback Bowl: #18 Minnesota 31, #12 Auburn 24 Post Game
Post by: Entropy on January 02, 2020, 10:28:58 AM
going into the bowl games I would not have guessed Minn would have won this game.  In fact, I would have said Minn keeping it competitive would have been a surprise.   What the game highlighted 2 things to me.  First, Minn's D was underappreciated by me all season.  I felt they were good based upon the style of teams they played rather than being that dominant.   They had toughness and enough speed to keep Auburn in check.   That D coordinator change they made last year really worked out.   Secondly, the mid tier Big10 teams closed the gap on the SEC mid tier teams (think of 3 tiers when reading this..).  I'm not just taking this one game as an example, but the last couple of years and games like Iowa vs USC.  The middle of the conference has improved on a nationally competitve level.   Credit to the BIG for their football investment over the past few years.

Title: Re: Outback Bowl: #18 Minnesota 31, #12 Auburn 24 Post Game
Post by: Cincydawg on January 02, 2020, 11:31:16 AM
Makes you wonder if the diminishing the bowl games in hopes of a playoff expansion is a long term play for ESPN. 
Huh, interesting theory, not bad.  I also got the notion they paid relatively little attention to even NY6 bowl games, and almost none to the lesser bowls, some of which were quite compelling stories.
Title: Re: Outback Bowl: #18 Minnesota 31, #12 Auburn 24 Post Game
Post by: Benthere2 on January 02, 2020, 04:53:56 PM
and I really think ESPN did a horrible job at televising not only our game but several other games.  SEC biased announcers are common but lack of replay coverage and just a horrible experience for those outside of the CB-series
Title: Re: Outback Bowl: #18 Minnesota 31, #12 Auburn 24 Post Game
Post by: Entropy on January 02, 2020, 05:02:22 PM
speaking of ESPN, was it me or were several of the ESPN games not in HDTV this year?  felt like the feed quality was down.
Title: Re: Outback Bowl: #18 Minnesota 31, #12 Auburn 24 Post Game
Post by: Cincydawg on January 02, 2020, 05:56:54 PM
I wasn't seeing quality issues with the video.  They had a few audio glitches.

I think ESPN announcers are all entirely shills for the Big Ten and say nothing but negative stuff about SEC teams.
Title: Re: Outback Bowl: #18 Minnesota 31, #12 Auburn 24 Post Game
Post by: FearlessF on January 02, 2020, 09:08:57 PM
speaking of ESPN, was it me or were several of the ESPN games not in HDTV this year?  felt like the feed quality was down.
probably all in HD, just turned down the bit rate somewhere along the network to save bandwidth
Title: Re: Outback Bowl: #18 Minnesota 31, #12 Auburn 24 Post Game
Post by: ELA on January 03, 2020, 08:38:49 AM
speaking of ESPN, was it me or were several of the ESPN games not in HDTV this year?  felt like the feed quality was down.
Yeah, they were certainly all in HD, maybe just not quite the same bit rate.  Turn to a non HD channel at some point to remember how truly bad it is.
Title: Re: Outback Bowl: #18 Minnesota 31, #12 Auburn 24 Post Game
Post by: RestingB!tchFace on January 03, 2020, 01:37:08 PM
I wasn't seeing quality issues with the video.  They had a few audio glitches.

I think ESPN announcers are all entirely shills for the Big Ten and say nothing but negative stuff about SEC teams.

Huh?  You've got that completely backwards.  ESPN trips over themselves trying to talk up the SEC every moment they can.
Title: Re: Outback Bowl: #18 Minnesota 31, #12 Auburn 24 Post Game
Post by: Cincydawg on January 03, 2020, 01:39:37 PM
When a person says "I think ....", whatever follows is generally an opinion.  One can of course disagree with another's opinion, but it remains his opinion.

ESPN clearly favors the Big Ten in every way nearly all the time and constantly belittles the SEC, in my opinion.




















In basketball anyway.
Title: Re: Outback Bowl: #18 Minnesota 31, #12 Auburn 24 Post Game
Post by: Entropy on January 03, 2020, 01:46:34 PM
When a person says "I think ....", whatever follows is generally an opinion.  One can of course disagree with another's opinion, but it remains his opinion.

ESPN clearly favors the Big Ten in every way nearly all the time and constantly belittles the SEC, in my opinion.




















In basketball anyway.
Am I being punked right now?
Title: Re: Outback Bowl: #18 Minnesota 31, #12 Auburn 24 Post Game
Post by: CWSooner on January 03, 2020, 02:08:41 PM
Am I being punked right now?
I think you are.  In my opinion.
Title: Re: Outback Bowl: #18 Minnesota 31, #12 Auburn 24 Post Game
Post by: utee94 on January 03, 2020, 02:10:09 PM
Ha!

Always read the fine print.
Title: Re: Outback Bowl: #18 Minnesota 31, #12 Auburn 24 Post Game
Post by: RestingB!tchFace on January 03, 2020, 02:14:01 PM
Am I being punked right now?

I don't think Cincy is being serious.  I suppose in basketball....the Big Ten gets more love.  But as far as football goes....the SEC is basically the only thing that matters to ESPN.
Title: Re: Outback Bowl: #18 Minnesota 31, #12 Auburn 24 Post Game
Post by: Entropy on January 03, 2020, 02:18:46 PM
I did not highlight the fine print....   :96:
Title: Re: Outback Bowl: #18 Minnesota 31, #12 Auburn 24 Post Game
Post by: Cincydawg on January 03, 2020, 02:25:48 PM
I do think some of this is that folks can be uptrasensitive (sensative) about a comment here or there and not recall the other favorable comments made at different times.

It's akin to see the bad call that went against your team and basically overlooking the bad call in favor of your team.  Anyway, I have learned not to listen to ESPN in general so I'm no expert on what they say.  I doubt it has any impact on outcomes.  You might argue it could on polls.
Title: Re: Outback Bowl: #18 Minnesota 31, #12 Auburn 24 Post Game
Post by: FearlessF on January 03, 2020, 02:45:10 PM
is akin a southerner's way of pronouncing and or typing aching?