CFB51 College Football Fan Community

The Power Five => Big Ten => Topic started by: medinabuckeye1 on December 10, 2019, 03:14:03 PM

Title: B1G Championships
Post by: medinabuckeye1 on December 10, 2019, 03:14:03 PM
There have now been nine B1GCG's.  Wisconsin leads in appearances with six while Ohio State leads in wins with four.  Those two teams are also the only two teams to have played each other more than once in the B1GCG.  
Appearances:
(https://i.imgur.com/SQSfac2.png)
Wins:
(https://i.imgur.com/yzgOFtH.png)
Match-ups:
(https://i.imgur.com/Fh9xoxK.png)

The existence of the B1GCG should change the way we view league titles.  Prior to the B1GCG there were 114 seasons of football played by this league but there were 167 Champions.  That works out to an average of 1.46 per year because when two teams tied they were just both declared co-champions.  

Total B1G Championships:


Michigan has held the lead in B1G Championships since they moved into a tie with Minnesota at 16 each following Michigan's 1943 title (shared with Purdue) and they have held the lead alone since they broke the tie with Minnesota by winning an outright title in 1947.  

History of the lead in B1G Championships:


Michigan's lead in league titles grew to as many as 13 when the won their last, in 2004 (42-29 over tOSU).  It is now down to four (42-38 over tOSU) and has not been that small since prior to the 1971 season when they led 22-18 over Minnesota.  
Title: Re: B1G Championships
Post by: Cincydawg on December 10, 2019, 03:50:25 PM
The league has become one Teamensional.
Title: Re: B1G Championships
Post by: Brutus Buckeye on December 10, 2019, 04:24:02 PM
Asterisks.
Title: Re: B1G Championships
Post by: ELA on December 10, 2019, 04:36:15 PM
For comparative purposes, what happens to the number of championships if you use tiebreakers to narrow it down to just one per year for all of the pre championship game years?
Title: Re: B1G Championships
Post by: medinabuckeye1 on December 10, 2019, 05:10:36 PM
For comparative purposes, what happens to the number of championships if you use tiebreakers to narrow it down to just one per year for all of the pre championship game years?
First, that would be an enormous project because there were 53 more champions than years from 1896-2010.  

Second, in a lot of the early cases and at least some modern ones it would be REALLY difficult to break the ties because the teams didn't play each other.  

Third, at some point in the past ties switched from being treated as non-events to being treated as 1/2 of a win and 1/2 of a loss.  Ie, in recent pre-OT ties a team that finished 6-0-2 would be tied with a team that finished 7-1 but in the old days the 6-0-2 team would be the winner based on what would effectively be viewed as a 6-0 record.  I know they changed that at some point but I don't know exactly when.  

Examples:
The first co-championship was in 1900 between Iowa and Minnesota:
The last co-championship was in 2010 between Wisconsin and Michigan State:
The most recent occurrence of this that I know of was tOSU and Iowa not playing each other and finishing tied in 2002:

Title: Re: B1G Championships
Post by: ELA on December 10, 2019, 05:30:36 PM
Well, what else do you have going on?  :)
Title: Re: B1G Championships
Post by: ELA on December 10, 2019, 05:31:45 PM
Another thing is expansion.  Forever there were 10 teams, with a two decade period of nine.  Mix in co-championships, and years where 1/3 of the league won title was probably not incredibly rare.
Title: Re: B1G Championships
Post by: Cincydawg on December 10, 2019, 05:42:34 PM
Anybody have information on the last year each B1G team won at least ten games?  Obviously several did this year.  Rutger would not have managed it in the B1G, nor UMD.
Title: Re: B1G Championships
Post by: Brutus Buckeye on December 10, 2019, 05:57:06 PM
For comparative purposes, what happens to the number of championships if you use tiebreakers to narrow it down to just one per year for all of the pre championship game years?

O0

For the record...

It wasn't me this time, Medina.
Title: Re: B1G Championships
Post by: 847badgerfan on December 10, 2019, 06:13:54 PM
Anybody have information on the last year each B1G team won at least ten games?  Obviously several did this year.  Rutger would not have managed it in the B1G, nor UMD.
Illinois 2001
Indiana N/A
Iowa 2015
Michigan 2018
MSU 2017
Minnie 2019
Nebraska 2012
NU 2017
OSU 2019
Penn State 2019
Purdue N/A
Wisconsin 2019

Title: Re: B1G Championships
Post by: medinabuckeye1 on December 10, 2019, 06:16:02 PM
Another thing is expansion.  Forever there were 10 teams, with a two decade period of nine.  Mix in co-championships, and years where 1/3 of the league won title was probably not incredibly rare.
Just FYI, the largest number of co-champions was four in 1990 when Michigan, Illinois, Iowa, and Michigan State all shared the league title.  They all went 6-2:


There were also a slew of occasions when three teams shared the title.  
Title: Re: B1G Championships
Post by: Cincydawg on December 10, 2019, 06:19:07 PM
Indiana and Purdue have never won ten games?  Huh.
Title: Re: B1G Championships
Post by: OrangeAfroMan on December 10, 2019, 06:23:21 PM
I'd advocate for going back to determine the tiebreaker h2h champions, while accepting the true co-champ years (a la 2002) up to the point this wasn't possible.  Or if you go back far enough to where you had the 2002 situation every year for a long run of seasons.

It could just be an era acknowledged as true champions.  In creating teams from the past for Whoa Nellie, I'm just putting co-champions...but it's bothersome.  And I can't just go by who went to the Rose Bowl, thanks to the stupid no-repeat policy.  
Title: Re: B1G Championships
Post by: OrangeAfroMan on December 10, 2019, 06:23:42 PM
Indiana and Purdue have never won ten games?  Huh.
When your best years were back when seasons were 10 games......
Title: Re: B1G Championships
Post by: Brutus Buckeye on December 10, 2019, 06:37:22 PM
When OSU joined the Big Ten, they were required to cut their schedule back to 7 games per season, only 3 of which were conference games. It was a Big Ten rule, apparently. They also had to agree to quit playing Michigan unless/until they rejoined the Big Ten.