CFB51 College Football Fan Community
The Power Four => Big Ten => Topic started by: medinabuckeye1 on October 21, 2025, 12:33:24 PM
-
I'm going to limit this to the teams with one loss or less for several reasons. First, I think it is relatively unlikely that a 2-loss team is going to make the CG. Second, brevity.
Obviously the Buckeyes and Hoosiers control the race. If they keep winning that ends the discussion. Here are their remaining schedules:
Ohio State:
- off on 10/25
- vs 0-4 Penn State on 11/1
- at 0-4 Purdue on 11/8
- vs 3-1 UCLA on 11/15
- vs 0-4 Rutgers on 11/22
- at 3-1 #25 Michigan on 11/29
Indiana:
- vs 3-1 UCLA on 10/25
- at 1-3 Maryland on 11/1
- at 0-4 Penn State on 11/8
- vs 0-4 Wisconsin on 11/15
- off on 11/22
- at 0-4 Purdue on 11/28
Then we get to the 1-loss teams:
3-1 USC (lost to Illinois), opp win % .528:
- off on 10/25
- at 2-2 Nebraska on 11/1
- vs 3-1 NU on 11/7
- vs 3-1 Iowa on 11/15
- at #6 3-1 Oregon on 11/22
- vs 3-1 UCLA on 11/29
3-1 Northwestern (lost to Oregon), opp win % .528:
- at 2-2 Nebraska on 10/25
- off on 11/1
- at 3-1 USC on 11/7
- vs #25 3-1 M on 11/15
- vs 3-1 MN on 11/22
- at #23 2-2 Illinois on 11/29
3-1 UCLA (lost to NU) opp win% .528:
- at #2 4-0 IU on 10/25
- off on 11/1
- vs 2-2 Nebraska on 11/8
- at #1 4-0 tOSU on 11/15
- vs 2-2 UDub on 11/22
- at 3-1 USC on 11/29
#6 3-1 Oregon (lost to IU), opp win% .500:
- vs UW on 10/25
- off on 11/1
- at 3-1 Iowa on 11/8
- vs 3-1 Minnesota on 11/14
- vs 3-1 USC on 11/22
- at 2-2 UDub on 11/29
#25 3-1 Michigan (lost to USC), opp win% .417:
- at 0-4 MSU on 10/25
- vs 0-4 Purdue on 11/1
- off on 11/8
- at 3-1 Northwestern on 11/15
- at 1-3 Maryland on 11/22
- vs 4-0 #1 Ohio State on 11/29
3-1 Iowa (lost to IU), opp win % .417:
- vs 3-1 Minnesota on 10/25
- off on 11/1
- vs #6 3-1 Oregon on 11/18
- at 3-1 USC on 11/15
- vs 0-4 MSU on 11/22
- at 2-2 Nebraska on 11/28
3-1 Minnesota (lost to tOSU) opp win% .417
- at 3-1 Iowa on 10/25
- vs 0-4 MSU on 11/1
- off on 11/8
- at #6 3-1 Oregon on 11/14
- at 3-1 NU on 11/22
- vs 0-4 UW on 11/29
For now there are really too many moving parts to get any more detailed than that but you can see the games that shape the race. There is a pretty good chance that NU (@UNL) and UCLA (@IU) fall off of this list this weekend. Also the IA/MN loser will fall off the list as well so it should be a lot more digestible next week.
-
If had to guess final Big Ten records
Ohio St 9-0
Ind 9-0
Oregon 7-2
Mich 7-2
USC 6-3
Iowa 6-3
ILL 6-3
Wash 5-4
UCLA 5-4
Minn 5-4
Neb 5-4
NW 4-5
PSU 3-6
MD 2-7
Pur 1-8
Rut 1-8
MSU 0-9
Wisc 0-9
-
Technically nobody is mathematically eliminated yet, right?
-
Technically nobody is mathematically eliminated yet, right?
Correct, but I believe with the current setup, any team with 5 or more losses would be eliminated. I believe any team with 5 losses would have no mathematical chance to make the CCG. Its different from the old days with divisions where it was possible to win a division with a 4-5 record.
So Wisc, MSU, PSU, Purdue and Rutgers will all be eliminated once they each lose their next game.
-
Michigan has such an easy schedule this season. They are not really a 7-2 in the conference record team, but they are with their schedule.
-
Correct, but I believe with the current setup, any team with 5 or more losses would be eliminated. I believe any team with 5 losses would have no mathematical chance to make the CCG. Its different from the old days with divisions where it was possible to win a division with a 4-5 record.
So Wisc, MSU, PSU, Purdue and Rutgers will all be eliminated once they each lose their next game.
Eh . . .
Ppossibly but if you actually traced it out it probably isn't possible for all the 4-0 and 3-1 teams to end up 5-4 because a lot of them play each other and each time that happens one of them has to win.
I'm not tracing it out because everyone knows it won't happen anyway.
-
Michigan has such an easy schedule this season. They are not really a 7-2 in the conference record team, but they are with their schedule.
It isn't just Michigan. This is the reality of only playing about half of the other teams in the conference. The gap between the toughest and the easiest schedules is significant. Indiana last year is a great example.
-
This season, Wisconsin and Iowa are on the extremely difficult side. As for Ohio State, if you are #1,the toughest schedule might make a b-b mark shot into the record if it does.
-
Eh . . .
Ppossibly but if you actually traced it out it probably isn't possible for all the 4-0 and 3-1 teams to end up 5-4 because a lot of them play each other and each time that happens one of them has to win.
I'm not tracing it out because everyone knows it won't happen anyway.
Yeah, I agree its not worth it to map it all out, but still blows my mind to think about everything that would need to happen for Wisconsin to win the Big Ten.
Wisconsin would need to win its 5 final games, which includes games against Oregon and Indiana.
Wisconsin would have to finish in a tie for at least 2nd place at 5-4, and then win that tiebreaker.
Then Wisconsin would have to win the BigTen CCG.
Odds of it happening would have to be astronomical.
-
Yeah, I agree its not worth it to map it all out, but still blows my mind to think about everything that would need to happen for Wisconsin to win the Big Ten.
Wisconsin would need to win its 5 final games, which includes games against Oregon and Indiana.
Wisconsin would have to finish in a tie for at least 2nd place at 5-4, and then win that tiebreaker.
Then Wisconsin would have to win the BigTen CCG.
Odds of it happening would have to be astronomical.
I'll do a little bit of the math:
There are 18 teams and they each play 9 games so there are 162 results (9*18). There are actually only 81 games (162/2) because each game is a result twice, once for each team. Each game produces a winner and a loser so there will be 81 wins and 81 losses.
In theory nine teams could go 5-4 while the other nine went 4-5. The math there works ([5+4]*9=81). It is a little easier, however, if one team goes 9-0 thus absorbing more of the wins and leaving more losses for all the others.
In this case Wisconsin would have to beat Indiana to get to 5-4 so assume that Ohio State (the only other undefeated) goes 9-0. Then we'll let IU finish 5-4 and we already stipulated that Wisconsin wins out to finish 5-4 so that gives us:
- 9-0 Ohio State
- 5-4 Indiana
- 5-4 Wisconsin
In total, 19 wins and 8 losses are accounted for leaving 62 wins and 73 losses for the other 15 teams. The easiest way is for two of them to go 5-4 while the rest go 4-5 which gives us:
- 9-0 Ohio State
- 5-4 Indiana, Wisconsin, and two other teams for a total of 20 wins and 16 losses.
- 4-5 the other 13 teams for a total of 52 wins and 65 losses.
That adds up to:
- 9 wins by tOSU
- 20 wins by the four teams that go 5-4 (5*4)
- 52 wins by the 13 teams that go 4-5 (4*13)
- 81 wins
- 0 losses by tOSU
- 16 losses by the four teams that go 5-4 (4*4)
- 65 losses by the 13 teams that go 4-5 (5*13)
- 81 losses
So Wisconsin would need to win a 4-way tie.
-
What about a Penn State-Wisconsin final?
-
What about a Penn State-Wisconsin final?
You just love doing this . . .
I *think* that one is mathematically impossible. They each already have four losses so they would each have to win out to get to 5-4. Ohio State and Indiana each already have four wins so they each would have to win no more than one game to finish 5-4 or worse.
Since this requires two 5-4 teams we can't absorb a bunch of wins by having one team go 9-0 so we are stuck with:
- nine 5-4 teams and nine 4-5 teams or
- 10 5-4 teams, eight 4-5 teams, and one 3-6 team, etc.
In any case there would have to be AT LEAST a nine-way tie for first at 5-4 and so many of the 3-1 and 4-0 teams play each other that I doubt it would be even mathematically possible because they can't both lose those games.