CFB51 College Football Fan Community

The Power Five => Big Ten => Topic started by: Temp430 on September 16, 2024, 07:01:40 AM

Title: #11 USC (2-1, 0-1) at #18 Michigan (3-1, 1-0) Postgame
Post by: Temp430 on September 16, 2024, 07:01:40 AM
The game in Ann Arbor can be found on CBS at 3:30 PM EST.  Michigan opened at -10.5 in the distant past and the line has since moved to Michigan +6.  Michigan pulled QB Warren after this third INT on Saturday and put Orji in who did Ok.  Remains to be seen who will start for Michigan vs. the Trojans.  I don't think Michigan has a spread offense which kind of neuters Orji's potential.  Thinking this will be nearly as ugly as the Texas game.
Title: Re: #11 USC (2-0, 0-0) at #18 Michigan (2-1, 0-0) Game Week
Post by: Mdot21 on September 16, 2024, 09:41:38 AM
The game in Ann Arbor can be found on CBS at 3:30 PM EST.  Michigan opened at -10.5 in the distant past and the line has since moved to Michigan +6.  Michigan pulled QB Warren after this third INT on Saturday and put Orji in who did Ok.  Remains to be seen who will start for Michigan vs. the Trojans.  I don't think Michigan has a spread offense which kind of neuters Orji's potential.  Thinking this will be nearly as ugly as the Texas game.
I have no clue what to think. 

If they start Orji and Mullings however they may just be able to run the ball a shit ton and pull out a W at home. 
Title: Re: #11 USC (2-0, 0-0) at #18 Michigan (2-1, 0-0) Game Week
Post by: Mdot21 on September 16, 2024, 01:24:54 PM
tale as old as time. teams that take care of the football and stay disciplined and don't commit a ton of penalties usually are the most successful teams. teams that don't turn the ball over and don't commit a lot of penalties usually win a lot of games. teams that don't do either of those things....

https://twitter.com/bluebyninety/status/1835478151331234234
Title: Re: #11 USC (2-0, 0-0) at #18 Michigan (2-1, 0-0) Game Week
Post by: ELA on September 16, 2024, 01:26:06 PM
Orji named starter
Title: Re: #11 USC (2-0, 0-0) at #18 Michigan (2-1, 0-0) Game Week
Post by: Mdot21 on September 16, 2024, 01:26:54 PM
Orji named starter
Sherrone Moore had no other choice. His team and his fan base would've had a revolt if he kept Davis Warren as the starter.
Title: Re: #11 USC (2-0, 0-0) at #18 Michigan (2-1, 0-0) Game Week
Post by: ELA on September 16, 2024, 01:29:00 PM
Michigan 27, USC 20
Title: Re: #11 USC (2-0, 0-0) at #18 Michigan (2-1, 0-0) Game Week
Post by: Temp430 on September 16, 2024, 01:29:24 PM
The Orji era has begun.  Let's hope it's longer than the Warren era.

https://athlonsports.com/college/wolverine-digest/michigan-football-news-qb-alex-orji-to-start-against-usc-glb3 (https://athlonsports.com/college/wolverine-digest/michigan-football-news-qb-alex-orji-to-start-against-usc-glb3)


Now make Mullings the starting RB and put Edwards in the slot every now and then and they may have something,
Title: Re: #11 USC (2-0, 0-0) at #18 Michigan (2-1, 0-0) Game Week
Post by: ELA on September 16, 2024, 01:30:08 PM
The Orji era has begun.  Let's hope it's longer than the Warren era.
Nobody has fun at a quick Orji
Title: Re: #11 USC (2-0, 0-0) at #18 Michigan (2-1, 0-0) Game Week
Post by: Mdot21 on September 16, 2024, 01:33:28 PM
Nobody has fun at a quick Orji
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eKrN4vNsBzA
Title: Re: #11 USC (2-0, 0-0) at #18 Michigan (2-1, 0-0) Game Week
Post by: FearlessF on September 16, 2024, 02:38:58 PM
The Orji era has begun.  Let's hope it's longer than the Warren era.

https://athlonsports.com/college/wolverine-digest/michigan-football-news-qb-alex-orji-to-start-against-usc-glb3 (https://athlonsports.com/college/wolverine-digest/michigan-football-news-qb-alex-orji-to-start-against-usc-glb3)


Now make Mullings the starting RB and put Edwards in the slot every now and then and they may have something,
with last season's O-Line, maybe
gonna have to toss more than 4 passes vs solid defenses
Title: Re: #11 USC (2-0, 0-0) at #18 Michigan (2-1, 0-0) Game Week
Post by: SuperMario on September 16, 2024, 02:53:58 PM
with last season's O-Line, maybe
gonna have to toss more than 4 passes vs solid defenses
This is exactly why I was so irked they didn’t give him meaningful play time when the Texas game was clearly over. How could every other human with a pulse see it except the coaching staff?
Title: Re: #11 USC (2-0, 0-0) at #18 Michigan (2-1, 0-0) Game Week
Post by: medinabuckeye1 on September 16, 2024, 10:43:53 PM
How could every other human with a pulse see it except the coaching staff?
To be fair to the current Michigan coaching staff, they lost their eyes.
(https://i.imgur.com/rHHFWKG.png)
Title: Re: #11 USC (2-0, 0-0) at #18 Michigan (2-1, 0-0) Game Week
Post by: SuperMario on September 17, 2024, 12:40:43 AM
To be fair to the current Michigan coaching staff, they lost their eyes.
(https://i.imgur.com/rHHFWKG.png)
When are you going to be done with it? 7 -olinemen drafted. Qb goes #9. Star rb. Star receiver drafted. Head coach and most of the important assistants go.

yet here you go. I’m sure you blame Stallions on the OSU loss, even though the program had a massive microscope at that point and you take every chance to bring it up and say asterisk. The take is weak. Your opinion on it is weak. You’ll be the first to say it’s only gold pants, tattoos and Bobby D was only giving players cash envelopes of small values at charity events for their “costs”. The hypocrisy is hilarious, sad and frankly getting annoying.
Title: Re: #11 USC (2-0, 0-0) at #18 Michigan (2-1, 0-0) Game Week
Post by: Temp430 on September 17, 2024, 07:00:44 AM
with last season's O-Line, maybe
gonna have to toss more than 4 passes vs solid defenses
Plenty of time left to iron out the issues before late November.  Until then Michigan's offense is going to be painful to watch.
Title: Re: #11 USC (2-0, 0-0) at #18 Michigan (2-1, 0-0) Game Week
Post by: Temp430 on September 17, 2024, 07:19:43 AM
Maybe Mullings will get the start?  


<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Highest Graded Week 3 Running Backs💨 <a href="https://t.co/ucixZ51mWm">pic.twitter.com/ucixZ51mWm</a></p>&mdash; PFF College (@PFF_College) <a href="https://twitter.com/PFF_College/status/1835757293947752667?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">September 16, 2024</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
Title: Re: #11 USC (2-0, 0-0) at #18 Michigan (2-1, 0-0) Game Week
Post by: FearlessF on September 17, 2024, 08:30:59 AM
big ten is strong in RB
Title: Re: #11 USC (2-0, 0-0) at #18 Michigan (2-1, 0-0) Game Week
Post by: FearlessF on September 17, 2024, 08:36:42 AM
Plenty of time left to iron out the issues before late November.  Until then Michigan's offense is going to be painful to watch.
so, the defense is gonna carry the wins over USC and Oregon until then?
Or, "the Game" is all that matters?
Title: Re: #11 USC (2-0, 0-0) at #18 Michigan (2-1, 0-0) Game Week
Post by: medinabuckeye1 on September 17, 2024, 11:25:47 AM
When are you going to be done with it? 7 -olinemen drafted. Qb goes #9. Star rb. Star receiver drafted. Head coach and most of the important assistants go.

yet here you go. I’m sure you blame Stallions on the OSU loss, even though the program had a massive microscope at that point and you take every chance to bring it up and say asterisk. The take is weak. Your opinion on it is weak. You’ll be the first to say it’s only gold pants, tattoos and Bobby D was only giving players cash envelopes of small values at charity events for their “costs”. The hypocrisy is hilarious, sad and frankly getting annoying.
First, as discussed previously, "somebody else cheated too" still isn't a defense no matter how many times you allege it.  

Second, your effort at equivalence is pathetic on multiple levels.  

Ohio State fired a NC winning coach for failing to disclose one email because Ohio State had the self respect to understand that their institutional dignity was more important that winning a few games.  The trash institution that you cheer for just signed a contract with a HC who actively obstructed an ongoing NCAA investigation.  

Further, all of your allegations fit the pattern of the usual NCAA violations in which a booster and a kid broke the rules.  The worst example I can think of is the Cam Newton situation.  We typically all say "Auburn paid Cam Newton" or "Auburn cheated" but that isn't technically true (at least to my knowledge).  What happened, AFAIK, is that Auburn boosters paid Cam Newton's dad's church.  Note that the institution itself wasn't actually involved in the cheating.  

The Michigan situation is completely different.  Employees of the institution cheated.  That is not some wild-eyed rival fan's take like the allegations you are throwing out, it is facts that are basically undisputed.  The institution itself was involved and complicit and then failed to take reasonable actions to rectify the situation.  

The institution you choose to cheer for abandoned their last thread of dignity when they signed a contract with a guy who had obstructed an ongoing NCAA investigation.  

I want to say something here to answer a criticism that I assume you'll make:
As a rival fan, looking at Michigan under Sherrone Moore, I'm not impressed.  I said in the power rankings thread that the team currently looks like less than the sum of it's parts.  From what I've seen so far, I have NO anti-Michigan reason to want Michigan to fire Sherrone Moore.  From what I've seen so far he appears to be an example of the Peter Principle much like Kerry Coombs was as DC at tOSU*.  

*For anyone unfamiliar, Kerry Coombs was CB's coach at tOSU for 2012 then CB's and ST's for five years from 2013-2017 then left and spent two years as a DB coach in the NFL.  He was GREAT at those things so he got named DC at tOSU and his 2020 and 2021 tOSU defenses sucked.  If you aren't familiar with the Peter Principle it says that people tend to rise to the level of their incompetence.  As applied to Kerry Coombs and Sherrone Moore (conditionally, he could end up ok) they were great at their prior jobs so they got promoted until they got to a level where they were incompetent.  

So I'll ask again:
When you wear a blue shirt with a yellow "M", and tell your kids not to lie, cheat, and steal, how do you explain the exception that allows lying, cheating, and stealing if you are just really, really sick of losing to Ohio State for two decades?  
SiteFirst MeetingLast MeetingGamesWin %WinsLossesTiesAverage Score
Any20012019190.105217 22.5333.89
Home20012019100.20028 23.0031.20
Away2002201890.00009 22.0036.89
Neutral 
Individual Game Results of Michigan (vs Ohio State), 2001-2019

Date Opponent (record)ResultScoreSite
11/30/2019vs.*Ohio State (http://www.jhowell.net/cf/scores/OhioState.htm#2019) (13-1)L2756
11/24/2018@*Ohio State (http://www.jhowell.net/cf/scores/OhioState.htm#2018) (13-1)L3962
11/25/2017vs.*Ohio State (http://www.jhowell.net/cf/scores/OhioState.htm#2017) (12-2)L2031
11/26/2016@*Ohio State (http://www.jhowell.net/cf/scores/OhioState.htm#2016) (11-2)L2730
11/28/2015vs.*Ohio State (http://www.jhowell.net/cf/scores/OhioState.htm#2015) (12-1)L1342
11/29/2014@*Ohio State (http://www.jhowell.net/cf/scores/OhioState.htm#2014) (14-1)L2842
11/30/2013vs.*Ohio State (http://www.jhowell.net/cf/scores/OhioState.htm#2013) (12-2)L4142
11/24/2012@*Ohio State (http://www.jhowell.net/cf/scores/OhioState.htm#2012) (12-0)L2126
11/26/2011vs.*Ohio State (http://www.jhowell.net/cf/scores/OhioState.htm#2011) (6-7)W4034
11/27/2010@*Ohio State (http://www.jhowell.net/cf/scores/OhioState.htm#2010) (12-1)L737
11/21/2009vs.*Ohio State (http://www.jhowell.net/cf/scores/OhioState.htm#2009) (11-2)L1021
11/22/2008@*Ohio State (http://www.jhowell.net/cf/scores/OhioState.htm#2008) (10-3)L742
11/17/2007vs.*Ohio State (http://www.jhowell.net/cf/scores/OhioState.htm#2007) (11-2)L314
11/18/2006@*Ohio State (http://www.jhowell.net/cf/scores/OhioState.htm#2006) (12-1)L3942
11/19/2005vs.*Ohio State (http://www.jhowell.net/cf/scores/OhioState.htm#2005) (10-2)L2125
11/20/2004@*Ohio State (http://www.jhowell.net/cf/scores/OhioState.htm#2004) (8-4)L2137
11/22/2003vs.*Ohio State (http://www.jhowell.net/cf/scores/OhioState.htm#2003) (11-2)W3521
11/23/2002@*Ohio State (http://www.jhowell.net/cf/scores/OhioState.htm#2002) (14-0)L914
11/24/2001vs.*Ohio State (http://www.jhowell.net/cf/scores/OhioState.htm#2001) (7-5)L2026

Title: Re: #11 USC (2-0, 0-0) at #18 Michigan (2-1, 0-0) Game Week
Post by: SuperMario on September 17, 2024, 11:59:03 AM
You’re not even worth communicating with. You talk to people that don’t share your opinion like they’re beneath you. Stop posting on Michigan threads. 
Title: Re: #11 USC (2-0, 0-0) at #18 Michigan (2-1, 0-0) Game Week
Post by: SuperMario on September 17, 2024, 12:12:54 PM
I’m going to take a clearer stance. I went through bilateral craniotomy in 2022. Some of my favorite moments recovering was my kids snuggling with me, watching Michigan games and being a family.  We went through hell as a family on multiple levels. So anytime you start trying to act like I’m a poor father for not asking my kids about cheating, you’re seriously just a flipping asshole and you’ve never gone through real shit in your life. You can call people pathetic all you want as you have no character so your summation of people holds zero weight:
Title: Re: #11 USC (2-0, 0-0) at #18 Michigan (2-1, 0-0) Game Week
Post by: medinabuckeye1 on September 17, 2024, 12:24:11 PM
You’re not even worth communicating with. You talk to people that don’t share your opinion like they’re beneath you. Stop posting on Michigan threads.
Not my opinions, facts.  
I’m going to take a clearer stance. I went through bilateral craniotomy in 2022. Some of my favorite moments recovering was my kids snuggling with me, watching Michigan games and being a family.  We went through hell as a family on multiple levels. 
I'm truly sorry for what you went through but it doesn't give you any level of moral authority let alone to say this:
You can call people pathetic all you want as you have no character so your summation of people holds zero weight:

Fact:
The institution you root for stole a F4 from the institution I graduated from through what wiki calls "one of the largest incidents involving payments to athletes in American collegiate history."

Fact:
Employees of the institution you root for lied, cheated, stole, and destroyed evidence over the last three years.  

Own it.  The institution you root for is trash.  

No Michigan "man" has any right to question anyone else's character. 
Title: Re: #11 USC (2-0, 0-0) at #18 Michigan (2-1, 0-0) Game Week
Post by: 847badgerfan on September 17, 2024, 12:29:46 PM
C'mon. Let's move past this.

All the Michigan posters here are good people and had nothing to do with what Michigan did or didn't do.

Nobody here wants their team to do bad things.
Title: Re: #11 USC (2-0, 0-0) at #18 Michigan (2-1, 0-0) Game Week
Post by: Mdot21 on September 17, 2024, 12:36:27 PM
To be fair to the current Michigan coaching staff, they lost their eyes.
(https://i.imgur.com/rHHFWKG.png)
shut the fuck up about it already you whining little pussy. 

you almost sound like a chubby blue haired they/them libtard shitlib with TDS. 

Jeem and this Stallions fellow truly broke the brains of the simple jack Bucknutjob fan base. Holy shit. It's amazing to see actually. I love it.

Your program has been soft as baby shit at the line of scrimmage the past few years. Haven't had any Bosa brothers or Chase Young's walking on that field. Instead you've had...Zach Harrison? Jack Sawyer? JTT? Lmao. FAR cry from the type of DUDES in the front 7 y'all used to have. Your best LB'er in that time span has been....Tommy Eichenberg? Lmfao. GTFO. I guess when the head coach Ryan Day only cares about offense and recruiting Quarterbacks, Running Backs, and Wide Receivers the defensive talent tends to go to shit?

You lost 3 in a row to Michigan, you haven't beaten them since 2019, Michigan meanwhile just won 3 B1G 'chips in a row, had 3 playoff trips in a row, and won a Natty. You're just gonna have to suck on a fat bag of AIDS dicks and deal with it. And no 47595 page dissertation you write on some message board is going to change that reality. Get over it. 
Title: Re: #11 USC (2-0, 0-0) at #18 Michigan (2-1, 0-0) Game Week
Post by: SuperMario on September 17, 2024, 12:39:48 PM
C'mon. Let's move past this.

All the Michigan posters here are good people and had nothing to do with what Michigan did or didn't do.

Nobody here wants their team to do bad things.
It’s old. It’s seriously old. Most of us are at points in our life where we share the game we love with the people we love and cherish the memories. His tirades on this path are why people disappear from here. Saying “the institute you root for is trash” is a beyond disgusting thing to say.

no Michigan man has a right to judge anyone’s character? The implication behind that is every Michigan man has little or no character. That’s such a disgusting thing to say. 
Title: Re: #11 USC (2-0, 0-0) at #18 Michigan (2-1, 0-0) Game Week
Post by: betarhoalphadelta on September 17, 2024, 01:07:08 PM
It’s old. It’s seriously old. Most of us are at points in our life where we share the game we love with the people we love and cherish the memories. His tirades on this path are why people disappear from here. Saying “the institute you root for is trash” is a beyond disgusting thing to say.
As I've said I'm basically an outside observer without an inherent bias for or against either team. But this is one of the most egregious cheating scandals I've ever seen in college football. The phrase "I've got receipts" is a bit of a hackneyed phrase, but Michigan actually had receipts that Stalions had to submit for reimbursement! 

But I've seen only two reactions to this scandal from the Michigan fans on this board. 



Deflect. Minimize. Excuse. 

What I haven't seen, and would expect to, is to hear: "Yeah, it was bad. It was cheating. Everyone involved should be punished. The school should have cleaned house of everyone involved, even outside the football program and into the athletic department of anyone who knew and was complicit in it. It was wrong, but please give us the grace to go and correct it the right way."

Maybe some of the Michigan fans on this board have said that and I've missed it. But I don't recall it. 
Title: Re: #11 USC (2-0, 0-0) at #18 Michigan (2-1, 0-0) Game Week
Post by: utee94 on September 17, 2024, 01:14:51 PM
^^^^^

Everything bwar just said.  100%.

I'll add that even now, Michigan fans still call out Ohio State as being a dirty cheater institution.  It's been years and years since the last scandal broke there, yet even now Michigan fans bring it up.

So to expect Ohio State fans to just "drop it" while plenty of the sordid story has just recently come out, and current staff are STILL under further investigation, is not only unrealistic-- it's silly.

Title: Re: #11 USC (2-0, 0-0) at #18 Michigan (2-1, 0-0) Game Week
Post by: utee94 on September 17, 2024, 01:18:48 PM
One other thing-- SuperMario, you've always seemed like a good guy, and for me at least, and likely most of the people around here, it's not personal.  Not at all.

Some of the Ohio State fans might be taking it too far in your opinion, and I get that.  It's annoying and painful.  For over a decade every dumbass dipshit on the internet has blamed Texas for all of the problems of realignment without ever actually bothering to uncover any of the facts.  It annoys the shit out of me, absolutely.  But ultimately you have to just understand that there are a lot of annoying people in the world and stop letting it get to you.

Except for me.  I still call out every dumbass know-nothing dipshit who blames Texas for everything.  Those dicks can fuck right off. :)

Title: Re: #11 USC (2-0, 0-0) at #18 Michigan (2-1, 0-0) Game Week
Post by: SuperMario on September 17, 2024, 01:20:02 PM
Sorry, but this is the 4th time he’s brought up my kids in a conversation? He doesn’t know my kids, doesn’t know my family and there should always be an unwritten rule - leave my kids out of your f-ing mouth! I’ve let it pass a few times, but he’s consistently brought them up. 

What do you tell your kids? None of your damn business how I raise my kids.

Is it possible they crossed lines and cheated? Sure is, but no one knows the entire story even though some act like they have all the pieces.  

The logo on your sweatshirt with an M represents you have no character and you’re all about cheating and great thing you’re teaching your kids!

Ok, coming from the same dude that probably wears a Browns sweatshirt  and the muni-lot is a disgrace to family integrity. 

Sorry, but if consensus doesn’t see that consistently bringing up a posters kids isn’t a line crossing move, then this forum is dead to me.
Title: Re: #11 USC (2-0, 0-0) at #18 Michigan (2-1, 0-0) Game Week
Post by: 847badgerfan on September 17, 2024, 01:21:51 PM
We need to leave family out of any discussion on this, to be honest.
Title: Re: #11 USC (2-0, 0-0) at #18 Michigan (2-1, 0-0) Game Week
Post by: utee94 on September 17, 2024, 01:28:30 PM
We need to leave family out of any discussion on this, to be honest.
Agree.  I don't know of any parents who raise their kids to be cheaters.  I suppose it might happen, you see it in teen sports movies and TV shows like Karate Kid or Friday Night Lights.  But I don't know anyone who actually believes or practices that in real life.

The Texas A&M Aggies are among the dirtiest cheater programs in NCAA history, yet I don't blame my wife for that, nor do I tell her she should be ashamed of her school.  She didn't have anything to do with the shenanigans of Jackie $herrill and RC $locum.

I strongly support keeping it that way here.

Title: Re: #11 USC (2-0, 0-0) at #18 Michigan (2-1, 0-0) Game Week
Post by: 847badgerfan on September 17, 2024, 01:34:53 PM
I thought RC was rather clean. Was he not?

I for sure know Sherrill was scum.
Title: Re: #11 USC (2-0, 0-0) at #18 Michigan (2-1, 0-0) Game Week
Post by: 847badgerfan on September 17, 2024, 01:35:47 PM
My wife went to St. Cloud State. I divorce her every time SCSU beats Wisconsin.










.
In hockey.
Title: Re: #11 USC (2-0, 0-0) at #18 Michigan (2-1, 0-0) Game Week
Post by: utee94 on September 17, 2024, 01:38:07 PM
I thought RC was rather clean. Was he not?

I for sure know Sherrill was scum.
RC was Jackie's bagman.  There's a reason they promoted from within.
Title: Re: #11 USC (2-0, 0-0) at #18 Michigan (2-1, 0-0) Game Week
Post by: 847badgerfan on September 17, 2024, 01:49:52 PM
Did not know that. Interesting.

RC is probably the best coach aTm has had in my lifetime.
Title: Re: #11 USC (2-0, 0-0) at #18 Michigan (2-1, 0-0) Game Week
Post by: ELA on September 17, 2024, 01:52:47 PM
Agree.  I don't know of any parents who raise their kids to be cheaters.  I suppose it might happen, you see it in teen sports movies and TV shows like Karate Kid or Friday Night Lights.  But I don't know anyone who actually believes or practices that in real life.

The Texas A&M Aggies are among the dirtiest cheater programs in NCAA history, yet I don't blame my wife for that, nor do I tell her she should be ashamed of her school.  She didn't have anything to do with the shenanigans of Jackie $herrill and RC $locum.

I strongly support keeping it that way here.
Nominated for best backhanded compliment in board history
Title: Re: #11 USC (2-0, 0-0) at #18 Michigan (2-1, 0-0) Game Week
Post by: FearlessF on September 17, 2024, 02:36:08 PM
I like a little spice between rivals 
Title: Re: #11 USC (2-0, 0-0) at #18 Michigan (2-1, 0-0) Game Week
Post by: medinabuckeye1 on September 17, 2024, 02:37:16 PM
As I've said I'm basically an outside observer without an inherent bias for or against either team. But this is one of the most egregious cheating scandals I've ever seen in college football. The phrase "I've got receipts" is a bit of a hackneyed phrase, but Michigan actually had receipts that Stalions had to submit for reimbursement!

But I've seen only two reactions to this scandal from the Michigan fans on this board.

  • The Mdot approach. He doesn't care that Michigan cheated, in fact I think he revels in it. Because they won the championship and showed the NCAA to be the feckless organization that they are.
  • The approach from pretty much every other M fan. When the allegations came out, "let's wait for all the facts". "Maybe Stalions was a lone wolf" (he wasn't. When the proof started coming out "well everyone steals signs" (but not like this). When Stalions was gone and they still were winning "well I guess it wasn't that much of an advantage so who really cares." When Harbaugh ran off to the NFL and Michigan didn't clean house and hired the guy who was there during all of this and is under NCAA investigation for deleting evidence that was later recovered, just says "oh well, we'll let the NCAA process play out."

Deflect. Minimize. Excuse.

What I haven't seen, and would expect to, is to hear: "Yeah, it was bad. It was cheating. Everyone involved should be punished. The school should have cleaned house of everyone involved, even outside the football program and into the athletic department of anyone who knew and was complicit in it. It was wrong, but please give us the grace to go and correct it the right way."

Maybe some of the Michigan fans on this board have said that and I've missed it. But I don't recall it.
This, 100% this.  
^^^^^

Everything bwar just said.  100%.

I'll add that even now, Michigan fans still call out Ohio State as being a dirty cheater institution.  It's been years and years since the last scandal broke there, yet even now Michigan fans bring it up.

So to expect Ohio State fans to just "drop it" while plenty of the sordid story has just recently come out, and current staff are STILL under further investigation, is not only unrealistic-- it's silly.
This too.  

This IS the problem @SuperMario (https://www.cfb51.com/index.php?action=profile;u=1596) .  I never thought I'd say this but at this point I have more respect for @Mdot21 (https://www.cfb51.com/index.php?action=profile;u=1595) than I do for you.  He just called me a:
whining little pussy.
Then he said a bunch of other crap.  It is exactly as @betarhoalphadelta (https://www.cfb51.com/index.php?action=profile;u=19) just said:
  • The Mdot approach. He doesn't care that Michigan cheated, in fact I think he revels in it. Because they won the championship and showed the NCAA to be the feckless organization that they are.
He clearly doesn't give a rat's behind about character.  As bwar said, he revels in Michigan's cheating.  

The difference between you and him is at least he has the balls to own it.  You don't and so long as that remains the case I'll keep calling you out for it and if that means this board is dead to you then leave.  But before you do:

I want you to understand where I am coming from.  If you had told me two years ago that Michigan would engage in:
one of the most egregious cheating scandals I've ever seen in college football. 
and further that it would be proven as in:
The phrase "I've got receipts" is a bit of a hackneyed phrase, but Michigan actually had receipts that Stalions had to submit for reimbursement!
I'd have thought it was some lone wolf or *MAYBE* Harbaugh but that once the evidence was presented the institution would have the self respect to:
The school should have cleaned house of everyone involved, even outside the football program and into the athletic department of anyone who knew and was complicit in it. It was wrong, but please give us the grace to go and correct it the right way."
but they didn't.  They stepped further into it.  The entire institution is now complicit.  There is no "Institutional Control".  The inmates are running the asylum.  There was no cleaning house.  They actually signed a contract with a guy who obstructed an NCAA investigation.  

If you had told me this two years ago I would NEVER have believed you.  I had enough respect for the institution such that I simply wouldn't have believed it.  But all of the above happened.  None of it is wild-eyed tOSU fan/Michigan hater allegations, it is factual and I intentionally quoted neutral posters, fans of Purdue and Texas so as to emphasize that this is NOT standard-issue rivals poking at each other.  

The above deals with the institution.  Now I'll move on to you:
I'm frankly shocked by your reaction (or lack thereof) to this.  A few weeks ago I said that I was shocked by Mdot's reaction and bwar called me out on it.  He was right, nothing should shock me from mdot.  I shouldn't be shocked that the flagrant cheating, destruction of evidence, and just total lack of ethics from the University of Michigan doesn't bother him.  You @SuperMario (https://www.cfb51.com/index.php?action=profile;u=1596) are a different situation.  Much like the institution you root for, if someone had told me two years ago that Michigan would engage in what (neutral fan) bwar called "one of the most egregious cheating scandals (he'd) ever seen in college football" I would have expected that you would not stand behind that.  I would have expected that your reaction would have been something along the lines of:
"Yeah, it was bad. It was cheating. Everyone involved should be punished. The school should have cleaned house of everyone involved, even outside the football program and into the athletic department of anyone who knew and was complicit in it. It was wrong, but please give us the grace to go and correct it the right way."
But the sad fact is:
Maybe some of the Michigan fans on this board have said that and I've missed it. But I don't recall it.
That is sad and pathetic.  

When Tressel got caught failing to disclose an email, some of us (tOSU fans) on here supported his termination.  We were saddened but we KNEW that he had to go.  We didn't want our institution to accept that behavior.  

Two years ago I would have expected at least some Michigan fans to respond like that and I would have expected you to be one of them.  Are there ANY Michigan fans here who can distinguish right from wrong?  
Title: Re: #11 USC (2-0, 0-0) at #18 Michigan (2-1, 0-0) Game Week
Post by: betarhoalphadelta on September 17, 2024, 02:41:54 PM
Yeah, I think Medina is crossing the line with that. I'm on your side there. Shouldn't bring kids into this.

But we're now almost a year into this. And yet you still say something like:

Is it possible they crossed lines and cheated? Sure is, but no one knows the entire story even though some act like they have all the pieces. 
I'd expect an OSU fan to take everything that has come out about this from the beginning and make it worse than it is. And I'd expect every Michigan fan to try to paint everything in the best light possible. 

But after a year, I think we ALL have enough pieces to say that this happened. 

Ok, coming from the same dude that probably wears a Browns sweatshirt  and the muni-lot is a disgrace to family integrity.

It would be like a Browns fan saying "yeah, there were lawsuits about Deshaun Watson, and there's smoke there, but without having been in those massage parlors I can't be sure that any of them are true. Is it possible he's a serial committer of sexual assault? Sure is, but no one knows the entire story!"

I wouldn't ever expect Browns fans to do something like that. 

Unless Watson leads the team to winning the Super Bowl, of course. Then they'll excuse him. Just like Michigan fans are wishing this all away lest it taint their championship.
Title: Re: #11 USC (2-0, 0-0) at #18 Michigan (2-1, 0-0) Game Week
Post by: medinabuckeye1 on September 17, 2024, 02:52:38 PM
Nobody here wants their team to do bad things.
I can think of at least one exception.  
Title: Re: #11 USC (2-0, 0-0) at #18 Michigan (2-1, 0-0) Game Week
Post by: medinabuckeye1 on September 17, 2024, 02:53:08 PM
Saying “the institute you root for is trash” is a beyond disgusting thing to say.
It would be disgusting if it weren't true.  
Title: Re: #11 USC (2-0, 0-0) at #18 Michigan (2-1, 0-0) Game Week
Post by: 847badgerfan on September 17, 2024, 02:53:46 PM
I'm calling for a truce.

Gives me and @GopherRock (https://www.cfb51.com/index.php?action=profile;u=47) a chance to join the fight club.

Which gives me inspiration to start a new thread.

"The CFB51 Fight Club Thread"

And keep all the shit in there instead of every Michigan or Ohio State or Rankings or Stream thread. Or or or.

I'm consulting @utee94 (https://www.cfb51.com/index.php?action=profile;u=15) and @ELA (https://www.cfb51.com/index.php?action=profile;u=55) on this concept.
Title: Re: #11 USC (2-0, 0-0) at #18 Michigan (2-1, 0-0) Game Week
Post by: 847badgerfan on September 17, 2024, 02:56:09 PM
It would be disgusting if it weren't true. 
The entire institution is not trash. That's too. There is a whole lot of good about Michigan.

Do I respect the AD? Not at this time, I don't. But I'm not gonna trash the whole department and school for it.
Title: Re: #11 USC (2-0, 0-0) at #18 Michigan (2-1, 0-0) Game Week
Post by: medinabuckeye1 on September 17, 2024, 02:59:06 PM
Ok, coming from the same dude that probably wears a Browns sweatshirt  and the muni-lot is a disgrace to family integrity.
I own one Browns shirt.  The QB pictured on it is Bernie Kosar so yeah, not me.  

Sorry, but this is the 4th time he’s brought up my kids in a conversation? He doesn’t know my kids, doesn’t know my family and there should always be an unwritten rule - leave my kids out of your f-ing mouth! I’ve let it pass a few times, but he’s consistently brought them up.

What do you tell your kids? None of your damn business how I raise my kids.
I brought it up specifically because I don't think you are @Mdot21 (https://www.cfb51.com/index.php?action=profile;u=1595) .  I think you are a good person.  I think if YOU were AD a M, you'd have reacted more appropriately.  

Either I'm wrong, of you have to somehow deal with the juxtaposition of being a good person, telling your kids not to lie, cheat, and steal and then wearing a sweatshirt with a logo of a school that is complicit in lying, cheating, and stealing.  How do you deal with that?  

We have enough facts to know that this happened.  How do you deal with it?  
Title: Re: #11 USC (2-0, 0-0) at #18 Michigan (2-1, 0-0) Game Week
Post by: GopherRock on September 17, 2024, 03:06:11 PM
I'm calling for a truce.

Gives me and @GopherRock (https://www.cfb51.com/index.php?action=profile;u=47) a chance to join the fight club.

Which gives me inspiration to start a new thread.

"The CFB51 Fight Club Thread"

And keep all the shit in there instead of every Michigan or Ohio State or Rankings or Stream thread. Or or or.

I'm consulting @utee94 (https://www.cfb51.com/index.php?action=profile;u=15) and @ELA (https://www.cfb51.com/index.php?action=profile;u=55) on this concept.
We went over the rules in the dressing room.

Defend yourself at all times.

Obey my commands at all times.

If you knock the other man down, go to the neutral corner and stay there until I tell you otherwise.

DING DING
Title: Re: #11 USC (2-0, 0-0) at #18 Michigan (2-1, 0-0) Game Week
Post by: ELA on September 17, 2024, 03:18:46 PM
We went over the rules in the dressing room.

Defend yourself at all times.

Obey my commands at all times.

If you knock the other man down, go to the neutral corner and stay there until I tell you otherwise.

DING DING
(https://y.yarn.co/fcc8431d-00a2-45a2-8849-07690aec5348_text.gif)
Title: Re: #11 USC (2-0, 0-0) at #18 Michigan (2-1, 0-0) Game Week
Post by: SuperMario on September 17, 2024, 03:22:21 PM
I’m glad you don’t respect me. Again you bring up kids. Let’s through juxtaposition in there to sound “super smart.”

Many years ago talking privately to some really good Penn State guys on here, I learned you can’t characterize people by their fanhood and the actions of the institution or organization. They actions can be terrible, but doesn’t outline the character of all the fans. Penn State fans weren’t  supporters of child abuse. They didn’t know how to hang on to meaningful memories with family and friend. Houston Astros fans aren’t terrible humans for their teams actions of crossing the line, hitting a garbage can near the locker room. Are there tons of red flags? Sure are, but doesn’t make the father and son that shared winning the World Series together terrible human that deserve no respect because they aren’t focusing on cheating rather then their memory together.

I’m the type of person, especially due to the moments I’ve faced in life, that it’s not the sport, the team or the organization I bow down to, it’s the memories it gives me and the people I love.

So when I focus more on my moments after brain surgery, with my three kids in Michigan gear and watching them jump up and down and be so happy, I could give a damn less if Michigan won or lost. It was the moment with them, after facing uncertainty of survival of a surgery and not being able to leave bed for 5 months, but having them gather in the same room with me every Saturday that had everything to do with appreciating a moment I wasn’t sure I’d get rather that being obsessed with the win.

So MB, I hope you dislike me because over and over you characterize me a certain way and you don’t know a damn thing about my. You don’t know my priorities in life, my giving spirit to my family and friend and the amount of people in real life that are in my corner because of who I am.

You’re just a keyboard warrior that’s just an asshole at this point and I pray that you have even a fraction of good people in your corner that I have when you go through life jeopardizing medical circumstances. Until then, sit up on your high horse and show how you focus on the wrong shit in life. You’re foaming at the mouth wondering how I’m talking to my kids about Michigan cheating and I take every moment with my kids to be thankful they still have a dad and 20 months ago he couldn’t get out of bed and today he spends ever moment he can with them. Because you know what doesn’t matter? Some bitter ass buckeye fan screaming about cheating a year later. And what does matter, is the time they are getting that was not guaranteed
Title: Re: #11 USC (2-0, 0-0) at #18 Michigan (2-1, 0-0) Game Week
Post by: ELA on September 17, 2024, 05:32:29 PM
I think we can all agree nobody likes the Astros.  They intentionally tanked for years, and then when they couldn't get over the hump they cheated.  And then their GM celebrated by yelling at women journalists how glad they were they signed an abuser who Toronto cut.  They literally checked every box of shitty.  I don't want to lump them in with Baylor's basketball coach covering a murder, because they did nothing illegal.  But man, tanking, cheating, signing domestic abusers.  I can't think of a more easily hatable team.  I actually do think anyone celebrating Astros championships has issues.

Did Michigan cheat?  Obviously.  But it was the perfect college football scandal.  Nobody was hurt.  You have a random staffer becoming a celebrity, wearing disguises on opponent sidelines.  Michigan wound up winning a championship, that every rival can stick an asterisk on, that Michigan fans can defend.  Man, it's perfect.  The fact that Stallions is dead to fans, and Taylor Lewan has a podcast?  Nah, get that rapist out of my fance, and give me a million Connor Stallions.  Don't make it into something it isn't
Title: Re: #11 USC (2-0, 0-0) at #18 Michigan (2-1, 0-0) Game Week
Post by: MaximumSam on September 17, 2024, 06:00:19 PM
I am once again asking for all discussions of the Michigan scandal be in meme form
Title: Re: #11 USC (2-0, 0-0) at #18 Michigan (2-1, 0-0) Game Week
Post by: MrNubbz on September 17, 2024, 07:21:38 PM
Did Michigan cheat?  Obviously.  But it was the perfect college football scandal.  Nobody was hurt. 
Like DB Cooper it appears they got away with the loot - the only subject I've ever binge watched - Cooper that is
Title: Re: #11 USC (2-0, 0-0) at #18 Michigan (2-1, 0-0) Game Week
Post by: FearlessF on September 17, 2024, 09:35:51 PM
they can keep the loot

it's tainted
Title: Re: #11 USC (2-0, 0-0) at #18 Michigan (2-1, 0-0) Game Week
Post by: utee94 on September 17, 2024, 09:39:01 PM
they can keep the loot

it's tainted
Meh, every single one of OU's football titles is at least as tainted, but I don't hear any of you yahoos howling about that.

Auburn with Cam Newton.

USC with Reggie Bush.

Tons of football titles are tainted, and the only people who ever give a rat's ass about it, are the closest rivals.
Title: Re: #11 USC (2-0, 0-0) at #18 Michigan (2-1, 0-0) Game Week
Post by: boilerbanger on September 17, 2024, 09:42:57 PM
Meh, every single one of OU's football titles is at least as tainted, but I don't hear any of you yahoos howling about that.

Auburn with Cam Newton.

USC with Reggie Bush.

Tons of football titles are tainted, and the only people who ever give a rat's ass about it, are the closest rivals.
Well said .. agree 100%
Title: Re: #11 USC (2-0, 0-0) at #18 Michigan (2-1, 0-0) Game Week
Post by: FearlessF on September 17, 2024, 09:47:42 PM
I disagree

payin players is a different form of cheating and something that has been going on since the beginning of the sport

stealing signs is also a lifelong thing, but not to this EXTENT

this is unprecedented and should be treated as such 
Title: Re: #11 USC (2-0, 0-0) at #18 Michigan (2-1, 0-0) Game Week
Post by: utee94 on September 17, 2024, 09:55:34 PM
I disagree

payin players is a different form of cheating and something that has been going on since the beginning of the sport

stealing signs is also a lifelong thing, but not to this EXTENT

this is unprecedented and should be treated as such
Feel free to disagree.  I don't see any difference at all.

OU's large scale of paying players was more akin to professional football than it was college, they gained a tremendous advantage over their competitors who refused to engage in the same forbidden tactics, and it was so institutionalized that it went on for decades upon decades, under numerous school administrations, numerous ADs, and numerous head coaches.

So no, I don't see it as any different.  And yet you dipsticks are howling about THIS one case.  It's honestly laughable.
Title: Re: #11 USC (2-0, 0-0) at #18 Michigan (2-1, 0-0) Game Week
Post by: ELA on September 17, 2024, 10:03:30 PM
Well said .. agree 100%
Yeah but youve been railing against Indiana's 1968? Rose Bowl appearance since you got here
Title: Re: #11 USC (2-0, 0-0) at #18 Michigan (2-1, 0-0) Game Week
Post by: FearlessF on September 17, 2024, 10:08:38 PM
So no, I don't see it as any different.  And yet you dipsticks are howling about THIS one case.  It's honestly laughable.
dipsticks?!?!?!?
Title: Re: #11 USC (2-0, 0-0) at #18 Michigan (2-1, 0-0) Game Week
Post by: utee94 on September 17, 2024, 10:12:10 PM
dipsticks?!?!?!?
It comes from a place of love.  I don't REALLY want to hurt your feelings... :)
Title: Re: #11 USC (2-0, 0-0) at #18 Michigan (2-1, 0-0) Game Week
Post by: GopherRock on September 17, 2024, 11:57:29 PM
dipsticks?!?!?!?
Clearly you don't know how much 0W-20 full synthetic it takes to keep the system running. 
Title: Re: #11 USC (2-0, 0-0) at #18 Michigan (2-1, 0-0) Game Week
Post by: MrNubbz on September 18, 2024, 09:04:14 AM
Meh, every single one of OU's football titles is at least as tainted, but I don't hear any of you yahoos howling about that.
Not even close Junior the dirt burglars weren't that sharp and I'm sure there's no "Surly" Boosters on the 40 Acres ;D
Title: Re: #11 USC (2-0, 0-0) at #18 Michigan (2-1, 0-0) Game Week
Post by: utee94 on September 18, 2024, 09:40:04 AM
Not even close Junior the dirt burglars weren't that sharp and I'm sure there's no "Surly" Boosters on the 40 Acres ;D
Lulzno

(https://y.yarn.co/6a212ac7-c4b2-4212-ad5e-c3bf661f90eb_text.gif)
Title: Re: #11 USC (2-0, 0-0) at #18 Michigan (2-1, 0-0) Game Week
Post by: CatsbyAZ on September 18, 2024, 10:56:38 AM
For all the 'cheater talk' in this thread, at least Michigan leveraged something out of it, winning a National Championship during the season that also blew up in scandal. How many other schools are busted for cheating without any trophies to show for it? Texas A&M, Arizona State, North Carolina, Miami.

As for the game Vs USC, Michigan loses something like 24-10 this Saturday. The Wolverines have shown nothing to indicate they're picking up where Harbaugh left them off. Michigan is playing more like what they were before Harbaugh took over. 

I'm reminded of watching the Brady Hoke years with my older cousin, a big Michigan fan who goes to some of the games. After Michigan beat UCONN in a frustrating 24-21 game in 2013, he got on the phone with his UM buddies and started shouting "Where're we gonna get SIX wins! Where're we gonna get SIX wins!" 

The same thing I think he'll be saying after Saturday's USC game.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wvNxuGMbE3c
Title: Re: #11 USC (2-0, 0-0) at #18 Michigan (2-1, 0-0) Game Week
Post by: medinabuckeye1 on September 18, 2024, 11:04:25 AM
Meh, every single one of OU's football titles is at least as tainted, but I don't hear any of you yahoos howling about that.

Auburn with Cam Newton.

USC with Reggie Bush.

Tons of football titles are tainted, and the only people who ever give a rat's ass about it, are the closest rivals.
I disagree, payin players is a different form of cheating and something that has been going on since the beginning of the sport

stealing signs is also a lifelong thing, but not to this EXTENT

this is unprecedented and should be treated as such
I'm with @FearlessF (https://www.cfb51.com/index.php?action=profile;u=10) on this and I'll add that another neutral fan, @betarhoalphadelta (https://www.cfb51.com/index.php?action=profile;u=19) called it "one of the most egregious college football scandals (he'd) ever seen.  I'm in that camp and NOT just because it is Michigan.  I'll explain:

OU:  The usual paying players but the institution (to the best of my knowledge) didn't actually write checks.  The actual violations were committed by boosters and kids.  

Auburn with Cam Newton:  I've brought this one up as a comparison many times.  Again, the institution did not commit the violation.  Boosters paid a kid (actually a kid's dad's church).  

USC with Reggie Bush:  Agents paid a kid.  Again, the institution did not commit the violation.  

Similarly, SM has alleged repeatedly that various tOSU players got "hundred-dollar handshakes", no-show jobs, and the like.  I'm sure it has happened in the past at tOSU but I'm equally sure that it has happened at his Michigan, @utee94 (https://www.cfb51.com/index.php?action=profile;u=15) 's Texas, @FearlessF (https://www.cfb51.com/index.php?action=profile;u=10) 's Nebraska, and probably even at @betarhoalphadelta (https://www.cfb51.com/index.php?action=profile;u=19) 's Purdue.  In all of those cases boosters and/or agents and kids broke a rule.  It happens.  

The Cam Newton situation and the Fab Five scandal were different in scale.  Newton didn't get a hundred dollar handshake or a few bucks from a no-show job, allegedly his father's church got something like half a freaking million dollars.  The Fab Five was even worse as they had a near-NBA level payroll.  

This scandal is very different (and much worse) not because it differs in scale but because it differs in type.  The violation wasn't committed by a booster, agent, or kid.  The violation was committed by an employee of the institution.  The institution is inextricably involved because it was their employee cheated.  This wasn't a failure to monitor (or more realistically at a lot of schools, an intentional effort not to notice) violations committed by kids and agents/boosters.  This was the institution itself actively flaunting the rules and throwing sportsmanship to the trash.  

Then the institution chose to do NOTHING once the whole scheme was uncovered.  As I've said, Ohio State fired a NC winning coach for failing to disclose one email that had notified him of a violation committed by kids.  That is the reaction I expect from respectable institutions.  Michigan tried to re-sign their cheating coach then, when he beat the posse out of town they hired an underling who had obstructed the NCAA's investigation by destroying evidence.  What kind of institution does that?  
Title: Re: #11 USC (2-0, 0-0) at #18 Michigan (2-1, 0-0) Game Week
Post by: utee94 on September 18, 2024, 11:27:20 AM
I'm with @FearlessF (https://www.cfb51.com/index.php?action=profile;u=10) on this and I'll add that another neutral fan, @betarhoalphadelta (https://www.cfb51.com/index.php?action=profile;u=19) called it "one of the most egregious college football scandals (he'd) ever seen.  I'm in that camp and NOT just because it is Michigan.  I'll explain:

OU:  The usual paying players but the institution (to the best of my knowledge) didn't actually write checks.  The actual violations were committed by boosters and kids. 

Auburn with Cam Newton:  I've brought this one up as a comparison many times.  Again, the institution did not commit the violation.  Boosters paid a kid (actually a kid's dad's church). 

USC with Reggie Bush:  Agents paid a kid.  Again, the institution did not commit the violation. 

Similarly, SM has alleged repeatedly that various tOSU players got "hundred-dollar handshakes", no-show jobs, and the like.  I'm sure it has happened in the past at tOSU but I'm equally sure that it has happened at his Michigan, @utee94 (https://www.cfb51.com/index.php?action=profile;u=15) 's Texas, @FearlessF (https://www.cfb51.com/index.php?action=profile;u=10) 's Nebraska, and probably even at @betarhoalphadelta (https://www.cfb51.com/index.php?action=profile;u=19) 's Purdue.  In all of those cases boosters and/or agents and kids broke a rule.  It happens. 

The Cam Newton situation and the Fab Five scandal were different in scale.  Newton didn't get a hundred dollar handshake or a few bucks from a no-show job, allegedly his father's church got something like half a freaking million dollars.  The Fab Five was even worse as they had a near-NBA level payroll. 

This scandal is very different (and much worse) not because it differs in scale but because it differs in type.  The violation wasn't committed by a booster, agent, or kid.  The violation was committed by an employee of the institution.  The institution is inextricably involved because it was their employee cheated.  This wasn't a failure to monitor (or more realistically at a lot of schools, an intentional effort not to notice) violations committed by kids and agents/boosters.  This was the institution itself actively flaunting the rules and throwing sportsmanship to the trash. 

Then the institution chose to do NOTHING once the whole scheme was uncovered.  As I've said, Ohio State fired a NC winning coach for failing to disclose one email that had notified him of a violation committed by kids.  That is the reaction I expect from respectable institutions.  Michigan tried to re-sign their cheating coach then, when he beat the posse out of town they hired an underling who had obstructed the NCAA's investigation by destroying evidence.  What kind of institution does that? 

Nope.  It's no different.  You care about it because they're your hated rival.  In 12 months nobody is going to remember or care about this, in the same way you don't care that OU engaged in over 5 decades of institutionalized cheating and that's the only reason they have any titles at all.  Your dismissal of OU's egregious cheating is only proving my point. You don't care that they have numerous ill-gotten titles.  You don't care at all.

Nobody currently cares about Michigan's actions nearly as much as Ohio State fans, and in a year nobody will care or bother to bring it up, other than Ohio State fans.
Title: Re: #11 USC (2-0, 0-0) at #18 Michigan (2-1, 0-0) Game Week
Post by: betarhoalphadelta on September 18, 2024, 11:37:28 AM
 @betarhoalphadelta (https://www.cfb51.com/index.php?action=profile;u=19) called it "one of the most egregious college football scandals (he'd) ever seen.  

You keep coming back to that statement, so I do want to soften it a little bit with some context. 

I'm younger than a lot of you folks here. In that way, I haven't been following college football as long or as closely as some of you just based on my age. 

I'm older than some folks here. But unlike many of you, I did not grow up in a household that cared about college football. It was the Chicago suburbs and my parents went to colleges without football teams, so the fall was about the Bears, not Illinois or Northwestern or even Notre Dame (we weren't Catholic or Irish after all). Especially since one of my formative memories was the '85 Bears winning the Super Bowl when I was 7. 

I didn't start my college football fandom until my sophomore year at Purdue, 1997, as we sucked in 1996 so I didn't attend any games. And in 1996 I was in the dorms. In 1997 I moved into the fraternity house, got season tickets with them, and that's when it really started. Even then, I mostly thought about Purdue and the Big Ten. 

So I haven't seen or paid attention to TONS of college football scandals. I mean, a couple of the big ones were Reggie Bush, Cam Newton, tattoogate, and of course the Penn State mess that wasn't really a "football" scandal at all. It just happened within the football program. I'm probably missing a few, of course. Even going to basketball, the Fab Five is ancient history to me and I have zero emotional response to it despite it being as I understand it a pretty major scandal. 

And yes, I do think it happens everywhere. Do I think any Purdue boosters are throwing down the sort of dollars that reportedly lured Cam Newton? No, of course not. Our boosters don't care that much. Do I think it's a virtual certainty that many Purdue athletes over the nearly 30 years that I've followed the sport have received impermissible benefits. Of course. There are too many places where it could happen under the radar that I'm not going to claim some moral high ground just to be proven wrong down the road. 

This was different. It was a complex, orchestrated scheme, that had to involve multiple members of Michigan staff directly. And on top of that, it was directly about gaining a competitive on the field advantage far beyond any sort of effort any team had ever made to decipher opponents' signs, including blatantly violating the rule against advanced in-person scouting. 

From a moral perspective, this scandal doesn't even come close to potentially harboring a pedophile like Penn State. From a football perspective, however, it does. 
Title: Re: #11 USC (2-0, 0-0) at #18 Michigan (2-1, 0-0) Game Week
Post by: MrNubbz on September 18, 2024, 11:39:28 AM
Lulzno

(https://y.yarn.co/6a212ac7-c4b2-4212-ad5e-c3bf661f90eb_text.gif)
(https://media0.giphy.com/media/YHYmMLkOmqoo/200.gif) (https://media0.giphy.com/media/YHYmMLkOmqoo/200.gif)
Title: Re: #11 USC (2-0, 0-0) at #18 Michigan (2-1, 0-0) Game Week
Post by: betarhoalphadelta on September 18, 2024, 11:50:36 AM
Nope.  It's no different.  You care about it because they're your hated rival.  In 12 months nobody is going to remember or care about this, in the same way you don't care that OU cheated egregiously for 5 decades and that's the only reason they have any titles at all.  Your dismissal of OU's egregious cheating is only proving my point. You don't care that they have numerous ill-gotten titles.  You don't care at all.

Nobody currently cares about Michigan's actions nearly as much as Ohio State fans, and in a year nobody will care or bother to bring it up, other than Ohio State fans.
That's true, and it's not. I agree with you that many of the OSU fans here care about it MORE because it's Michigan than anything else. And I think Michigan fans are trying to bury it now and "move on" because they know that a decade from now, all anyone will remember about 2023 is Michigan won the national championship and there won't be an asterisk hanging over it for eternity. I'm sure I'll have forgotten about it by then while OSU fans will still be bringing it up, just like M fans and tattoogate. 

But I think the reason this whole thing shocked the college football world last year is that I agree with medina that it's different. We've never seen anything like this, at least in college. Both the type of cheating, and the scope of the scheme. The whole Spygate thing with the Patriots is about the closest that I can come up with, and there are fans around the NFL who will always call Belichick a cheater for the rest of their lives because of it.
Title: Re: #11 USC (2-0, 0-0) at #18 Michigan (2-1, 0-0) Game Week
Post by: medinabuckeye1 on September 18, 2024, 12:00:56 PM
You keep coming back to that statement, so I do want to soften it a little bit with some context.
Fair.  
This was different. It was a complex, orchestrated scheme, that had to involve multiple members of Michigan staff directly. And on top of that, it was directly about gaining a competitive on the field advantage far beyond any sort of effort any team had ever made to decipher opponents' signs, including blatantly violating the rule against advanced in-person scouting.
This IS my point.  It wasn't boosters/agents and kids, it was the institution.  
That's true, and it's not. I agree with you that many of the OSU fans here care about it MORE because it's Michigan than anything else. And I think Michigan fans are trying to bury it now and "move on" because they know that a decade from now, all anyone will remember about 2023 is Michigan won the national championship and there won't be an asterisk hanging over it for eternity. I'm sure I'll have forgotten about it by then while OSU fans will still be bringing it up, just like M fans and tattoogate.

But I think the reason this whole thing shocked the college football world last year is that I agree with medina that it's different. We've never seen anything like this, at least in college. Both the type of cheating, and the scope of the scheme. The whole Spygate thing with the Patriots is about the closest that I can come up with, and there are fans around the NFL who will always call Belichick a cheater for the rest of their lives because of it.
Maybe some of it for me is that I've heard about tattoogate for over a decade and that was:


The cheating at Michigan was NOT boosters/agents and kids and the institution didn't fire those complicit.  It didn't even fire a guy who actively obstructed the NCAA investigation by destroying evidence.  Not only did they not fire him, they promoted him and signed a contract holding him immune from the destruction of evidence.  That is why I call the institution trash.  They are.  
Title: Re: #11 USC (2-0, 0-0) at #18 Michigan (2-1, 0-0) Game Week
Post by: 847badgerfan on September 18, 2024, 12:01:58 PM
Are USC and Michigan playing this weekend?
Title: Re: #11 USC (2-0, 0-0) at #18 Michigan (2-1, 0-0) Game Week
Post by: utee94 on September 18, 2024, 12:04:27 PM
Are USC and Michigan playing this weekend?
Probably?  
Title: Re: #11 USC (2-0, 0-0) at #18 Michigan (2-1, 0-0) Game Week
Post by: medinabuckeye1 on September 18, 2024, 12:11:47 PM
From a moral perspective, this scandal doesn't even come close to potentially harboring a pedophile like Penn State. From a football perspective, however, it does.
My take on this has always been that the NCAA should never have gotten involved.  There is simply nothing they could do that would be sufficient to punish pedophilia and/or harboring a pedophile.  That isn't a football/sports/ncaa violation, it is a criminal matter that should have been and was dealt with by the appropriate criminal jurisdiction.  

Jerry Sandusky is a vile monster and just to be clear I don't hold mere cheaters like Jim Harbaugh, Connor Stallions, and Sherrone Moore in anywhere NEAR the contempt that I hold Sandusky.  

From the perspective of the NCAA, however, I don't think they had any reason to be involved in the prosecution of Jerry Sandusky because his transgressions were criminal in nature and thus should have been (and were) dealt with by the appropriate criminal authorities.  

The transgressions of Harbaugh, Stallions, Moore, and I'll add Tressel were not criminal.  They were violations of sports-related rules.  Thus, the NCAA is the appropriate authority to address them.  

When Tressel failed to disclose an email he got a five year show-cause.  
Title: Re: #11 USC (2-0, 0-0) at #18 Michigan (2-1, 0-0) Game Week
Post by: utee94 on September 18, 2024, 12:12:40 PM
Fair.  This IS my point.  It wasn't boosters/agents and kids, it was the institution.
If you guys think that the decades of institutionalized cheating at a place like OU didn't heavily involve the coaches and athletic department actively directing the boosters on which recruits to target with bags of cash, and who to continue funneling cash to via fake jobs once they reached campus, then I've got some ocean-front property in Arizona to sell you.  How do you think that stuff works?  You think boosters just find some player they like, give him a lot of money, and then tell coach "hey I'm sending old Joe Smith your way, hope you can find a use for him?" It's always coordinated through the coaching staff and athletic department.  NIL works exactly the same, except now it's above the table and legal.

We're not talking about hundred dollar handshakes from a booster after a good game, we're talking about carefully orchestrated recruiting by the coaches, and payment from the boosters upon their direction.  In the olden days it could reach hundreds of thousands of dollars in a class, more recently it was hitting 8 figures, before NIL made it all legal anyway.

Decades upon decades of institutionalized cheating, and y'all don't give a rat's ass about it, and indeed go out of your way to make all kinds of excuses for it.

So go cry me a river.
Title: Re: #11 USC (2-0, 0-0) at #18 Michigan (2-1, 0-0) Game Week
Post by: 847badgerfan on September 18, 2024, 12:17:11 PM
The transgressions of Harbaugh, Stallions, Moore, and I'll add Tressel were not criminal.  They were violations of sports-related rules.  Thus, the NCAA is the appropriate authority to address them. 
Actually, the Big Ten is the appropriate authority. Conferences have different rules when it comes to signs, signals and such.

That said, is USC playing Michigan this weekend?
Title: Re: #11 USC (2-0, 0-0) at #18 Michigan (2-1, 0-0) Game Week
Post by: utee94 on September 18, 2024, 12:22:23 PM
Actually, the Big Ten is the appropriate authority. Conferences have different rules when it comes to signs, signals and such.

That said, is USC playing Michigan this weekend?
The Ohio State honks are sucking all the oxygen out of the room, not likely we'll find any Michigan fans that want to discuss the game under the circumstances.  And of course we don't have any USC fans.

I think the Trojans are going to win but I think Michigan will make a game of it.  They're not dead yet...


(https://i.imgur.com/5TGn89D.gif)
Title: Re: #11 USC (2-0, 0-0) at #18 Michigan (2-1, 0-0) Game Week
Post by: MaximumSam on September 18, 2024, 12:26:02 PM
Who do you trust least: Michigan's offense or USC's defense?
Title: Re: #11 USC (2-0, 0-0) at #18 Michigan (2-1, 0-0) Game Week
Post by: medinabuckeye1 on September 18, 2024, 12:33:54 PM
Who do you trust least: Michigan's offense or USC's defense?
I think that USC's vastly improved defense will be enough to contain M's vastly diminished offense and that will be the difference because the strength on strength of M's defense vs USC's offense should be fairly even. 
Title: Re: #11 USC (2-0, 0-0) at #18 Michigan (2-1, 0-0) Game Week
Post by: utee94 on September 18, 2024, 12:46:23 PM
I think that USC's vastly improved defense will be enough to contain M's vastly diminished offense and that will be the difference because the strength on strength of M's defense vs USC's offense should be fairly even.

Yeah that's what I'm feeling as well.  I really do think that it'll take some time for Michigan's offensive line to gel, and it's unfortunate timing for them, that they're catching Texas and USC early in the season.  Later, they should be a lot better. Not championship-caliber good, but also not left-for-dead bad, like some folks seem to believe, at this time.
Title: Re: #11 USC (2-0, 0-0) at #18 Michigan (2-1, 0-0) Game Week
Post by: 847badgerfan on September 18, 2024, 01:07:10 PM
I think that USC's vastly improved defense will be enough to contain M's vastly diminished offense and that will be the difference because the strength on strength of M's defense vs USC's offense should be fairly even.
Yep.
Title: Re: #11 USC (2-0, 0-0) at #18 Michigan (2-1, 0-0) Game Week
Post by: MaximumSam on September 18, 2024, 01:46:31 PM
USC's defense is better through two games this year, but I'm not sure that's enough for me to say I trust them
Title: Re: #11 USC (2-0, 0-0) at #18 Michigan (2-1, 0-0) Game Week
Post by: MrNubbz on September 18, 2024, 01:58:23 PM

The Ohio State honks are sucking all the oxygen out of the room
No you're just winded from running off the 'Skers,Aggies & Buffs then leaving the Big 12 at the alter all whilst chasing the SEC bagmen down who've gone legit

:)
Title: Re: #11 USC (2-0, 0-0) at #18 Michigan (2-1, 0-0) Game Week
Post by: medinabuckeye1 on September 18, 2024, 02:35:21 PM
Yeah that's what I'm feeling as well.  I really do think that it'll take some time for Michigan's offensive line to gel, and it's unfortunate timing for them, that they're catching Texas and USC early in the season.  Later, they should be a lot better. Not championship-caliber good, but also not left-for-dead bad, like some folks seem to believe, at this time.
FWIW:
This sucks for Ohio State because M in late November is probably going to be something like 10-2 caliber team with something like a 7-4 record thus creating a lose/lose situation for the Buckeyes.

That is the nature of the schedule and if you look back historically it explains most of the upsets. For example, in 2004 a 9-1 Michigan team that was ranked #7 got upset by a 6-4 Ohio State team that was unranked. 

At the time it was a shocking upset but looking back and knowing how good Ohio State was in 2005 and beyond the shock isn't that they beat Michigan it is that they lost to Northwestern, Wisconsin, Iowa, and Purdue. 
Title: Re: #11 USC (2-0, 0-0) at #18 Michigan (2-1, 0-0) Game Week
Post by: utee94 on September 18, 2024, 03:21:27 PM
No you're just winded from running off the 'Skers,Aggies & Buffs then leaving the Big 12 at the alter all whilst chasing the SEC bagmen down who've gone legit

:)
(https://media.tenor.com/-ifMoleTroUAAAAM/why-i-outta.gif)
Title: Re: #11 USC (2-0, 0-0) at #18 Michigan (2-1, 0-0) Game Week
Post by: ELA on September 18, 2024, 03:23:13 PM
At the time it was a shocking upset but looking back and knowing how good Ohio State was in 2005 and beyond the shock isn't that they beat Michigan it is that they lost to Northwestern, Wisconsin, Iowa, and Purdue.
Good thing they weren't in the Big Ten West back then
Title: Re: #11 USC (2-0, 0-0) at #18 Michigan (2-1, 0-0) Game Week
Post by: FearlessF on September 18, 2024, 09:25:13 PM
FWIW:
This sucks for Ohio State because M in late November is probably going to be something like 10-2 caliber team with something like a 7-4 record thus creating a lose/lose situation for the Buckeyes.

that's called REACHING for something that sucks for Buck fans
Title: Re: #11 USC (2-0, 0-0) at #18 Michigan (2-1, 0-0) Game Week
Post by: Mdot21 on September 19, 2024, 10:32:09 AM

"What did they not do over the last couple of years? They did not manipulate the structure of their defense in order to create pressure," Klatt said on a recent episode of his podcast. "They were not blitz-heavy. Over the last three years, they blitzed 29% of the time. That was 48th in college football, so about average. They weren't manipulating their structure in order to create pressure."

"The problem now is, that's Wink Martindale's entire M.O. He wants to blitz," Klatt said. "They were over 50% blitz against Texas, and on the season Michigan is blitzing at the fourth-highest rate in college football at 48%. So, they went from 29% over the last three years, in which they were dominant, didn't lose a Big Ten regular season game dating back to the '21 season against Michigan State on the road, and they were blitzing 29% of the time. Now, they're blitzing 48% of the time, and I don't believe that their structure is quite as sound."


Wink Martindale is Don Brown. Don Brown is Wink Martindale. 

(https://i.redd.it/bekphnqftcb41.jpg)

Title: Re: #11 USC (2-0, 0-0) at #18 Michigan (2-1, 0-0) Game Week
Post by: FearlessF on September 19, 2024, 08:04:11 PM
Apparently they both suck
Title: Re: #11 USC (2-0, 0-0) at #18 Michigan (2-1, 0-0) Game Week
Post by: MrNubbz on September 19, 2024, 08:25:20 PM
Sheesh you win 2 games vs punching bags and the Husker Prick Squad awakens from a 2 decade hibernation
Title: Re: #11 USC (2-0, 0-0) at #18 Michigan (2-1, 0-0) Game Week
Post by: FearlessF on September 19, 2024, 10:37:33 PM
3 games vs punchin bags

and cheaters get called out regardless of wins
Title: Re: #11 USC (2-0, 0-0) at #18 Michigan (2-1, 0-0) Game Week
Post by: Mdot21 on September 20, 2024, 08:44:44 AM
what a difference not having a QB makes...who woulda thunk it?

this doesn't include running, which JJ McCarthy was pretty good at doing to pick up 1st downs when need be. man he was under appreciated. he was always super talented- which is why he was OMERG 5 STARZ as a HS recruit. His passing stats and his overall development as a passer were hamstrung by the system and Jeem- but elite traits and talent for the position was always there. 

hot take: JJ is going to wind up being the best QB of his draft class. He's in by far the best situation of them all. Vikings have the best WR in the NFL. They have two excellent young offensive tackles tied up- and you need two these days and not just the LT anymore because the pass rushers are just better today. They have a young former QB head coach who is an offensive guru who will teach him the game and develop him. And because of his injury in the pre-season he's going to be getting a year to redshirt and learn the system and develop and not have to be thrown to the wolves and have his confidence shattered and battered like Caleb Williams and Bo Nix's already are being. 

https://twitter.com/LuckIsMadeFF/status/1758534468594503681
Title: Re: #11 USC (2-0, 0-0) at #18 Michigan (2-1, 0-0) Game Week
Post by: MrNubbz on September 20, 2024, 10:01:18 AM
JJs out for the year so fake news :cheer:
Title: Re: #11 USC (2-0, 0-0) at #18 Michigan (2-1, 0-0) Game Week
Post by: ELA on September 20, 2024, 02:45:48 PM
https://twitter.com/Andy_Staples/status/1836958649207394574?t=htTFtJZNZ8RQfWcn7fH-RA&s=19
Title: Re: #11 USC (2-0, 0-0) at #18 Michigan (2-1, 0-0) Game Week
Post by: Mdot21 on September 21, 2024, 08:31:22 PM
https://twitter.com/cfbrep/status/1837592093126283315?s=46&t=WlnuR3MuiobA8aA_izh4EQ

https://twitter.com/loswithemos/status/1837613236944097296?s=46&t=WlnuR3MuiobA8aA_izh4EQ
Title: Re: #11 USC (2-0, 0-0) at #18 Michigan (2-1, 0-0) Game Week
Post by: Mdot21 on September 21, 2024, 09:34:30 PM
https://twitter.com/JasonKirk_fyi/status/1837637440347009329
Title: Re: #11 USC (2-0, 0-0) at #18 Michigan (2-1, 0-0) Game Week
Post by: Mdot21 on September 21, 2024, 09:41:26 PM
gotta say I love 235 pound RB's that run through tackles and run people over...

https://twitter.com/Chapmatic34/status/1837628542068445581
Title: Re: #11 USC (2-0, 0-0) at #18 Michigan (2-1, 0-0) Game Week
Post by: Mdot21 on September 21, 2024, 10:40:46 PM
https://twitter.com/awfulannouncing/status/1837627999757238501
Title: Re: #11 USC (2-0, 0-0) at #18 Michigan (2-1, 0-0) Game Week
Post by: ELA on September 21, 2024, 10:50:21 PM
gotta say I love 235 pound RB's that run through tackles and run people over...

https://twitter.com/Chapmatic34/status/1837628542068445581
And thats why I hate the "no 2 high safeties" take.  Football has a natural pendulum.  Sorry that HS football is a joke and everyone plays 7 v 7s.  If you cant stop 5 yards up the middle every play, thats on you.  Do I wish it required some more elaborate blocking schemes?  Yeah, but Ill take the natural enb and flow of the game
Title: Re: #11 USC (2-0, 0-0) at #18 Michigan (2-1, 0-0) Game Week
Post by: Temp430 on September 22, 2024, 07:20:49 AM
Michigan still needs to figure out how to throw the ball effectively when needed.  If they do, they might have something when they show up in Columbus in two months.
Title: Re: #11 USC (2-0, 0-0) at #18 Michigan (2-1, 0-0) Game Week
Post by: MrNubbz on September 22, 2024, 07:37:02 AM
And they might not
Title: Re: #11 USC (2-0, 0-0) at #18 Michigan (2-1, 0-0) Game Week
Post by: Mdot21 on September 22, 2024, 11:32:05 AM
Michigan still needs to figure out how to throw the ball effectively when needed.  If they do, they might have something when they show up in Columbus in two months.
I honestly don't know how that happens.

If I'm Sherrone I am studying a ton of UF tape under Meyer/Tebow and trying my best to emulate that. 

You have a stud pass catching TE like they had. You have a 235-240 pound battering ram freight train at QB. You have a guy that is oh so explosive but not truly a RB and not truly a WR- more like a hybrid. 

Maybe just try to copy that? Cause this offense as is- is a mess. They need to really switch some things up. Go more tempo, feed Mullings 20-25 carries a game and let him run defenses over into submission, get Edwards on the field with Mullings at the same time by putting him in the slot and out wide. They just need to get way more creative with scheme, play calling, and personnel usage. 
Title: Re: #11 USC (2-1, 0-1) at #18 Michigan (3-1, 1-0) Postgame
Post by: Mdot21 on September 22, 2024, 11:44:24 PM
Mason Graham is a man child in the middle...


https://twitter.com/_RyanFowler_/status/1837615479478767899

Semaj Morgan is going to be severely under-utilized and remain pissed off all season because Michigan doesn't have a QB that can get him the ball....he's a really good WR imo...

https://twitter.com/itsAntWright/status/1837625599658950793
Title: Re: #11 USC (2-1, 0-1) at #18 Michigan (3-1, 1-0) Postgame
Post by: Temp430 on September 23, 2024, 06:35:22 AM
Orji is learning.  He has a huge arm but is still learning how to see the field.  Do you remember JJ not seeing open receivers?  I do and he got better.  Orji hasn't thrown that many passes in actual games and his long passes this year have all been a bit too long.  Better too long than too short.  Orji will get better now that he's starting.  I guess I'm hoping that it'll be enough to make Michigan's passing game dangerous enough to help with the running game.  Opponents will still stack the box no matter what.
Title: Re: #11 USC (2-1, 0-1) at #18 Michigan (3-1, 1-0) Postgame
Post by: Mdot21 on September 23, 2024, 02:55:06 PM
Orji is learning.  He has a huge arm but is still learning how to see the field.  Do you remember JJ not seeing open receivers?  I do and he got better.  Orji hasn't thrown that many passes in actual games and his long passes this year have all been a bit too long.  Better too long than too short.  Orji will get better now that he's starting.  I guess I'm hoping that it'll be enough to make Michigan's passing game dangerous enough to help with the running game.  Opponents will still stack the box no matter what.
Idk. I have my doubts and I'd love to be proven wrong by him. But point blank period he's definitely a MUCH better option than Davis Warren- who is a walk-on that sucks and should never see the field at a place like Michigan let alone be a starter. The only reason for Davis Warren to ever see the field at a place like Michigan would be to unload the bench and your 2nd, 3rd, and 4th string QBs have already taken snaps so might as well let the 5th string walk-on QB get a couple reps. That's it. Period. End of story.

Davis Warren brought absolutely nothing to that offense and in fact he only hurt it and hindered it because of his inaccuracy and bad decision making/interceptions. Orji at least brings a plus to the run game. Just having him back there changes the math, makes the defense have to account for him and makes it 11 on 11 and not 10 on 11 like it is with Warren. And just having Orji back there will freeze DE's and LB's for split second and make them hesitate and have to think OK is the QB handing it or pulling it and running. With Warren that's never even a thought- they know they can just crash down on the back.

So even if Orji can't throw- he's helping the run game FAR more than Davis Warren- and ontop of that at least he's not throwing an interception every 10th pass attempt like Davis Warren who sucks- was.

Just run the ball on offense and protect the football- don't turn it over, play stingy defense, play excellent special teams & the field position game and Michigan will beat most teams on that schedule.


OL is slowly improving as well and starting to click, as evidenced by this metric below.


https://twitter.com/_ZachShaw/status/1838205941470093484