CFB51 College Football Fan Community

The Power Five => Big Ten => Topic started by: medinabuckeye1 on January 11, 2022, 11:15:08 AM

Title: Eight Years of the CFP are now in the books
Post by: medinabuckeye1 on January 11, 2022, 11:15:08 AM
Championships:

Wins:
Appearances:

Even though they didn't win it all, Alabama really pulled away this year:
Championships:  Since the winner was a first-time CFP winner Bama's lead remains one over Clemson and two over the 1-NC group that is now expanded to tOSU, LSU, and UGA.  

Wins:
Bama got yet another CFP win to pull further ahead of their closest contender (Clemson) and they have six more CFP wins than third place (tOSU/UGA).  

Appearances:
This is where Bama really pulled ahead.  They had a down year and still made it while their closest competitors (Clemson, tOSU, and Oklahoma) all missed.  

Title: Re: Eight Years of the CFP are now in the books
Post by: utee94 on January 11, 2022, 11:41:17 AM
Expanding the playoff will surely cause Alabama to stop making playoff appearances.
Title: Re: Eight Years of the CFP are now in the books
Post by: Cincydawg on January 11, 2022, 11:42:14 AM
I am theoretically curious which "team left out" really had a solid chance of winning the current system.
Title: Re: Eight Years of the CFP are now in the books
Post by: medinabuckeye1 on January 11, 2022, 12:02:00 PM
I am theoretically curious why "team left out" really had a solid chance of winning the current system.
Huh?
Title: Re: Eight Years of the CFP are now in the books
Post by: bayareabadger on January 11, 2022, 01:25:41 PM
I am theoretically curious why "team left out" really had a solid chance of winning the current system.
I don't think anyone would argue that. 

We've only seen a couple champs that would've been left out in the old system, so I suppose we don't know. And with the old system, we saw a few champs that would've been locked out in the previous system. 
Title: Re: Eight Years of the CFP are now in the books
Post by: OrangeAfroMan on January 11, 2022, 01:44:23 PM
Pre-CFP, bowl alliance any of it, there were 2 examples I'm aware of where the #5 team rose to #1 after the bowls.  That can't happen anymore, unless....
Title: Re: Eight Years of the CFP are now in the books
Post by: Cincydawg on January 11, 2022, 04:15:28 PM
I was pondering which Five slotted team could have won an extended playoff.
Title: Re: Eight Years of the CFP are now in the books
Post by: utee94 on January 11, 2022, 04:34:41 PM
I was pondering which Five slotted team could have won an extended playoff.
I don't even know who the "first one out" was in any of the given years, but I suspect medinabuckeye will be along any moment to provide this analysis, and we will all be very grateful. :)

Title: Re: Eight Years of the CFP are now in the books
Post by: medinabuckeye1 on January 11, 2022, 05:10:45 PM
I don't even know who the "first one out" was in any of the given years, but I suspect medinabuckeye will be along any moment to provide this analysis, and we will all be very grateful. :)
Eh, it is really hard to say.  

One thing about the playoff is that the eight CFP Champions starting with Ohio State in 2014 have probably played eight of the ten or so toughest schedules ever played by a NC and quite possibly the toughest eight.  

When I look at Ohio State's CFP NC in 2014, after the Michigan game that year the Buckeyes played:
Just a few years prior to that very good tOSU season would have ended with Michigan, Rose Bowl and the Rose Bowl opponent *MIGHT* have been a great one like USC in 1968/69 (#2 at game time, #4 final) or they might have been not so good.  

That 2014 tOSU team ended up playing (final AP ranks):
2015 Champion Alabama ended up playing (final AP ranks):
The 2014 Buckeyes played three top-5 teams and four of the top-13.  The 2015 Tide played three top-10 teams and SEVEN ranked teams.  Pre-CFP schedules like that would almost never have happened.  I know that 1973 USC played #1 ND, #2 tOSU, and #3 Oklahoma but they went 0-2-1 and if they HAD won those games then those teams wouldn't have finished that high.  

In the Buckeyes last pre-BCS NC (1968) they played:

That was a REALLY tough schedule for that era because a bunch of stars aligned to make it that way:
Still, it wasn't NEARLY as tough at the very top as what all CFP Champs have faced.  

Title: Re: Eight Years of the CFP are now in the books
Post by: FearlessF on January 12, 2022, 11:25:32 AM
5th team

what 6th, 7th, or 8th team would have a reasonable chance???
Title: Re: Eight Years of the CFP are now in the books
Post by: Cincydawg on January 12, 2022, 11:54:53 AM
That is why I'd be OK with a 6 team playoff, but no more.  I don't think teams 7-12 should be included, and view 5 and 6 as sketchy.

This year we would have had some bad conference champs in the mix and an at large that won it as it stands now.
Title: Re: Eight Years of the CFP are now in the books
Post by: medinabuckeye1 on January 12, 2022, 12:04:48 PM
That is why I'd be OK with a 6 team playoff, but no more.  I don't think teams 7-12 should be included, and view 5 and 6 as sketchy.

This year we would have had some bad conference champs in the mix and an at large that won it as it stands now.
I wasn't in favor of expanding to four and I'm not in favor of further expansion but, as I outlined in another thread (https://www.cfb51.com/big-ten/if-not-when-how-much-longer-until-the-big-moneyhelmets-break/28/), I feel that expansion is inevitable and think that an eight team CFP with the first round on campus hosted by the top-4 league champions would be the best expansion possibility.  Why do you like six and how would you set it up?  
Title: Re: Eight Years of the CFP are now in the books
Post by: Cincydawg on January 12, 2022, 12:13:43 PM
I prefer four, but think six is "OK" and 8 is too many for reasons stated.  But six allows all conference champs to be included plus one at large.  And perhaps this year Cincy would be the at large.  But then Wake and Utah get in along with OU, meh.
Title: Re: Eight Years of the CFP are now in the books
Post by: utee94 on January 12, 2022, 01:34:48 PM
Since this is the only CFP thread on the front page, I'll put this here:

https://twitter.com/jbook37/status/1480967027627937794?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1480967027627937794%7Ctwgr%5E%7Ctwcon%5Es1_&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.surlyhorns.com%2Fboard%2Findex.php%3Fapp%3Dcoremodule%3Dsystemcontroller%3Dembedurl%3Dhttps%3A%2F%2Ftwitter.com%2Fjbook37%2Fstatus%2F1480967027627937794
Title: Re: Eight Years of the CFP are now in the books
Post by: betarhoalphadelta on January 12, 2022, 01:49:36 PM
Since this is the only CFP thread on the front page, I'll put this here:

https://twitter.com/jbook37/status/1480967027627937794?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1480967027627937794%7Ctwgr%5E%7Ctwcon%5Es1_&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.surlyhorns.com%2Fboard%2Findex.php%3Fapp%3Dcoremodule%3Dsystemcontroller%3Dembedurl%3Dhttps%3A%2F%2Ftwitter.com%2Fjbook37%2Fstatus%2F1480967027627937794

That's a dumb hill to die on, for several reasons...



Of course, this presupposes that it's true. I wouldn't exactly trust it. 
Title: Re: Eight Years of the CFP are now in the books
Post by: ELA on January 12, 2022, 01:54:47 PM
I would think the only time it wouldn't happen, would be if there was an upset in the conference championship game. In the CFP era, where a non tourney, or even close, team knocked a team out?
Title: Re: Eight Years of the CFP are now in the books
Post by: utee94 on January 12, 2022, 01:55:38 PM
That's a dumb hill to die on, for several reasons...

  • 95% of the time, the B1G champion will be one of the 5 highest ranked champs, even if you assume nothing in the college football landscape ever changes.
  • It should be the G5 that's arguing that it should be the ***6*** highest ranked champs, to keep their seat at the table, but nothing really affects Warren in any way there.
  • My own belief is that the realignment of OU/TX to the SEC is going to turn the system into a P4/G6 system, or maybe at most a P4.5/G5.5 system, and if that happens it becomes even MORE likely that the B1G champ will be one of the top 4 ranked champs 95% of the time, and one of the top 5 ranked champs any year that isn't complete and total chaos.
  • If you're the goddamn Big Ten Conference, with some of the most storied history of the ENTIRE world of CFB, and your champ isn't one of the top 5 conf champs? They probably don't deserve to be in the playoff anyway.


Of course, this presupposes that it's true. I wouldn't exactly trust it.

If it's true, of course, I actually agree with Warren.

However, it seems like he's trying to protect FBS college football in general rather than performing his fiduciary responsibility to the B1G.



Title: Re: Eight Years of the CFP are now in the books
Post by: medinabuckeye1 on January 12, 2022, 02:45:06 PM
I would think the only time it wouldn't happen, would be if there was an upset in the conference championship game. In the CFP era, where a non tourney, or even close, team knocked a team out?
I agree but even there the B1G would likely be fine for two reasons:

AP ranks in the CFP era:


AP ranks of league champs pre-bowl:
2014:
2015:
2016:
Note that the other two teams in the top-7 were #2 tOSU and #6 Michigan.  

2017:
2018:
2019:
2020:
2021:

So in eight years the B1G champion has been:

So in the CFP era the B1G Champion has never been ranked worse than #5 and has only been outside the top-4 Champs once (and that was AP only, they were top-4 in the CFP).  


Even if there had been upsets:
2014:
With a win over #6 tOSU in the B1GCG the #11 Badgers would have improved to 11-2 and finished #6 right behind Baylor/TCU (both 11-1) and ahead of tOSU (11-2) and MSU (10-2).  They'd have been the 5th highest ranked P5 Champion.  

2015:
Michigan State WAS the lower ranked team and moved up to #3 and third among P5 Champs.  

2016:
Penn State WAS the lower ranked team and moved up to #5 and fourth among P5 Champs.  

2017:
Ohio State WAS the lower ranked team and moved up to #5 and fourth among P5 Champs.  

2018:
With a win over #6 tOSU in the B1GCG the #21 Wildcats would have improved to 9-4 and probably finished #14.  That would have been last among P5 Champs but 10-2 Michigan was #8 and 11-2 Ohio State would have been ahead of them.  

2019:  
With a win over #2 tOSU in the B1GCG the #10 Badgers would have improved to 11-2 and probably finished #5.  That would have been fourth among P5 Champs.  

2020:
With a win over #3 tOSU in the B1GCG the #15 Wildcats would have improved to 7-1 and probably finished #6.  That would have been third among P5 Champs.  

2021:
With a win over #2 Michigan in the B1GCG the #15 Hawkeyes would have improved to 11-2 and probably finished #5 or #6. That would have been second or third among P5 Champs.