I think that also puts risk/reward analysis back in play. There was a call in an MSU game a couple years back, maybe against Indiana? The Indiana player easily picked up the first down, and had like a 30 yard gain. They then stopped play to review if he had stepped out like 2 yards earlier, and it was so close, I couldn't tell, I thought they'd uphold the call, which the ultimately I think did. But either way, it was going to be 1st and 10, just from either the 26 or the 28. I think in the risk/reward, the reward was so small, no coach would ever challenge that, unless it was blatantly obvious. Instead we had a long stoppage for something that was too close to call, that was ultimately sort of meaningless.
