header pic

Perhaps the BEST B1G Forum anywhere, here at College Football Fan Site, CFB51!!!

The 'Old' CFN/Scout Crowd- Enjoy Civil discussion, game analytics, in depth player and coaching 'takes' and discussing topics surrounding the game. You can even have your own free board, all you have to do is ask!!!

Anyone is welcomed and encouraged to join our FREE site and to take part in our community- a community with you- the user, the fan, -and the person- will be protected from intrusive actions and with a clean place to interact.


Author

Topic: Who would you realistically replace Rutgers with?

 (Read 21694 times)

MarqHusker

  • Team Captain
  • *******
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 5502
  • Liked:
Re: Who would you realistically replace Rutgers with?
« Reply #84 on: September 20, 2018, 10:25:03 PM »
Indiana which demonstrated its Northern bonafides in many ways during the CW sure does have a southern element in pockets of the state, mostly (again) south of I-70, but not really until you get out of Indy, and certainly South of Bloomington and again towards Louisville and SE towards Cincinnati.   There's quite a broad range of dialects from N to S in this state.

847badgerfan

  • Administrator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 25184
  • Liked:
Re: Who would you realistically replace Rutgers with?
« Reply #85 on: September 21, 2018, 06:07:55 AM »
Illinois is much the same in that regard. "Downstate" is typically in reference to anything South from I-80. It's different, for sure.
U RAH RAH! WIS CON SIN!

MarqHusker

  • Team Captain
  • *******
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 5502
  • Liked:
Re: Who would you realistically replace Rutgers with?
« Reply #86 on: September 21, 2018, 07:52:46 AM »
I've always been of the impression that Bloomington Normal is that dividing line of N and S.   Cubs or Cardinals.  People who still try to claim they live in Chicagoland vs those who know it's bulljive.

Cincydawg

  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 71497
  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Liked:
Re: Who would you realistically replace Rutgers with?
« Reply #87 on: September 21, 2018, 08:30:50 AM »
Cincinnati has an interesting "culture", or blend thereof, being a few miles from Indiana and across the river from KY.  You hear a lot of different accents there.  

Atlanta of course seems to be mostly transplants from Ohio and Michigan plus a lot of Hispanics.  Part of the town is heavily Vietnamese populated and they have some good places to eat.  In the park near us, one can see just about every kind of person and accent, even some French speaking folks at times.


Cincydawg

  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 71497
  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Liked:
Re: Who would you realistically replace Rutgers with?
« Reply #88 on: September 21, 2018, 08:32:42 AM »
Georgia Tech would be an interesting program to consider for a conference, but I suspect they are locked into the ACC for all practical purposes.  They often do well in baseball.  Their football seems to have fallen off quite a bit of late.  I don't think a new coach would help much there though.  Their offense is good for programs that can't recruit at a high level.

I'm somewhat surprised more teams don't adopt some version of that offense.

jhetfield99

  • Red Shirt
  • ***
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 331
  • Liked:
Re: Who would you realistically replace Rutgers with?
« Reply #89 on: September 22, 2018, 03:35:00 AM »
Meh, Big 11 sucks.  This is what I'm talking about:


This is great.  How old is this and where did you find it?

ELA

  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 20309
  • Liked:
Re: Who would you realistically replace Rutgers with?
« Reply #90 on: September 22, 2018, 04:47:17 PM »
For realsies....

Non-B10 AAU members with FBS football:
Buffalo
I mean, they are on the list

847badgerfan

  • Administrator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 25184
  • Liked:
Re: Who would you realistically replace Rutgers with?
« Reply #91 on: September 22, 2018, 05:23:56 PM »
Just coming here to post it. May as well try the other side of New York. Hell, add Cornell too. We need another Big Red.
U RAH RAH! WIS CON SIN!

MrNubbz

  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 17126
  • Liked:
Re: Who would you realistically replace Rutgers with?
« Reply #92 on: September 23, 2018, 12:27:23 PM »
Repeating myself from another thread but sheesh Jeebis at home no less,hopefully Maryland comes around at least it'll be a wash.I know back in the '70s-'80s Northwestern was pretty weak but they are an original member and weren't reached out to like they were some kind of catch.Thanx Big Jim
Suburbia:Where they tear out the trees & then name streets after them.

Cincydawg

  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 71497
  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Liked:
Re: Who would you realistically replace Rutgers with?
« Reply #93 on: September 23, 2018, 12:33:19 PM »
I think we all realize that a good coach can turn around a program in a few years.  Illinois is a sleeping program now.

Look at Purdue, the best 1-3 team in the country.  Nobody wanted to kick Purdue out when they were bad though.

Rutgers is pretty clearly the weakest team in the conference at the moment, I think, but they were half decent just a couple years back.  Or so.

And maybe they have good lacrosse teams.

A flagship NJ program has potential.  

Maybe Nebraska should get the boot though.

847badgerfan

  • Administrator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 25184
  • Liked:
Re: Who would you realistically replace Rutgers with?
« Reply #94 on: September 23, 2018, 12:36:21 PM »
Illinois has been a sleeping giant ever since Mike White was fired for cheating.
U RAH RAH! WIS CON SIN!

847badgerfan

  • Administrator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 25184
  • Liked:
Re: Who would you realistically replace Rutgers with?
« Reply #95 on: September 23, 2018, 12:47:54 PM »
Put M, MSU, PSU, UW, Iowa and NU in a division. The others are in a separate division. Last place team from upper division drops to lower division and first place team from lower division moves up.
U RAH RAH! WIS CON SIN!

Cincydawg

  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 71497
  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Liked:
Re: Who would you realistically replace Rutgers with?
« Reply #96 on: September 23, 2018, 12:55:16 PM »
The Illini could be an 8 win team with a decent coach, but of course said coach would get poached soon enough if it happened.

Wisconsin managed a turnaround that has been pretty long lived.

OrangeAfroMan

  • Stats Porn
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 18839
  • Liked:
Re: Who would you realistically replace Rutgers with?
« Reply #97 on: September 23, 2018, 01:06:37 PM »
Rutgers isn't just normal "worst in the conference" bad.  Blown out by Kansas and Buffalo is a special kind of awful.
“The Swamp is where Gators live.  We feel comfortable there, but we hope our opponents feel tentative. A swamp is hot and sticky and can be dangerous." - Steve Spurrier

 

Support the Site!
Purchase of every item listed here DIRECTLY supports the site.