I get where you are coming from, but you are not going to get uniformity in a lot of these things even if everyone wanted it unless you actually merge the major conferences into a super conference who can impose rules.
Think of it like this. Right now, let's say Texas and Oklahoma decide to move from the Big 12. The other conferences aren't going to neatly decide who goes where. They are all going to want those two because they are cash cows and those two will want whatever situation is best for them (not 100% money, but that's a big factor). The PAC-12 might be the one to get them because it would have the most room to expand (could add some travel mates), but money would be a lot better elsewhere (PAC-12 is currently getting less than Big 12 schools; would change with those two, but not like Big Ten or SEC money). Then after they are gone, the others that miss out are not just going to expand for the sake of expanding. If the other 8 Big 12 schools add more money than headaches, sure, but honestly most won't. The Big Ten, SEC, and ACC are already at 14 (maybe more in this situation) and that's not a great desire to expand and play less of each other.
As for my personal view on it, I like the controversy. I don't want 4 conferences and 4 spots because I want to care about those early season out of conference games and those random possible losses along the way. Those matter a lot less if you are talking about conference champs in automatically.
