It's too bad that D-I college hockey isn't a 120-300 school club. I'm not at all a fan of holding kids out of college after high school, delaying them from entering the real world, until they are 2-4 years older and big enough to beat the 17-year-old blue chip prospects. Granted, I'm biased because Michigan (and most of the Big Ten) is the latter kind of program, but I like to think this would seem crooked no matter my team. Unfortunately, changing the rules is impractical because the small schools require this strategy to compete and will never vote oppositely. Likewise, breaking away is impractical because the sport barely has a sustainable number of D-I schools as it is. Ef