header pic

Perhaps the BEST B1G Forum anywhere, here at College Football Fan Site, CFB51!!!

The 'Old' CFN/Scout Crowd- Enjoy Civil discussion, game analytics, in depth player and coaching 'takes' and discussing topics surrounding the game. You can even have your own free board, all you have to do is ask!!!

Anyone is welcomed and encouraged to join our FREE site and to take part in our community- a community with you- the user, the fan, -and the person- will be protected from intrusive actions and with a clean place to interact.


« previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 12 13 [14] 15 16 ... 21   Go Down
Author

Topic: Who would you realistically replace Rutgers with?

 (Read 32901 times)

betarhoalphadelta

  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 14560
  • Liked:
Re: Who would you realistically replace Rutgers with?
« Reply #182 on: September 28, 2018, 10:42:55 PM »
FWIW, my issue with "Purdon't" is that it's frankly just a weak insult. I expect better from most fans [Hoosiers excluded]. 
Logged

FearlessF

  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 45617
  • Liked:
Re: Who would you realistically replace Rutgers with?
« Reply #183 on: September 28, 2018, 10:46:37 PM »
exactly

at least be clever
Logged
"Courage; Generosity; Fairness; Honor; In these are the true awards of manly sport."

Anonymous Coward

  • All Star
  • ******
  • Posts: 3187
  • Liked:
Re: Who would you realistically replace Rutgers with?
« Reply #184 on: September 28, 2018, 11:10:09 PM »
Quote from: bwarbiany on September 28, 2018, 10:42:55 PM
FWIW, my issue with "Purdon't" is that it's frankly just a weak insult. I expect better from most fans [Hoosiers excluded].
For sure. I mean it's a play on words, at least, but it's not one worth executing.
tO$U and U$C, likewise, show no effort.
Ditto scUM, but that one may be even worse, since those letters don't even try to be clever (the s and c are neither naturally related to Michigan, nor are they part of some abbreviation). It's no better or worse than dUMb, bUMs or rUMplestiltskin. It's popularity seems unconscionable to everyone except those who use it.
At least TTUN has a backstory, though I guess it isn't really demeaning (both sides seem to like it).
« Last Edit: September 28, 2018, 11:11:59 PM by Anonymous Coward »
Logged

Brutus Buckeye

  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 12097
  • Liked:
Re: Who would you realistically replace Rutgers with?
« Reply #185 on: September 28, 2018, 11:20:57 PM »
TDS was a good one that Urban coined for BYU when he was at Utah. It stood for "Team down south" in an obviously OSU inspired jab. It still lives on to this day. 

Although today it has taken on new meaning in popular vernacular as "Trump derangement syndrome" which ironically is better suited as a descriptor for Ute fans than it is for their Cougar adversaries. 
Logged

utee94

  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 22283
  • Liked:
Re: Who would you realistically replace Rutgers with?
« Reply #186 on: September 29, 2018, 12:13:32 AM »
No love for fUCLA?

The Aggies like to call us "t.u."

And we simply say "ou sucks"
Logged

847badgerfan

  • Administrator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 31196
  • Liked:
Re: Who would you realistically replace Rutgers with?
« Reply #187 on: September 29, 2018, 07:05:34 AM »
Those ain't Big Ten teams, amigo. But yeah, just more silliness.
Logged
U RAH RAH! WIS CON SIN!

847badgerfan

  • Administrator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 31196
  • Liked:
Re: Who would you realistically replace Rutgers with?
« Reply #188 on: September 29, 2018, 08:08:21 AM »
Conversation





[color=rgba(20, 23, 26, 1)]Matt Sugam

[color=rgba(101, 119, 134, 1)]@MattSugam[/color]



[color=rgba(20, 23, 26, 1)]Walking behind Buffalo players on the way to the bus after beating Rutgers 42-13.
One player: “I thought that was Delaware State out there.”
Second player: “Man, they’d lose to Delaware State.”[/color]
[color=rgba(101, 119, 134, 1)][color=rgba(101, 119, 134, 1)]3:05 PM · Sep 22, 2018[/color][/size][/color]
[/font][/size][/color]
Logged
U RAH RAH! WIS CON SIN!

utee94

  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 22283
  • Liked:
Re: Who would you realistically replace Rutgers with?
« Reply #189 on: September 30, 2018, 12:26:13 PM »
Quote from: 847badgerfan on September 29, 2018, 07:05:34 AM
Those ain't Big Ten teams, amigo. But yeah, just more silliness.
Oh, my deepest apologies.  Didn't realize y'all were limiting the discussion to ONLY stupid names for B1G teams.
Guess I'll just abandon the B1G board and stick to the B12.
Logged

Cincydawg

  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 83029
  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Liked:
Re: Who would you realistically replace Rutgers with?
« Reply #190 on: September 30, 2018, 12:34:21 PM »
Syracuse seems to be a hard nosed team.
Logged

OrangeAfroMan

  • Stats Porn
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 21805
  • Liked:
Re: Who would you realistically replace Rutgers with?
« Reply #191 on: September 30, 2018, 12:49:36 PM »
I always thought Syracuse would be a good B10 addition.
Logged
“The Swamp is where Gators live.  We feel comfortable there, but we hope our opponents feel tentative. A swamp is hot and sticky and can be dangerous." - Steve Spurrier

847badgerfan

  • Administrator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 31196
  • Liked:
Re: Who would you realistically replace Rutgers with?
« Reply #192 on: September 30, 2018, 12:56:53 PM »
Quote from: utee94 on September 30, 2018, 12:26:13 PM
Oh, my deepest apologies.  Didn't realize y'all were limiting the discussion to ONLY stupid names for B1G teams.
Guess I'll just abandon the B1G board and stick to the B12.
Don't be so sensative. I was just messing around. Have a Tito's!!
Logged
U RAH RAH! WIS CON SIN!

FearlessF

  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 45617
  • Liked:
Re: Who would you realistically replace Rutgers with?
« Reply #193 on: October 01, 2018, 08:09:55 PM »
good idea
Logged
"Courage; Generosity; Fairness; Honor; In these are the true awards of manly sport."

fezzador

  • Player
  • ****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 576
  • Liked:
Re: Who would you realistically replace Rutgers with?
« Reply #194 on: October 02, 2018, 08:21:27 AM »
Quote from: OrangeAfroMan on September 30, 2018, 12:49:36 PM
I always thought Syracuse would be a good B10 addition.
Heck, Buffalo would be an upgrade over Buttgers.
Logged

Cincydawg

  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 83029
  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Liked:
Re: Who would you realistically replace Rutgers with?
« Reply #195 on: October 02, 2018, 08:35:54 AM »
Does anyone have any idea as to whether the PTBs at Rutgers are interested in Football (and athletics)?

If they are, that could matter, and they might shell out to get a decent coach at some point.  They should be able to be a 7-5 kind of program at some point, I think.
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 12 13 [14] 15 16 ... 21   Go Up
« previous next »
 
Support the Site!
Purchase of every item listed here DIRECTLY supports the site.
Custom Jeep Badges

Custom Jeep Badges