header pic

Perhaps the BEST B1G Forum anywhere, here at College Football Fan Site, CFB51!!!

The 'Old' CFN/Scout Crowd- Enjoy Civil discussion, game analytics, in depth player and coaching 'takes' and discussing topics surrounding the game. You can even have your own free board, all you have to do is ask!!!

Anyone is welcomed and encouraged to join our FREE site and to take part in our community- a community with you- the user, the fan, -and the person- will be protected from intrusive actions and with a clean place to interact.


« previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 9 10 [11] 12 13 ... 21   Go Down
Author

Topic: Who would you realistically replace Rutgers with?

 (Read 32949 times)

847badgerfan

  • Administrator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 31207
  • Liked:
Re: Who would you realistically replace Rutgers with?
« Reply #140 on: September 27, 2018, 06:10:28 PM »
PSU's helmet factor certainly helped. Rutgers is probably gone, had it happened there. I have to believe there is some buyer's remorse among the chancellors and presidents anyway. A Sandusky-like occurrence would be a good excuse, but precedent is set now because of PSU.



Being a helmet has its privileges. Everyone knows this.
Logged
U RAH RAH! WIS CON SIN!

Cincydawg

  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 83044
  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Liked:
Re: Who would you realistically replace Rutgers with?
« Reply #141 on: September 27, 2018, 06:19:49 PM »
Well, I still think the question is moot.  
Logged

Anonymous Coward

  • All Star
  • ******
  • Posts: 3187
  • Liked:
Re: Who would you realistically replace Rutgers with?
« Reply #142 on: September 27, 2018, 06:22:03 PM »
Michigan fans have begun to call Rutgers "Rutger," as if the original were a plural and they lost the privilege, and somehow this seems far** more demeaning and hilarious to me than tO$U or scUM. I won't be sad if it sticks.

**(I could never bold, italicize, underline and all caps that enough)
« Last Edit: September 27, 2018, 06:26:11 PM by Anonymous Coward »
Logged

Cincydawg

  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 83044
  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Liked:
Re: Who would you realistically replace Rutgers with?
« Reply #143 on: September 27, 2018, 06:25:34 PM »
Well, in an years, Rutgers will be in the Big Ten.
Logged

utee94

  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 22289
  • Liked:
Re: Who would you realistically replace Rutgers with?
« Reply #144 on: September 27, 2018, 07:08:23 PM »
Quote from: Cincydawg on September 27, 2018, 06:19:49 PM
Well, I still think the question is moot.  
Of course it's moot.  Given the massive budgets involved among state institutions, you really think the B1G wants to open itself to that much litigation?  Of course they don't.  
Some type of institutional failure, of course, is a different story. 
But poor athletic performance?  Nope.  The B1G administrators knew that's what they were signing up for from the beginning.  They accepted it as the cost of doing business and moved on.  
Logged

Cincydawg

  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 83044
  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Liked:
Re: Who would you realistically replace Rutgers with?
« Reply #145 on: September 27, 2018, 07:39:53 PM »
Rutgers with a good coach could be decent, like Kentucky decent.
Logged

MarqHusker

  • Team Captain
  • *******
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 6039
  • Liked:
Re: Who would you realistically replace Rutgers with?
« Reply #146 on: September 27, 2018, 08:40:38 PM »
Quote from: Anonymous Coward on September 27, 2018, 06:22:03 PM
Michigan fans have begun to call Rutgers "Rutger," as if the original were a plural and they lost the privilege, and somehow this seems far** more demeaning and hilarious to me than tO$U or scUM. I won't be sad if it sticks.

**(I could never bold, italicize, underline and all caps that enough)
I thought everyone knew about this.  
Logged

Anonymous Coward

  • All Star
  • ******
  • Posts: 3187
  • Liked:
Re: Who would you realistically replace Rutgers with?
« Reply #147 on: September 27, 2018, 09:20:00 PM »
(1) new to me
(2) awesome
Logged

Brutus Buckeye

  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 12098
  • Liked:
Re: Who would you realistically replace Rutgers with?
« Reply #148 on: September 27, 2018, 10:03:46 PM »
Quote from: OrangeAfroMan on September 27, 2018, 06:06:51 PM
Well see, that brings up an interesting point.  Say the Sandusky thing happened at Rutgers.  A school only added for dollars and faux-eyeballs....not a strong addition with a great history....what then?



I'd guess Rutgers would've gotten a harsher initial sentence and would not have been afforded the concessions after the fact.  They would've had no noble coach (O'Brien) to steward them through nasty waters and may very well have been cut loose by the conference.



Or I'm just crazy, right?  Rutgers + Sandusky = ?
Oh, well why didn't you stipulate that in the OP. That certainly raises the plausibility of this unlikely scenario. 
Two teams from the same division of the same conference in neighboring states both happen to have harbored a chomo on the coaching staff. 
What a thread! 
Logged

Brutus Buckeye

  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 12098
  • Liked:
Re: Who would you realistically replace Rutgers with?
« Reply #149 on: September 28, 2018, 12:20:51 AM »
They are definitely bringing the best mascot to the table.

Logged

Anonymous Coward

  • All Star
  • ******
  • Posts: 3187
  • Liked:
Re: Who would you realistically replace Rutgers with?
« Reply #150 on: September 28, 2018, 12:55:11 AM »
I dislike people mascots. And that's one of the worst.
Logged

Big Beef Tacosupreme

  • Player
  • ****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 930
  • Liked:
Re: Who would you realistically replace Rutgers with?
« Reply #151 on: September 28, 2018, 09:46:57 AM »
Quote from: OrangeAfroMan on September 27, 2018, 06:06:51 PM
Well see, that brings up an interesting point.  Say the Sandusky thing happened at Rutgers.  A school only added for dollars and faux-eyeballs....not a strong addition with a great history....what then?



I'd guess Rutgers would've gotten a harsher initial sentence and would not have been afforded the concessions after the fact.  They would've had no noble coach (O'Brien) to steward them through nasty waters and may very well have been cut loose by the conference.



Or I'm just crazy, right?  Rutgers + Sandusky = ?
Here's what would have happened.
NOTHING.
You know why?  Nobody cares about Rutgers.
Baylor covered up for murder and numerous rapes BY THEIR ATHLETES and nothing happened to them.  You know why?  Because hardly anybody cares about Baylor.  People care even less about Rutgers.  How many average people do you think know about the crime ring Rutger's football players had this off season?
Need another example?  Michigan State's issues.  That got some publicity, but it would have been much worse at a helmet school. 
Helmet schools are under a microscope.  Trade swag for tattoos?  HUGE PROBLEM, BETTER REVAMP THE ENTIRE PROGRAM.  Coaching staff doesn't fire someone even though they were never convicted of a crime?  FIRE URBAN, OHIO STATE COVERS UP VIOLENCE AGAINST WOMEN!!!
Logged

Brutus Buckeye

  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 12098
  • Liked:
Re: Who would you realistically replace Rutgers with?
« Reply #152 on: September 28, 2018, 10:04:54 AM »
The southern helmets aren't under the same microscope. 
Logged

Brutus Buckeye

  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 12098
  • Liked:
Re: Who would you realistically replace Rutgers with?
« Reply #153 on: September 28, 2018, 10:31:55 AM »
Shameless Jameis the rapist, Mixon's KO punch, Cam Newton, Miami's various shenanigans, and so forth. 
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 9 10 [11] 12 13 ... 21   Go Up
« previous next »
 
Support the Site!
Purchase of every item listed here DIRECTLY supports the site.
EGA- Once and Always

Custom Bronco Badges