Because I don't get why we would artificially limit our knowledge. It's not like we are saying that the bowl results have to repeat themselves. But considering how the bulk of the data points (games against lesser opponents) are useless, I think that removing one of the few relevant data points in creating an opinion as to who would win doesn't make sense to me. I would pick Miami to beat PSU in a rematch. I think people are equally capable of evaluating what is an upset vs. what revealed a meaningful result.