header pic

Perhaps the BEST B1G Forum anywhere, here at College Football Fan Site, CFB51!!!

The 'Old' CFN/Scout Crowd- Enjoy Civil discussion, game analytics, in depth player and coaching 'takes' and discussing topics surrounding the game. You can even have your own free board, all you have to do is ask!!!

Anyone is welcomed and encouraged to join our FREE site and to take part in our community- a community with you- the user, the fan, -and the person- will be protected from intrusive actions and with a clean place to interact.


Author

Topic: Weather, Climate, Environment, and Energy

 (Read 530930 times)

847badgerfan

  • Administrator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 25268
  • Liked:
Re: Weather, Climate, and Environment
« Reply #3094 on: July 19, 2020, 10:51:52 AM »
I'm not for subsidizing anything.
U RAH RAH! WIS CON SIN!

FearlessF

  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 37567
  • Liked:
Re: Weather, Climate, and Environment
« Reply #3095 on: July 19, 2020, 10:53:48 AM »
if the subsidy won't pay for itself in 3 years

"Courage; Generosity; Fairness; Honor; In these are the true awards of manly sport."

Cincydawg

  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 71604
  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Liked:
Re: Weather, Climate, and Environment
« Reply #3096 on: July 19, 2020, 10:54:09 AM »
One thing about summer weather here is that it is near constant, highs in the low 90s and afternoon storms, almost every day.

We went out for breakfast and ate outside and it was hot already, not unbearable, but hot.

Cincydawg

  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 71604
  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Liked:
Re: Weather, Climate, and Environment
« Reply #3097 on: July 19, 2020, 10:55:13 AM »
Some kinds of subsidies I can at least formulate an argument for their existence, the ethanol fuel thing is SO glaringly bad, the only real argument is the corn lobby, which is almost as powerful as the egg lobby, and that Iowa has an early role in Presidential primaries.

FearlessF

  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 37567
  • Liked:
Re: Weather, Climate, and Environment
« Reply #3098 on: July 19, 2020, 11:04:48 AM »
Iowa gets in on the green wind energy subsidies as well
"Courage; Generosity; Fairness; Honor; In these are the true awards of manly sport."

Cincydawg

  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 71604
  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Liked:
Re: Weather, Climate, and Environment
« Reply #3099 on: July 19, 2020, 11:07:54 AM »
I'm still curious if I somehow elect to buy wind energy for my electricity how that changes anything but who gets paid.  The electricity is the same, the grid is the same, each electron may be motivated by coal, and probably is, largely.

Seems like a scam to me.

FearlessF

  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 37567
  • Liked:
Re: Weather, Climate, and Environment
« Reply #3100 on: July 19, 2020, 11:41:06 AM »
I don't have a choice here

my provider is Mid-American Energy - Warren Buffet

my neighbors that live in the country have one choice - the Rural Electric Coop - about double the price as mine
"Courage; Generosity; Fairness; Honor; In these are the true awards of manly sport."

Cincydawg

  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 71604
  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Liked:
Re: Weather, Climate, and Environment
« Reply #3101 on: July 19, 2020, 11:45:11 AM »
It's cheap here, and I don't appear to have a choice in the provider.  My bill averages about $100 a month year round, maybe a bit more.  Only two sides are exposed to the elements, but there is a lot of glass.

We were over $200 in the house, mostly because of winter and the gas heating bill.  No gas here, except on the roof apparently, they have a hot water boiler, somewhere.  Hot water (and cold) are covered in the HOA, which is a bit odd to me.  No water heaters in the units, one more thing that can't fail.  Two heat pumps, no water heater.

The other nice thing is our wood floors creaked like crazy in the old house, not here, it's rein concrete.

MichiFan87

  • Player
  • ****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 796
  • Liked:
Re: Weather, Climate, and Environment
« Reply #3102 on: July 19, 2020, 11:48:40 AM »
I'm still curious if I somehow elect to buy wind energy for my electricity how that changes anything but who gets paid.  The electricity is the same, the grid is the same, each electron may be motivated by coal, and probably is, largely.

Seems like a scam to me.
Basically it accelerates the investment in more renewables, and in some cases it reduces your bill.

For example, community solar programs are increasingly common in some states. These are basically commercial to utility scale systems located within the same state but often sited on brownfields and large rooftops like warehouses. People can subscribe for a portion of the capacity of the system and pay for the electricity produced at a lower rate than they would pay the utility. By the time that whole project is subscribed to, another community solar system gets developed and the cycle repeats.
“When your team is winning, be ready to be tough, because winning can make you soft. On the other hand, when your team is losing, stick by them. Keep believing”
― Bo Schembechler

MichiFan87

  • Player
  • ****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 796
  • Liked:
Re: Weather, Climate, and Environment
« Reply #3103 on: July 19, 2020, 11:56:43 AM »
Iowa and Georgia are not deregulated so you only have no choice from your utility, unlike Texas, Illinois, Ohio, and most Northeastern states.

There is finally some push to change that in regulated states, though. It's called community choice aggregation, which has been highly successful in California but not in other states, because the other states that allow them are all deregulated. Now, though, AZ, CO, NV, OR, WA, and MI are all considering legislation to allow it.

The way it works is that municipalities or counties can take control over how their energy is procured, so that they can offer lower rates and/or higher levels of renewable energy. Because utility rates are set by the state governments, they can't really respond to this quickly. The utility is still responsible for basically everything else. Customers can still choose to just remain with the utility but generally there's no reason for them to do that. Because these programs work through government entities, customers can be assured that their rates will remain stable whereas in deregulated states, some of the energy suppliers are unfortunately quite shady and unethical by offering low intro rates before they get jacked up.
“When your team is winning, be ready to be tough, because winning can make you soft. On the other hand, when your team is losing, stick by them. Keep believing”
― Bo Schembechler

Cincydawg

  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 71604
  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Liked:
Re: Weather, Climate, and Environment
« Reply #3104 on: July 19, 2020, 12:00:37 PM »
The electricity I use cannot be tracked by to some specific source.  Simple as that.

I might think I'm being green by paying more for "wind" or whatever, but the source of my electricity does not change just because I sign up for something.

Unless I establish my own transmission grid that is.

Sounds like a scam to me, always has.  Now, if you run a powerline for that wind mill over there to my house, maybe I'll listen up.

Cincydawg

  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 71604
  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Liked:
Re: Weather, Climate, and Environment
« Reply #3105 on: July 19, 2020, 12:03:25 PM »
I read a bit about using hydrogen to power airplanes.  My general conclusion is that is a long ways in the future, decades, for obvious reasons, so I'm not going to get excited about it.  And yes, I read about some demonstrations of the technology, yay.

I read a bit about Biden's latest green proposals (they change about every 6 months) and am unimpressed, not surprisingly.  I see it as a worthless political document, not a serious proposal.  I'm sure if he's elected Congress will try and throw more money at the problem.

I'm also convinced it will make almost no different in the actual problem, nothing measurable.

But we can all pat ourselves on the back for pretending to be "green" ...

betarhoalphadelta

  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 12213
  • Liked:
Re: Weather, Climate, and Environment
« Reply #3106 on: July 19, 2020, 02:05:55 PM »
Related to that, if the plant-based meat really takes off, then that could be a big deal since vegetables, fruits, and grains are much more efficient to produce than meat. I haven't converted to plant-based meat yet (I used to be more hopeful for lab-based meat but now I'm not so sure), but I'm hopeful that over time it will become more cost-effective and taste just as good. If that happens, the meat industry will be drastically reduced.
My concern is that plant-based meat is not a particularly healthy alternative to meat. In some cases, it's considered to potentially be worse health-wise due to high sodium content and high soy content [Impossible is soy-based, but not Beyond Meat which I believe is soy-free]. Then, some of them tend to be higher in carbs than meat, which may have its own health risks. Given that we've seen health problems caused by many of the supposedly "healthy" alternatives to other products (such as artificial sweeteners), I worry that plant-based meat will end up having a hidden flaw as a result of the processing and added ingredients necessary to make it taste like meat. 

Lab-grown meat could help somewhat with this, in that it would avoid the environmental impact without substituting a less healthy alternative. However, I also worry that it'll be able to be price-competitive with traditional meat, and that texture-wise it might end up being a substitute for ground beef, but it won't ever really be a substitute for a proper steak. 

To me, a better solution than creating fake meat is to try to reduce meat consumption overall. I don't want a Beyond Burger or an Impossible Burger. That doesn't appeal to me at ALL. I'll gladly grill up a portobello mushroom burger though. I don't view it as trying to replicate meat, either. I view it as a different--and entirely delicious--sandwich of its own. I don't go into it expecting a hamburger, so I'm not disappointed that it's not what it was never intended to be. If I want a hamburger, I'll make a hamburger. If I want a delicious sandwich without meat, I have other options.

There are all sorts of delicious ways to make meatless dishes that don't require a "fake meat" substitute. There are also tons of ways to make dishes which contain meat but where overall meat content as a portion of calories consumed is low--such as stir fry. Rotating things like this into weekly meal planning is a much better way to reduce meat consumption for either health or environmental reasons without subjecting yourself to the unknown of "fake" meat. 

Cincydawg

  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 71604
  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Liked:
Re: Weather, Climate, and Environment
« Reply #3107 on: July 19, 2020, 02:34:14 PM »
The lab made meat I've seen requires "starting materials", duh, which look to me to be expensive.

I don't worry about carbs in my diet, except sugar, which I try and minimize.

Some items I've read suggests the impact of the cattle industry and climate change is over blown, but of course one has to be alert to biased "studies".

We did once have a lot of bison (~60 million) on the plains, though their guts are a bit different than cattle (I see widely varying figures) of course.

https://agreenerworld.org/a-greener-world/a-convenient-untruth/?gclid=Cj0KCQjw3s_4BRDPARIsAJsyoLOWZyVQqeQdjqn2hC1-hYzdIFcVGUetBVRK9Jubg4toEkaFza2zPZgaApemEALw_wcB

https://mrdrscienceteacher.wordpress.com/2019/09/21/bison-vs-cow-greenhouse-gas-emissions/

It is true that methane degrades in the atmosphere, so you have to figure what is being lost versus what is generated each year, and from what source.  Oil and gas dropping and landfills are major sources of methane as well.  As with most things, it gets a bit complicated trying to decipher.


 

Support the Site!
Purchase of every item listed here DIRECTLY supports the site.