header pic

Perhaps the BEST B1G Forum anywhere, here at College Football Fan Site, CFB51!!!

The 'Old' CFN/Scout Crowd- Enjoy Civil discussion, game analytics, in depth player and coaching 'takes' and discussing topics surrounding the game. You can even have your own free board, all you have to do is ask!!!

Anyone is welcomed and encouraged to join our FREE site and to take part in our community- a community with you- the user, the fan, -and the person- will be protected from intrusive actions and with a clean place to interact.


Author

Topic: The Death of College Football - Realignment, NIL, Portal, Etc.

 (Read 213088 times)

Cincydawg

  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 83448
  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Liked:
Re: The Death of College Football - Realignment, NIL, Portal, Etc.
« Reply #2324 on: Today at 10:48:23 AM »
75% of 35,000 isn't too glorious.

847badgerfan

  • Administrator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 31351
  • Liked:
Re: The Death of College Football - Realignment, NIL, Portal, Etc.
« Reply #2325 on: Today at 10:50:41 AM »
I didn't give Northwestern credit for their mark of 114 percent because of where they played.
U RAH RAH! WIS CON SIN!

FearlessF

  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 45843
  • Liked:
Re: The Death of College Football - Realignment, NIL, Portal, Etc.
« Reply #2326 on: Today at 10:51:44 AM »
seems odd that UNL wasn't able to achieve 75%
"Courage; Generosity; Fairness; Honor; In these are the true awards of manly sport."

OrangeAfroMan

  • Stats Porn
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 21858
  • Liked:
Re: The Death of College Football - Realignment, NIL, Portal, Etc.
« Reply #2327 on: Today at 10:52:26 AM »
Both the Coliseum and the Rose Bowl were built in the 1920s.

I'm not interested enough in it to really look at the history of either place, but I'm not arrogant enough to ask: "Why did they build it if it wasn't going to fill to the brim with college football fans in 2025, over a hundred years later?"

I'm assuming they had their reasons.
How about "why did they build it if it wasn't going to fill to the brim with college football fans for the past 100 years?"

Is that humble enough?
“The Swamp is where Gators live.  We feel comfortable there, but we hope our opponents feel tentative. A swamp is hot and sticky and can be dangerous." - Steve Spurrier

847badgerfan

  • Administrator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 31351
  • Liked:
Re: The Death of College Football - Realignment, NIL, Portal, Etc.
« Reply #2328 on: Today at 10:52:50 AM »
seems odd that UNL wasn't able to achieve 75%
Lincoln ain't a big city. 
U RAH RAH! WIS CON SIN!

FearlessF

  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 45843
  • Liked:
Re: The Death of College Football - Realignment, NIL, Portal, Etc.
« Reply #2329 on: Today at 10:53:36 AM »
well, that's true
"Courage; Generosity; Fairness; Honor; In these are the true awards of manly sport."

OrangeAfroMan

  • Stats Porn
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 21858
  • Liked:
Re: The Death of College Football - Realignment, NIL, Portal, Etc.
« Reply #2330 on: Today at 10:54:46 AM »
Even stadiums in Austin, Columbus, Ann Arbor, or Gainesville only have 100K fans 6-8 times per year and sit empty the other 357 days.  Why build stadiums at all if they're going to be idle 98% of the time?
Probably money.


Filled 6-8 times per year >>>>>>> filled once per year (roughly 6-8x as much money :) )

Filled 6-8 times per year >>>>>>> 50% full 6-8 times per year (roughly 2x as much money :) )

It's cool this post needed to exist I guess.
“The Swamp is where Gators live.  We feel comfortable there, but we hope our opponents feel tentative. A swamp is hot and sticky and can be dangerous." - Steve Spurrier

MrNubbz

  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 20081
  • Liked:
Re: The Death of College Football - Realignment, NIL, Portal, Etc.
« Reply #2331 on: Today at 11:39:06 AM »
Even stadiums in Austin, Columbus, Ann Arbor, or Gainesville only have 100K fans 6-8 times per year and sit empty the other 357 days.  Why build stadiums at all if they're going to be idle 98% of the time?
Well graduations for one and winter hockey tournements but we could always just disband CFB I guess. Tear those Stadiums down and make that space a Culteral Arts Bldg or a facility for Dance that would make bank for the Admns I'm sure ::)
“I refuse to answer that question on the grounds that I don't know the answer”― Douglas Adams

MrNubbz

  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 20081
  • Liked:
Re: The Death of College Football - Realignment, NIL, Portal, Etc.
« Reply #2332 on: Today at 11:42:11 AM »
75 percent of capacity or more, 2024:

Duke (75%)

Louisville (83%)

Boston College (90%)


Ohio State (101%)

Kansas (104%)
How the hell do you get over 100% - SRO,gate crashers,vendors & ticket takers?
“I refuse to answer that question on the grounds that I don't know the answer”― Douglas Adams

Cincydawg

  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 83448
  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Liked:
Re: The Death of College Football - Realignment, NIL, Portal, Etc.
« Reply #2333 on: Today at 11:43:50 AM »
Standing room isn't in seating capacity.

bayareabadger

  • Legend
  • ****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 9416
  • Liked:
Re: The Death of College Football - Realignment, NIL, Portal, Etc.
« Reply #2334 on: Today at 12:54:01 PM »
I like how you continue to be deliberately obtuse and avoid the actual topic.  It seems to be your specialty.

College football is less popular in California than in other places, including but not limited to Texas.

Why?

It's what cost the PAC its conference.  That seems important.

Not important in a global macroeconomy kind of way, or in a poor people are starving kind of way, but the type of important that resonates on a message board dedicated to... college football.
You like this? Awww. 

But yes, my specialty is to look at something that seems to lack a bit of context and try to explore it. If the actual topic is why, I'd agree a part of it is that the fever is less strong than in some other place. But I think it jumps over a key aspect.

Brad laid it out. It's hard to build that kind of passion/fandom/what have you in cities like that. And because of the way California schools developed and are decentralized, all the big (and most of the small) schools at that level are in those places. That just is what it is. In addition to other limitations, Ca doesn't have the kinds of big central schools to generate that kind of popularity. 

You could turn up the passion to Georgia, Texas, Florida levels, and none of those schools will reach consistent UT/UGA/even UF levels. 

Gigem

  • All Star
  • ******
  • Posts: 3451
  • Liked:
Re: The Death of College Football - Realignment, NIL, Portal, Etc.
« Reply #2335 on: Today at 12:56:24 PM »
USC is a directional school.
I’ve mused on that in the pas. The original directional school. 

Gigem

  • All Star
  • ******
  • Posts: 3451
  • Liked:
Re: The Death of College Football - Realignment, NIL, Portal, Etc.
« Reply #2336 on: Today at 01:04:58 PM »
Wait, wasn’t the coliseum built for some kind of Olympic venue or something similar way back when?  Even if LA didn’t host the Olympics way back when maybe they just built it so it could be used as part of an attraction?  Also it’s perfectly reasonable to assume that if you’re LA you’d think you’d be filling the stadium on a regular basis. If not sporting events maybe concerts and other events.  What other stadiums existed in that time?  

MrNubbz

  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 20081
  • Liked:
Re: The Death of College Football - Realignment, NIL, Portal, Etc.
« Reply #2337 on: Today at 01:06:55 PM »
Standing room isn't in seating capacity.
Maybe I'm bad at math but wouldn't 100% indicate full?
“I refuse to answer that question on the grounds that I don't know the answer”― Douglas Adams

 

Support the Site!
Purchase of every item listed here DIRECTLY supports the site.