header pic

Perhaps the BEST B1G Forum anywhere, here at College Football Fan Site, CFB51!!!

The 'Old' CFN/Scout Crowd- Enjoy Civil discussion, game analytics, in depth player and coaching 'takes' and discussing topics surrounding the game. You can even have your own free board, all you have to do is ask!!!

Anyone is welcomed and encouraged to join our FREE site and to take part in our community- a community with you- the user, the fan, -and the person- will be protected from intrusive actions and with a clean place to interact.


Author

Topic: The Death of College Football - Realignment, NIL, Portal, Etc.

 (Read 83297 times)

utee94

  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 17714
  • Liked:
Re: UW and UO to Big Ten ~ Memorial Day?
« Reply #420 on: June 09, 2023, 09:09:06 AM »
sucks when your helmet isn't shiny enough to continue to get the perks

UT and OU will luv the SEC
We've sucked for so long that I'm surprised we still do, but in college football, money talks.  Same as it ever was.

FearlessF

  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 37577
  • Liked:
Re: UW and UO to Big Ten ~ Memorial Day?
« Reply #421 on: June 09, 2023, 09:52:10 AM »
that's why you were invited to Saban's party
he wants your money
not sure he's going to give you many perks
"Courage; Generosity; Fairness; Honor; In these are the true awards of manly sport."

Temp430

  • All Star
  • ******
  • Posts: 2513
  • Liked:
Re: UW and UO to Big Ten ~ Memorial Day?
« Reply #422 on: June 09, 2023, 09:53:23 AM »
Looking forward to seeing the 2024 SEC schedules.  Texas visits Michigan and hosts Oklahoma in 2024.

Michigan's 2024 schedule is an upgrade over recent years.

8/31 Fresno State
9/7  Texas
9/21 Arkansas State

Dates TBD:

@Illinois
Maryland
Michigan State
Minnesota
UCLA
Wisconsin
@Ohio State
@Rutgers
@USC
A decade of Victory over Penn State.

All in since 1969

utee94

  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 17714
  • Liked:
Re: UW and UO to Big Ten ~ Memorial Day?
« Reply #423 on: June 09, 2023, 09:55:24 AM »
that's why you were invited to Saban's party
he wants your money
not sure he's going to give you many perks

And we want his money, as well.  Win/win.

Don't need any perks handed out from Saban, we come with our own built-in.  

utee94

  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 17714
  • Liked:
Re: UW and UO to Big Ten ~ Memorial Day?
« Reply #424 on: June 09, 2023, 09:57:38 AM »
Looking forward to seeing the 2024 SEC schedules.  Texas visits Michigan and hosts Oklahoma in 2024.
Of course, just to clarify, all that means is that Texas is the "designated home team" at the neutral site Cotton Bowl in Dallas that year.

But yeah, I'm certainly looking forward to that stretch from 2024-2027 where Texas playes @Michigan, @Ohio State, Ohio State, Michigan.  Gonna be some fun times ahead!

medinabuckeye1

  • Legend
  • ****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 8906
  • Liked:
Re: UW and UO to Big Ten ~ Memorial Day?
« Reply #425 on: June 09, 2023, 10:04:32 AM »
Are you denying that OSU and Michigan get and have always gotten preferential treatment?
You are changing the discussion and beating up strawmen.  I never said that tOSU and Michigan have NEVER gotten preferential treatment.  

I'm arguing THIS instance.  You implicitly alleged that the fact that tOSU, Michigan, and PSU get five home games is an example of preferential treatment.  You ignored that while they do get five home (and four away) games in 2024, it alternates and they get four home (and five away) games in 2025.  It then alternates from there.  @LittlePig pointed out that it is simply a carry forward from the E/W division where the B1G-E teams got five home games in even years and the B1G-W teams got five home games in odd years.  

In order to balance the league, UCLA was tossed in with the B1G-E teams and USC was tossed in with the B1G-W teams such that, going forward:
  • UCLA and the old B1G-E teams (RU, UMD, PSU, tOSU, IU, M, MSU) will have five home games in even years.  
  • USC and the old B1G-W teams (UNL, MN, UW, IA, NU, IL, PU) will have five home games in odd years.  
Where is the preferential treatment?  


The only plausible argument I can see, which you didn't even bother to make but @FearlessF made it for you is that this *COULD* change in the future and *IF* this exists for an odd number of years, then PSU/tOSU/M (and five other teams) will have gotten five home games once more than they got four home games while your school and seven others will have gotten the opposite.  
Helmets get preferential treatment. 

Fans of helmet teams really should be able to admit this.
I'm not arguing that it has never and will never happen.  I'm arguing that *THIS* allegation of it is ridiculously weak.  It only ends up being preferential on the basis of a possible future contingency happening at a particular time.  

Furthermore, note that the pattern established with the growth from 14 to 16 teams is to keep the existing members in their existing situations (existing B1G-E members keep playing 5 home games in even years) and split the additions to balance things out.  Provided that precedent stands it doesn't even matter when and if new schools are added.  

Where is the preferential treatment?  @847badgerfan alleged it but he has been unable to back it up and fearless' argument is conditional with the existing precedent disproving it.  

If there is so much preferential treatment why don't you give an example where it ACTUALLY happened instead of alleging it where it does not exist.  

medinabuckeye1

  • Legend
  • ****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 8906
  • Liked:
Re: UW and UO to Big Ten ~ Memorial Day?
« Reply #426 on: June 09, 2023, 10:08:27 AM »
I think the odds of the Big Ten having 3 teams going  undefeated are 1 out of 6  million.  I would not worry about it.  Ok I admit I just made that number up.  Medina can probably tell us the real odds.
I'm with you in general but I'd be curious about the specifics.  

If somebody says that Rutgers, Indiana, and Northwestern all do not play each other in 2027 I wouldn't worry.  OTOH, if USC, tOSU and PSU don't play each other in 2025 I'd be more concerned.  

FearlessF

  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 37577
  • Liked:
Re: UW and UO to Big Ten ~ Memorial Day?
« Reply #427 on: June 09, 2023, 10:40:48 AM »
I'm with you in general but I'd be curious about the specifics. 

If somebody says that Rutgers, Indiana, and Northwestern all do not play each other in 2027 I wouldn't worry.  OTOH, if USC, tOSU and PSU don't play each other in 2025 I'd be more concerned. 
taking a page from the SEC book would increase chances of multiple playoff slots
"Courage; Generosity; Fairness; Honor; In these are the true awards of manly sport."

847badgerfan

  • Administrator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 25278
  • Liked:
Re: UW and UO to Big Ten ~ Memorial Day?
« Reply #428 on: June 09, 2023, 10:47:24 AM »
Where is the preferential treatment?  @847badgerfan alleged it but he has been unable to back it up and fearless' argument is conditional with the existing precedent disproving it. 

If there is so much preferential treatment why don't you give an example where it ACTUALLY happened instead of alleging it where it does not exist. 
When the conference went to 9 games, which division was the first to have 5 at home? That actually happened.

You're not going to convince me that they flipped a coin, and yes, I know it flips every year.
U RAH RAH! WIS CON SIN!

medinabuckeye1

  • Legend
  • ****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 8906
  • Liked:
Re: UW and UO to Big Ten ~ Memorial Day?
« Reply #429 on: June 09, 2023, 11:02:07 AM »
When the conference went to 9 games, which division was the first to have 5 at home? That actually happened.

You're not going to convince me that they flipped a coin, and yes, I know it flips every year.
But that only becomes preferential if:
  • The structure lasts an odd number of years, and
  • The structure that replaces it fails to balance things out.
Ok, I guess it is hypothetically potentially preferential. That is extremely weak as evidence of preferential treatment. 


utee94

  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 17714
  • Liked:
Re: UW and UO to Big Ten ~ Memorial Day?
« Reply #430 on: June 09, 2023, 11:05:57 AM »
taking a page from the SEC book would increase chances of multiple playoff slots
8 conference games is the way to go, unless/until the selection committee starts to punish you for doing it. It's bad for football fans but good for the conference's pocketbook.

OrangeAfroMan

  • Stats Porn
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 18877
  • Liked:
Re: UW and UO to Big Ten ~ Memorial Day?
« Reply #431 on: June 09, 2023, 11:13:59 AM »
8 conference games is the way to go, unless/until the selection committee starts to punish you for doing it. It's bad for football fans but good for the conference's pocketbook.
But if they did that, they couldn't bitch incessantly about the SEC doing it.
“The Swamp is where Gators live.  We feel comfortable there, but we hope our opponents feel tentative. A swamp is hot and sticky and can be dangerous." - Steve Spurrier

847badgerfan

  • Administrator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 25278
  • Liked:
Re: UW and UO to Big Ten ~ Memorial Day?
« Reply #432 on: June 09, 2023, 11:40:23 AM »
8 conference games is the way to go, unless/until the selection committee starts to punish you for doing it. It's bad for football fans but good for the conference's pocketbook.
10 would be the way to go.
U RAH RAH! WIS CON SIN!

Cincydawg

  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 71615
  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Liked:
Re: UW and UO to Big Ten ~ Memorial Day?
« Reply #433 on: June 09, 2023, 11:41:07 AM »
I'd be OK with 8 IFF teams had to play two other P5s OOC.

 

Support the Site!
Purchase of every item listed here DIRECTLY supports the site.