header pic

Perhaps the BEST B1G Forum anywhere, here at College Football Fan Site, CFB51!!!

The 'Old' CFN/Scout Crowd- Enjoy Civil discussion, game analytics, in depth player and coaching 'takes' and discussing topics surrounding the game. You can even have your own free board, all you have to do is ask!!!

Anyone is welcomed and encouraged to join our FREE site and to take part in our community- a community with you- the user, the fan, -and the person- will be protected from intrusive actions and with a clean place to interact.


Author

Topic: UCLA and USC

 (Read 49321 times)

Cincydawg

  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 72131
  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Liked:
Re: UCLA and USC
« Reply #434 on: July 12, 2022, 03:54:09 PM »
I'd say UGA's rivals are UF, Auburn, and Tennessee, historically.  Fourth might be Ole Miss or Kentucky.  

LittlePig

  • Starter
  • *****
  • Posts: 1372
  • Liked:
Re: UCLA and USC
« Reply #435 on: July 12, 2022, 04:25:06 PM »
I'd say UGA's rivals are UF, Auburn, and Tennessee, historically.  Fourth might be Ole Miss or Kentucky. 
Yes, but somebody needs to be paired up with South Carolina.  Until Clemson and NCSU are added to the SEC, Georgia is the closest school to South Carolina geographicly (I think)

FearlessF

  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 37789
  • Liked:
Re: UCLA and USC
« Reply #436 on: July 12, 2022, 04:45:10 PM »
For Big Ten I would guess for the 3 fixed rivals
Captain Kirk won't like it one bit!

me either 
"Courage; Generosity; Fairness; Honor; In these are the true awards of manly sport."

Cincydawg

  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 72131
  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Liked:
Re: UCLA and USC
« Reply #437 on: July 12, 2022, 05:48:15 PM »
Kick South Carolina out.  Problem solved.

Hawkinole

  • Starter
  • *****
  • Posts: 2227
  • Liked:
Re: UCLA and USC
« Reply #438 on: July 12, 2022, 07:05:32 PM »
For Big Ten I would guess for the 3 fixed rivals

With USC and NW both being private schools in large metro areas,  they could be considered rivals, right?


MSU - Mich, Indy, MD
PSU - OSU, MD, Rut
Do you have no respect for the Land Grant Trophy rivalry?:)

Gigem

  • Starter
  • *****
  • Posts: 2153
  • Liked:
Re: UCLA and USC
« Reply #439 on: July 12, 2022, 08:27:18 PM »
RIP TAM  :)
Why RIP A&M?  We already have played in the sec west for the last 10 years, no doubt the toughest division in CFb. I’d trade OU and Tex for Alabama and some of the other teams any day. 

Personally I’d like to play Texas and LSU and somebody other than OU. Perhaps Arkansas or Georgia or even Florida. 

utee94

  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 17794
  • Liked:
Re: UCLA and USC
« Reply #440 on: July 12, 2022, 09:29:18 PM »
Why RIP A&M?  We already have played in the sec west for the last 10 years, no doubt the toughest division in CFb. I’d trade OU and Tex for Alabama and some of the other teams any day.

Personally I’d like to play Texas and LSU and somebody other than OU. Perhaps Arkansas or Georgia or even Florida.
I definitely prefer this idea of playing 3 non-rotating games that are NOT locked into pods, so TAMU could annually play Texas and LSU and not necessarily OU or Arkansas.

As a Texas fan my clear preference for 3 non-rotating games would be TAMU, OU, and the pigs.  But no reason those three schools should be locked into the same.

FearlessF

  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 37789
  • Liked:
Re: UCLA and USC
« Reply #441 on: July 12, 2022, 09:49:29 PM »
how about no "F" ing pods and you simply play everyone in your stinkin division - every stinkin season

it's VERY simple
"Courage; Generosity; Fairness; Honor; In these are the true awards of manly sport."

Hawkinole

  • Starter
  • *****
  • Posts: 2227
  • Liked:
Re: UCLA and USC
« Reply #442 on: July 13, 2022, 12:13:49 AM »
how about no "F" ing pods and you simply play everyone in your stinkin division - every stinkin season

it's VERY simple
It could be very simple and this is easier position to take for a Nebraska, Rutgers, or Maryland fan, than it is for the rest of the Big Ten fans, I would guess. We are accustomed to playing the traditional Big Ten teams, and as we expand we lose those traditional Big Ten games.
I have heard some say conference expansion is destroying college football because some regional games will not be played. It is destructive, and may cause a loss of interest, but "destroying" is further than I could go.
Some parents don't want their kids playing football, and that in the end could lead to the sport's demise, but long after I am gone.

OrangeAfroMan

  • Stats Porn
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 18940
  • Liked:
Re: UCLA and USC
« Reply #443 on: July 13, 2022, 02:36:51 AM »
I'd say UGA's rivals are UF, Auburn, and Tennessee, historically.  Fourth might be Ole Miss or Kentucky. 
And Florida's are Georgia, Auburn, and Tennessee.  
Pairing Florida with LSU will simply be prolonging a BS rivalry to begin with.  
“The Swamp is where Gators live.  We feel comfortable there, but we hope our opponents feel tentative. A swamp is hot and sticky and can be dangerous." - Steve Spurrier

MrNubbz

  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 17200
  • Liked:
Re: UCLA and USC
« Reply #444 on: July 13, 2022, 08:54:57 AM »
For Big Ten I would guess for the 3 fixed rivals

PSU - OSU, MD, Rut
Penn State would snap that up in a second.They already play tOSU every season so you'd be scheduling 2 automatic Ws
Suburbia:Where they tear out the trees & then name streets after them.

medinabuckeye1

  • Legend
  • ****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 8941
  • Liked:
Re: UCLA and USC
« Reply #445 on: July 13, 2022, 09:17:41 AM »
I generally like what @LittlePig came up with and I want to add that I've done lists like his and it isn't easy. Compromises have to be made.

It is easy to pick one or two "rivalries" from the list to criticize but MUCH harder to come up with a better alternative. 

FearlessF

  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 37789
  • Liked:
Re: UCLA and USC
« Reply #446 on: July 13, 2022, 09:27:10 AM »
I know it's a full magnitude tougher as the number of teams increase, but I'd much rather schedule 4 or more teams that play annually like the Iowa AD is pushing.

watering it down to only 3 teams in an attempt to be able to play Rutgers and Maryland somewhat regularly, every 5 or 6 seasons maybe more just because they're in "the same" conference is a stretch that doesn't help
"Courage; Generosity; Fairness; Honor; In these are the true awards of manly sport."

utee94

  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 17794
  • Liked:
Re: UCLA and USC
« Reply #447 on: July 13, 2022, 09:31:55 AM »
I know it's a full magnitude tougher as the number of teams increase, but I'd much rather schedule 4 or more teams that play annually like the Iowa AD is pushing.

watering it down to only 3 teams in an attempt to be able to play Rutgers and Maryland somewhat regularly, every 5 or 6 seasons maybe more just because they're in "the same" conference is a stretch that doesn't help
For many, many decades, the SEC was more a loose federation of teams that agreed to mostly the same rules.  There were teams in the SEC in the 50s, 60s, 70s, 80s, that shared a conference but played each other seldom, or not at all.

I think it's okay if we start looking at conferences that way.  As you suggest, there's no real need for Nebraska to play Rutgers or Maryland. Let's admit that conferences are just financial institutions, and set up some schedules that are fun and make sense.


 

Support the Site!
Purchase of every item listed here DIRECTLY supports the site.