header pic

Perhaps the BEST B1G Forum anywhere, here at College Football Fan Site, CFB51!!!

The 'Old' CFN/Scout Crowd- Enjoy Civil discussion, game analytics, in depth player and coaching 'takes' and discussing topics surrounding the game. You can even have your own free board, all you have to do is ask!!!

Anyone is welcomed and encouraged to join our FREE site and to take part in our community- a community with you- the user, the fan, -and the person- will be protected from intrusive actions and with a clean place to interact.


Author

Topic: UCLA and USC

 (Read 49321 times)

MrNubbz

  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 17200
  • Liked:
Re: UCLA and USC
« Reply #154 on: July 02, 2022, 12:00:08 PM »
Without USC/UCLA, the PAC is in worse shape than the New Big 12.  Both financially, and competitively.  If any poaching occurs, it'll likely go the other direction.

Maybe the BIG should have left the Bruins and grabbed the Ducks
Suburbia:Where they tear out the trees & then name streets after them.

FearlessF

  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 37789
  • Liked:
Re: UCLA and USC
« Reply #155 on: July 02, 2022, 12:04:46 PM »
This is the Bug Eaters chance to bolt might start racking up some Titles again.They'll even let you bring the Runzas and Bud fat
true, now that the Horns and Sooners and Aggies and Buffaloes and Tigers are gone, the Huskers could possibly win the Big 12
"Courage; Generosity; Fairness; Honor; In these are the true awards of manly sport."

utee94

  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 17794
  • Liked:
Re: UCLA and USC
« Reply #156 on: July 02, 2022, 12:11:04 PM »
Maybe the BIG should have left the Bruins and grabbed the Ducks

I think the Ducks are a terrible add for the B1G.  I'd consider that a big mistake.  Not Rutgers-bad, but still unnecessary and stupid.

Brutus Buckeye

  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 11253
  • Liked:
Re: UCLA and USC
« Reply #157 on: July 02, 2022, 12:24:03 PM »
I don't buy that the new Big 12 is in better shape than what's left of the Pac 12. It's a mid-major super conference with terrible geography, where the centerpiece is OSU2 and West Virginia football.

Pac 12 still has way more prestige, even without the LA twins. 

Last year everyone overreacted by writing the Big 12's obituary prematurely, and now they are doing the exact same with the Pac 12. It's as predictable as a mediocre helmet getting over ranked in the preseason polls. 
1919, 20, 21, 28, 29, 31, 34, 35, 36, 37, 42, 44
WWH: 1952, 54, 55, 57, 58, 60, 61, 62, 63, 65, 67, 68, 70, 72, 74, 75
1979, 81, 82, 84, 87, 94, 98
2001, 02, 04, 05, 06, 07, 08, 09, 10, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19

FearlessF

  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 37789
  • Liked:
Re: UCLA and USC
« Reply #158 on: July 02, 2022, 12:28:10 PM »
the PAC commish wasn't happy about the slow scheduling of the Big Ten and the PAC

he should step up and schedule the remainder of the PAC vs the remainder of the 12 to see which is stronger in 2024
"Courage; Generosity; Fairness; Honor; In these are the true awards of manly sport."

Brutus Buckeye

  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 11253
  • Liked:
Re: UCLA and USC
« Reply #159 on: July 02, 2022, 12:40:55 PM »
I mean BYU might arguably be the helmetiest team in the new Big 12, and they are an elevated mid major. Yet their competition for the honor is OSU2 and West Virginia.

If they joined the Pac 12, they'd be behind Oregon, UDub and Stanford in prestige at the very least, and there are probably a few others that are ahead of (or at least equal to) OSU2 and WV's prowess. Plus they'd have four other teams in their own time zone, instead of being an extreme geographic outlier in a conference that contains the prestigious brands of UCF and Cincinnati.

I mean, come on. The choice is obvious.
1919, 20, 21, 28, 29, 31, 34, 35, 36, 37, 42, 44
WWH: 1952, 54, 55, 57, 58, 60, 61, 62, 63, 65, 67, 68, 70, 72, 74, 75
1979, 81, 82, 84, 87, 94, 98
2001, 02, 04, 05, 06, 07, 08, 09, 10, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19

FearlessF

  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 37789
  • Liked:
Re: UCLA and USC
« Reply #160 on: July 02, 2022, 12:41:41 PM »
May be an image of 2 people and text that says 'Blinkin @blinkinriley When USC sees lowa run three TEs out on the field.'
"Courage; Generosity; Fairness; Honor; In these are the true awards of manly sport."

MrNubbz

  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 17200
  • Liked:
Re: UCLA and USC
« Reply #161 on: July 02, 2022, 01:00:55 PM »
I think the Ducks are a terrible add for the B1G.  I'd consider that a big mistake.  Not Rutgers-bad, but still unnecessary and stupid.
Well the whole thing starting a decade ago is stoopid. It just seems like UCLA can't get their collective selves together on the field - hope that changes
Suburbia:Where they tear out the trees & then name streets after them.

Cincydawg

  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 72131
  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Liked:
Re: UCLA and USC
« Reply #162 on: July 02, 2022, 01:02:42 PM »
My list of Blue Bloods:

ND - Indy
OSU - 10
UM - 10
Nebbie - 10
USc Pac/10

Texas - 12/SEC
OU - 12/SEC
Bama - SEC

Next Up:

Penn State - 10
Tenn?? - SEC

Then a cluster with UGA/LSU/Auburn ... Clemson/FSU? ... Miami ...

I don't know if that correlates well with eyeballs, but it would be closeish.


MrNubbz

  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 17200
  • Liked:
Re: UCLA and USC
« Reply #163 on: July 02, 2022, 01:03:52 PM »
Another thing with the financial fiasco of gas and electric prices it can't be getting any cheaper to transport to/fro.So it could actually financially back fire
Suburbia:Where they tear out the trees & then name streets after them.

FearlessF

  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 37789
  • Liked:
Re: UCLA and USC
« Reply #164 on: July 02, 2022, 01:12:30 PM »
you can buy a lot of energy with 100 million
"Courage; Generosity; Fairness; Honor; In these are the true awards of manly sport."

Cincydawg

  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 72131
  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Liked:
Re: UCLA and USC
« Reply #165 on: July 02, 2022, 01:15:50 PM »
Universities like to portray themselves as being "green" of course, and this isn't, at all.


FearlessF

  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 37789
  • Liked:
Re: UCLA and USC
« Reply #166 on: July 02, 2022, 01:34:40 PM »
so do some politicians and world leaders

and they aren't A tall
"Courage; Generosity; Fairness; Honor; In these are the true awards of manly sport."

Cincydawg

  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 72131
  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Liked:
Re: UCLA and USC
« Reply #167 on: July 02, 2022, 01:44:48 PM »
So do Big Companies, even Exxon, et al.  I've seen some of the PR efforts from the inside.

 

Support the Site!
Purchase of every item listed here DIRECTLY supports the site.