header pic

Perhaps the BEST B1G Forum anywhere, here at College Football Fan Site, CFB51!!!

The 'Old' CFN/Scout Crowd- Enjoy Civil discussion, game analytics, in depth player and coaching 'takes' and discussing topics surrounding the game. You can even have your own free board, all you have to do is ask!!!

Anyone is welcomed and encouraged to join our FREE site and to take part in our community- a community with you- the user, the fan, -and the person- will be protected from intrusive actions and with a clean place to interact.


Author

Topic: The Power of a Small Incentive: Looking at Realignment over the Past 4

 (Read 1928 times)

OrangeAfroMan

  • Stats Porn
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 18874
  • Liked:
Re: The Power of a Small Incentive: Looking at Realignment over the Past 4
« Reply #14 on: August 13, 2023, 03:14:47 PM »
Nope.
I ask WHY, and this is what I get.
“The Swamp is where Gators live.  We feel comfortable there, but we hope our opponents feel tentative. A swamp is hot and sticky and can be dangerous." - Steve Spurrier

OrangeAfroMan

  • Stats Porn
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 18874
  • Liked:
Re: The Power of a Small Incentive: Looking at Realignment over the Past 4
« Reply #15 on: August 13, 2023, 03:17:07 PM »
Wow, WOW.  I say the word "regulation," and everyone starts spouting off about the government.
It doesn't have to be the government.  
Sheesh.
It can be ANY entity as long as it has buy-in from the conferences and schools.  
Calm down, guys.  The big, bad government doesn't own the word "regulation."
“The Swamp is where Gators live.  We feel comfortable there, but we hope our opponents feel tentative. A swamp is hot and sticky and can be dangerous." - Steve Spurrier

Brutus Buckeye

  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 11240
  • Liked:
Re: The Power of a Small Incentive: Looking at Realignment over the Past 4
« Reply #16 on: August 13, 2023, 04:32:14 PM »
Imagine if it were to be regulated by a Fro type character, where the SEC would get all 12 of the playoff spots. 
1919, 20, 21, 28, 29, 31, 34, 35, 36, 37, 42, 44
WWH: 1952, 54, 55, 57, 58, 60, 61, 62, 63, 65, 67, 68, 70, 72, 74, 75
1979, 81, 82, 84, 87, 94, 98
2001, 02, 04, 05, 06, 07, 08, 09, 10, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19

OrangeAfroMan

  • Stats Porn
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 18874
  • Liked:
Re: The Power of a Small Incentive: Looking at Realignment over the Past 4
« Reply #17 on: August 13, 2023, 04:53:33 PM »
The caricature of me you have in your mind sounds awful, but he's living there rent-free.
“The Swamp is where Gators live.  We feel comfortable there, but we hope our opponents feel tentative. A swamp is hot and sticky and can be dangerous." - Steve Spurrier

Hawkinole

  • Starter
  • *****
  • Posts: 2223
  • Liked:
Re: The Power of a Small Incentive: Looking at Realignment over the Past 4
« Reply #18 on: August 13, 2023, 08:11:27 PM »
That's a lot to take in. Great post.

What would it look like today? Probably similar to what it looked like then. I think the Eastern Indies would have formed a conference if they could foresee what was coming. Some of them probably REALLY regret not doing so when JoePa tried.

PSU, Pitt, Cuse, BC, WVU, USCe, FSU, Miami, VT for sure.

Rutgers? Would Maryland jump at a conference like that? NC State?
Other possibilities from 1980 independents include Louisville, and Georgia Tech which are now in the ACC. We might have had a slightly different landscape today, but we probably would have had consolidation, and schools jumping conferences. The point of the original post was that the TV money was a tack-on source of revenue then, whereas now it is the main source of revenue for the SEC and Big Ten.

OrangeAfroMan

  • Stats Porn
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 18874
  • Liked:
Re: The Power of a Small Incentive: Looking at Realignment over the Past 4
« Reply #19 on: August 13, 2023, 11:09:53 PM »
Having so many independents back in the day was really useful for quality scheduling.  You want big-time OOC games, that's the environment to have them.
It'd be cool to go back to that and maybe have each conference sponsor a group of independents in their region to split money with.  
“The Swamp is where Gators live.  We feel comfortable there, but we hope our opponents feel tentative. A swamp is hot and sticky and can be dangerous." - Steve Spurrier

Cincydawg

  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 71587
  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Liked:
Re: The Power of a Small Incentive: Looking at Realignment over the Past 4
« Reply #20 on: August 14, 2023, 07:46:05 AM »
We could put the Egg Lobby in charge ....

... instead of the NCAA (which everyone seems to hate).  Any such body would be hated in such a field, it's inherent.


847badgerfan

  • Administrator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 25267
  • Liked:
Re: The Power of a Small Incentive: Looking at Realignment over the Past 4
« Reply #21 on: August 14, 2023, 08:47:00 AM »
So I'm not picking this apart, I'm trying to understand what you're getting at-- are you suggesting that Texas would have been a big enough brand that the B1G never would have wanted or needed to later pursue Nebraska, Maryland, Rutgers, UCLA, USC, Oregon, and Washington? 

I'm as big a Texas homer as you'll find but I can't really believe that.

And if Texas joins the B1G in 1991, then I still see the SEC responding, probably with Texas A&M rather than Arkansas, or perhaps both.  And the escalation dance continues.
I think things would look a whole lot different.

The Big Ten did not pursue any of those schools.

Except maybe Rutgers, because Rutgers would never think the Big Ten would have any interest.
U RAH RAH! WIS CON SIN!

Cincydawg

  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 71587
  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Liked:
Re: The Power of a Small Incentive: Looking at Realignment over the Past 4
« Reply #22 on: August 14, 2023, 08:48:44 AM »
Everybody wants to be in one of two conferences except maybe ND and the Academies.  If UNC/UVA could bolt with no issues, I think they would.

847badgerfan

  • Administrator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 25267
  • Liked:
Re: The Power of a Small Incentive: Looking at Realignment over the Past 4
« Reply #23 on: August 14, 2023, 09:06:57 AM »
Everybody wants to be in one of two conferences except maybe ND and the Academies.  If UNC/UVA could bolt with no issues, I think they would.
They do now. That was not always the case.
U RAH RAH! WIS CON SIN!

Temp430

  • All Star
  • ******
  • Posts: 2513
  • Liked:
A decade of Victory over Penn State.

All in since 1969

847badgerfan

  • Administrator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 25267
  • Liked:
U RAH RAH! WIS CON SIN!

Cincydawg

  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 71587
  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Liked:
Re: The Power of a Small Incentive: Looking at Realignment over the Past 4
« Reply #26 on: August 14, 2023, 09:27:55 AM »
They do now. That was not always the case.
Of course not, folks were pretty happy where they were even ten years ago.  The TV money has splurged.  The Pac messed up, the ACC tried to lock it down, the B12 picked up loose pieces.  At the moment, I can't think of a program that wouldn't jump at an invite to the Big Two other than the four mentioned.

The four premier programs left are in the ACC.  

betarhoalphadelta

  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 12208
  • Liked:
Re: The Power of a Small Incentive: Looking at Realignment over the Past 4
« Reply #27 on: August 14, 2023, 10:39:38 AM »
It can be ANY entity as long as it has buy-in from the conferences and schools. 
So the fox will be guarding the henhouse, huh? 

 

Support the Site!
Purchase of every item listed here DIRECTLY supports the site.