header pic

Perhaps the BEST B1G Forum anywhere, here at College Football Fan Site, CFB51!!!

The 'Old' CFN/Scout Crowd- Enjoy Civil discussion, game analytics, in depth player and coaching 'takes' and discussing topics surrounding the game. You can even have your own free board, all you have to do is ask!!!

Anyone is welcomed and encouraged to join our FREE site and to take part in our community- a community with you- the user, the fan, -and the person- will be protected from intrusive actions and with a clean place to interact.


Author

Topic: The New Newer Newest Era of College Football (SOC Playoffs Round 1)

 (Read 8382 times)

OrangeAfroMan

  • Stats Porn
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 21774
  • Liked:
Re: The New Newer Newest Era of College Football (SOC Playoffs Round 1)
« Reply #238 on: December 28, 2024, 11:06:06 AM »
Betcha a dollar it doesn't.
“The Swamp is where Gators live.  We feel comfortable there, but we hope our opponents feel tentative. A swamp is hot and sticky and can be dangerous." - Steve Spurrier

Mdot21

  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 16786
  • Liked:
Re: The New Newer Newest Era of College Football (SOC Playoffs Round 1)
« Reply #239 on: December 28, 2024, 12:48:32 PM »
In 2030, UGA is scheduled to play Clemson, Ohio State, and Georgia Tech.  It'll be interesting to see if that survives.
they'll all be in the same conference by then, wouldn't worry too much about it.

847badgerfan

  • Administrator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 31103
  • Liked:
Re: The New Newer Newest Era of College Football (SOC Playoffs Round 1)
« Reply #240 on: December 28, 2024, 12:50:25 PM »
GT will be in a different division, with the Wisconsins and Iowas of the world.
U RAH RAH! WIS CON SIN!

Cincydawg

  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 82669
  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Liked:
Re: The New Newer Newest Era of College Football (SOC Playoffs Round 1)
« Reply #241 on: December 28, 2024, 01:13:07 PM »
I suspect we'd all agree that TODAY we have two major conferences, and two more that are below them, and then some others.  We have a P2 and a M2 and then Ghowevermany.  M stands for "medium".  I don't know what will happen beyond looking at what the $$$ will dictate.  I suspect I won't like it.  I probably will still watch.

If early losses don't matter that much, you might as well schedule a heavy hitter OOC.  If you win, it's very good.  UGA had four wins over playoff teams this year.

That probably  helped offset their two Ls.

OrangeAfroMan

  • Stats Porn
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 21774
  • Liked:
Re: The New Newer Newest Era of College Football (SOC Playoffs Round 1)
« Reply #242 on: December 28, 2024, 02:01:37 PM »
In 2030, actual 7 year olds will form the committee, ranking teams by W-L record.  Programs can go back to playing local high schools and semi-pro teams like they did 100 years ago.

“The Swamp is where Gators live.  We feel comfortable there, but we hope our opponents feel tentative. A swamp is hot and sticky and can be dangerous." - Steve Spurrier

Cincydawg

  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 82669
  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Liked:
Re: The New Newer Newest Era of College Football (SOC Playoffs Round 1)
« Reply #243 on: December 28, 2024, 02:06:38 PM »
The teams complaining about being left out of the Show lost only conference games, so their OOC slate was largely irrelevant to this discussion.  Maybe if they had played better OOC competition and won it would have helped.

It also helps not to lose to Vandy or Kentucky.  I have some agreement about South Carolina as they lost to three fairly competent teams close except Ole Miss.  But the OOC games didn't hurt any of these teams.

It helped South Carolina's argument.

E.g., the OOC losses simply didn't exist.

OrangeAfroMan

  • Stats Porn
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 21774
  • Liked:
Re: The New Newer Newest Era of College Football (SOC Playoffs Round 1)
« Reply #244 on: December 28, 2024, 02:17:02 PM »
It's not about one team or this season specifically.  
“The Swamp is where Gators live.  We feel comfortable there, but we hope our opponents feel tentative. A swamp is hot and sticky and can be dangerous." - Steve Spurrier

Gigem

  • All Star
  • ******
  • Posts: 3355
  • Liked:
Re: The New Newer Newest Era of College Football (SOC Playoffs Round 1)
« Reply #245 on: December 28, 2024, 03:40:42 PM »
hmmm....


https://twitter.com/justcoverblog/status/1872967212056887568

The only problem with this statement is that neither the A&M team of the USC team that played last night were the same ones that played a month ago.  We lost a good amount of our starters to opt out, many choosing to go to the draft next year, and some deciding to leave the program.  Same with USC. 

It's more like, some of the starters and a lot of the backups of USC beat some of the starters and a lot of the backups at A&M, that made 4th place in the conference this year.  

It still sucked to lose, especially when you were up by 17 late, but until something gets done about the portal, NIL, and players opting out it's just what it is.  Personally, I wish that bowl season would just die out, and let's just straight up do the playoff, however many teams they decide to include.  

OrangeAfroMan

  • Stats Porn
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 21774
  • Liked:
Re: The New Newer Newest Era of College Football (SOC Playoffs Round 1)
« Reply #246 on: December 28, 2024, 04:41:39 PM »
Any takeaways from bowl outcomes aren't valid, for or against whoever.  These aren't the same teams.  These are exhibitions that are accidently still being counted.  

We all know this.  Yet still we post.
“The Swamp is where Gators live.  We feel comfortable there, but we hope our opponents feel tentative. A swamp is hot and sticky and can be dangerous." - Steve Spurrier

Honestbuckeye

  • Team Captain
  • *******
  • Posts: 6918
  • Liked:
Re: The New Newer Newest Era of College Football (SOC Playoffs Round 1)
« Reply #247 on: December 28, 2024, 04:47:37 PM »
Purely entertainment.  This Iowa State/Miami game has 56 points already and still less than halfway through 2nd quarter.    Twelving.  
Get your facts first, then you can distort them as you please.
-Mark Twain

FearlessF

  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 45547
  • Liked:
Re: The New Newer Newest Era of College Football (SOC Playoffs Round 1)
« Reply #248 on: December 28, 2024, 05:42:02 PM »
Any takeaways from bowl outcomes aren't valid, for or against whoever.  These aren't the same teams.  These are exhibitions that are accidently still being counted. 
teams are always changing in this day and age
from the first game to the bowl game
injuries, quitters, early portal

line up your roster and play the game - it's gonna count

if not, just turn down the bowl invitation
"Courage; Generosity; Fairness; Honor; In these are the true awards of manly sport."

OrangeAfroMan

  • Stats Porn
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 21774
  • Liked:
Re: The New Newer Newest Era of College Football (SOC Playoffs Round 1)
« Reply #249 on: December 28, 2024, 05:48:52 PM »
I bet at least half of HCs would accept the practices and have no bowl.  The bowl isn't germane to their mission.  
“The Swamp is where Gators live.  We feel comfortable there, but we hope our opponents feel tentative. A swamp is hot and sticky and can be dangerous." - Steve Spurrier

bayareabadger

  • Legend
  • ****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 9344
  • Liked:
Re: The New Newer Newest Era of College Football (SOC Playoffs Round 1)
« Reply #250 on: December 28, 2024, 05:50:00 PM »
Lotta coaches opt out too. Which is a damn shame. 

Cincydawg

  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 82669
  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Liked:
Re: The New Newer Newest Era of College Football (SOC Playoffs Round 1)
« Reply #251 on: December 29, 2024, 07:31:05 AM »
I'm not convinced teams won't schedule OOC games of note these days.  I think they help, and this season is all we have to go on.  Why is UGA ranked 2 and Indiana ranked lower?  That's a 2 loss team higher than a 1 loss.  For all the complaining by Bama, as I note, their OOC slate was irrelevant, some with Ole Miss.

If those latter two had played another P5 kind of team and won, they might have made it in with 3 losses in conference play.  maybe.

 

Support the Site!
Purchase of every item listed here DIRECTLY supports the site.