I actually thought I'd find the opposite - that the DAL OL would be highly-drafted guys who fulfilled expectations. What I found was the opposite of that and I thought I'd share.
Silly me.
Well, I think given a little bit of the context of the previous discussion, it was an important contribution.
A few of us were arguing that the way to build a team is to start with the lines and build out from there.
In this case, that obviously wasn't the strategy. I think the DAL OL was probably VERY good, but it certainly wasn't a group assembled from top draft picks who were
expected to do what they did.
But when you look at them:
- T - Mark Tuinei - Pro bowl 94/95
- G - Nate Newton - All-pro 94/95, pro bowl 92/93/94/95/96/98
- C - Mark Stepnoski - Pro bowl 92/93/94
- G - Kevin Gogan (Only until 93) - Nothing with Dallas, but 2nd-team All-pro 98 (with SF), Pro bowl 94 (with Oakland), 95/96 (with SF) - So he was pretty good.
- G - Larry Allen (94 onward) - All-pro 96/97/98/99/00/01, pro-bowl 95/96/97/98/99/00/01/03/04/05
- T - Erik Williams - All-pro 93/96, pro bowl 93/96/97/99
So they weren't a bunch of no-talent hacks who were useless without Aikman/Smith/Irvin. They just didn't come from exactly the blue-chip pedigree you might have expected.
IMHO, it does help to suggest that having a great OL is a big part of having a great football team, which is what I was saying--that a great OL make the skill position guys around them MUCH better, and thus it's probably MORE important than the skill positions that everyone pays attention to.
Now, if you brought them up with the idea of suggesting that it was all about Aikman/Smith/Irvin, or as an indication that the Dallas OL was really not ALL that much better than the Detroit OL that Sanders ran behind? No, I don't think you've proven a point there.
Because when you look at Detroit's OL, only two players in that era had any of the same accolades:
- Kevin Glover: Pro bowl 95/96/97
- Lomas Brown: All-pro 95, pro bowl 90/91/92/93/94/95
Only two players, and they only had their accolades in one single overlapping year, 95.
Dallas, on the other hand, had at least one all-pro every year from 93-01, and multiple pro bowlers every year. You talked about them like they were a bunch of scrubs without the skill guys.