header pic

Perhaps the BEST B1G Forum anywhere, here at College Football Fan Site, CFB51!!!

The 'Old' CFN/Scout Crowd- Enjoy Civil discussion, game analytics, in depth player and coaching 'takes' and discussing topics surrounding the game. You can even have your own free board, all you have to do is ask!!!

Anyone is welcomed and encouraged to join our FREE site and to take part in our community- a community with you- the user, the fan, -and the person- will be protected from intrusive actions and with a clean place to interact.


« previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 5 6 [7] 8 9 ... 11   Go Down
Author

Topic: Talk of Eliminating Divisions

 (Read 8033 times)

Brutus Buckeye

  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 11237
  • Liked:
Re: Talk of Eliminating Divisions
« Reply #84 on: December 10, 2018, 05:15:45 PM »
I only liked the current ones because OSU drew Nebraska, I suppose. 

If we can't have them, then I'd prefer to simply put the illibuck back on the annual.

 The names out of a hat thing is just dumb.
Logged
1919, 20, 21, 28, 29, 31, 34, 35, 36, 37, 42, 44
WWH: 1952, 54, 55, 57, 58, 60, 61, 62, 63, 65, 67, 68, 70, 72, 74, 75
1979, 81, 82, 84, 87, 94, 98
2001, 02, 04, 05, 06, 07, 08, 09, 10, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19

FearlessF

  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 37520
  • Liked:
Re: Talk of Eliminating Divisions
« Reply #85 on: December 10, 2018, 05:16:10 PM »
just make the divisions large enough that there's no need for any cross overs

9-team divisions would be great.  Round robin playing the other 8 teams, send the champ to the CCG
Logged
"Courage; Generosity; Fairness; Honor; In these are the true awards of manly sport."

ELA

  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 20320
  • Liked:
Re: Talk of Eliminating Divisions
« Reply #86 on: December 10, 2018, 05:25:54 PM »
Quote from: FearlessF on December 10, 2018, 05:16:10 PM
just make the divisions large enough that there's no need for any cross overs

9-team divisions would be great.  Round robin playing the other 8 teams, send the champ to the CCG
I keep saying two 10 team divisions.  One division of Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Michigan, MSU, Minnesota, Northwestern, OSU, Purdue and Wisconsin; and one of Arizona, ASU, Cal, Oregon, OSU, Stanford, UCLA, USC, Washington and WSU.  Then they could play their conference championship on New Years Day in Pasadena.
:86:
Logged

FearlessF

  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 37520
  • Liked:
Re: Talk of Eliminating Divisions
« Reply #87 on: December 10, 2018, 05:37:21 PM »
I'd like that with a 10-team conference from Texas to Nebraska
Logged
"Courage; Generosity; Fairness; Honor; In these are the true awards of manly sport."

Brutus Buckeye

  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 11237
  • Liked:
Re: Talk of Eliminating Divisions
« Reply #88 on: December 10, 2018, 05:56:09 PM »
Only if Pacific, Long Beach and Fulerton can come back from the dead. 
Logged
1919, 20, 21, 28, 29, 31, 34, 35, 36, 37, 42, 44
WWH: 1952, 54, 55, 57, 58, 60, 61, 62, 63, 65, 67, 68, 70, 72, 74, 75
1979, 81, 82, 84, 87, 94, 98
2001, 02, 04, 05, 06, 07, 08, 09, 10, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19

LittlePig

  • Starter
  • *****
  • Posts: 1365
  • Liked:
Re: Talk of Eliminating Divisions
« Reply #89 on: December 10, 2018, 05:56:50 PM »
Quote from: 847badgerfan on December 10, 2018, 02:33:07 PM
They shoulda gave PSU to Iowa.
Things are always changing but I would set up round 2 of the fixed crossovers like this:
OSU-Wisc (best teams in each division)
MSU-Iowa  ( because NW got MSU last time)
PSU-Neb (brcause they are traditional powers)
Mich-NW ( because NW got MSU last time)
MD-ILL  (because ILL got Rutgers last time)
Rut-Minn (because ILL got Rut last time and Minn has slid below NW and Iowa in the pecking order)
Indy-Pur (because they have to play each other)
Logged

Brutus Buckeye

  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 11237
  • Liked:
Re: Talk of Eliminating Divisions
« Reply #90 on: December 10, 2018, 06:19:03 PM »
Northwestern has Rutgers, not MSU. Illinois has MSU, not Rutgers. 
Logged
1919, 20, 21, 28, 29, 31, 34, 35, 36, 37, 42, 44
WWH: 1952, 54, 55, 57, 58, 60, 61, 62, 63, 65, 67, 68, 70, 72, 74, 75
1979, 81, 82, 84, 87, 94, 98
2001, 02, 04, 05, 06, 07, 08, 09, 10, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19

LittlePig

  • Starter
  • *****
  • Posts: 1365
  • Liked:
Re: Talk of Eliminating Divisions
« Reply #91 on: December 10, 2018, 11:49:24 PM »
Quote from: Brutus Buckeye on December 10, 2018, 06:19:03 PM
Northwestern has Rutgers, not MSU. Illinois has MSU, not Rutgers.
Is that what you are proposing for fixed rivals????
Logged

Brutus Buckeye

  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 11237
  • Liked:
Re: Talk of Eliminating Divisions
« Reply #92 on: December 10, 2018, 11:52:00 PM »
Quote from: LittlePig on December 10, 2018, 11:49:24 PM
Is that what you are proposing for fixed rivals????
No. Those are the current fixed rivals. 
Logged
1919, 20, 21, 28, 29, 31, 34, 35, 36, 37, 42, 44
WWH: 1952, 54, 55, 57, 58, 60, 61, 62, 63, 65, 67, 68, 70, 72, 74, 75
1979, 81, 82, 84, 87, 94, 98
2001, 02, 04, 05, 06, 07, 08, 09, 10, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19

mcwterps1

  • All Star
  • ******
  • Posts: 3152
  • Liked:
Re: Talk of Eliminating Divisions
« Reply #93 on: December 11, 2018, 06:23:54 AM »
I don't think I mentioned this in my previous post, but I'm not in favor of getting rid of the divisions.

The rich would just continue to get rich while the bottom tier teams would continue to stay at the bottom.

Terrible recipe for college football. It's bad enough we have a playoff system that favors the rich getting richer.
Logged

Brutus Buckeye

  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 11237
  • Liked:
Re: Talk of Eliminating Divisions
« Reply #94 on: December 11, 2018, 06:40:47 AM »
Everybody gets a trophy! 
Logged
1919, 20, 21, 28, 29, 31, 34, 35, 36, 37, 42, 44
WWH: 1952, 54, 55, 57, 58, 60, 61, 62, 63, 65, 67, 68, 70, 72, 74, 75
1979, 81, 82, 84, 87, 94, 98
2001, 02, 04, 05, 06, 07, 08, 09, 10, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19

Entropy

  • Starter
  • *****
  • Posts: 1432
  • Liked:
Re: Talk of Eliminating Divisions
« Reply #95 on: December 11, 2018, 09:54:05 AM »
I think a large portion of husker fans would have liked to have seen PSU instead of Michigan... due to having a history with that program.  
Logged

utee94

  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 17672
  • Liked:
Re: Talk of Eliminating Divisions
« Reply #96 on: December 11, 2018, 10:00:00 AM »
OK.  There are now 14 teams in the B1G.  So you drop the divisions, move to a 13-game conference schedule, and play a full roundrobin.  That solves all the problems doesn't it?
Logged

mcwterps1

  • All Star
  • ******
  • Posts: 3152
  • Liked:
Re: Talk of Eliminating Divisions
« Reply #97 on: December 11, 2018, 11:15:47 AM »
Quote from: Brutus Buckeye on December 11, 2018, 06:40:47 AM
Everybody gets a trophy!
I take it you were talking about my post?
Because it's only the rich that would care to keep it that way.
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 5 6 [7] 8 9 ... 11   Go Up
« previous next »
 
Support the Site!
Purchase of every item listed here DIRECTLY supports the site.
FAFO No Trespassing Sign

WeatherPROOF Sign Single Sided