Lol. I highly doubt that. I think your numbers are off by a lot.
Okay, so right now we have 2.28M official confirmed cases and 121K deaths. That's a case fatality rate of 5.3%.
There haven't been any great antibody studies that I'm aware of. The best at the time was the NY study. Although it was highly criticized for likely not being representative, it suggested a roughly 10x difference in NY between confirmed cases and actual cases. Although some think that's too high, we'll just take that as gospel.
If that's the case, we have about 22.8M cases, including all asymptomatic and mild cases. That of course brings the actual fatality rate down to about 0.53%, or about 5 times the flu. 22.8M cases is about 7% of the population.
If we assume a rough number of 70% infection rate needed to reach herd immunity (values I've seen are in the 60-80% range but 70% makes the math trivially easy) then you assume we have to have 10x the current infection rate to get there. If the fatality rate holds at 0.53%, you end up with 1.21M deaths from Coronavirus.
Obviously these are all back of the envelope calcuations. We don't know if the true infection rate is 10x that of confirmed cases. We don't know if the true herd immunity rate is 70% or 50% or 90%. This is a new virus we've never seen before.
But that's how you easily extrapolate to 1-2M deaths, and I don't think ANY of those logical leaps is a bridge too far.