Perhaps the BEST B1G Forum anywhere, here at College Football Fan Site, CFB51!!!

I hope you are right but if the economy isn't opened up soon a mad dash will morph into mayhem unprecedented.I'm starting to see cracks and they could be colossal.Rockwell's America could turn into Stephen King's right before our eyes.In stirring a course for a cure it could turn worse than the curse

People are going to venture out based on their own personal comfort with the risk levels.  Some will go out immediately.  Others will wait a couple of weeks.  Still others will wait a couple of months.

That's a good thing, as it will continue to slow the spread of the "Second Wave" or whatever you want to call it.  It will happen naturally without forced government-mandated closures.

Initially there won't be enough people out to sustain restaurants, bars, movie theaters, and other entertainment-oriented businesses.  So we'll continue to see a relatively high rate of failure amongst those businesses.  But if we don't start somewhere, we'll see even MORE failures.  

Obviously hotspots like NYC will remain shutdown far longer.  I feel for those folks.

Again, your right to swing your fist ends at the tip of my nose...

Let's say you have a known, documented case of the flu and you're in the peak of contagious period. Should you be "allowed" to ride a crowded subway? Maybe sit between a mother bringing her newborn home from the hospital and a wheezing 90-year-old? Are you not infringing on everyone else's right not to be infected by you and essentially swinging your fist right through their faces?

I realize that's extreme compared to the case of not having a known infection of Coronavirus. But in a global pandemic, is there no level to which it might be actually *necessary* to mandate precautions? 

again to take away personal rights ijust because you may be infected in my opinion is not constitutional

Driving is not a right.

sure it is

That's a good thing, as it will continue to slow the spread of the "Second Wave" or whatever you want to call it.  It will happen naturally without forced government-mandated closures.

Fairly certain the charities are winding down on meat supply/procurement.Bills are coming due all over the place and many can no longer hear"hang on will get through this together" that's touching but not accurate.As you point out it will happen naturally, follow regulations and procedure but the economy has to get into gear

questions Id like an answer to:

once you get the virus are you immune forever or for a shorter period of time

does everyone who gets the virus become immune

is it possible to get over the virus testing negative but still spread it

what is a true number of people with antibodies by state

1: Unknown. This is a key aspect of any potential vaccine. If exposure doesn't confer permanent immunity, I don't know if a vaccine would. 
2: Unknown. We don't have enough information to know who has gotten it nor the length of immunity.
3: Yes, that much we know. Because we think the test has as high as a 30% false negative rate, you may get the virus, get tested and show up negative (due to test problems), get over it, but obviously during the symptomatic time [and slightly before] you can spread it.
4: Unknown, but we all want to know this with higher confidence.

This is why people are wary about "let 'er rip" opening things up... And when people tell you Sweden is going to reach herd immunity, that assumes that exposure confers permanent immunity. If immunity is only temporary, Sweden might be just as susceptible to a 2nd-wave pandemic as the rest of us. 

This is why people are wary about "let 'er rip" opening things up... And when people tell you Sweden is going to reach herd immunity, that assumes that exposure confers permanent immunity. If immunity is only temporary, Sweden might be just as susceptible to a 2nd-wave pandemic as the rest of us.

If immunity is only temporary we are in big trouble

again to take away personal rights ijust because you may be infected in my opinion is not constitutional

if a state can suspend personal rights out of concern you may have the virus then a state can confiscate all guns out of concern you may be a serial killer

As with a lot of things, there's a balance. 

If the gov't said everyone was mandated to wear masks now and forever, that's one thing. If there's a global pandemic and they say "wear a mask until this passes" it's another...