I don’t care for him, but your saying it nicely. The factual evidence on the whole collusion thing now clearly points to fraud at the least and possible laws broken, as a means to start an investigation that many behind knew had no merit.
I do think the whole collusion thing was horribly misunderstood and misreported, because we still keep calling it "the whole collusion thing".
We know the Russians were trying to meddle in our election. We know they were doing so to make it more likely that Trump won. There was no proof that the Trump campaign actively colluded with them to do that, and the investigation basically stated that.
What nobody seems to walk back and ask is "why did the Russians want him to win? How does his victory benefit Russia?"
I'm not entirely sure, but I think his efforts to pin the interference in the election on the Ukrainians instead of Russia, at the specific time that the Russians needed some political cover for annexing the Crimea, are a little suspect.
not far different from the whole impeachment thing. Total transparency- here is a tape of the call.
No, no, no.
There was never a tape of the call provided to anyone. Didn't happen.
And although they kept saying "read the transcript", the 'transcript' wasn't a transcript -- it was a
memo summarizing what was said on the call. So we have no clue how accurate it actually is.
