The B1G may need to think outside the box for 15 and 16. ND is an obvious target, but there still might be too much mutual animosity for it to be realistic. I would have to say programs in large states with lots of B1G alumni would be optimal. I'm thinking the U of Texas, U of Florida, and UNC. UNC might make the most sense because while still a geographic outlier, it's still the closest to existing B1G schools (it's about 4 hours or so from UMD, and 6-7 from Penn State). UNC and Texas don't have the conference stability that Florida has, but if there is an SEC school that might think about bolting for the B1G - even for a split second - it's UF.
Umm, no. None of this.
The realistic options for B1G expansion are limited to these, in order of preference:
1 - AAU schools bordering the footprint
2 - AAU schools within the footprint
3 - ND
So in Group 1, you have Missouri, Kansas, Virginia, Colorado (hmmph), and technically Buffalo (n/a)
Depending on who you add from Group 1, you could extend the footprint further with the likes of UNC, Duke, Utah, or Vanderbilt.
Group 2, you have Pitt and Iowa State
Group 3 is Notre Dame
That's it.
Now, I think the B1G could add Pitt and ND and be perfectly fine.
The options in Group 1 are interesting in pairs - getting Mizzou & KU or Virginia & UNC....that's probably what the conference brass would prefer over a Pitt/ND addition.
But I'd be reeeeeally careful if they're extracting Missouri out of the SEC. If that actually happened, I think some tectonic plates would start shuffling - some big boys would be like stonehenge dominoes falling. The SEC would then go after a Texas or a Texas/OU or UNC/UVA/VT itself.
Anywho, that's how I see it.