Here is what COULD happen, someday, with the 12 team concept. UAB gets in as the 12 seed as the highest ranked G5 conference champ at 11-2. They play say at UGA and score a HUGE upset as the Dawgs have 4 TOs to none etc. Then they upset Texas in the final four round by a point, and then they beat Ohio State miraculously. All highly improbable of course. The AP poll comes out with Alabama as Number 1 and UAB at 5.
Problem #1 is that you only have them winning three games:
The 12-seed would have to win four games:
- 12 over 5 to get into the final eight
- 12 over 4 to get to the final four
- 12 over 1/8/9 to get to the CG
- 12 over 2/3/6/7/10/11 in the CG
So in addition to the three helmets you already have them taking out, they'd need a fourth big win.
Problem #2 is that the chances of pulling off four consecutive stupendous upsets are vanishingly small.
Problem #3 is that if they did all of that I just can't see anyone, not even
@OrangeAfroMan or I arguing that they didn't deserve the #1 ranking.
I'm very outspoken in making the argument that upsets happen and the best team doesn't always win so in your example I'd probably still be saying that after UAB's road win at Georgia and maybe even after their upset of Texas but once they pulled off a third and then a fourth consecutive upset the numbers just don't work. It becomes more likely that we are wrong than it is that they beat those odds four consecutive times.
Problem #4 is that it would never happen. The playoff and playoff expansion makes it less likely rather than more likely for a non-helmet to win because UGA/TX/tOSU recruit at the highest level and spend the most on coaching, NIL, facilities, etc. They will suffer upsets but the more chances you give themen the more likely they (collectively) are to eventually win.