header pic

Perhaps the BEST B1G Forum anywhere, here at College Football Fan Site, CFB51!!!

The 'Old' CFN/Scout Crowd- Enjoy Civil discussion, game analytics, in depth player and coaching 'takes' and discussing topics surrounding the game. You can even have your own free board, all you have to do is ask!!!

Anyone is welcomed and encouraged to join our FREE site and to take part in our community- a community with you- the user, the fan, -and the person- will be protected from intrusive actions and with a clean place to interact.


Author

Topic: Revenge Tour for the Law Firm of Franklin & Day (SOC Rd. 2)

 (Read 6133 times)

SFBadger96

  • Starter
  • *****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 1841
  • Liked:
Re: Revenge Tour for the Law Firm of Franklin & Day (SOC Rd. 2)
« Reply #224 on: January 06, 2025, 02:25:15 PM »
Oh yeah, Stanford is tops on the West Coast for Tech and Engineering, for sure.  I've worked with several Stanford grads, most of them were fine, although one of them was hands-down the worst engineer I've ever encountered in the professional field.


It's funny how that happens. For law school Stanford is also--maybe obviously--great. But...also puts out a few folk who are too arrogant to put in the work.

betarhoalphadelta

  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 14508
  • Liked:
Re: Revenge Tour for the Law Firm of Franklin & Day (SOC Rd. 2)
« Reply #225 on: January 06, 2025, 02:29:26 PM »
Bang for your buck, the UCs are far superior (Cal, UCLA, UCSD, and UC-Davis, at least), and Cal Poly SLO is, too (that's probably the best bang for your buck). Stanford and CalTech are far superior when it comes to the sparkle of the degree, although I'm sure much harder to get into than SC.
You may appreciate hearing that a friend of my eldest's is at Purdue for engineering and is loving it. He's got a job in the LA area that he did last summer and probably this coming summer--it seems they are already recruiting him for post-college.
Agree 100% regarding the UCs, and Cal Poly SLO is a very well-respected school. I don't know that Cal Poly Pomona holds a candle to it though. 

I often forget about CalTech just because it's SO tiny (undergrad) so you meet very few grads, and I think it's more heavily into aeronautics/aerospace than I think of for EE which means I wouldn't run into them as much. I'm guessing my buddies who work for Northrup probably know a lot more CalTech folks than I would. 

As always for people who are coming out of school or looking for jobs in engineering, if they have any interest in what I do (data storage / HDDs), I'm always available to help if they want to reach out, and if they're looking for openings at my company we have an employee referral process that might get them a closer look... 

SFBadger96

  • Starter
  • *****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 1841
  • Liked:
Re: Revenge Tour for the Law Firm of Franklin & Day (SOC Rd. 2)
« Reply #226 on: January 06, 2025, 02:38:48 PM »
Agree 100% regarding the UCs, and Cal Poly SLO is a very well-respected school. I don't know that Cal Poly Pomona holds a candle to it though.
Yeah, that's weird. I'm sure CP-Pomona is a fine school, but for whatever reason it's reputation is quite different than SLO. Lately I've heard SLO referred to as effectively a UC, at least from the standpoint of prestige.

betarhoalphadelta

  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 14508
  • Liked:
Re: Revenge Tour for the Law Firm of Franklin & Day (SOC Rd. 2)
« Reply #227 on: January 06, 2025, 03:37:57 PM »
Yeah, that's weird. I'm sure CP-Pomona is a fine school, but for whatever reason it's reputation is quite different than SLO. Lately I've heard SLO referred to as effectively a UC, at least from the standpoint of prestige.
I think the reputation that a lot of schools get has a lot more to do with how selective their admissions are rather than how strong they are educationally. After all, the curriculum is the curriculum. I doubt that what I learned at Purdue and what utee94 learned at Texas were very different. 

I suspect that the people who are admitted to CP-Pomona can't get admitted into SLO or the UCs. 

Just as the Stanford guy that utee mentioned very well might have been very smart and a brilliant student, and thus was good enough to get admitted to Stanford, but didn't have the rest of the necessary skills that translate to actually doing any real engineering work. 

847badgerfan

  • Administrator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 31077
  • Liked:
Re: Revenge Tour for the Law Firm of Franklin & Day (SOC Rd. 2)
« Reply #228 on: January 08, 2025, 03:38:09 PM »
I think they have an engineering school, but it's nothing of note.

In fact, my son is looking at colleges now and wants to go into engineering (likely nuclear), and there are people on his mom's side of the family suggesting he apply to USC. Uhh, no. Not a school worth going to for engineering. It'd be a complete waste of money.

USC is really good for degrees where networking at the undergraduate level is really important, like business school. And it's a good place to go for med school or law school. Or to go get an MBA if you're in tech.

But it's not factored into tech in any meaningful way. Stanford is the elite West Coast private school for that one...
It's a very good engineering school, but you'd be best served going to a UC-___________.
U RAH RAH! WIS CON SIN!

ELA

  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 22874
  • Liked:
Re: Revenge Tour for the Law Firm of Franklin & Day (SOC Rd. 2)
« Reply #229 on: January 08, 2025, 03:53:46 PM »
Pretty good for a BFA too, right?

That's a degree which is totally about the connections you get

NorthernOhioBuckeye

  • Starter
  • *****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 1241
  • Liked:
Re: Revenge Tour for the Law Firm of Franklin & Day (SOC Rd. 2)
« Reply #230 on: January 09, 2025, 12:35:59 PM »
I mean, I don't really consider Texas an SEC team either, but for the purposes of television revenue, I'm pretty sure that ESPN does. :)

This is a great helmet final 4 matchup, and also a pretty outstanding "Hater's Ball" of college football.  I'm not sure there are 4 teams more universally hated than these 4.  Which is absolutely fantastic for TV ratings.
I don't know abou that, but Michigan would like you to hold their beer. :)

Gigem

  • All Star
  • ******
  • Posts: 3351
  • Liked:
Re: Revenge Tour for the Law Firm of Franklin & Day (SOC Rd. 2)
« Reply #231 on: January 09, 2025, 01:59:09 PM »
I don't know abou that, but Michigan would like you to hold their beer. :)
The funny thing is that you guys called it before the season.  That the only thing the playoff would do is get/keep more helmet teams in the hunt for the MNC.  Under the old systems, both Ohio State and Texas would have been out of the hunt at the end of the season, possibly even the old 4 team playoff.  I think ND would have been kept out as well, although the power of the helemet is very strong, and that loss to NIU was a long time ago.  
So we have 3 blue blood programs that would have been out, Texas, ND, and Ohio State.  Possibly literally 3 of the bluest of blue bloods with those three.  And then you have Penn St, which I'm not sure if you guys consider them blue blood or not but certainly they're in that conversation, top 15 for sure.  

utee94

  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 22199
  • Liked:
Re: Revenge Tour for the Law Firm of Franklin & Day (SOC Rd. 2)
« Reply #232 on: January 09, 2025, 02:33:05 PM »
I consider Penn State a helmet, but not a blue-blood.  But they're certainly very close and tend to draw a lot of national eyeballs, which is the real point I think you're making.


Mdot21

  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 16786
  • Liked:
Re: Revenge Tour for the Law Firm of Franklin & Day (SOC Rd. 2)
« Reply #233 on: January 09, 2025, 04:40:27 PM »
So we have 3 blue blood programs that would have been out, Texas, ND, and Ohio State.  Possibly literally 3 of the bluest of blue bloods with those three.  And then you have Penn St, which I'm not sure if you guys consider them blue blood or not but certainly they're in that conversation, top 15 for sure. 
Bama has to be up there in top 3 of bluest of blue bloods. ND, Bama, Ohio State your top 3 imo with USC & Michigan right there on them heels. Texas is certainly a blue blood but not top 3 imo. USC and Michigan have stronger case for top 3 than Texas imo. Oklahoma has a stronger case for top 3 as well. This is like nitpicking though.

Penn State is a helmet, but not a blue blood. Those dirty rotten Cornfuckers in Nebraska are on verge of losing blue blood status and being demoted to helmet imo. It's been a pretty sorry nearly 30 years. Tommie Frazier was a looooong time ago.

SFBadger96

  • Starter
  • *****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 1841
  • Liked:
Re: Revenge Tour for the Law Firm of Franklin & Day (SOC Rd. 2)
« Reply #234 on: January 09, 2025, 05:27:00 PM »
All time wins seems like the easiest way to do this and feels like it checks out:

Michigan
Alabama
Ohio State
Notre Dame
Texas
Oklahoma
USC

That's my list of the bluest of the blue bloods. They also each claim numberous national championships, most of which get some reasonable level of respect (Texas, at 4, is on the low-end for MNCs, but hard to ignore all those wins, and that long rivalry with OU).

After that it's helmet status, but probably not quite the cream of the crop.
Penn State, Nebraska, Tennessee, Georgia, Florida State.

I feel like after Georgia the picture gets a lot murkier, but still in the helmet category: LSU, Florida, Miami. But what about Clemson, Auburn, Washington, aTm...I think those are still helmet schools. VaTech? Not really. Arizona State? No. Michigan State? Meh. West Virginia? No. Utah? Only been in the big boy conferences for a few seconds. (Boise State doesn't count.) Wisconsin? I don't think so. Then it's just a jumble of major conference teams who have had their moments in the spotlight, some of which are right now.

I think Nebraska might have stayed in the higher group if it had stayed more relevant since joining the Big Ten. Penn State takes a back seat to those other three in its geographic neighborhood. Michigan, Ohio State, and Notre Dame are just bigger names.

Gigem

  • All Star
  • ******
  • Posts: 3351
  • Liked:
Re: Revenge Tour for the Law Firm of Franklin & Day (SOC Rd. 2)
« Reply #235 on: January 09, 2025, 08:39:42 PM »
Bama has to be up there in top 3 of bluest of blue bloods. ND, Bama, Ohio State your top 3 imo with USC & Michigan right there on them heels. Texas is certainly a blue blood but not top 3 imo. USC and Michigan have stronger case for top 3 than Texas imo. Oklahoma has a stronger case for top 3 as well. This is like nitpicking though.

Penn State is a helmet, but not a blue blood. Those dirty rotten Cornfuckers in Nebraska are on verge of losing blue blood status and being demoted to helmet imo. It's been a pretty sorry nearly 30 years. Tommie Frazier was a looooong time ago.
JFC, you guys and your list of blue bloods and bluest of the blue bloods. I never said anything about “top 3” blue bloods. 

The whole point of the post is that all the CFP has been so far is to put more top programs into the national title race that otherwise would not have gotten in. Just like many on this board mused about before the whole 12 team thing even started. 

Gigem

  • All Star
  • ******
  • Posts: 3351
  • Liked:
Re: Revenge Tour for the Law Firm of Franklin & Day (SOC Rd. 2)
« Reply #236 on: January 09, 2025, 08:44:23 PM »
All time wins seems like the easiest way to do this and feels like it checks out:

Michigan
Alabama
Ohio State
Notre Dame
Texas
Oklahoma
USC

That's my list of the bluest of the blue bloods. They also each claim numberous national championships, most of which get some reasonable level of respect (Texas, at 4, is on the low-end for MNCs, but hard to ignore all those wins, and that long rivalry with OU).

After that it's helmet status, but probably not quite the cream of the crop.
Penn State, Nebraska, Tennessee, Georgia, Florida State.

I feel like after Georgia the picture gets a lot murkier, but still in the helmet category: LSU, Florida, Miami. But what about Clemson, Auburn, Washington, aTm...I think those are still helmet schools. VaTech? Not really. Arizona State? No. Michigan State? Meh. West Virginia? No. Utah? Only been in the big boy conferences for a few seconds. (Boise State doesn't count.) Wisconsin? I don't think so. Then it's just a jumble of major conference teams who have had their moments in the spotlight, some of which are right now.

I think Nebraska might have stayed in the higher group if it had stayed more relevant since joining the Big Ten. Penn State takes a back seat to those other three in its geographic neighborhood. Michigan, Ohio State, and Notre Dame are just bigger names.
I’d remove Nebraska and UTenn and replace with Florida and LSU. Simply because I’m not sure that either team can ever get back to where they were. LSU and UF have won a lot this century. Kinda like how Minnesota dropped out of helmet team status back in the 1980’s. 

 

Support the Site!
Purchase of every item listed here DIRECTLY supports the site.