header pic

Perhaps the BEST B1G Forum anywhere, here at College Football Fan Site, CFB51!!!

The 'Old' CFN/Scout Crowd- Enjoy Civil discussion, game analytics, in depth player and coaching 'takes' and discussing topics surrounding the game. You can even have your own free board, all you have to do is ask!!!

Anyone is welcomed and encouraged to join our FREE site and to take part in our community- a community with you- the user, the fan, -and the person- will be protected from intrusive actions and with a clean place to interact.


Author

Topic: Rankings ... ugh

 (Read 1037482 times)

betarhoalphadelta

  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 17476
  • Liked:
Re: Rankings ... ugh
« Reply #6104 on: August 27, 2026, 10:54:13 AM »
I'm pretty sure everyone here is well above 135 ...
I think I can point out a few laggards amongst us. :57:

But yeah, any IQ test I've taken during the course of my life has put me in the 135-145 range. 

Cincydawg

  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 91574
  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Liked:
Re: Rankings ... ugh
« Reply #6105 on: August 27, 2026, 11:13:04 AM »
I dimly recall some "IQ test", Stanford maybe?  I was told it maxed out at 140.  I'd guess you'd need a special test for folks above 120 or so to be very good.

SFBadger96

  • All Star
  • ******
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 3094
  • Liked:
Re: Rankings ... ugh
« Reply #6106 on: August 27, 2026, 11:30:25 AM »
I think I've taken 3-4 IQ tests and I dimly recall a low of 122 and a high of 129? I'm pretty smart. I know plenty of people smarter.

SFGopher tested very high--above 130--the one time he took one.

FearlessF

  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 56246
  • Liked:
Re: Rankings ... ugh
« Reply #6107 on: August 27, 2026, 11:31:24 AM »
not sure what I would do with that number if I had it
"Courage; Generosity; Fairness; Honor; In these are the true awards of manly sport."

Cincydawg

  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 91574
  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Liked:
Re: Rankings ... ugh
« Reply #6108 on: August 27, 2026, 11:33:37 AM »
I've met enough folks I thought were smarter than me to be pretty humble about it, of course, humility is one of my many great traits.

My neighbor here is a retired physics professor from Tech, PhD Harvard, postdo Oxford.  I have zero understanding of his research field, he doesn't talk about it.

There are two PhD economics professors down the hall, nice folks, he's from Georgia, she's from Mass.  The other Georgia, which is not what they call it.


betarhoalphadelta

  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 17476
  • Liked:
Re: Rankings ... ugh
« Reply #6109 on: August 27, 2026, 11:36:21 AM »
not sure what I would do with that number if I had it
Nothing. 

As I've heard women put it, it's not the size of the brain that matters, it's how you use it. 

Or something like that. 

Cincydawg

  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 91574
  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Liked:
Re: Rankings ... ugh
« Reply #6110 on: August 27, 2026, 11:38:15 AM »
My experience with folks who bandy about their IQ number is they aren't very smart, usually.


betarhoalphadelta

  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 17476
  • Liked:
Re: Rankings ... ugh
« Reply #6111 on: August 27, 2026, 11:38:22 AM »
Does anyone remember back when Fox broadcast a "national IQ test" called Test the Nation?


847badgerfan

  • Administrator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 37477
  • Liked:
Re: Rankings ... ugh
« Reply #6112 on: August 27, 2026, 11:40:22 AM »
Where would one go to even take such a test?
U RAH RAH! WIS CON SIN!

MikeDeTiger

  • Team Captain
  • *******
  • Posts: 7368
  • Liked:
Re: Rankings ... ugh
« Reply #6113 on: August 27, 2026, 11:56:33 AM »
The only one I've taken administered by "people who know what they're doing" (supposedly) was when I would've the one from elementary school when I was placed in G/T.  If they told me the score, I don't remember it and wouldn't have known what to do with it.  

I dug around online for the EBRP G/T requirements in 1986 and turned up some records.  I'm skeptical.  The IQ requirement was higher than what I'd expect to be the threshold, and frankly I just don't think I'm as bright as that minimum.  

Entirely possible the info I dug up is faulty.  IQ also fluctuates over time, so also I potentially I maxed out at a young age.  

I've taken a number of tests online in my adult life out of curiosity.  I can't think they're very reliable.  Interestingly, my score has been consistent across those tests.  And also lower than the supposed minimum threshold I found for G/T kids in my childhood school system.  

Somewhat jokingly (but also kinda not?), I've always said that I've known many people smarter than me, and many people not as smart as me.  I meet them in about equal numbers, it seems.  Ergo, I conclude I am perfectly average with an IQ of 100.  

847badgerfan

  • Administrator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 37477
  • Liked:
Re: Rankings ... ugh
« Reply #6114 on: August 27, 2026, 12:10:15 PM »
I'm not even curious really. I know I'm pretty smart and that's enough for me.

Most of the people I know who are smarter than me reside... HERE!
U RAH RAH! WIS CON SIN!

FearlessF

  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 56246
  • Liked:
Re: Rankings ... ugh
« Reply #6115 on: August 27, 2026, 12:23:05 PM »
I'm usually not the smartest guy in the room but,............. I have experience
"Courage; Generosity; Fairness; Honor; In these are the true awards of manly sport."

Wildcat4E

  • Player
  • ****
  • Posts: 522
  • Liked:
Re: Rankings ... ugh
« Reply #6116 on: August 27, 2026, 12:53:08 PM »

Yellowstone Volcano would wipe KS out.  Saw a show about that umpteen years ago.  But that's not humorous, like half of the others.

betarhoalphadelta

  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 17476
  • Liked:
Re: Rankings ... ugh
« Reply #6117 on: August 27, 2026, 01:52:55 PM »
Are they talking about the Yellowstone Caldera going kaboom? I also saw a show about that--seems to happen every 600-700 thousand years, and the last one (according to Wiki) was ~631,000 years ago. So it's "due" lol.

But my takeaway from that show is that an eruption of that magnitude would be pretty catastrophic for the entire western half of the US. IMHO far more impactful on CA than a big quake. 

So I'm gonna say this entire map/infographic is BS. 

 

Support the Site!
Purchase of every item listed here DIRECTLY supports the site.