header pic

Perhaps the BEST B1G Forum anywhere, here at College Football Fan Site, CFB51!!!

The 'Old' CFN/Scout Crowd- Enjoy Civil discussion, game analytics, in depth player and coaching 'takes' and discussing topics surrounding the game. You can even have your own free board, all you have to do is ask!!!

Anyone is welcomed and encouraged to join our FREE site and to take part in our community- a community with you- the user, the fan, -and the person- will be protected from intrusive actions and with a clean place to interact.


« previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 394 395 [396]   Go Down
Author

Topic: Rankings ... ugh

 (Read 731838 times)

FearlessF

  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 53894
  • Liked:
Re: Rankings ... ugh
« Reply #5530 on: April 06, 2026, 12:55:33 PM »
and don't call me Shirley
Logged
"Courage; Generosity; Fairness; Honor; In these are the true awards of manly sport."

MikeDeTiger

  • Team Captain
  • *******
  • Posts: 6257
  • Liked:
Re: Rankings ... ugh
« Reply #5531 on: April 06, 2026, 01:11:53 PM »
Quote from: betarhoalphadelta on April 06, 2026, 12:12:52 PM
You're not.

Major coaching turnover leads to major player turnover in this new era.

https://www.si.com/fannation/college/cfb-hq/transfer-portal/top-5-college-football-programs-with-most-transfer-portal-player-churn

According to that article, LSU was top-10 in turnover.

True, but we had enough year-to-year turnover in the Brian Kelly era that I stopped trying to keep track of it.  Maybe not 60+, but enough that I perpetually didn't know half the starters come kickoff.  Even as much as we've regularly had--which I thought might be roughly average for teams who think they can seriously compete--is enough to put me off of trying to make reasonable projections.  Too many moving parts.  
Logged

betarhoalphadelta

  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 16757
  • Liked:
Re: Rankings ... ugh
« Reply #5532 on: April 06, 2026, 01:35:37 PM »
Quote from: MikeDeTiger on April 06, 2026, 01:11:53 PM
True, but we had enough year-to-year turnover in the Brian Kelly era that I stopped trying to keep track of it.  Maybe not 60+, but enough that I perpetually didn't know half the starters come kickoff.  Even as much as we've regularly had--which I thought might be roughly average for teams who think they can seriously compete--is enough to put me off of trying to make reasonable projections.  Too many moving parts. 
Oh, completely agree with that. There's very little reason to spend much time worrying about this now. 
Logged

Cincydawg

  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 89514
  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Liked:
Re: Rankings ... ugh
« Reply #5533 on: April 07, 2026, 07:09:17 AM »
No college teams?

Logged

847badgerfan

  • Administrator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 35609
  • Liked:
Re: Rankings ... ugh
« Reply #5534 on: April 07, 2026, 07:21:44 AM »
No Chicago Bears, but 60M for the Bulls?

Terrible list.
Logged
U RAH RAH! WIS CON SIN!
Pages: 1 ... 394 395 [396]   Go Up
« previous next »
 
Support the Site!
Purchase of every item listed here DIRECTLY supports the site.
CFB51 Subscription
Subscribe

Shadow Box Plaque