header pic

Perhaps the BEST B1G Forum anywhere, here at College Football Fan Site, CFB51!!!

The 'Old' CFN/Scout Crowd- Enjoy Civil discussion, game analytics, in depth player and coaching 'takes' and discussing topics surrounding the game. You can even have your own free board, all you have to do is ask!!!

Anyone is welcomed and encouraged to join our FREE site and to take part in our community- a community with you- the user, the fan, -and the person- will be protected from intrusive actions and with a clean place to interact.


Author

Topic: Rankings ... ugh

 (Read 292168 times)

OrangeAfroMan

  • Stats Porn
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 21765
  • Liked:
Re: Rankings ... ugh
« Reply #2856 on: July 31, 2024, 10:34:05 PM »
So are mulligans good for the sanctity of the regular season or bad?  Hmm, tough one.
“The Swamp is where Gators live.  We feel comfortable there, but we hope our opponents feel tentative. A swamp is hot and sticky and can be dangerous." - Steve Spurrier


ELA

  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 22865
  • Liked:
Re: Rankings ... ugh
« Reply #2858 on: August 01, 2024, 12:52:26 AM »
This is a wrinkle though.  A team like Iowa who (by this system) is favored in 11 games.  But so many are narrow margins, they are projected to win 7.6 games.  But this metric doesnt really.account for that

OrangeAfroMan

  • Stats Porn
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 21765
  • Liked:
Re: Rankings ... ugh
« Reply #2859 on: August 01, 2024, 03:59:58 AM »
This is a wrinkle though.  A team like Iowa who (by this system) is favored in 11 games.  But so many are narrow margins, they are projected to win 7.6 games.  But this metric doesnt really.account for that
As how thorough their explanation is for this, they'd have zero faith in the masses understanding your point, lol.
“The Swamp is where Gators live.  We feel comfortable there, but we hope our opponents feel tentative. A swamp is hot and sticky and can be dangerous." - Steve Spurrier

Gigem

  • All Star
  • ******
  • Posts: 3345
  • Liked:
Re: Rankings ... ugh
« Reply #2860 on: August 01, 2024, 08:19:37 AM »
They are changing kickoff rules next season, will look a lot different
So are these the actual rules?  Because my first thought was sarcasm. 

MaximumSam

  • Guest
Re: Rankings ... ugh
« Reply #2861 on: August 01, 2024, 08:24:28 AM »
So are these the actual rules?  Because my first thought was sarcasm.
Yes, the new kickoff rules change where the kicking team lines up. I think now they line up on the opposing team's 40. Necessitated changes in the onsides kick rules, as they will have to line up like normal to do one.

FearlessF

  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 45434
  • Liked:
Re: Rankings ... ugh
« Reply #2862 on: August 01, 2024, 08:32:14 AM »
redickerous
"Courage; Generosity; Fairness; Honor; In these are the true awards of manly sport."

Gigem

  • All Star
  • ******
  • Posts: 3345
  • Liked:
Re: Rankings ... ugh
« Reply #2863 on: August 01, 2024, 09:46:57 AM »
Posting about football talk on a football board is getting my panties in a bunch?

This place is losing it. 

Bitch all day about Biden, Harris, food, guns, or whatever the fuck, cool.  Disagree with a football thing - PSYCHO!
Well, since I'm not speaking to you in person and I only have so much context from what is written in your responses you seem to be very animated about this list. 

I notice they left out Johnny Manziel from the list, but I couldn't care less.  It's supposed to elicit rage. Somebody else might write a list that puts Manziel at #1, which I wouldn't agree with either.  I found it hilarious that they listed Kyler Murray and put him under OU/A&M.  

Suh at #1?  Very questionable.  Great player, no doubt.  I had never even heard of several players on the list.  I don't even really remember much about Ed Reed in college, hell we're practically the same age (40's).  I think some of the choices are spot on, not everything is about pure stats.  VY was definitely a great player.  Cam, Tebow, all great.  
Why not just respond with your Top 20 list.  

Gigem

  • All Star
  • ******
  • Posts: 3345
  • Liked:
Re: Rankings ... ugh
« Reply #2864 on: August 01, 2024, 09:47:35 AM »
Oh, and I definitely think they did everybody a disservice by leaving out Colt McCoy.  That was a helluva great CFB player.  

FearlessF

  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 45434
  • Liked:
Re: Rankings ... ugh
« Reply #2865 on: August 01, 2024, 10:16:56 AM »
Simms was better
"Courage; Generosity; Fairness; Honor; In these are the true awards of manly sport."

FearlessF

  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 45434
  • Liked:
Re: Rankings ... ugh
« Reply #2866 on: August 01, 2024, 10:28:23 AM »
"Courage; Generosity; Fairness; Honor; In these are the true awards of manly sport."

utee94

  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 22169
  • Liked:
Re: Rankings ... ugh
« Reply #2867 on: August 01, 2024, 10:50:59 AM »
Simms was better
Wrong QB controversy bub.

FearlessF

  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 45434
  • Liked:
Re: Rankings ... ugh
« Reply #2868 on: August 01, 2024, 11:12:32 AM »
point still stands
"Courage; Generosity; Fairness; Honor; In these are the true awards of manly sport."

utee94

  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 22169
  • Liked:
Re: Rankings ... ugh
« Reply #2869 on: August 01, 2024, 11:18:12 AM »
I liked Simms just fine.  Glad he spent his college years here.

 

Support the Site!
Purchase of every item listed here DIRECTLY supports the site.