header pic

Perhaps the BEST B1G Forum anywhere, here at College Football Fan Site, CFB51!!!

The 'Old' CFN/Scout Crowd- Enjoy Civil discussion, game analytics, in depth player and coaching 'takes' and discussing topics surrounding the game. You can even have your own free board, all you have to do is ask!!!

Anyone is welcomed and encouraged to join our FREE site and to take part in our community- a community with you- the user, the fan, -and the person- will be protected from intrusive actions and with a clean place to interact.


Author

Topic: Rankings ... ugh

 (Read 77579 times)

FearlessF

  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 37532
  • Liked:
Re: Rankings ... ugh
« Reply #1862 on: April 16, 2024, 09:21:25 AM »


Bib Gourmand: Signifies great value, highlighting simple yet skillful cooking at an affordable price




One MICHELIN Star: Restaurants where dishes with distinct flavors are prepared to a consistently high standard




Two MICHELIN Stars: Awarded when the personality and talent of the chef are evident in their expertly crafted dishes




Three MICHELIN Stars: Chefs at the peak of their profession whose cooking has been elevated to an art form
"Courage; Generosity; Fairness; Honor; In these are the true awards of manly sport."

847badgerfan

  • Administrator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 25234
  • Liked:
Re: Rankings ... ugh
« Reply #1863 on: April 16, 2024, 09:56:15 AM »

Bib Gourmand: Signifies great value, highlighting simple yet skillful cooking at an affordable price




One MICHELIN Star: Restaurants where dishes with distinct flavors are prepared to a consistently high standard




Two MICHELIN Stars: Awarded when the personality and talent of the chef are evident in their expertly crafted dishes




Three MICHELIN Stars: Chefs at the peak of their profession whose cooking has been elevated to an art form

I'm good with the Bibs and the 1* places. Topolobampo in Chicago is a great 1*. Probably the best Michelin place I've eaten at. Topolobampo - Chicago Restaurant (topolochicago.com)

I'm also good with many of the places not mentioned at all.
U RAH RAH! WIS CON SIN!

FearlessF

  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 37532
  • Liked:
Re: Rankings ... ugh
« Reply #1864 on: April 16, 2024, 10:10:18 AM »
yup, not impressed with personality and art on my plate
"Courage; Generosity; Fairness; Honor; In these are the true awards of manly sport."

Cincydawg

  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 71550
  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Liked:
Re: Rankings ... ugh
« Reply #1865 on: April 16, 2024, 10:24:43 AM »
I understand a fine restaurant should pay attention to "plating", it's part of the deal.  But for me, a dish shouldn't look like something in an art gallery.  

We dined twice at a place here that later got a star, and it is very good in all respects (and expensive).  The courses look very nice, there is plenty to eat, and everything is very tasty.  The wine prices aren't insane.

FearlessF

  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 37532
  • Liked:
Re: Rankings ... ugh
« Reply #1866 on: April 16, 2024, 10:46:48 AM »
"plating" "presentation" is more important for some than others

If my lasagna tips over or is upside down on my plate, it still tastes the same to me

just don't short me on the gravy
"Courage; Generosity; Fairness; Honor; In these are the true awards of manly sport."

Cincydawg

  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 71550
  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Liked:
Re: Rankings ... ugh
« Reply #1867 on: April 16, 2024, 10:59:44 AM »
I don't think "plating" is much of a factor for lasagna or spaghetti or even steak or hamburger.  But in some "fine" restaurant, I expect some attention to plating.  It's part of the deal.

Even a moderately priced Italian place will often throw down a sprig of parsely on lasagna, maybe even an "Olive Garden" does it.


FearlessF

  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 37532
  • Liked:
Re: Rankings ... ugh
« Reply #1868 on: April 16, 2024, 11:12:20 AM »
I understand.

It just doesn't mean much at all to me.

I'm a poor dirt farmer
"Courage; Generosity; Fairness; Honor; In these are the true awards of manly sport."

OrangeAfroMan

  • Stats Porn
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 18849
  • Liked:
Re: Rankings ... ugh
« Reply #1869 on: April 16, 2024, 06:32:54 PM »

Bib Gourmand: Signifies great value, highlighting simple yet skillful cooking at an affordable price




One MICHELIN Star: Restaurants where dishes with distinct flavors are prepared to a consistently high standard
a small meal, but it was good, so you're happy



Two MICHELIN Stars: Awarded when the personality and talent of the chef are evident in their expertly crafted dishes
a smaller meal, kinda weird, you grab a burger on the way home



Three MICHELIN Stars: Chefs at the peak of their profession whose cooking has been elevated to an art form
is this food?  not sure what it is, not sure how to eat it.  you sit and eat at a known commodity restaurant afterward
My guesstimates...
“The Swamp is where Gators live.  We feel comfortable there, but we hope our opponents feel tentative. A swamp is hot and sticky and can be dangerous." - Steve Spurrier

OrangeAfroMan

  • Stats Porn
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 18849
  • Liked:
Re: Rankings ... ugh
« Reply #1870 on: April 16, 2024, 06:34:58 PM »
93 Zona played in the PAC
not a run heavy conference
They allowed fewer rushing yards than rushing attempts.
Case closed.

“The Swamp is where Gators live.  We feel comfortable there, but we hope our opponents feel tentative. A swamp is hot and sticky and can be dangerous." - Steve Spurrier

Cincydawg

  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 71550
  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Liked:
Re: Rankings ... ugh
« Reply #1871 on: April 16, 2024, 06:45:55 PM »
The 3 star where we had lunch had plenty of food. 

FearlessF

  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 37532
  • Liked:
Re: Rankings ... ugh
« Reply #1872 on: April 16, 2024, 06:49:05 PM »
They allowed fewer rushing yards than rushing attempts.
Case closed.


because the PAC was a passing conference?
How many 1,000 yard rushers in the PAC in 93?
"Courage; Generosity; Fairness; Honor; In these are the true awards of manly sport."

OrangeAfroMan

  • Stats Porn
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 18849
  • Liked:
Re: Rankings ... ugh
« Reply #1873 on: April 16, 2024, 06:59:46 PM »
Allowing fewer than a yard per carry for a season would be impressive in 7-on-7, lol.  Sigh.

There were three 1,000 yd rushers in the PAC that year.  Arizona played 2 of them. 
There were 4 in the Big Ten.  Two in the Big 8.  Three in the SEC. 

Arizona played Miami in the Fiesta Bowl, shutting them out for the first time since 1979.  The Canes had 35 yards rushing.

“The Swamp is where Gators live.  We feel comfortable there, but we hope our opponents feel tentative. A swamp is hot and sticky and can be dangerous." - Steve Spurrier

OrangeAfroMan

  • Stats Porn
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 18849
  • Liked:
Re: Rankings ... ugh
« Reply #1874 on: April 16, 2024, 07:03:50 PM »
It's official:  I'll get push-back on anything I post.  Jesus.
“The Swamp is where Gators live.  We feel comfortable there, but we hope our opponents feel tentative. A swamp is hot and sticky and can be dangerous." - Steve Spurrier

FearlessF

  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 37532
  • Liked:
Re: Rankings ... ugh
« Reply #1875 on: April 16, 2024, 08:06:59 PM »
wasn't pushing back so much as asking questions

see the "?"?
"Courage; Generosity; Fairness; Honor; In these are the true awards of manly sport."

 

Support the Site!
Purchase of every item listed here DIRECTLY supports the site.