header pic

Perhaps the BEST B1G Forum anywhere, here at College Football Fan Site, CFB51!!!

The 'Old' CFN/Scout Crowd- Enjoy Civil discussion, game analytics, in depth player and coaching 'takes' and discussing topics surrounding the game. You can even have your own free board, all you have to do is ask!!!

Anyone is welcomed and encouraged to join our FREE site and to take part in our community- a community with you- the user, the fan, -and the person- will be protected from intrusive actions and with a clean place to interact.


Author

Topic: In other news ...

 (Read 1045743 times)

Cincydawg

  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 72224
  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Liked:
Re: In other news ...
« Reply #31738 on: Today at 02:35:06 PM »



Cincydawg

  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 72224
  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Liked:
Re: In other news ...
« Reply #31739 on: Today at 02:41:57 PM »
I think it worth pondering "How much is enough?".  Most of us have worked a large portion of our lives to earn wealth, if we count school, it's most of our lives.  Hopefully, work wasn't all bad of course.  My last boss I'm told is still working.  He was promoted very early in his career, and then stalled out.  It clearly meant a ton to him to make he next level (and then the next).  I know about how much he earned, and it's quite a bit.  He's probably not working so much for more wealth as more status, though once you retire such things are pretty trivial.  I get asked on rare occasions where I worked, but never what my level was (not that it would make any sense to anyone anyway).

A buddy of mine just retired, he had told me his target was $3 million in assets, and his house was probably a quarter of that.  He's pretty young, probably 55, but he should be able to continue with his lifestyle just fine.

I retired 11 years ago and have more in my IRA than I did then by a significant amoung (thanks Joe).  So, I'm not spending my wealth, though I try at times.

But, if one is reasonably content with less expensive things in life, a lot less will do just fine.  I could live myself on my SS alone if the condo was paid off.  It's a matter of perspective, if you keep wanting more more more, you won't be fulfilled.

utee94

  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 17811
  • Liked:
Re: In other news ...
« Reply #31740 on: Today at 02:45:30 PM »
"It's not having what you want, it's wanting what you've got."
-Sheryl Crow, Soak Up The Sun
I've always loved that line, since the first time I heard that song.

Still, I want a 1965 Mustang convertible, and a lake house on deep water. :)

847badgerfan

  • Administrator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 25531
  • Liked:
Re: In other news ...
« Reply #31741 on: Today at 02:51:42 PM »
I don't count my house as an asset per se - I have to live somewhere. Sure, I could sell it and have a lot of money in my pocket, but I still have to live somewhere.

Assets to me are real estate holdings (other than your house), stocks, bonds, IRA's, 401K's, cash, and business ownership shares.

What did I miss? Bitcoin or some such?

I'd like someone to explain Bitcoin. I do not understand it at all.
U RAH RAH! WIS CON SIN!

 

Support the Site!
Purchase of every item listed here DIRECTLY supports the site.