header pic

Perhaps the BEST B1G Forum anywhere, here at College Football Fan Site, CFB51!!!

The 'Old' CFN/Scout Crowd- Enjoy Civil discussion, game analytics, in depth player and coaching 'takes' and discussing topics surrounding the game. You can even have your own free board, all you have to do is ask!!!

Anyone is welcomed and encouraged to join our FREE site and to take part in our community- a community with you- the user, the fan, -and the person- will be protected from intrusive actions and with a clean place to interact.


Author

Topic: Phil Steele's Top 25

 (Read 16792 times)

OrangeAfroMan

  • Stats Porn
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 21773
  • Liked:
Re: Phil Steele's Top 25
« Reply #98 on: July 19, 2023, 04:56:07 PM »
So, imagine a good program, think maybe Clemson or Penn State,  over a decade they finish the regular season ranked as follows:

8  9  6  3  11  5  15  2  8 10

Do they have a better shot with 12 or with 4?  Tough to compute, I think.
Well, with 4, that team has eight zeroes, so it's pretty easy to compute.
“The Swamp is where Gators live.  We feel comfortable there, but we hope our opponents feel tentative. A swamp is hot and sticky and can be dangerous." - Steve Spurrier

Cincydawg

  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 82604
  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Liked:
Re: Phil Steele's Top 25
« Reply #99 on: July 19, 2023, 04:59:39 PM »
Sure, that's my point, 8 zeros today, 8 slight chances tomorrow.  On the other hand, the two shots today in the 12 scenarios have a lower probability of winning out.

medinabuckeye1

  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 10620
  • Liked:
Re: Phil Steele's Top 25
« Reply #100 on: July 19, 2023, 05:04:30 PM »
My favorite part of this year was TCU losing the CCG to K-State and not moving down one spot!  To avoid a rematch! 
At that point, they're no longer rankings!
Honestly, that was unfair to Georgia. 

The Bulldogs had the most impressive regular season and should have gotten the easiest Semi-final. Everyone knew that was TCU but nobody wanted a tOSU/M rematch in the other Semi-final so UGA got screwed. Didn't matter, they won anyway. 

OrangeAfroMan

  • Stats Porn
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 21773
  • Liked:
Re: Phil Steele's Top 25
« Reply #101 on: July 19, 2023, 05:09:24 PM »
Things would be okay, if not for these higher-ups wanting to diddle with everything.  
Let's use computers in the BCS....but let's drastically alter their formulas!
Let's have a playoff.....but let's avoid rematches at all costs!
They'll screw up something else in the 12-team playoff, guaranteed.
“The Swamp is where Gators live.  We feel comfortable there, but we hope our opponents feel tentative. A swamp is hot and sticky and can be dangerous." - Steve Spurrier

Cincydawg

  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 82604
  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Liked:
Re: Phil Steele's Top 25
« Reply #102 on: July 19, 2023, 05:12:10 PM »
They will get second guessed yes

FearlessF

  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 45511
  • Liked:
Re: Phil Steele's Top 25
« Reply #103 on: July 19, 2023, 05:22:43 PM »
My favorite part of this year was TCU losing the CCG to K-State and not moving down one spot!  To avoid a rematch! 
At that point, they're no longer rankings!
this has been going on forever

I don't like it

Ohio St. didn't play michigan either
why does everyone hate rematches?
"Courage; Generosity; Fairness; Honor; In these are the true awards of manly sport."

FearlessF

  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 45511
  • Liked:
Re: Phil Steele's Top 25
« Reply #104 on: July 19, 2023, 05:24:50 PM »
With the margin of victory removed from the computer rankings in the BCS, Colorado could have beaten Nebraska 82-6 and the Huskers would have still been ranked #2.
yup, not the Husker's fault

wasn't another more worthy team that season

wouldn't have mattered, that Cane team would have beaten any of them
"Courage; Generosity; Fairness; Honor; In these are the true awards of manly sport."

utee94

  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 22225
  • Liked:
Re: Phil Steele's Top 25
« Reply #105 on: July 19, 2023, 06:29:32 PM »

why does everyone hate rematches?
Because we've already seen those two teams play and it's a lot more fun to see different teams play?

Just spitballin' here.

OrangeAfroMan

  • Stats Porn
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 21773
  • Liked:
Re: Phil Steele's Top 25
« Reply #106 on: July 19, 2023, 06:46:22 PM »
Plus, rematches only leave things settled when one team wins both games.  If they split, then they're on even ground.  Except that in college football, WHEN you lost was of extreme importance.  So the winner of the rematch benefits the most.
“The Swamp is where Gators live.  We feel comfortable there, but we hope our opponents feel tentative. A swamp is hot and sticky and can be dangerous." - Steve Spurrier

betarhoalphadelta

  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 14514
  • Liked:
Re: Phil Steele's Top 25
« Reply #107 on: July 19, 2023, 07:12:40 PM »
why does everyone hate rematches?
Depends on the circumstances.

For example, the BCS was by nature VERY exclusionary. 2 teams get a shot. Which likely means that a worthy team is being excluded.

Think of 2011. 

LSU was 13-0. Of course they get into the BCSCG. 

Behind LSU, you had three teams knotted at 11-1. Alabama (who had already lost to LSU on the field, in Tuscaloosa), Oklahoma State, and Stanford. 

Now, you can make the argument that Alabama had the strongest loss of the 11-1 teams. But you can also make the argument that having lost to LSU on their home field in Tuscaloosa, we already "knew" that LSU was better. So why not give one of the other 11-1 teams a shot? We *don't* know if either of those teams is better than LSU. 

In that case I didn't like a rematch. 

In a 12-team playoff? Rematches will be inevitable. But that's okay, because you can make the argument that all worthy teams (and a few unworthy teams) are in the field, so regardless of who plays who, and when, the cream should rise to the top. 

OrangeAfroMan

  • Stats Porn
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 21773
  • Liked:
Re: Phil Steele's Top 25
« Reply #108 on: July 19, 2023, 09:33:26 PM »
That 9-6 game was an overtime game, so they basically played to a tie.  
Both of 2007 LSU's losses were in overtime as well.  
I think that mattered in the eyes of the voters.
“The Swamp is where Gators live.  We feel comfortable there, but we hope our opponents feel tentative. A swamp is hot and sticky and can be dangerous." - Steve Spurrier

medinabuckeye1

  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 10620
  • Liked:
Re: Phil Steele's Top 25
« Reply #109 on: July 20, 2023, 05:12:54 AM »
That 9-6 game was an overtime game, so they basically played to a tie. 
Both of 2007 LSU's losses were in overtime as well. 
I think that mattered in the eyes of the voters.
In addition to the two losses being in OT, that LSU had EASILY the best SoS of the 2-loss teams:
  • They played in a tough conference. 
  • They made the CCG so that was an extra tough game.
  • They flat obliterated ACC Champion VaTech OOC.



847badgerfan

  • Administrator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 31097
  • Liked:
Re: Phil Steele's Top 25
« Reply #110 on: July 20, 2023, 07:59:42 AM »
I would have liked to see Washington play Oklahoma in 2000.
U RAH RAH! WIS CON SIN!

FearlessF

  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 45511
  • Liked:
Re: Phil Steele's Top 25
« Reply #111 on: July 20, 2023, 08:44:40 AM »
rematches in basketball
multiple games in baseball

I think two Ohio St./ Michigan games last year would have been grand

they earned it
"Courage; Generosity; Fairness; Honor; In these are the true awards of manly sport."

 

Support the Site!
Purchase of every item listed here DIRECTLY supports the site.