header pic

Perhaps the BEST B1G Forum anywhere, here at College Football Fan Site, CFB51!!!

The 'Old' CFN/Scout Crowd- Enjoy Civil discussion, game analytics, in depth player and coaching 'takes' and discussing topics surrounding the game. You can even have your own free board, all you have to do is ask!!!

Anyone is welcomed and encouraged to join our FREE site and to take part in our community- a community with you- the user, the fan, -and the person- will be protected from intrusive actions and with a clean place to interact.


Author

Topic: PAC 12 Offseason Thread

 (Read 4955 times)

ELA

  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 20350
  • Liked:
Re: PAC 12 Offseason Thread
« Reply #70 on: July 26, 2019, 02:20:11 PM »
Most? No.

But the Los Angeles and Inland Empire metro areas have a combined 16M residents. That's plenty to actually put butts in seats even if a low percentage of fans actually attend.
Yeah but it's also a big number of tv viewers.  If it gets more eyeballs nationwide, I doubt they care about the atmosphere at schools that traditionally struggle with attendance.

Cincydawg

  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 71688
  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Liked:
Re: PAC 12 Offseason Thread
« Reply #71 on: July 26, 2019, 04:43:53 PM »
If I tune into a game with 10 K fans and quiet applause, I get the notion it must not be very important.

CatsbyAZ

  • All Star
  • ******
  • Posts: 2792
  • Liked:
Re: PAC 12 Offseason Thread
« Reply #72 on: July 26, 2019, 06:01:41 PM »
Most? No.

But the Los Angeles and Inland Empire metro areas have a combined 16M residents. That's plenty to actually put butts in seats even if a low percentage of fans actually attend.

A number of UCLA and SC alums I know won’t attend the games anymore because “it’s a nightmare.” The city traffic, fighting for parking, expensive parking, increasing ticket prices, and easier experience of watching on TV are the different excuses I’ve heard. Of course these are excuses I’ve heard from all fanbases but I think traffic/parking is a particularly severe battle for the LA schools.

betarhoalphadelta

  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 12230
  • Liked:
Re: PAC 12 Offseason Thread
« Reply #73 on: July 26, 2019, 08:01:41 PM »
A number of UCLA and SC alums I know won’t attend the games anymore because “it’s a nightmare.” The city traffic, fighting for parking, expensive parking, increasing ticket prices, and easier experience of watching on TV are the different excuses I’ve heard. Of course these are excuses I’ve heard from all fanbases but I think traffic/parking is a particularly severe battle for the LA schools.
I hate going to LA for anything, at any time. So I get it. 

We went to a Dodger game last Saturday, and leaving from our friends' house in Long Beach it took us well over an hour to go about 23 miles. Not rush hour, not even a weekday, and it was hell. 

FearlessF

  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 37633
  • Liked:
Re: PAC 12 Offseason Thread
« Reply #74 on: July 27, 2019, 09:24:11 AM »
perhaps self driving cars can save the city
"Courage; Generosity; Fairness; Honor; In these are the true awards of manly sport."

ELA

  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 20350
  • Liked:
Re: PAC 12 Offseason Thread
« Reply #75 on: July 27, 2019, 10:59:45 PM »

MrNubbz

  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 17174
  • Liked:
Re: PAC 12 Offseason Thread
« Reply #76 on: July 28, 2019, 08:10:19 AM »
PAC after dark will get a bigger audience.What are these idgits thinking?
Suburbia:Where they tear out the trees & then name streets after them.

Brutus Buckeye

  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 11248
  • Liked:
Re: PAC 12 Offseason Thread
« Reply #77 on: July 28, 2019, 09:05:22 AM »
So who has good attendance? UDub, Oregon, and the MTZ teams, minus Arizona? 
1919, 20, 21, 28, 29, 31, 34, 35, 36, 37, 42, 44
WWH: 1952, 54, 55, 57, 58, 60, 61, 62, 63, 65, 67, 68, 70, 72, 74, 75
1979, 81, 82, 84, 87, 94, 98
2001, 02, 04, 05, 06, 07, 08, 09, 10, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19

Cincydawg

  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 71688
  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Liked:
Re: PAC 12 Offseason Thread
« Reply #78 on: July 28, 2019, 09:09:55 AM »
2018 Average Home Attendance:
  • Washington - 69,816
  • UCLA - 57,492
  • USC - 55,565
  • ASU - 51,745
  • Oregon - 51,456
  • Utah - 46,716
  • Arizona - 45,356
  • Colorado - 44,587
  • Cal - 40,907
  • Stanford - 38,514
  • OSU - 34,735
  • WSU - 29,727


Cincydawg

  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 71688
  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Liked:
Re: PAC 12 Offseason Thread
« Reply #79 on: July 28, 2019, 09:12:20 AM »
https://www.seattletimes.com/sports/uw-husky-football/how-the-pac-12s-attendance-and-tv-ratings-compared-with-other-conference-title-games/

Pac-12 (Washington vs. Utah)

Time: 5 p.m./FOX (Friday)
Levi’s Stadium capacity: 67.500
Announced crowd: 35,134
Percentage filled: 52
TV rating: 3.1
Note: Up 15 percent from last year (Stanford vs. USC/ESPN) but down 21 percent from 2016 (UW vs. Colorado/FOX).



« Last Edit: July 28, 2019, 12:07:19 PM by Cincydawg »

FearlessF

  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 37633
  • Liked:
Re: PAC 12 Offseason Thread
« Reply #80 on: July 28, 2019, 09:21:08 AM »
Week 14 College Football TV Ratings

RTGVWRS
(+ STREAM)
GAMECONFDATE/TIMENET
10.117.499MALA-UGASEC Champ.12/1, 4:00pCBS
6.210.155M
(10.299M)
OKLA-TexasB12 Champ.12/1, NoonABC
5.08.659MOSU-NWSTNB1G Champ.12/1, 8:15pFOX
2.54.236MCLEM-PittACC Champ.12/1, 8:00pABC
2.64.059MWASH-UtahP12 Champ.11/30, 8:20pFOX

"Courage; Generosity; Fairness; Honor; In these are the true awards of manly sport."

Brutus Buckeye

  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 11248
  • Liked:
Re: PAC 12 Offseason Thread
« Reply #81 on: July 28, 2019, 11:12:35 AM »

San Jose St once played a 7:00 AM (Pacific) game, back in their WAC days. 
1919, 20, 21, 28, 29, 31, 34, 35, 36, 37, 42, 44
WWH: 1952, 54, 55, 57, 58, 60, 61, 62, 63, 65, 67, 68, 70, 72, 74, 75
1979, 81, 82, 84, 87, 94, 98
2001, 02, 04, 05, 06, 07, 08, 09, 10, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19

Cincydawg

  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 71688
  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Liked:
Re: PAC 12 Offseason Thread
« Reply #82 on: July 28, 2019, 12:08:42 PM »
I don't like starting a CFB game at 9 AM local at all.  Ratings wise, it runs right into any number of eastern conference games which will likely be of more interest BACK EAST.


CWSooner

  • Team Captain
  • *******
  • Posts: 6054
  • Liked:
Re: PAC 12 Offseason Thread
« Reply #83 on: July 28, 2019, 05:22:17 PM »
I know an OU fan who is much better-informed than I am who thinks that the Pac-12 is going to kick out Colorado and Utah, then merge with Texas, Texas Tech, OU, fOSU, KU, and K-State.

He says that the 9:00 start time is a sign that the Pac-12 is failing and knows that it is failing.

I don't buy it, but maybe someone else here does.
Play Like a Champion Today

 

Support the Site!
Purchase of every item listed here DIRECTLY supports the site.