header pic

Perhaps the BEST B1G Forum anywhere, here at College Football Fan Site, CFB51!!!

The 'Old' CFN/Scout Crowd- Enjoy Civil discussion, game analytics, in depth player and coaching 'takes' and discussing topics surrounding the game. You can even have your own free board, all you have to do is ask!!!

Anyone is welcomed and encouraged to join our FREE site and to take part in our community- a community with you- the user, the fan, -and the person- will be protected from intrusive actions and with a clean place to interact.


Author

Topic: OT - Grumpy Old Man Thread

 (Read 82788 times)

utee94

  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 26652
  • Liked:
Re: OT - Grumpy Old Man Thread
« Reply #1302 on: April 22, 2026, 09:04:06 AM »
Well, language is fluid.
The dictionary is putting 'irreguardless' in this year, as enough people use it and understand it that it's now an actual word. 

What's worse than grumpy?
The dictionary actually put it in way back in 1934, but people are still stupid for using a word that means not regardless, to mean regardless.

847badgerfan

  • Administrator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 35756
  • Liked:
Re: OT - Grumpy Old Man Thread
« Reply #1303 on: April 22, 2026, 09:05:24 AM »
The dictionary actually put it in way back in 1934, but people are still stupid for using a word that means not regardless, to mean regardless.

That one makes my skin crawl.
U RAH RAH! WIS CON SIN!

Riffraft

  • Starter
  • *****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 1867
  • Liked:
Re: OT - Grumpy Old Man Thread
« Reply #1304 on: April 22, 2026, 10:08:39 AM »
The dictionary does not give a word its meaning. Context gives a word meaning.  Dictionaries only record what context has been used for a word. therefore irregardess and regardless while not fitting good etymology they mean the same thing.  Just like flammable and inflammable mean the same thing in spite of etymology. 

Just as someone observed earlier grammar and dictionary definitions do not dictate the rules, but the rules and definitions are based on what is observed. 

When I use teach Koine Greek and Biblical Hebrew, I would use the word ball to show that the dictionary does not define a word but the context of a word gives it meaning.  Did I mean a round object, did I mean a dance event, do I mean having a good time.  Only context gives it meaning. 

All of this gives rise to words changing their meaning.  Take "merry" it use to have the usage as courageous.  Hence, Robin Hood and his Merry Men was not because they were happy but courageous.

utee94

  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 26652
  • Liked:
Re: OT - Grumpy Old Man Thread
« Reply #1305 on: April 22, 2026, 10:14:07 AM »
That's all very interesting.

If you utter "irregardless" then I automatically know you are stupid and not worthy of conversation.

"Could of" is worse, though.  It displays a completel lack of understanding of the meaning of the phrase you're attempting to say.

"I could of run for another ten miles."

Nope.


847badgerfan

  • Administrator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 35756
  • Liked:
Re: OT - Grumpy Old Man Thread
« Reply #1306 on: April 22, 2026, 10:18:52 AM »
"I could care less!"

Me: "Could you really?"
U RAH RAH! WIS CON SIN!

utee94

  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 26652
  • Liked:
Re: OT - Grumpy Old Man Thread
« Reply #1307 on: April 22, 2026, 10:19:40 AM »
"I could care less!"

Me: "Could you really?"
Yup, that one too. 

847badgerfan

  • Administrator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 35756
  • Liked:
Re: OT - Grumpy Old Man Thread
« Reply #1308 on: April 22, 2026, 10:26:19 AM »
We've become really good friends with some other Illinois people that we've met since living here.

They are "Sowt Siders" ("SowtWes" suburbs, actually).

Pronunciation and grammar are lacking for sure - being great people makes up for it.

Makes me happy.
U RAH RAH! WIS CON SIN!

jgvol

  • Team Captain
  • *******
  • Posts: 7092
  • Liked:
Re: OT - Grumpy Old Man Thread
« Reply #1309 on: April 22, 2026, 10:26:44 AM »
"He engineered that drive perfectly."

Dumbass people gonna dumbass.

I've got no beef.


"Engineered" is the past tense and past participle of the transitive verb engineer, which means to skillfully plan, construct, manage, or manipulate a situation or object. It often implies using technical expertise, foresight, or clever, sometimes maneuvering, strategies to achieve a specific result, such as a product, project, or outcome. 

utee94

  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 26652
  • Liked:
Re: OT - Grumpy Old Man Thread
« Reply #1310 on: April 22, 2026, 10:29:41 AM »
We've become really good friends with some other Illinois people that we've met since living here.

They are "Sowt Siders" ("SowtWes" suburbs, actually).

Pronunciation and grammar are lacking for sure - being great people makes up for it.

Makes me happy.
This is the grumpy thread.  Take that crap to the happy thread, it's over there ------->


jgvol

  • Team Captain
  • *******
  • Posts: 7092
  • Liked:
Re: OT - Grumpy Old Man Thread
« Reply #1311 on: April 22, 2026, 10:31:17 AM »
That's all very interesting.

If you utter "irregardless" then I automatically know you are stupid and not worthy of conversation.

"Could of" is worse, though.  It displays a completel lack of understanding of the meaning of the phrase you're attempting to say.

"I could of run for another ten miles."

Nope.



I believe that is "could've", which is real short southern for could have.

utee94

  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 26652
  • Liked:
Re: OT - Grumpy Old Man Thread
« Reply #1312 on: April 22, 2026, 10:33:01 AM »
I believe that is "could've", which is real short southern for could have.
I'm talking about when it's written, which I see commonly in written media and on message boards.  Probably not this one.  Maybe.

Obviously spoken, you can't tell how someone would be writing it.

847badgerfan

  • Administrator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 35756
  • Liked:
Re: OT - Grumpy Old Man Thread
« Reply #1313 on: April 22, 2026, 10:34:10 AM »
I've got no beef.


"Engineered" is the past tense and past participle of the transitive verb engineer, which means to use knowledge gained through education, examination and professional practice to skillfully plan, construct, manage, a project. or manipulate a situation or object. It always often implies using technical expertise, foresight, or clever, sometimes maneuvering, strategies to achieve a specific result, such as a product, project, or outcome.
That's better.
U RAH RAH! WIS CON SIN!

jgvol

  • Team Captain
  • *******
  • Posts: 7092
  • Liked:
Re: OT - Grumpy Old Man Thread
« Reply #1314 on: April 22, 2026, 10:35:52 AM »
I'm talking about when it's written, which I see commonly in written media and on message boards.  Probably not this one.  Maybe.

Obviously spoken, you can't tell how someone would be writing it.

Well, damn.  That is dumb.  I don't know that I've ever seen it written out as could of, but I probably have and just glossed over it as.....dumb.

utee94

  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 26652
  • Liked:
Re: OT - Grumpy Old Man Thread
« Reply #1315 on: April 22, 2026, 10:36:05 AM »
That's better.
Maybe, but you can "engineer" poorly as well.  Anything produced by engineers, is engineered.  And I've encountered some very bad engineers performing some very poor engineering, over the decades.


 

Support the Site!
Purchase of every item listed here DIRECTLY supports the site.