header pic

Perhaps the BEST B1G Forum anywhere, here at College Football Fan Site, CFB51!!!

The 'Old' CFN/Scout Crowd- Enjoy Civil discussion, game analytics, in depth player and coaching 'takes' and discussing topics surrounding the game. You can even have your own free board, all you have to do is ask!!!

Anyone is welcomed and encouraged to join our FREE site and to take part in our community- a community with you- the user, the fan, -and the person- will be protected from intrusive actions and with a clean place to interact.


Author

Topic: Ohio State's first ever .900 decade,

 (Read 1788 times)

medinabuckeye1

  • Legend
  • ****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 8906
  • Liked:
Ohio State's first ever .900 decade,
« on: January 03, 2022, 11:40:57 AM »
117-13 from 2012-2021

  • 12-0 in 2012, 1.000
  • 12-2 in 2013, 0.857
  • 14-1 in 2014, 0.933
  • 12-1 in 2015, 0.923
  • 11-2 in 2016, 0.846
  • 12-2 in 2017, 0.857
  • 13-1 in 2018, 0.929
  • 13-1 in 2019, 0.929
  • 7-1 in 2020, 0.875
  • 11-2 in 2021, 0.846
  • 117-13 from 2012-2021, 0.900

In the rolling decade look used here, 2021's 11-2 replaces 2011's 6-7 so that five game improvement moved the Buckeyes up to exactly 0.900.  

I tracked this for all the traditional helmets and a few others back to the first AP Poll.  Ie, the first 10-year period that I have tracked is 1927-1936 and I tracked it for:
  • tOSU
  • USC
  • OU
  • TX
  • ND
  • M
  • TN
  • LSU
  • Bama
  • FSU
  • PSU
  • Clemson
  • UF
  • Miami, FL
  • UNL
Those are sorted by their worst 10-year.  Ohio State is far-and-away #1 on that metric.  

It sucks when all-time great accomplishments are overshadowed by some other team (Bama) doing even better at the same time.  

To put this in perspective, in all of the 10-year periods from 1927-1936 through 2012-2021 here are all of the .900 decades:
  • 0.9245, OU was 97-7-2 from 1948-1957
  • 0.9245, OU was 97-7-2 from 1949-1958
  • 0.9143, Bama will be 128-12 from 2012-2021 if they beat UGA
  • 0.9130, Bama was 126-12 from 2011-2020
  • 0.9095, OU was 94-8-3 from 1947-1956
  • 0.9071, Bama was 127-13 from 2009-2018
  • 0.9071, Bama will be 127-13 from 2012-2021 if they lose to UGA
  • 0.9000, tOSU was 117-13 from 2012-2021

Either/or, obviously.  

The odd thing about this is yet another entry in the category of Ohio State's consistency.  The Buckeyes somehow managed to pull off a .900 decade without winning multiple NC's.  By contrast:
  • OU won three between 1948 and 1957 (50, 55, 56).  
  • OU won three between 1949 and 1958 (50, 55, 56).  
  • Bama will have won five between 2012 and 2021 if they beat UGA (12, 15, 17, 20, 21).  
  • Bama won five between 2011 and 2020 (11, 12, 15, 17, 20).  
  • OU won three between 1947 and 1956 (50, 55, 56).  
  • Bama won five between 2009 and 2018 (09, 11, 12, 15, 17).  
  • Bama will have won four between 2012 and 2021 if they lose to UGA (12, 15, 17, 20).  
  • tOSU won one between 2012 and 2021 (14).  


TyphonInc

  • Starter
  • *****
  • Posts: 1928
  • Easily Amused
  • Liked:
Re: Ohio State's first ever .900 decade,
« Reply #1 on: January 03, 2022, 01:26:36 PM »
OSU's best decade ever you not only had the Juggernaut of Alabama to deal with, but Clemson's best decade as well. 

OrangeAfroMan

  • Stats Porn
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 18799
  • Liked:
Re: Ohio State's first ever .900 decade,
« Reply #2 on: January 03, 2022, 01:52:41 PM »
and Purdue!
“The Swamp is where Gators live.  We feel comfortable there, but we hope our opponents feel tentative. A swamp is hot and sticky and can be dangerous." - Steve Spurrier

TyphonInc

  • Starter
  • *****
  • Posts: 1928
  • Easily Amused
  • Liked:
Re: Ohio State's first ever .900 decade,
« Reply #3 on: January 03, 2022, 02:14:18 PM »
and Purdue!

Go away Troll.

Serious question: is there a "block that asshole" button?

OrangeAfroMan

  • Stats Porn
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 18799
  • Liked:
Re: Ohio State's first ever .900 decade,
« Reply #4 on: January 03, 2022, 03:15:37 PM »
Wow, I thought it was a harmless joke.  
“The Swamp is where Gators live.  We feel comfortable there, but we hope our opponents feel tentative. A swamp is hot and sticky and can be dangerous." - Steve Spurrier

medinabuckeye1

  • Legend
  • ****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 8906
  • Liked:
Re: Ohio State's first ever .900 decade,
« Reply #5 on: January 04, 2022, 10:35:52 AM »
OSU's best decade ever you not only had the Juggernaut of Alabama to deal with, but Clemson's best decade as well.
To me this is a REALLY big deal.  This is only the seventh .900 decade in the last ~100 years.  That is immensely impressive.  It gets overshadowed because it came with only one NC and at the same time that Bama had an even stronger decade but it is still a humongous accomplishment.  

Cincydawg

  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 71186
  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Liked:
Re: Ohio State's first ever .900 decade,
« Reply #6 on: January 04, 2022, 10:46:07 AM »
It is impressive to me.


Brutus Buckeye

  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 11231
  • Liked:
Re: Ohio State's first ever .900 decade,
« Reply #7 on: January 04, 2022, 11:09:58 AM »
Bama is definitely the GOAT, but OSU is the clearcut second GOAT.
1919, 20, 21, 28, 29, 31, 34, 35, 36, 37, 42, 44
WWH: 1952, 54, 55, 57, 58, 60, 61, 62, 63, 65, 67, 68, 70, 72, 74, 75
1979, 81, 82, 84, 87, 94, 98
2001, 02, 04, 05, 06, 07, 08, 09, 10, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19

Cincydawg

  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 71186
  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Liked:
Re: Ohio State's first ever .900 decade,
« Reply #8 on: January 04, 2022, 11:19:10 AM »
Serious question: is there a "block that asshole" button?
There is the ability to block specific posters if you don't want to read their posts.

I think it better just to have the discipline to ignore them.

rolltidefan

  • Global Moderator
  • Starter
  • *****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 2219
  • Liked:
Re: Ohio State's first ever .900 decade,
« Reply #9 on: January 04, 2022, 11:20:36 AM »
OSU's best decade ever you not only had the Juggernaut of Alabama to deal with, but Clemson's best decade as well.
bama with potentially it's best ever, or 3rd best ever, and did so with both tosu and clemson having their best ever. imagine the decade for any of them if the other 2 had been just meh.

good info @medinabuckeye1 

rolltidefan

  • Global Moderator
  • Starter
  • *****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 2219
  • Liked:
Re: Ohio State's first ever .900 decade,
« Reply #10 on: January 04, 2022, 11:22:43 AM »
Bama is definitely the GOAT, but OSU is the clearcut second GOAT.

this is so hard to define. bama's decade run with the titles is probably the greatest ever, but i can't deny i'm jealous every time i look at the consistency of tosu. it's truly remarkable how they almost never have a bad season.

rolltidefan

  • Global Moderator
  • Starter
  • *****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 2219
  • Liked:
Re: Ohio State's first ever .900 decade,
« Reply #11 on: January 04, 2022, 11:38:15 AM »
bama and tosu are 1/2 in win%. not sure when that happened, but it's been within last year or so.

mich is still 1 in wins (976), but bama and osu are tied for 2nd (942). bama, fwiw, has 966 on field wins with 24 being vacated/forfeited from the textbook1 and napkin/agent2 "scandals". not sure what tosu's would be without the tattoo thing (did they take away wins for that?).

1 - in 06-07 players bought textbooks with their scholarships for their non-sports friends (vacated 16 wins)
2 - in 93 cb langham played all season while ineligible. he had signed a "contract" with an agent on a napkin in a bar while drunk and partying after winning the 92 national title. (forfeited 8 wins)

medinabuckeye1

  • Legend
  • ****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 8906
  • Liked:
Re: Ohio State's first ever .900 decade,
« Reply #12 on: January 04, 2022, 12:06:10 PM »
bama with potentially it's best ever, or 3rd best ever, and did so with both tosu and clemson having their best ever. imagine the decade for any of them if the other 2 had been just meh.

good info @medinabuckeye1
Thank you and this is an interesting point.  Nearly all of Bama, Clemson, and tOSU's CFP losses are to each other with the only exception being Clemson's loss to LSU in the 2019CG:
  • Bama lost to tOSU in 2014 semi-final
  • Clemson lost to Bama in 2015 CG
  • tOSU lost to Clemson in 2016 semi-final
  • Bama lost to Clemson in 2016 CG
  • Clemson lost to Bama in 2017 semi-final
  • Bama lost to Clemson in 2018 CG
  • tOSU lost to Clemson in 2019 semi-final
  • tOSU lost to Bama in 2020 CG

You make a good point.  If you take away the other two, the one remaining, wow!
this is so hard to define. bama's decade run with the titles is probably the greatest ever, but i can't deny i'm jealous every time i look at the consistency of tosu. it's truly remarkable how they almost never have a bad season.
Ohio State has bad seasons, they just haven't strung them together.  That said, your jealously is mutual.  While I do revel in the fact that tOSU hasn't had a bad decade in more than a century it is frustrating to be perennially thisclose to a monster multiple NC decade such as Bama and Oklahoma have enjoyed. 

If it posts right I'll attach the rolling 10-year winning percentages for Bama and tOSU.  Bama's troughs are MUCH worse than tOSU's.  Ohio State's worst decade from 1927-1936 through 2012-2021 is that they went 54-30-7 or .6319 from 1943-1952.  Bama has two major down periods much worse than that including being sub .500 as recently as 1998-2007 (49-54 or .4757). 

The flip side, of course, is that Bama's peaks are also MUCH higher.  In addition to their current peak being higher than tOSU's best ever, they also have a peak just shy of .900 for the '70's (107-13 or .8917 for 1971-1980), another peak over .85 for 1959-1968 and yet another in the '30's. 

Cincydawg

  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 71186
  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Liked:
Re: Ohio State's first ever .900 decade,
« Reply #13 on: January 04, 2022, 12:23:48 PM »
One metric I like is based on AP rankings.  You get a point for being ranked 20th for a week and 20 points for being ranked first for a week, then tote'em all up.

Last I saw of this, it had OSU first by quite a bit and then the usual suspects.

 

Support the Site!
Purchase of every item listed here DIRECTLY supports the site.