header pic

Perhaps the BEST B1G Forum anywhere, here at College Football Fan Site, CFB51!!!

The 'Old' CFN/Scout Crowd- Enjoy Civil discussion, game analytics, in depth player and coaching 'takes' and discussing topics surrounding the game. You can even have your own free board, all you have to do is ask!!!

Anyone is welcomed and encouraged to join our FREE site and to take part in our community- a community with you- the user, the fan, -and the person- will be protected from intrusive actions and with a clean place to interact.


Author

Topic: Major eligibility change proposal?

 (Read 4207 times)

ELA

  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 20301
  • Liked:
Major eligibility change proposal?
« on: January 09, 2018, 08:01:32 PM »
ACC proposing a change that players could play in ANY 4 games and still get a redshirt.  Would be particularly big for how many freshmen could now play in bowl games.

847badgerfan

  • Administrator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 25163
  • Liked:
Re: Major eligibility change proposal?
« Reply #1 on: January 09, 2018, 08:14:03 PM »
ACC proposing a change that players could play in ANY 4 games and still get a redshirt.  Would be particularly big for how many freshmen could now play in bowl games.
I like it. A bowl game is a perfect place to play the kiddies after a whole season of practice plus the bowl practices.

Good job ACC. Make it happen, B1G.
U RAH RAH! WIS CON SIN!

DevilFroggy

  • Red Shirt
  • ***
  • Posts: 455
  • Liked:
Re: Major eligibility change proposal?
« Reply #2 on: January 09, 2018, 08:32:47 PM »
I am 100% for this.
I thought I settled my debts that night on the ride home
But I have still got hell to pay

LittlePig

  • Starter
  • *****
  • Posts: 1362
  • Liked:
Re: Major eligibility change proposal?
« Reply #3 on: January 09, 2018, 08:53:26 PM »
I don't  know. 

 This means any redshirt can play in the last 4 games if they had been sitting out the first 9 games.  I guess thats ok, but I am not sure if that is the spirit of what a redshirt is.


ELA

  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 20301
  • Liked:
Re: Major eligibility change proposal?
« Reply #4 on: January 09, 2018, 09:03:18 PM »
Yeah, I think I'd prefer the change that bowls don't count towards your redshirt.

Even that said PURELY FROM A FAN STANDPOINT, NOT FROM A PLAYERS FAIRNESS STANDPOINT, I've come back a bit on that.

Initially it seemed great, as a way to balance kids not playing.  But I realized that's great... for your team.  I'd be interested to see MSUs true freshmen.  Maybe a conference opponents QB.  Other than that?  Don't care.  Turn on a random bowl and Iowa decides to roll with three true freshmen on the OL to get a look at them?  I'm turning that off.  LSU decides to out in their true freshman QB on a potential game winning drive to see how he handles adversity?  I don't care.

So I'm not sure that helps "save" the bowls as much as I initially thought.  I actually think it makes me less interested in every non MSU bowl if the teams treat them like NFL preseason games.  Particularly because it'll also damage bowl pools, if you can't even rely on how seriously a team will take a game, and that's what gives me a rooting interest in a good number of games, just like the bracket pools in March.  I'm guessing Vegas wouldn't like the change either.

DevilFroggy

  • Red Shirt
  • ***
  • Posts: 455
  • Liked:
Re: Major eligibility change proposal?
« Reply #5 on: January 09, 2018, 11:41:15 PM »
Frankly I'd be completely ok if they did away with redshirts and everyone was had 5 years to play 5 seasons, if they wanted.
I thought I settled my debts that night on the ride home
But I have still got hell to pay

JerseyTerrapin

  • Red Shirt
  • ***
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 189
  • Liked:
Re: Major eligibility change proposal?
« Reply #6 on: January 10, 2018, 08:48:18 AM »
I don't understand the need for any change.  If anything, I would prefer ELA's idea about simply ignoring bowl participation.  Actually, I don't really have a problem with this, because bowls are "extra time" (but would it also be allowed in the playoff games?)

But instead of passing the "any four games" rule, let's just extend eligibility to five years straightaway and be done with it (I'm not in favor of this, it's not a professional league, but we should at least "man up" and admit what the change really is).

Maybe I'm wrong.  What am I missing?
« Last Edit: January 10, 2018, 08:49:50 AM by JerseyTerrapin »

LittlePig

  • Starter
  • *****
  • Posts: 1362
  • Liked:
Re: Major eligibility change proposal?
« Reply #7 on: January 10, 2018, 09:03:28 AM »
How about just limiting players to 5 years and just 48 total regular season games played, plus an unlimited number of bowls and CCG in 5 years.  

Geolion91

  • Red Shirt
  • ***
  • Posts: 378
  • Liked:
Re: Major eligibility change proposal?
« Reply #8 on: January 10, 2018, 09:07:27 AM »
I think 4 games is too many.  I'd be good with 2 or 3.  coaches could play freshman against the cupcake ooc games and then decide who to redshirt.

rolltidefan

  • Global Moderator
  • Starter
  • *****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 2219
  • Liked:
Re: Major eligibility change proposal?
« Reply #9 on: January 10, 2018, 09:35:16 AM »
Frankly I'd be completely ok if they did away with redshirts and everyone was had 5 years to play 5 seasons, if they wanted.
this is my take as well.
i'm good with the proposal, too.
but why not just do away with the need for redshirts (sans medical).

medinabuckeye1

  • Legend
  • ****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 8906
  • Liked:
Re: Major eligibility change proposal?
« Reply #10 on: January 10, 2018, 10:30:37 AM »
Trying to decide how I feel about this.  I'm in favor of the bowl proposal, but not sure about this.  My initial reaction is to agree with Geolion.  Four seems like too many.  I think two plus the bowl would be good.  It might be nice to be able to get some true freshman's feet wet against an OOC Cupcake and I like it for bowls particularly to offset the growing trend of non-participation but I don't think it should be 1/3 of the season.  

medinabuckeye1

  • Legend
  • ****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 8906
  • Liked:
Re: Major eligibility change proposal?
« Reply #11 on: January 10, 2018, 10:31:56 AM »
The five year proposal could do a lot to increase parity.  Schools that don't typically get 5* recruits likely headed to the NFL would have more fifth year guys which would compensate for the extra talent of the 5* guys who leave in three years.  

PSUinNC

  • Red Shirt
  • ***
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 242
  • Liked:
Re: Major eligibility change proposal?
« Reply #12 on: January 10, 2018, 10:54:35 AM »
I think 4 games is too many.  I'd be good with 2 or 3.  coaches could play freshman against the cupcake ooc games and then decide who to redshirt.
I like this idea.  4 games just seems a bit excessive.  2 games gives you the bowl plus flexibility if a guy goes down late in the season.  If a guy goes down in October, you're probably burning a shirt to begin with.  

ELA

  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 20301
  • Liked:
Re: Major eligibility change proposal?
« Reply #13 on: January 10, 2018, 11:42:52 AM »
The five year proposal could do a lot to increase parity.  Schools that don't typically get 5* recruits likely headed to the NFL would have more fifth year guys which would compensate for the extra talent of the 5* guys who leave in three years.  
Unless they also eliminate the sitting out a year after transferring rule.
Then the Group of 5 becomes nothing more than glorified prep school.

 

Support the Site!
Purchase of every item listed here DIRECTLY supports the site.