header pic

Perhaps the BEST B1G Forum anywhere, here at College Football Fan Site, CFB51!!!

The 'Old' CFN/Scout Crowd- Enjoy Civil discussion, game analytics, in depth player and coaching 'takes' and discussing topics surrounding the game. You can even have your own free board, all you have to do is ask!!!

Anyone is welcomed and encouraged to join our FREE site and to take part in our community- a community with you- the user, the fan, -and the person- will be protected from intrusive actions and with a clean place to interact.


Author

Topic: Likely expansion targets for the B1G

 (Read 16300 times)

Brutus Buckeye

  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 11235
  • Liked:
Re: Likely expansion targets for the B1G
« Reply #14 on: July 26, 2021, 11:59:20 AM »
If you are adding teams from the Left coast, they'd almost have to be football only members. No way they are going to pay to fly their women's lacrosse teams to Hopkins, Rutgers, Maryland, etc every other week. 
1919, 20, 21, 28, 29, 31, 34, 35, 36, 37, 42, 44
WWH: 1952, 54, 55, 57, 58, 60, 61, 62, 63, 65, 67, 68, 70, 72, 74, 75
1979, 81, 82, 84, 87, 94, 98
2001, 02, 04, 05, 06, 07, 08, 09, 10, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19

medinabuckeye1

  • Legend
  • ****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 8906
  • Liked:
Re: Likely expansion targets for the B1G
« Reply #15 on: July 26, 2021, 11:59:27 AM »
Totally agree, hoping that Barry Alvarez and Jim Delaney are actually calling the shots behind the scene, lol.
Me too.  If we could just put Alvarez in charge and give him carte blanche, I'd be for it.  

FearlessF

  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 37498
  • Liked:
Re: Likely expansion targets for the B1G
« Reply #16 on: July 26, 2021, 11:59:42 AM »
West Virginia has only 2 million people?

Be better off grabbing Kentucky
"Courage; Generosity; Fairness; Honor; In these are the true awards of manly sport."

medinabuckeye1

  • Legend
  • ****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 8906
  • Liked:
Re: Likely expansion targets for the B1G
« Reply #17 on: July 26, 2021, 12:01:44 PM »
How do you know they won't?  This is all about TV Ratings and inventory moving forward - the SEC just broke precedent by adding a school inside a state in their current footprint.  I get it's Texas, but Clemson would definitely be the "Texas" of South Carolina - seems like a no brainer for them to add Clemson.  I'd say the same with Florida State.  I'd double or triple the likelihood if either of those schools were in the B1G.

The SEC won't let the B1G have any control over the south in my view.
Clemson may be the "Texas" of South Carolina but that isn't the point.  The point is that South Carolina isn't Texas.  South Carolina has a pop of 5.1M.  Texas' population is nearly six times that.  Adding a second school in SC (Clemson) doesn't bring in eyeballs anything like adding the flagship school in Texas does.  

ELA

  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 20309
  • Liked:

Brutus Buckeye

  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 11235
  • Liked:
Re: Likely expansion targets for the B1G
« Reply #19 on: July 26, 2021, 12:41:05 PM »
Then there is definitely no point in expanding. 

1919, 20, 21, 28, 29, 31, 34, 35, 36, 37, 42, 44
WWH: 1952, 54, 55, 57, 58, 60, 61, 62, 63, 65, 67, 68, 70, 72, 74, 75
1979, 81, 82, 84, 87, 94, 98
2001, 02, 04, 05, 06, 07, 08, 09, 10, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19

FearlessF

  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 37498
  • Liked:
Re: Likely expansion targets for the B1G
« Reply #20 on: July 26, 2021, 01:15:40 PM »
yup, from that list I'd welcome Texas and/or Notre Dame

the Left coast schools might just drop football some day

Colorado would be a last resort - maybe
"Courage; Generosity; Fairness; Honor; In these are the true awards of manly sport."

MarqHusker

  • Team Captain
  • *******
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 5502
  • Liked:
Re: Likely expansion targets for the B1G
« Reply #21 on: July 26, 2021, 01:19:34 PM »
I'd bet against the BIG dying on the hill for AAU membership as a pre-req.  It will be viewed as a fetish.

FearlessF

  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 37498
  • Liked:
Re: Likely expansion targets for the B1G
« Reply #22 on: July 26, 2021, 01:22:59 PM »
Ed Zachery

they would take the Sooners if it meant getting Texas

they would also take Notre Dame
"Courage; Generosity; Fairness; Honor; In these are the true awards of manly sport."

JerseyTerrapin

  • Red Shirt
  • ***
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 189
  • Liked:
Re: Likely expansion targets for the B1G
« Reply #23 on: July 26, 2021, 01:41:07 PM »
Clemson football was solid prior to the current regime, including a national title in the eighties.  With their strong donor system (IPTAY) that keeps the program in the money, they will likely remain a power regardless of the next coach...

Brutus Buckeye

  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 11235
  • Liked:
Re: Likely expansion targets for the B1G
« Reply #24 on: July 26, 2021, 01:50:32 PM »
I'd bet against the BIG dying on the hill for AAU membership as a pre-req.  It will be viewed as a fetish.
It is a fetish, and if the tweet is true then it has to be USC and Notre Dame. Nothing else there moves the needle.

The Big Ten won't have any negotiation power either. They will have to concede every demand that either school makes,  with a reach around and a happy ending.
1919, 20, 21, 28, 29, 31, 34, 35, 36, 37, 42, 44
WWH: 1952, 54, 55, 57, 58, 60, 61, 62, 63, 65, 67, 68, 70, 72, 74, 75
1979, 81, 82, 84, 87, 94, 98
2001, 02, 04, 05, 06, 07, 08, 09, 10, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19

Cincydawg

  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 71497
  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Liked:
Re: Likely expansion targets for the B1G
« Reply #25 on: July 26, 2021, 01:51:00 PM »
I "think" the Big Ten should not be in any hurry, at all.  They have a top conference, there is no need to get stampeded.

I saw a rumor they were talking with Ok State, maybe..


Brutus Buckeye

  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 11235
  • Liked:
Re: Likely expansion targets for the B1G
« Reply #26 on: July 26, 2021, 02:01:07 PM »
Ha!

Change my vote to OSUs 2 and 3 as my preferred expansion duo.
1919, 20, 21, 28, 29, 31, 34, 35, 36, 37, 42, 44
WWH: 1952, 54, 55, 57, 58, 60, 61, 62, 63, 65, 67, 68, 70, 72, 74, 75
1979, 81, 82, 84, 87, 94, 98
2001, 02, 04, 05, 06, 07, 08, 09, 10, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19

CWSooner

  • Team Captain
  • *******
  • Posts: 6045
  • Liked:
Re: Likely expansion targets for the B1G
« Reply #27 on: July 26, 2021, 02:02:31 PM »
I "think" the Big Ten should not be in any hurry, at all.  They have a top conference, there is no need to get stampeded.

I saw a rumor they were talking with Ok State, maybe..
Gag me!
Play Like a Champion Today

 

Support the Site!
Purchase of every item listed here DIRECTLY supports the site.