No, it was clear today. And no I don’t think the issues at OSU even come close to what happened at Baylor. Why- do you?
All I am saying is that the level of unanimous hatred was a bit of a surprise to me. People are talking like Meyer committed multiple rapes.
No, I don't think the issues at OSU come even close to Baylor. What I'm saying is that my perception [as a Purdue fan, not tied to either school] was that the news coverage and outrage over Baylor was much larger than OSU. I'm saying I'm surprised that you seem to perceive the opposite; that it's worse for OSU.
I suggested that might be because you're closer to OSU and other sources--and I'm not sure where you live, bit if it's Ohio, this is obviously going to be bigger news there than elsewhere too. I was suggesting you MIGHT have a skewed version of how big and vitriolic the news is nationally due to that.
I could be wrong. I got off most social media a while ago, so maybe this has blown up in a way I just haven't seen.
Also, I stated my reasons, as did the committee as to why I don’t think he covered up DV, but also I stated my reasons why I would have fired him. He didn’t. In fact, the DV at this juncture is an allegation.
Again, I'm saying he believes he didn't cover up DV because he didn't believe it existed. Apparently neither he nor Shelley found Courtney credible. And because there were no formal charges filed against Zach, he didn't believe he was required to report it.
But I'm saying that this is exactly why we don't put football coaches in charge of adjudicating whether DV occurred. That's why he's supposed to report to compliance. It's why at my job if I hear of something like this, I'm required to report to HR,
even if the person disclosing it begs me not to. Because my job trusts me to be an engineer, not to be an expert on DV.
I'm saying the net effect of Meyer's action is to cover up potential DV, because he kept it out of the eyes of people who know a lot more than him about DV. The Compliance office doesn't try to tell him how to attack a fire zone blitz on 3rd and 9. But the exchange for that is that they don't expect him to determine what things are or are not DV--he's required to report it to them.
He failed to do that, and the net effect was that this entire situation was covered up until this year.
- the broad level, and depth of hatred for him, surprised me. I get that some of it is just mob mentality/ political correctness, and some of it is the natural process in our society of brininging down high successful people, especially for fans if that person is your enemy.
I think he screwed up. I feel like the OSU investigation was determined to find in his favor, and excused him from blame on some highly sketchy reasons.
But again, I'm a Purdue fan. I don't hate him. I was the one who basically stepped out of this whole discussion once he publicly stated that he follows all reporting protocols, which turned out not to be true. I even created a plausible alternate hypothesis for why Smith wasn't fired--because the divorce "fixed" the issue as they were no longer married and thus any future DV risk was lessened.
It turns out, though, that he didn't follow reporting protocols. He didn't report a lot of Zach's bad behavior to anyone. He harbored a creepy douchebag who was violating OSU policies at best--and who was also a domestic abuser at worst--because he felt bad over Earl Bruce.