header pic

Perhaps the BEST B1G Forum anywhere, here at College Football Fan Site, CFB51!!!

The 'Old' CFN/Scout Crowd- Enjoy Civil discussion, game analytics, in depth player and coaching 'takes' and discussing topics surrounding the game. You can even have your own free board, all you have to do is ask!!!

Anyone is welcomed and encouraged to join our FREE site and to take part in our community- a community with you- the user, the fan, -and the person- will be protected from intrusive actions and with a clean place to interact.


Author

Topic: Initial Playoff Committee Rankings

 (Read 13758 times)

Mdot21

  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 14340
  • Liked:
Re: Initial Playoff Committee Rankings
« Reply #14 on: October 31, 2018, 10:49:51 AM »
SEC needs to go to a 9 game schedule and stop playing FCS teams.

Entropy

  • Starter
  • *****
  • Posts: 1432
  • Liked:
Re: Initial Playoff Committee Rankings
« Reply #15 on: October 31, 2018, 10:51:02 AM »
SEC needs to go to a 9 game schedule and stop playing FCS teams.
or the BIG needs to do the same...  At some point, you're hurting yourself.  

FearlessF

  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 37524
  • Liked:
Re: Initial Playoff Committee Rankings
« Reply #16 on: October 31, 2018, 11:03:21 AM »
SEC needs to go to a 9 game schedule and stop playing FCS teams.
yes, because this above is NOT going to happen
why would they change when they can pile up winning percentage, more home games, and guarantee at least one BCS playoff team and sometimes two?
it's a proven model to huge $$$
"Courage; Generosity; Fairness; Honor; In these are the true awards of manly sport."

Cincydawg

  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 71548
  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Liked:
Re: Initial Playoff Committee Rankings
« Reply #17 on: October 31, 2018, 12:03:52 PM »
The SEC may "need" 8 conference games, but it won't happen, so it pointless to say they "need" something.  What they "need" is money and that drives what they do.  I might LIKE for something to happen, but that's not the same as saying someone NEEDS to do something.

I think the "real ranking" here is only teams with a legit shot, not teams with 2 losses barring a real breakdown.

FearlessF

  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 37524
  • Liked:
Re: Initial Playoff Committee Rankings
« Reply #18 on: October 31, 2018, 12:22:17 PM »
if the SEC network doesn't force better content for better ratings, then it will not happen

I think the BTN pushed Delaney into 9 conference games
"Courage; Generosity; Fairness; Honor; In these are the true awards of manly sport."

Cincydawg

  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 71548
  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Liked:
Re: Initial Playoff Committee Rankings
« Reply #19 on: October 31, 2018, 01:32:44 PM »
I don't see a 9 game slate as likely in the SEC or ACC.  We can wish for it, and other things, but it isn't likely.

My own "wish" would be for a P5 requirement, if you will, to play ten P5 teams a year, however devised.  Vandy would be in demand.


Drew4UTk

  • Administrator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 10165
  • Liked:
Re: Initial Playoff Committee Rankings
« Reply #20 on: October 31, 2018, 02:02:14 PM »
y'all mighty worried about the SEC it appears... the SEC will work it's way out, but it WILL deliver a prospect to the tourney... so- hope they lose?  

y'all can say what you will, and much of it is solid argument, but the SEC enjoys a lot of credit in development and advancement in this game- and if you want to split hairs it's Tom Osborne's fault damn near exclusively in my opinion.  because of SEC dominance, early in the century, the rest of the CFB world had to alter their way of doing business- and from it you get ridiculous speed in spreads from Ohio State, high pressure D's in PSU, lean-on-you-for-four-quarters-threatening-TD-play-every-down from the likes of Wiscy, ect...  There was a brief moment the SEC had the greatest collection of top tier coaches ever assembled in one conference, and it showed... those coaches and the minions of those coaches are spreading, and along with it threats of encroachment if not out right challenging the throne... Remove Bama, or make them a middle of the pack team, and the SEC isn't hardly anything more than a BigXII or PAC....

^but ALL of that is leaning on tradition, and a tradition which is written by the victor- and has little to do with the current landscape other than folks can't let it go.  again I say, the SEC will work itself out and possibly out of the national picture......... consider the possibility Bama loses to Auburn after beating LSU, and UGA beats UK but loses to GT before beating Bama- poof- the SEC ain't got a grain of sand to stand on that won't roll out from underneath them, and tOSU, PSU, WVU, Okey, or even UCF are in.

FearlessF

  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 37524
  • Liked:
Re: Initial Playoff Committee Rankings
« Reply #21 on: October 31, 2018, 02:05:48 PM »
poppycock

the SEC will have a player in the tourney of four
"Courage; Generosity; Fairness; Honor; In these are the true awards of manly sport."

Drew4UTk

  • Administrator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 10165
  • Liked:
Re: Initial Playoff Committee Rankings
« Reply #22 on: October 31, 2018, 02:08:07 PM »
yup.... but the 'fact' is a 'fact' of odds.... there is a greater chance they will than there is they won't, but that is only a certainty, not a mathematical one. 

FearlessF

  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 37524
  • Liked:
Re: Initial Playoff Committee Rankings
« Reply #23 on: October 31, 2018, 02:10:16 PM »
I agree, but the odds are in their favor when they are the only conference possible of getting a 2-loss team in the tourney
"Courage; Generosity; Fairness; Honor; In these are the true awards of manly sport."

Roaddawg

  • Red Shirt
  • ***
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 116
  • Liked:
Re: Initial Playoff Committee Rankings
« Reply #24 on: October 31, 2018, 02:32:48 PM »
No surprise with this ranking, it's early and a lot will change in the next few weeks of November.  ESecPN has the usual SEC loaded rankings early, to keep a few teams in the Big Picture.  What will be fun to watch is when they have to start kissing Jimmy Football's butt when M climbs into the Top 4.  After all the years of slamming him on the sidelines, they will have to show some love, and with his wonderful media personality, it could get interesting. 

847badgerfan

  • Administrator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 25215
  • Liked:
Re: Initial Playoff Committee Rankings
« Reply #25 on: October 31, 2018, 02:46:48 PM »
1. Alabama 8-0
2. Clemson 8-0
3. LSU 7-1
4. Notre Dame 8-0

Sub Michigan for Clemson and Georgia for Notre Dame and I'm good.
U RAH RAH! WIS CON SIN!

Cincydawg

  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 71548
  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Liked:
Re: Initial Playoff Committee Rankings
« Reply #26 on: October 31, 2018, 03:12:53 PM »
Bama is a 2 TD favorite over the #3 ranked team ON THE ROAD, in Baton Rouge, at night.

I don't recall a year since maybe 1995 when #1 was so heavily favored over the field.


fezzador

  • Player
  • ****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 576
  • Liked:
Re: Initial Playoff Committee Rankings
« Reply #27 on: October 31, 2018, 03:34:42 PM »
I think a lot of folks are surprised the line isn't higher, like 17 or 18 points.

LSU has the defense to slow Bama down, but they still don't have enough of an offense to be a real threat.  Bama will probably score in the high 20s to mid 30s, and LSU probably won't score much more than 17 or so.

 

Support the Site!
Purchase of every item listed here DIRECTLY supports the site.