header pic

Perhaps the BEST B1G Forum anywhere, here at College Football Fan Site, CFB51!!!

The 'Old' CFN/Scout Crowd- Enjoy Civil discussion, game analytics, in depth player and coaching 'takes' and discussing topics surrounding the game. You can even have your own free board, all you have to do is ask!!!

Anyone is welcomed and encouraged to join our FREE site and to take part in our community- a community with you- the user, the fan, -and the person- will be protected from intrusive actions and with a clean place to interact.


Author

Topic: Infractions panel could not conclude academic violations in North Carolina case

 (Read 3689 times)

PSUinNC

  • Red Shirt
  • ***
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 242
  • Liked:
I don't think they buried their entire reputation.  This will largely be forgotten in 3-4 years, and likely is only known to folks who follow sports anyway.  Their graduate programs will not be affected at all.  Most undergraduate programs will see zero impact.

^^THIS^^

This is very old news actually:  https://www.insidehighered.com/quicktakes/2015/06/12/accrediting-body-places-unc-probation

UNC played this like a fiddle.  They knew the troubles from the NCAA would be much more severe in terms of monetary impact to the school (via athletics) vs. they knew the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools Commission on College wouldn't dare pull their accreditation.  So, they are on some kind of minor probation with the SACSCOC...big whoop, they had their ace up their sleeve already.  
« Last Edit: October 25, 2017, 09:49:34 AM by PSUinNC »

PSUinNC

  • Red Shirt
  • ***
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 242
  • Liked:
I am of course an "actual alum" and I don't care, but my opinion is irrelevant as I'm retired.  But, for the sake of discussion, would this have kept me from getting a job back when?  I don't think so.
And some penalty by the NCAA would not have changed whatever perceptions have changed.
I know of no UNC fan or alum who cares.  And I live here.  

ELA

  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 20320
  • Liked:
As I said, throwing academic reputation under the bus to save the hoops program

@redditcfb: UNC's defense of fake classes to NCAA contradicted what they told accreditor, now they're asking questions www.newsobserver.com/news/local/education/unc-scandal/article183717756.html

In 2013, UNC was up for accreditation, to avoid issues they claimed the students had to prove they learned the material via an exam our the credits wouldn't count. That's not what they told the NCAA. UNC is up for accreditation again next month. Everything was a go on that until the NCAA report. Now, they aren't so sure about accreditation for UNC.

847badgerfan

  • Administrator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 25215
  • Liked:
Yeah but..
U RAH RAH! WIS CON SIN!

Entropy

  • Starter
  • *****
  • Posts: 1432
  • Liked:
I see a lot of grandstanding in the future, with no actual meaningful results.

847badgerfan

  • Administrator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 25215
  • Liked:
I see a lot of grandstanding in the future, with no actual meaningful results.
The more things change, the more they stay the same?
U RAH RAH! WIS CON SIN!

betarhoalphadelta

  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 12188
  • Liked:
So what would happen if SACS actually pulled their accreditation? What would the tangible result be?

Not that I expect them to, but I wouldn't be surprised if this resulted in them being placed back on probation. 

847badgerfan

  • Administrator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 25215
  • Liked:
So what would happen if SACS actually pulled their accreditation? What would the tangible result be?

Not that I expect them to, but I wouldn't be surprised if this resulted in them being placed back on probation.
They would become the equivalent of the University of Phoenix?

They would almost certainly lose their AAU status as their ability to gain research funding would essentially be gone.
U RAH RAH! WIS CON SIN!

 

Support the Site!
Purchase of every item listed here DIRECTLY supports the site.